Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Want a REAL reason to oppose pork?

Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) writes | more than 5 years ago

United States 3

I'm tired of all the people who think that we can recover the economy on private-industry jobs alone (where have they been the last 6 months when 3.5 MILLION private industry jobs disappeared?!?!?). However, there's still a good reason to oppose pork: The jobs the federal government creates, well 20% of them don't pay a living wage, leaving one in 5 federal employees in poverty (and I'll bet most of

I'm tired of all the people who think that we can recover the economy on private-industry jobs alone (where have they been the last 6 months when 3.5 MILLION private industry jobs disappeared?!?!?). However, there's still a good reason to oppose pork: The jobs the federal government creates, well 20% of them don't pay a living wage, leaving one in 5 federal employees in poverty (and I'll bet most of them, despite bipartisan "support for the troops" are soldiers).

cancel ×

3 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Very true (1)

Scott Lockwood (218839) | more than 5 years ago | (#26834697)

When I was in the service, I was an NCO, and still qualified for both WIC and food stamps. I had two children, and my wife didn't work (couldn't as I was stationed somewhere fairly remote, and there wasn't much in 'town' for her to do).

When we asked for raises, the Republican Controlled congress told us that since we didn't use the WIC and Food Stamps that we were eligible for, we must not need a raise.

Public enterprises (1)

Mer_panacea (1381133) | more than 5 years ago | (#26843253)

>However, there's still a good reason to oppose pork: The jobs the federal government creates

In well-developed countries, public enterprises contain a lot of needless investment. Because infrastructure was already well-built so there's scarce place to dig up more.

In the case of U.S., however, there's a lot of hinterland to develop. I think it works well if done under well-prepared plans by a superior leader.

Re:Public enterprises (1)

Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) | more than 5 years ago | (#26844063)

Unfortunately we don't have a superior leader. And thus, we get a stimulus bill that costs $200,000 to create a non-living-wage job for a year.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>