Journal Mike Hawk's Journal: Make it 3! 24
3 journals with Xopher's name. And I see you set your journals to no foes. There's that tolerance you left-wingers are supposed to be famous for. Free speech, as long we all agree with you, eh? But I don't blame you. We always make you look pretty darn silly. You probably felt like you were trolled, but really you were totally destroyed.
I, however, invite you to post here all you want. It just makes me look better.
And since you haven't figured it out, I don't post to convince YOU of anything since you strike me as a pretty closed-minded individual. You shouldn't be worried about if I respond to your posts or not. You should merely state your case. I never bought into the notion of endless internet debate. The format just isn't very interesting. In fact, if you were making a good case in the journal entries themselves you wouldn't need to respond much either. I don't even read your responses because I either know exactly what you are going to say and don't consider it interesting or I consider my post tight enough that I don't care what you have say. And finally, I find your stated frustrations with my style to be both funny and a total vindication.
At least MH42 comes with his "third way" Clintonista stuff most of the time.
I, however, invite you to post here all you want. It just makes me look better.
And since you haven't figured it out, I don't post to convince YOU of anything since you strike me as a pretty closed-minded individual. You shouldn't be worried about if I respond to your posts or not. You should merely state your case. I never bought into the notion of endless internet debate. The format just isn't very interesting. In fact, if you were making a good case in the journal entries themselves you wouldn't need to respond much either. I don't even read your responses because I either know exactly what you are going to say and don't consider it interesting or I consider my post tight enough that I don't care what you have say. And finally, I find your stated frustrations with my style to be both funny and a total vindication.
At least MH42 comes with his "third way" Clintonista stuff most of the time.
Settle down, Beavis (Score:1)
I Told You Exactly What I Would Do (Score:2)
Yes, you have the right to free speech. You're practising it here on your journal. Whatever makes you think you also have that right on my journal is beyond me. *I* am not the government. *I* am not bound to by the same rules as the government concerning the first amendment. If *I* don't want you spewing your neocon death-cult fascist bullshit on *my* journal, then *I* don't have to al
Give 'em hell Mike (Score:2)
I've been foed by Xopher because he didn't like being called "dishonest". Not that he minded *being* dishonest, just being called dishonest. Pretty much sums up why his journals are so closed now.
The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
I was not dishonest. You called me dishonest. Those are two separate things.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Well, then why is it so much easier to explain how you were dishonest than how you were honest? I mean I provided an explanation at the time of the accusation. You have yet to appeal to anything but your self-professed sincerity.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
I've recieved that message, but your fingers have not. How many times are you going to tell me you are done talking to me?
I have even explained why I am done.
Technically you have explained it. Specious as that explanation is...
THAT'S the reason I'm not going to bother rebutting that statement.
Hmm, because you wish to rely on specious explanations?
It's certainly not because I think you're correct on any level.
Oh of course you don't think I'm correct. But I
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Read the first sentence of my previous post.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
It certainly saves a copy and paste.
Oh how frivolous your feigned indignation.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
You just have to get in that last word...
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Is that all there is to you? Petty games and contests?
All to often people like yourself come into a conversation with high expectations and haughty pride. When those expectations don't play out (e.g. losing the debate) one will often see them play for a draw, but still declare some sort of victory for themselves.
You were dishonest, you were called on it, and now you are hanging in there. Why? Because you are one of those people. Unfulfilled.
Me? I just hang around long enough for people to really realize
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
I'm offended at the accusation. I expect you to take "reason" and "logic" seriously. That is why I expressed everything to you in those means. You were dishonest, and that was explained with reason and evidence. I expressed views whith reason, evidence and honesty.
I don't care if you take me seriously or not, but you are a hypocrit to write (where no one can touch you) in your journal that you espouse the values of logic and reason where here you de
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
And the only people who can't write in my journal is you, Mike Hawk, some random Indian dude, and Anonymous Cowards. That's it.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
What a crock! Challenged again in your values you choose to sink into dishonesty rather than be reasonable.
You have refused to provide any evidence other than "I told you so".
Wow, you are really rolling in the lies. Is it because you feel threatened? Look kid, its plain to see what is going on here. You live in your world and don't like people intruding with facts and reason. You ignore it (you've stated now twice that you haven't seen the reason and facts) and then e
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Other people have given up the other threads because YOU don't know when you've lost. I'm only keeping this thread going to see when you'll finally stop.
My end isn't really that hard to keep up at all. How hard is it to write "words, words, more words." You just keep trying to make serious rebuttals to non-serious remarks. You haven't caught on that the joke is on you. Merry fools and all that.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Yet another lie. "I said so" does not appear anywhere in my writing.
The closest I can find is "I already said how".
The former is an attempt to thrust oneself as an authority, as you did when you replied to the claim of dishonesty with simply "I am not dishonest". The latter is an effort to point you back at what has already been said. Which is a valid responce to someone who tries to deny the existance of reason and logic as a rhetorica
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Persistant verbage state
Its where you start mumbling, consoling yourself and plugging your ears.
Words have meaning, and when you let go of that you've hurt yourself far more than any pain relief it may compensate for.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
You are just like the others. Obstinate in holding to a false sense of reality to the end.
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)
What makes you say that?
Re:The Logic Is Simple (Score:2)