Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Propaganda and historical revisionism

Deskpoet (215561) writes | more than 11 years ago

User Journal 1

When I was a lad growing up with good ole American public education, it was drilled into us how evil the Soviet system was when it came to re-writing the past. The typical comparisons to Orwell were always bandied about; even without reading Solzhenitsyn, it was a given that *them* over there were different from *us* over here.

When I was a lad growing up with good ole American public education, it was drilled into us how evil the Soviet system was when it came to re-writing the past. The typical comparisons to Orwell were always bandied about; even without reading Solzhenitsyn, it was a given that *them* over there were different from *us* over here.

Sadly, that's not the case. While, yes, there are no gulags here (yet, though one can certainly wonder at the conundrum of professed "freedom" and the reality of America as the largest prison state in the world, openly practicing capital punishment as a social virtue; small wonder the evils of the Chinese system are now seen as market opportunity instead of state terror), the function of the "free press" to service the needs of the State certainly has not changed, and now seems to openly emulate the classic soviet "journalism", i.e. the lies the State tells about itself through its lackeys in the Fourth Estate now lack any integrity, as well as historical context, in their reportage of events.

This article from FAIR shows how much and how quickly things can change when Big Daddy needs to shoot his gun.

What A Difference Four Years Makes
Why U.N. inspectors left Iraq--then and now

The U.N. orders its weapons inspectors to leave Iraq after the chief inspector reports Baghdad is not fully cooperating with them.

-- Sheila MacVicar, ABC World News This Morning, 12/16/98

To bolster its claim, Iraq let reporters see one laboratory U.N. inspectors once visited before they were kicked out four years ago.

--John McWethy, ABC World News Tonight, 8/12/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Iraq story boiled over last night when the chief U.N. weapons inspector, Richard Butler, said that Iraq had not fully cooperated with inspectors and--as they had promised to do. As a result, the U.N. ordered its inspectors to leave Iraq this morning

--Katie Couric, NBC's Today, 12/16/98/

As Washington debates when and how to attack Iraq, a surprise offer from Baghdad. It is ready to talk about re-admitting U.N. weapons inspectors after kicking them out four years ago.

--Maurice DuBois, NBC's Saturday Today, 8/3/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The chief U.N. weapons inspector ordered his monitors to leave Baghdad today after saying that Iraq had once again reneged on its promise to cooperate--a report that renewed the threat of U.S. and British airstrikes.

--AP, 12/16/98

Information on Iraq's programs has been spotty since Saddam expelled U.N. weapons inspectors in 1998.

--AP, 9/7/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Immediately after submitting his report on Baghdad's noncompliance, Butler ordered his inspectors to leave Iraq.

--Los Angeles Times, 12/17/98

It is not known whether Iraq has rebuilt clandestine nuclear facilities since U.N. inspectors were forced out in 1998, but the report said the regime lacks nuclear material for a bomb and the capability to make weapons.

--Los Angeles Times, 9/10/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The United Nations once again has ordered its weapons inspectors out of Iraq. Today's evacuation follows a new warning from chief weapons inspector Richard Butler accusing Iraq of once again failing to cooperate with the inspectors. The United States and Britain repeatedly have warned that Iraq's failure to cooperate with the inspectors could lead to air strikes.

--Bob Edwards, NPR, 12/16/98

If he has secret weapons, he's had four years since he kicked out the inspectors to hide all of them.

--Daniel Schorr, NPR, 8/3/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the second time in a month that UNSCOM has pulled out in the face of a possible U.S.-led attack. But this time there may be no turning back. Weapons inspectors packed up their personal belongings and loaded up equipment at U.N. headquarters after a predawn evacuation order. In a matter of hours, they were gone, more than 120 of them headed for a flight to Bahrain.

--Jane Arraf, CNN, 12/16/98

What Mr. Bush is being urged to do by many advisers is focus on the simple fact that Saddam Hussein signed a piece of paper at the end of the Persian Gulf War, promising that the United Nations could have unfettered weapons inspections in Iraq. It has now been several years since those inspectors were kicked out.

--John King, CNN, 8/18/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russian Ambassador Sergei Lavrov criticized Butler for evacuating inspectors from Iraq Wednesday morning without seeking permission from the Security Council.

--USA Today, 12/17/98

Saddam expelled U.N. weapons inspectors in 1998, accusing some of being U.S. spies.

--USA Today, 9/4/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But the most recent irritant was Mr. Butler's quick withdrawal from Iraq on Wednesday of all his inspectors and those of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which monitors Iraqi nuclear programs, without Security Council permission. Mr. Butler acted after a telephone call from Peter Burleigh, the American representative to the United Nations, and a discussion with Secretary General Kofi Annan, who had also spoken to Mr. Burleigh.

--New York Times, 12/18/98

America's goal should be to ensure that Iraq is disarmed of all unconventional weapons.... To thwart this goal, Baghdad expelled United Nations arms inspectors four years ago.

--New York Times editorial, 8/3/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Butler ordered his inspectors to evacuate Baghdad, in anticipation of a military attack, on Tuesday night--at a time when most members of the Security Council had yet to receive his report.

--Washington Post, 12/18/98

Since 1998, when U.N. inspectors were expelled, Iraq has almost certainly been working to build more chemical and biological weapons,

--Washington Post editorial, 8/4/02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Butler abruptly pulled all of his inspectors out of Iraq shortly after handing Annan a report yesterday afternoon on Baghdad's continued failure to cooperate with UNSCOM, the agency that searches for Iraq's prohibited weapons of mass destruction.

-- Newsday, 12/17/98

The reason Hussein gave was that the U.N. inspectors' work was completed years ago, before he kicked them out in 1998, and they dismantled whatever weapons they found. That's disingenuous.

--Newsday editorial, 8/14/02

cancel ×

1 comment

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Your point... ? (2)

neocon (580579) | more than 11 years ago | (#4496755)

Now that's pretty rich -- the closest to an alleged `revision of history' you can come up with is members of the media describing inspectors being withdrawn after being physically threatened with violence and barred from doing their job as being `kicked out' (and I welcome you to read any of those articles in full (which I doubt you have) to see if anyone is claiming any other meaning to the words `kicked out')? And based on this, you draw out comparisons to the Soviets and to China?

Hah. I don't think anyone reading your post draws any conclusion but that you already believe the US to be like those regimes (irrationally and baselessly), and are looking desparately for anything to point at (no matter how weak) to back up your claim.

Now, if you want to see who is engaging in a little revisionism, take a look at the left -- the same people who urged immediate and unilateral disarmament during the cold war because they claimed that deterrence was immoral are now singing the praises of deterrence as an answer to Iraq.

Not to mention Scott Ritter, who shortly after accepting $400,000 from the Iraqi government to work on a film project completely reversed his position on Iraq -- just compare this interview [cnn.com] (from 1998) with this interview [cnn.com] (from this year).

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>