×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Greed

superyooser (100462) writes | more than 7 years ago

User Journal 4

For all the talk about "greedy corporations," they are no more tight-fisted and selfish than the typical consumer. (If you've worked in retail, you know what I'm talking about.) Especially the Slashdot consumer. (story: Amazon Adjusts Prices After Sales Error; see the comments)

For all the talk about "greedy corporations," they are no more tight-fisted and selfish than the typical consumer. (If you've worked in retail, you know what I'm talking about.) Especially the Slashdot consumer. (story: Amazon Adjusts Prices After Sales Error; see the comments)

On the Amazon story: Legally, I think a legitimate case can be made either way, for charging or not, but IANAL. But morally, I think Amazon is in the right. The consumers knew they were getting a literal steal of a bargain. "Buy one, get one free" means you have to buy one. Doubling the deal means you have to buy more, not less. "Buy" obviously means that the price is above $0.00, else it would be called "free": "Get one free, get one free." The people who took advantage of the glitch were being greedy consumers.

4 comments

Heck (1)

StalinsNotDead (764374) | more than 7 years ago | (#18030346)

If you've worked in retail

You don't even have to have worked in retail. Just stand in line behind the wrong person who tries to haggle with the cashier (it was only $23 last week, not $35) about how much they paid for a carton of cigarettes just last week. Well that's not how much they cost now.

I'm usually against greedy corps (1)

Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) | more than 7 years ago | (#18030626)

But this story just doesn't strike me as one. Whoever programmed that portion of the website should be fired, and while the corp could have been a little more understanding (such as, maybe, "We've made an awful mistake with the two-for-one deal you took advantage of. Please return the excess merchandise *or* your card will be charged for the wholesale amount of the goods you've been given. We're offering this discount because the mistake was our fault. We appologize for the inconvience.") there is no reason why they should *HAVE* to be and take the profit hit.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...