The Flamebait Troll

Journal sm62704's Journal: The Flamebait Troll 3

Journal by sm62704 on Friday June 27, 2008 @10:07AM

Sometimes the fucking moderation itself is flamebait. As much as I try not to bite, well God damn it the fucking arsewaddles that moderated yesterday need to have their asses bitchslapped. Fucktards.

In Supreme Court Holds Right to Bear Arms Applies to Individuals an AC wrote

Re:Sweet (Score:4, Informative)
by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 26, @01:47PM (#23952023)
The average /.r is male, and we are already allowed to bare chests. Thankfully, we don't go outside much, so other /.rs dont have to see our bare chests all that much. We are also sociophobic, so we don't have enough friends to take pics of us and put them online too.

Note that the retarded mods gave this an "informative", despite the fact that it was a JOKE and if taken seriously is seriously offtopic.

I responded

Re:Sweet (Score:0, Flamebait)
by sm62704 (957197) on Thursday June 26, @02:09PM (#23952571) Homepage Journal
The average /.r is male, and we are already allowed to bare chests
You must be gay. We heterosexuals dearly and truly wish for the female of the species to bare their chests at every opportunity!
Especially those of us who can't get one of our own.

How in the fucking hell is that comment in any way "flamebait"?? WTF???

modecx was also unfairly modded flamebait with an interesting response to my comment:

Re:Sweet (Score:0, Flamebait)
by modecx (130548) on Thursday June 26, @03:24PM (#23954591)
You must be gay. We heterosexuals dearly and truly wish for the female of the species to bare their chests at every opportunity!
You know, the only women who actually want to go topless in public are mostly the overweight middle-aged variety whose tits sag to their stomach, (which is equally saggy) because they thought going without a bra was a good idea for one reason or another; these women are in the same demographic as those who refuse to shave their armpits or ape-like legs, you know, as a way demonstrating their unsuppressed feminine nature--or some stupid shit. Let me share some wisdom: there's a reason Venus de Milo and similar visages are classical archetypes of femininity; and doughy middle-aged neanderthal-esqueness just doesn't fit into it.
There are some things which just shouldn't be seen, and I shudder at the thought of having to look (which I would, it's like a train wreck) at droopy boobs all flying around an swingin' with the gait that some of these heifers sport. Not to mention, it's a physical hazard there's a definite need to put leashes on those puppies! In all fairness, I'm not fond of seeing manboobs, beer belly and ass-crack flying all over the place, either. Same exact thing in my mind, I have no gender bias in this issue.
Now, if attractive, physically fit women (or men) want to go topless--you're all welcome to it. However, I still feel it's necessary to to place armed guards at all places where spandex is retailed, with authorization to shoot to kill all fatties who dare waddle over to touch the form fitting fabric.

But I have it figured out - the Microsoft PHBs had mod points yesterday. No wonder their OSes and apps suck so badly.

Re:Then STOP releasing the product! (Score:1, Troll)
by sm62704 (957197) on Thursday June 26, @09:27AM (#23947955) Homepage Journal
I find it hard to realize that he wouldn't know the technical difficulties in replacing a dll while the system is running, and possible ways around this, and the current state of affairs.
I find it hard to believe that Gates would think that Linux programmers could do something that his well paid staff can't! I don't think I've ever rebooted Linux unless I was replacing the kernel by trying a different distro or updating an existing one. And even then there's only ONE reboot; you put the CD in the drive, reboot, and the distro installs.
If I was Gates, heads would have been rolling years ago. But I agree with you, I think the email is bogus. The line at the bottom:
So after more than an hour of craziness and making my programs list garbage and being scared and seeing that Microsoft.com is a terrible website I haven't run Moviemaker and I haven't got the plus package.
I wouldn't be "scared" and I can't believe Gates would be, either.
many, many years ago now, in the late 90's
The late '90s was only a decade ago, young fellow! Many, many years ago my electric bill came on Hollerith cards.
So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated.
I've been vindicated for all those times I've been modded "flamebait" when I insist that people at Microsoft must be incredibly stupid. How can you NOT anticipate that people just might want to download something from a download page?
Go ahead, Microsoft employees, mod me down again. I'm sure with all the people at Microsoft there are lots of very intelligent folks, but when Pointy Haired Boss is in charge and Catbert is head of HR, it doesn't matter how smart Dilbert is, the product is going to look like it was designed by Uncyclopedia authors [uncyclopedia.org] who are high on something [uncyclopedia.org].
The email reads like something I might have written. Had Microsoft not had a defacto monopoly they would likely have gone out of business years ago.
I'd like to know what idiot came up with some of the Microsoft "innovations" like menus that don't show all the menu items? Don't they try their poorly designed crap out on real people?
"Skews me" while I read the rest of the user rants and shill excuses.

Pathetic. Almost as pathetic as Windows Vista.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.