Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

the most disastrous president in our history

countertrolling (1585477) writes | about 3 years ago

Botnet 2

< in terms of civil liberties >...

< in terms of civil liberties >...

... perhaps the biggest blow to civil liberties is what he has done to the movement itself. It has quieted to a whisper, muted by the power of Obama's personality and his symbolic importance as the first black president as well as the liberal who replaced Bush. Indeed, only a few days after he took office, the Nobel committee awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize without his having a single accomplishment to his credit beyond being elected. Many Democrats were, and remain, enraptured.

It's almost a classic case of the Stockholm syndrome, in which a hostage bonds with his captor despite the obvious threat to his existence. Even though many Democrats admit in private that they are shocked by Obama's position on civil liberties, they are incapable of opposing him. Some insist that they are simply motivated by realism: A Republican would be worse. However, realism alone cannot explain the utter absence of a push for an alternative Democratic candidate or organized opposition to Obama's policies on civil liberties in Congress during his term. It looks more like a cult of personality. Obama's policies have become secondary to his persona.

Ironically, had Obama been defeated in 2008, it is likely that an alliance for civil liberties might have coalesced and effectively fought the government's burgeoning police powers. A Gallup poll released this week shows 49% of Americans, a record since the poll began asking this question in 2003, believe that "the federal government poses an immediate threat to individuals' rights and freedoms." Yet the Obama administration long ago made a cynical calculation that it already had such voters in the bag and tacked to the right on this issue to show Obama was not "soft" on terror. He assumed that, yet again, civil libertarians might grumble and gripe but, come election day, they would not dare stay home.

Well, yeah, that's how it's supposed to work. Whoever you elect, make sure (s)he's a lizard.

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Let me finish that for you (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | about 3 years ago | (#37562276)

the most disastrous president in our history

Is serving his third term right now. Not a single thing that Obama has signed as president has been something that GWB would not have signed.

Not. One. Thing.

In other words, we all got punked with the 2008 election. We thought we were electing someone new, instead we were voting for more of the same. Not only that, but they had us in a no-win game. Vote for bucket of shit 1, get more of the same. Vote for bucket of shit 2, get more of the same. Vote for someone else, still get more of the same.

Don't vote at all, know what you get? Yep, more of the same. McCain wouldn't have changed anything either, and it had to go to either Obama or McCain.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?