Journal FortKnox's Journal: Asteroid Coming in 18 Years + Nuclear Waste 16
First, pardon my ignorance in the matters of nuclear weapons and waste.
Ok, I'm reading this story about an asteroid possibly hitting the earth in about 18 years. Now I recall stories about a nuclear waste facility being built in a mountain (sorry, I have a bad memory, and can't find a link, atm). Is it possible to load this waste into warheads and start firing them at the asteroid? At least it'll get the waste off the earth, and maybe we can break up/alter the trajectory of the asteroid?
Ok, I'm reading this story about an asteroid possibly hitting the earth in about 18 years. Now I recall stories about a nuclear waste facility being built in a mountain (sorry, I have a bad memory, and can't find a link, atm). Is it possible to load this waste into warheads and start firing them at the asteroid? At least it'll get the waste off the earth, and maybe we can break up/alter the trajectory of the asteroid?
Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Score:2)
It would probably be easier to simply make a new weapon and launch it. If we could safely and cost-effectively launch large amounts of waste long distances into space then we could probably just send our waste towards the sun. Somehow I don't think this is going to happen.
Re:Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Score:1)
I mean trying to make as many bombs as possible, and hurl them one after another at the asteroid.
If we could safely and cost-effectively launch large amounts of waste long distances into space then we could probably just send our waste towards the sun.
Its definately not cost-effective, but it could be life saving. I don't think the government would mind throwing all money at it and going into major debt rather than just waiting a few days for non-existance to set in.
Re:Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Score:1)
Then why not spend some time any money to figure out how to repackage the waste into weapons we can use to destroy each other with? Seems better than trying to figure out where to mine this stuff and then ruining our natural resources to get it.
Who am I kidding? I forgot the government was in charge of this...
No (Score:2)
And there's only one man who could lead them.
Honestly, though, it sucks that we're all going to die.
Re:No (Score:2)
Depends. If it hits asia, and you are prepared, we could just live life in a 'midieval-like' era. Time to brush up on my fencing and smithing.
Re:No (Score:2)
Re:No (Score:1)
I've always wanted to be a shapeshifter, myself. I hope I get enough radiation to be mutated enough. I'll call myself...
MR. SQUEEGEE
*Thunder crackling*
Re:No (Score:1)
Forgot to mention that the asteroid is packing radiation that will harmlessly mutate us. At least I hope so...
Re:No (Score:2)
Probably not a good idea (Score:2)
If one day a safer form of launching materials into orbit was developed (giant railguns or something scifi like that) that didn't involve combustive chemicals, then I say launch the stuff, but until then I really think Yucca or something like it is the way to go.
Sorry... (Score:1)
Also, it should be noted that weapons-grade uranium and plutonium are much purer than energy-grade (for Uranium, 20% U-235 instead of 3%), so it would take way more effort than it's worth to reprocess the waste for weapons.
Maybe we should just shoot a giant laser gun at the asteroid.
Re:Sorry... (Score:2)
Now then, you are correct in that much of the radioactive waste is garbage (gloves, cameras, and angry, drunken dwarves). National geophgraphic had a pretty decent article [nationalgeographic.com] on nuclear waste and how it is being mishandled like everything else.
What's that I hear? (Score:2)