pudge_confirmer's Journal: SIAM: possible Violation of principle

In a recent (on-line only) article, "Scientific American" takes note of the possible violation of the pudgi exclusion principle.

"The pudgi exclusion principle concerns the hypothesized impossibility of Christopher G. Nandor fixing any bug that has been pointed out in slash code. Up until recently, the most important example was that the titles of most HTML pages, programmatically determined by slash code, made no fscking sense when bookmarked.

However, recently some lame-o, incomplete, brainless 'upgrades' have been noted. Scientists are still trying to confirm whether these changes have occurred due to efforts by Mr. Nandor, or by someone mistakenly adding their own greasemonkey scripts to the repository. "

For example, note the titles of the following:

http://slashdot.org/~pudge_confirmer/
    is "Slashdot pudge_confirmer (11)",
    should be: "/.: pudge_confirmer RULES"

http://slashdot.org/~countertrolling/journal/232757
    is "Journal of countertrolling (1585477)",
    should be "/.: Way to go, Dave!! by countertrolling "

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1294007&cid=28605533
    is "Slashdot Comments: Way to go, Dave!!",
    should be : "/.: 'Way to go, Dave!!' by countertrolling; reply "Dave? Dave?""

and don't even get me started on this:

http://slashdot.org/~pudge_confirmer/journal/232309

p.s. remember about 10 years ago, when a little browser named "Communicator" preceded every title with the koan "Netscape: ". Boy, that did not last long, did it?

Don't forget to post; and up-mod the good posts you see here!

Ciao,

red4man

 

Re:

[jimmy_thlimmy]

I can not confirm any intelligent life here, but there are unuthual readingth on my Both tauruth wathte detector.

And thinking about a herthey highway turnth me on, thweetie.

Re:

[jimmy_thlimmy]

The only pearlth I like is the pearly white themen in my ath-hole.

Re:

[Jimmy_Slimmy]

Sorry, epic fail for you.

http://slashdot.org/~nicely

The user you requested does not exist, no matter how much you wish this might be the case.

It could have been sooo sweet between us, but you can not keep up.  Do i have to wear this condom?  Apparently, since it is going up your asth.

Admit it, you are pwned, dumbass.

Re:

[Red4man]

pwned

If my 'pwned' you mean 'shamelessly paid tribute to by imitation and wannabe status'...

CARRY ON, MY BASTARD CHILDREN!

At ease!

[a_klavan]

Take 5, cgn.

Re:

[a_klavan]

Whew, thanks for setting me straight. That is _such_ a relief. But can someone explain to me who this HILJ is? I am trying to learn my way around here. I just find it sooooo complicated. For a circle jerk, that is. Ciao, Alice (doesn't live here anymore, dumbasth)