nizo's Journal: Immigrant of the day

http://365immigrants.blogspot.com/2011/07/jesus-manuel-cordova.html .

.

.

forgot your pparagraph tag again

[Marxist Hacker 42]

Link not visible

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Reading the source file I find it is apparently some guy named Jesus:

jesus manuel cordova [blogspot.com].

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Why am I being trolled in someone else's journal? Why is the troll spouting nonsense and lies here about messages that don't exist, written by users other than me? Does this troll have nothing better to do?

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Its hard to believe you are trying when you keep spouting the same crap repeatedly. A script could do a better job of passing the Touring Test than you...

Re:

[damn_registrars]

I'm pretty sure Zippy the Pinhead has a similar response when you ask him about the Touring test as a typo for a Turing Test.

Except of course Zippy comes up with that response much quicker. Perhaps your gerbils (much like your responses) are tired?

Re:

[damn_registrars]

That was a marginally longer delay than usual for an AC troll response. The content, though, was just as bad as expected. Even a decent script would recognize a homophone as a typo, regardless of keyboard layout. If someone uses, for example, their when they want there, or your when they want you're, it is still considered a typo.

Can I get AC_TrollScript v2.0 replying to my messages now please? This pre-alpha version isn't very interesting, and seems to be stuck in a loop...

Re:

[damn_registrars]

The definition of typo that was just provided does not match the definition of typo previously provided. Which one do you support? If the AC trollscript that just barfed up this message is the same AC trollscript that barfed up the previous, then they need to rectify the disconnect. Of course, the AC trollscript would likely not be sufficiently well written to be able to pick up on that enormous logical failure.

Re:

[damn_registrars]

Wow, the AC trollscript found a message that was only 5 minutes old, and conjured up a generic reply. I can't say I find that impressive really, although to see such actions from an AC who is throwing around trolling or stalking allegations is amusing...

Re:

[damn_registrars]

You really think there's just one AC trolling you right now?

No, I do not. I have said repeatedly that you cannot prove that any two AC messages come from the same person. It might be one person who thinks themselves to be clever, or any other number. How you came to the notion that I supported there being any particular number is puzzling. You aren't a very good troll if you haven't read enough of my messages to know that. I suggest you might want to hone your trolling skills elsewhere before trying to troll me.

And a prolific sock-puppeteer

Wrong on that, too. That appears to be one key

Re:

[logical_failure]

A better idea is to create the account and troll damn_registrars the sockpuppeteer with it. So that's what I've done.