×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

I am none of these people...

damn_registrars (1103043) writes | more than 4 years ago

It's funny.  Laugh. 15

... no matter how much some others may claim it to be true. A certain hyper-con seems to be fond of shadow boxing and claiming that other people are me. Many of the times that his foes list has grown, it is because someone who he has mistaken for me has dared to challenge his statements.... no matter how much some others may claim it to be true. A certain hyper-con seems to be fond of shadow boxing and claiming that other people are me. Many of the times that his foes list has grown, it is because someone who he has mistaken for me has dared to challenge his statements.

To be blunt, I have no sock puppet accounts, period. However I have seen some of these accusations and I find them amusing enough to catalog quickly.

Whether the people behind the accounts should be amused, annoyed, or otherwise effected by the accusation is for them to decide.

Funny, how many users (including myself) have never been allowed to write comments for the journal entries posted by someone who endlessly complains about "fascism".

And his most recent: (as of this writing)

That particular "foe'ing" does not mention me by name, though we see the usual rg rhetoric:

since you apparently still support Obama you must be an idiot as well as a troll. Get lost

Which was only the beginning. It was quickly followed by another journal entry asking for the "stalker-troll"; a name he has used to describe his feelings towards me more than once. That journal entry was posted "comments disabled".

15 comments

Warning: Journal Entry is Not Entirely Accurate (1)

Mustakrakish (1309263) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268289)

Funny, how many users (including myself) have never been allowed to write comments for the journal entries posted by someone who endlessly complains about "fascism".

You were foed when RG was using the Naqamel account. You were posting over there.

Also, you claim that RG is accusing several people of being you, yet you only post one example. That's intentionally misleading, and considering how many times you accused RG of being Pudge, more than a little bit ironic.

It also begs the question: You have your own journal with which you can do whatever you want with - why do you piss and moan about RG doing what he wants with his?

Warning: Commenter Entry is Not Entirely Literate (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268517)

You were foed when RG was using the Naqamel account. You were posting over there.

Well, you know your slashdot history. I give you props for that. Indeed he foe'd me while he was using a different name; however my statement stands - I have never been able to post in his journals under his current name.

yet you only post one example.

Kindly go back and re-read, I posted two in that list.

considering how many times you accused RG of being Pudge

If you want to stalk me, I can't do anything about that. But you do yourself no service to cling to old statements. Your accusation is neither relevant nor recent.

why do you piss and moan about RG doing what he wants with his?

I'm not pissing and moaning. You can follow me around and accuse me of whatever you want, that does not make your accusations true.

Unlike you, I provide evidence to back up my allegations of him intentionally spreading lies and mis-truths.

He is free to continue doing as he wants; and I am free to continue to show how he cowers from reality in doing so.

And if he ever wants to come and stand up for himself, and actually have a discussion, he is always welcomed to come here and do so. Go ahead and check my foes list [slashdot.org] it is empty - and he has never been on it. Or he can continue shadow-boxing and spreading lies.

Re:Warning: Commenter Entry is Not Entirely Litera (1)

Mustakrakish (1309263) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268839)

Well, you know your slashdot history. I give you props for that. Indeed he foe'd me while he was using a different name; however my statement stands - I have never been able to post in his journals under his current name.

I was posting there too, ya idjit.

If you want to stalk me, I can't do anything about that.

Another hilariously ironic statement, considering how many JE's you've devoted to RG and Pudge.

I'm not pissing and moaning

The fact that you piss and moan anytime either Pudge or RG foes someone is self evident, and proof you're a weird little stalker.

And if he ever wants to come and stand up for himself, and actually have a discussion, he is always welcomed to come here and do so.

I also posted in some of the threads in which Naqamel/RG informed you (more than once) that he wasn't interested in having any kind of discussion with you.

Honestly, I think he's got the right idea. Respond if you want, but I'm not going to bother reading it, and I'm not going to waste any more time on your laughably inaccurate journals.

Re:Warning: Commenter Entry is Not Entirely Litera (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269159)

I'm not going to waste any more time

Sir, you are free to do whatever you want. Nobody is forcing you to read my journals; you made a choice to do so. Just as you made a choice to not bother backing up your allegations against me to make yourself appear to have an argument.

Or are you just trying to get onto my foes list, to make rg look better? Well, its not going to happen. Neither of you will be put there.

Though I have a question for you; not that I expect you to answer it. Why do you read the journal entries of your foes? I have been on your foes list for some time now - and you have never been on mine. Indeed when you foe'd me I was surprised as we had never had a discussion [slashdot.org], though I did find this friendly post of yours [slashdot.org] from last October. Though really a post like that could have just as easily been made to mock the conservative rhetoric that was turned up to 11 at the time.

OK, I confess (1)

Profane MuthaFucka (574406) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268775)

RG, Pudge, CleverNickname, and Solemn Dragon are all my accounts. Now you know.

Re:OK, I confess (0)

Red4man (1347635) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268869)

Really? You're Sol? Tits or GTFO.

Re:OK, I confess (2)

Profane MuthaFucka (574406) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269781)

I'd show you my tits, but I'm too fucking sick with some chronic fatigue or a weird intestinal problem to move. I'm losing weight and will probably be dead in 6 weeks. Can I tell you about my disease in great detail?

I also hate sucky people. They suck and they are mean. I have a dark secret from my past which I cannot reveal, except in a journal on one of the most heavily read websites in the world.

I write too. Let me write you stories about some kind of dragon. It's a pretty dragon, and it's name is, let me see, Mary Sue. Or maybe I'll make up some stories about my split personality. The stories I write are, admittedly, shitty beyond belief. A sentence should ALWAYS be shorter than the width of a browser hardcoded to 640 pixels, I always say. My throngs of teenage emo fans love them though.

I love you all my adoring sycophant fans. Make sure you look at my beautiful webpage and send me love letters.

http://www.solemndragon.com/ [solemndragon.com]

I see you obliged him... (0, Troll)

Red4man (1347635) | more than 4 years ago | (#28268941)

Which was only the beginning. It was quickly followed by another journal entry asking for the "stalker-troll"; a name he has used to describe his feelings towards me more than once. That journal entry was posted "comments disabled".

I hope he sees this journal and realizes you didn't disappoint him, dumbass.

Way to fucking step in it. You got punked by one of the biggest dumbasses on slashdot.

Re:I see you obliged him... (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269241)

ah, hell. things have been so dull around here even you might have a chance at amusing me. however many of you there are...

Where's the "love and kisses" crap for the end of your post? You must be a new red4man ... I was wondering if the usual crew got tired of it or something.

Re:I see you obliged him... (1)

Red4man (1347635) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269371)

Where's the "love and kisses" crap for the end of your post?

I mostly use that when posting AC, dumbass. I logged in to post this. Pay attention, shit for brains.

You must be a new red4man ... I was wondering if the usual crew got tired of it or something.

Dumbass. The thing about slashdot, is dumbasses like you are always joining up. We'll never run out of material.

Sock Puppet (1)

mcgrew (92797) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269155)

I was sm62704, but that's no secret; when I got the mcgrew account reactivated, I posted it as sm62704's last journal. Sometimes I reference that account's journals in the mcgrew comments and journals. "Anonymous Coward is, IMO, an apt moniker.

I never thought I'd see a worse president than Carter, but Shrub proved me wrong. It's too early to tell, but so far I think Obama's doing a pretty good job, especially considering the mess Bush left.

Re:Sock Puppet (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#28269421)

I never thought I'd see a worse president than Carter

Carter has at least been a valuable diplomatic asset since leaving the White House. Can't say that about Bush Sr, and its too early to tell what Bush Jr will do with his retirement.

It's too early to tell, but so far I think Obama's doing a pretty good job, especially considering the mess Bush left

Well, Obama has at least chosen to show up, which is more than we can say for most of GWB's first six months. Add to that the fact that he actually is willing to go and try to hold talks with countries that don't like us and he has a chance to make some real positive change.

And being as his general course of action for the economic mess has been to do as many things the opposite of what was done prior to it, we can't say he isn't trying to make a change. We'll see how many things actually get done and then we can start to ponder the impact they have.

Me? (1)

Jimmy_Slimmy (1499943) | more than 4 years ago | (#28281735)

jimmy_slimmy is actually the account I have used the most- I got it to take a friendly whack at pudge. I know of him from before slashdot, and his contradictions have always interested me. The thing is, he is so darn resistant to change, so amazingly close-minded. Since speaking truth to power has always been an interest of mine, and he runs slashdot as his own programming fiefdom, it has become a little hobby of mine. I figure he reads all this, especially when I use searchable terms like pudge pudge pudge Nandor perl facsist ego and liar liar pants on fire.

I do not think railgunner is pudge. If pudge says he does not post with any alias, I believe him. Lying does not seem to be one of his obvious patterns.

Anyway, it is funny how RG is so buddy buddy with pudge that he felt he had to foe me...

and he reads all this too.

Re:Me? (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#28282147)

jimmy_slimmy is actually the account I have used the most- I got it to take a friendly whack at pudge. I know of him from before slashdot, and his contradictions have always interested me

Are you possibly also pudge_confirmer [slashdot.org]? I suspected that account was from someone who already had an account here but I don't know who...

he runs slashdot as his own programming fiefdom

Did you mean to say he ruins slashdot as his own programming fiefdom?

Though I would say he acts more like slashdot is his own personal hyper-conservative blog; I suspect it has a bit more traffic than his own blog.

I do not think railgunner is pudge

I don't really care one way or the other, and I haven't cared for some time. I do find it amusing how some people seem to obsess over my earlier claim to that statement. They are equally arrogant and uninformed. They often disappear (as in no posts for some time) at about the same time, for about the same amount of time. They use many of the same derogatory terms when describing people, ideas, and things that they love to hate. They love to hate the same things. And they both foe'd me very quickly and refuse to answer the questions that I posed them before they foe'd me.

Though the best evidence I know of to support them not being the same person is that Pudge should, as a slashdot programmer, have access to the server logs at slashdot. Obviously I am not a slashdot sysadmin so they may do things differently, but if I was I would want my programmers to be able to view at the very least the relevant web access logs so they could see what is going on when they deploy new crap. And this could easily show that I post from a different computer than any of the users that have been accused of being me, which makes it highly unlikely that I have sock puppet accounts (though of course we all know that IP addresses can be faked without too much effort).

Lying does not seem to be one of his obvious patterns.

Not sure that I agree with that conclusion, though it may depend on exactly where you draw the line of "lying". He seems to be willing to distort reality to a very high degree while still not himself considering it to be "lying".

Anyway, it is funny how RG is so buddy buddy with pudge that he felt he had to foe me...

I noticed a while back that he called you a "barely literate troll" or some such thing, which is a line he likes to throw at me. I very much suspect he thinks you are me.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...