Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Flamebait and Politics

yog (19073) writes | more than 5 years ago

User Journal 2

I've noticed that quite often when I make a comment on a political topic such as the presidential elections, Islamic terrorism, and the Iraq war, it tends to get moderated as "flamebait". Now, I am not interested in starting flame wars, as anyone who reads my comment history will note.

I've noticed that quite often when I make a comment on a political topic such as the presidential elections, Islamic terrorism, and the Iraq war, it tends to get moderated as "flamebait". Now, I am not interested in starting flame wars, as anyone who reads my comment history will note.

Yet, on political subjects, if I express something the least bit opinionated beyond merely quoting the "facts", several moderators will step in and hit the comment with "overrated", "flamebait", or "troll".

There are in fact very few true flamebait postings on this forum, though lots of deliberate trolls. But someone commenting on a topic, no matter how opinionated they are, should not be modded down unless they are disrupting the conversation in some way. When I have mod points, the first thing I do is search for "flamebait" in a forum and, if appropriate, I will re-mod it to something more applicable.

I'll fight and die for your right to disagree with me.

It's too bad that not everyone sees it this way, and it's a damn shame that the metamoderation system, which is supposed to prevent this kind of incompetent use of mod points, does not work, apparently.

cancel ×

2 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Slashpolitics (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 5 years ago | (#26649335)

Unfortunately as you see there is no shortage of polarized discussion, which gets followed by polarized moderation. There probably ought to be tags to apply to comments that are inaccurate or otherwise not accurately categorized by the standard modifiers. If you email CmdrTaco about this, he will tell you that function will be in the "new moderation system", though of course there is no promise to when that will arrive.

Of course you have seen that the "new metamoderation system" is in place though it seems that its effects are open to debate. I'm not sure if the new metamoderation system has even corrected the problem of the abuse of the "overrated" tag (as you have also seen), which was completely immune from metamoderation under the old system and hence was rampantly overused by people in the past.

Re:Slashpolitics (1)

yog (19073) | more than 5 years ago | (#26675527)

Yes, I think "overrated" should just go away. Maybe "flamebait" should only work if 2+ people use it. If 1 person mods you flamebait, it would have no effect. Then, of course, the political moderators would just go to "troll".

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>