Journal TapeCutter's Journal: Cosmic Rays and Climate Change 4
A recent slashdot story reported on an article by the ex-editor of New Scientist, Nigel Calder. RealClimate have taken issue with what they call "bizarre calculus that takes evidence for solar forcing of climate as evidence against greenhouse gases for current climate change". They have posted a rebuttal to Calder's article that basically concludes: "No trend = no explanation for current changes".
It should also be noted that Calder's article ended with an advertisment for his new book "The Chilling Stars".
It should also be noted that Calder's article ended with an advertisment for his new book "The Chilling Stars".
Selling a book is not that damning (Score:2)
Nagal is a psuedo-skeptic. (Score:2)
Nothing wrong with proposing a theory via a book (Darwin anyone?), or taking money from an oil company (Lord Oxborough), and I love speculation if presented as such, ala Hanssen, Lovelock, string theory, life under the icy crust of Europa, ect, my own speculation (based on converging global problems) is that our agriculture won't keep pace with changing rain patterns and (at best) civilization back-slides 1000yrs or so.
Also the idea CR's have a role in cloud formation seems plausible, I certain
Cosmic rays (Score:2)
Actually, IIRC, most cosmic rays are extra-solar. However, there is a significant component that comes from the sun, so you would expect
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, nobody should never paint anything without first preparing the surface.