Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Slashdot Unintentionally Spams Users

FortKnox (169099) writes | more than 11 years ago

Spam 12

Slashdot has accidentally sent some of its messaging through email creating unintentional spam into some users inboxes. It looks like it may have been an overnight glitch that was quickly fixed, but multiple people have claimed to have the same issue. Perhaps its time that the slashcrew creates automated regression testing and other cost-effective testing ideas into theirSlashdot has accidentally sent some of its messaging through email creating unintentional spam into some users inboxes. It looks like it may have been an overnight glitch that was quickly fixed, but multiple people have claimed to have the same issue. Perhaps its time that the slashcrew creates automated regression testing and other cost-effective testing ideas into their process. Only stable releases should get pushed into the 'production' environment.

Yes, I did submit this. Yes, I assume it will be rejected.
Update: It was rejected by the time I wrote this JE.

Lets fight back. Make them talk about it! Put this in your sig:

<BR>--<BR>Did you get <A HREF="/~FortKnox/journal/23968">messages (with ads) in your email from slashdot</A> (aka spam)?

cancel ×

12 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Nothing like avoiding obvious questions (1)

sielwolf (246764) | more than 11 years ago | (#5294549)

when a simple topic could solve it. Just a header saying "/. last night may have accidentally blah blah blah".

What an interesting choice to ignore questions and try to quickly fix something in the hope users will quickly forget such a failure. Nice. This is borderline managerial incompotence.

ads in mails... (1)

Make (95577) | more than 11 years ago | (#5294562)

since yesterday, /. also includes advertisement in the notify emails. Most of those were caught by Spamassassin at my mailserver. They're killing journal discussions by this, aren't they?

Of course it was rejected (1)

DaytonCIM (100144) | more than 11 years ago | (#5294627)

Why would /. post a negative story about it self?

Seriously, the editors are not neutral, nor are they very open-minded. They all have distinct personalities and individual interests that translate into an (unintentional for the most part) agenda.

None of the editors will step up and post a story that points out a mistake about the company that sends them a bi-weekly check. Of course they have absolutely no problem posting stories slamming the evil empire (i.e. Micorsoft) or praising the good and holy kingdom of Linux. :)

Re:Of course it was rejected (1)

FortKnox (169099) | more than 11 years ago | (#5294648)

Its more along the lines of "Yeah, we had a quick problem but fixed it"

If you don't do that, you get conspiracy theories and pissed off readers. It isn't a matter of making themselves look bad as much as telling everyone it was fixed.

Re:Of course it was rejected (1)

DaytonCIM (100144) | more than 11 years ago | (#5294709)

You're right. Also, I thought it and with the current /. crowd we have, that story would be flooded with trolls in a matter of minutes.

I understand now why not to post that story. Oh well, I over-reacted... again. :)

Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

dthable (163749) | more than 11 years ago | (#5295016)

When I checked my email this morning, I thought it was another new feature they added to make things run slower. I spent an hour looking for a preference to turn it off. In the end I just trained Mail.app to move that crap into the Trash.

Speaking of regression testing, is there an automated testing framework for Perl/CGI apps? We've got something here at work written in Perl and uses the same test-in-production model that /. uses.

Re:Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

FortKnox (169099) | more than 11 years ago | (#5295112)

hey, do you still have those messages? Pudge wants the timestamp on the message header, and my mail is sitting at home (if I didn't delete it this morning)

Re:Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

slothdog (3329) | more than 11 years ago | (#5295317)

Here's mine:

Received: from sc8-slashdot-nfs.slashdot.org ([10.2.150.1] helo=localhost)
by sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18jBYo-00056s-00
for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:22 -0800

Re:Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

dthable (163749) | more than 11 years ago | (#5295524)

Here's the header from one of the messages. Those that got trapped by the spam filter are gone forever.

Return-Path:
Received: from smtpin01-en2.mac.com ([10.13.10.146]) by ms01.mac.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HA8E5E00.OBO for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:38 -0800
Received: from batch3.csd.uwm.edu (batch3.csd.uwm.edu [129.89.7.226]) by smtpin01-en2.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h1D55bpb027968 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (root@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu [129.89.7.201] (may be forged)) by batch3.csd.uwm.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1D55aZ1013890 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:05:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from batch3.csd.uwm.edu (batch3.csd.uwm.edu [129.89.169.226]) by alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1D55aLc014275 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:05:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com (mail.osdn.com [66.35.250.105]) by batch3.csd.uwm.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1D55aZ1019157 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:05:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from sc8-slashdot-nfs.slashdot.org ([10.2.150.1] helo=localhost) by sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jBYw-00058U-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:30 -0800
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:05 +0000
Subject: [Slashdot] New Journal Entry by jeffy124, "short unix question..."
From: slashdot@slashdot.org
To: dthable@uwm.edu
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-Id:

Re:Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

glh (14273) | more than 11 years ago | (#5299048)

Heh, I just checked my yahoo mail and had a couple in there. Here's the headers:

#1
X-Apparently-To: greg_huber@yahoo.com via 66.218.78.141; 12 Feb 2003 21:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from 66.35.250.105 (EHLO sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com) (66.35.250.105) by mta112.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 21:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sc8-slashdot-nfs.slashdot.org ([10.2.150.1] helo=localhost) by sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jBYs-00057n-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:26 -0800
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:05 +0000
Subject: [Slashdot] New Journal Entry by jeffy124, "short unix question..."
From: slashdot@slashdot.org | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
To: greg_huber@yahoo.com
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-Id:
Content-Length: 526

#2
X-Apparently-To: greg_huber@yahoo.com via 66.218.78.145; 12 Feb 2003 21:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from 66.35.250.105 (EHLO sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com) (66.35.250.105) by mta193.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 21:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sc8-slashdot-nfs.slashdot.org ([10.2.150.1] helo=localhost) by sc8-osdn-mail.osdn.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18jBYl-00056A-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:05:19 -0800
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:05 +0000
Subject: [Slashdot] New Journal Entry by Chacham, "What is the strangest/significant book that you own or saw?"
From: slashdot@slashdot.org | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
To: greg_huber@yahoo.com
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-Id:
Content-Length: 542

Re:Not A Bug...It's A Feature (1)

chromatic (9471) | more than 11 years ago | (#5353468)

is there an automated testing framework for Perl/CGI apps?

A combination of WWW::Mechanize [cpan.org] and Test::More [cpan.org] should do the trick.

Interestingly your submittal was deleted... (-1)

Real World Stuff (561780) | more than 11 years ago | (#5295360)

considering I still have 2 trolls in the que from yesterday afternoon.

2003-02-12 19:23:03 Does butt sex make you fart? (science,xmas) (rejected)
2003-02-12 19:30:26 I find my mother damn sexy...Is this wrong? (askslashdot,usa) (rejected)
2003-02-12 19:40:18 I am pregnant with michaels love child! (science,php)
2003-02-12 19:46:37 I'm not gay...but DAMN Old Ike sure makes me HOT! (bsd,amd)

Summary:
pending (2)
rejected (14)

This is as of 09:15 Pacific. Heh, and they say there isn't any bias.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>