Journal the_mad_poster's Journal: BREAKING NEWS: MIERS' NAME BEING WITHDRAWN 18
It appears that Bush has "reluctantly" accepted the withdraw of Harriet Miers' nomination. No complete sources just yet. (Update: NPR News just reported the withdraw).
Last I had heard on NPR, Miers' questionaire had not been resubmitted by the close of the day yesterday, and it was unclear if the White House had met the midnight deadline at all.
Apparently not.
lol How do I exhausted political capital?
More bad news: Rove and/or Libby are probably going to get indicted. Is this out of touch America?
Update 2:
Heh, of the withdraw, Bush said:
It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House -- disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel
Yea, right. I guess the fact that she couldn't even fill in the preliminary take-home, open-book test without screwing it up had nothing to do with their reservations, right Cmdr. Assmonkey?
It's the Breaking News Headline on CNN (Score:2)
Sonuvabitch! (Score:2)
Re:Sonuvabitch! (Score:1)
Bushy Boy's second term fell apart. That's what happens, I suppose, when your "mandate" consists of a 51% to 49% election victory.
Re:Sonuvabitch! (Score:2)
Charles Krauthammer predicted this (Score:2)
Re:Charles Krauthammer predicted this (Score:1)
And I still think it is horseshit, given that questions of Presidential privilege are *exactly* the type of thing that SCOTUS hears.
she wasn't anti abortion enough for them (Score:2)
from a 1993 speech: "The underlying theme in most of these cases is the insistence of more self-determination. The more I think about these issues, the more self-determination makes the most sense. Legislating religion or morality we gave up on a long time ago."
She added later, "When science determines the facts, and decisions vary based upon religious belief, then government should not act."
Which seemed at odds with the views she expressed in a 1989 candidate's survey on abort
Double-edged sword (Score:2)
OK, rant over.
Now what scare
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
If the Dems play their cards right, they can win the next election based on the message, "Republicans are trying to overturn Roe V. Wade by hook or crook. And notice how many crooks there are in the GOP."
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
Although I doubt the Republicans would pull such a move in the midst of all of their problems, this would be the ideal time for them to pull out their "nuclear option" card. They have everything they want to gain, starting with the overturning of RvW.
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
So if the Democrats get control of Congress in '06, the nuclear option would actually harm the Republicans, as the Democrats could send bill after bill into the House, and claim that the Republicans are doing harm
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
I think your scenario is more likely, as it is more reasonable - but my faith in reason is waning.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
I'm not so sure I agree. Their behavior in the past few years suggests that they think they're above reproach in anything they do. Will they let recent setbacks temper their position? I hope so, but again, I'm not optimistic.
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:1)
Depends if the Senate Democrats grow a collective set of balls. Someone 'out and proud' against Roe or another right wing nutjob should be a perfect case for a filibuster. What gets interesting here is the timing and height of potential indictments against the staff.
Indictments and resignations from Libby and Rove will make it much harder to corral Specter and others.
Interesting times indeed...
Re:Double-edged sword (Score:2)
From what I've seen Specter is going to demand Miers replacement not be too much of a wingnut.
If Bush does nominate an extremist there is a good chance that the Democrats will have at least some support from moderate Republicans in shooting them down. OTOH if the nominee isn't too much of a wingnut the base is going to bitch and the more conservative senators won't vote for them
She's with stupid (Score:2)
I don't mean to make too challenging a suggestion here, but if confidentiality is a concern maybe the President should consider not nominating his personal counsel to the freaking supreme court!
weirder yet (Score:2)
She actually did submit her answers, today [scotusblog.com]. God only knows why.