Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

And in local news...

pudge_confirmer (1504761) writes | more than 4 years ago

PC Games (Games) 4

This just in, on freedom of expression...

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249864

from the neighborhood of our very own coffee-holic...

This just in, on freedom of expression...

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249864

from the neighborhood of our very own coffee-holic...

cancel ×

4 comments

Standard for "expression" (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29585863)

Only things that don't give the judge a stiffie are "protected expression".

The question is, if we elect/appoint more Republicans as judges, will they ban Chippendale's and let us have our topless (women) bars back?

Linky (1)

Profane MuthaFucka (574406) | more than 4 years ago | (#29587881)

put a <URL: > around that shit to linkify

<URL:http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249864>

will give you this:

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090924/NEWS01/709249864 [heraldnet.com]

Re:Linky (1)

pudge_confirmer (1504761) | more than 4 years ago | (#29591155)

My sock puppets have informed me of similar things in the past, but I like my way for the reasons I have stated in the past.

Thanks for taking the time! This old dog will consider these new tricks.

Seems like truth in naming to me... (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#29596395)

It was, after all, called "grab n go". Which seems to be exactly what the customers were paying for.

Also strange that the article seems to indicate that paying to touch a bare hind end is prostitution; though apparently had they been paying for touching clothed hind ends it would have been OK?

What if they were touching bare hind ends for free and paying to touch them clothed?

I would think a clever lawyer could find a loophole on the prostitution bit. Though the exposed breasts through the window I doubt they'll have much luck fighting.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...