Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Uranium Harvested From Seawater

chill (34294) writes | about 2 years ago

Power 1

While it has long been known that the ocean contains, in aggregate, large amounts of valuable minerals dissolved in it, extracting them has been expensive and difficult.

While it has long been known that the ocean contains, in aggregate, large amounts of valuable minerals dissolved in it, extracting them has been expensive and difficult.

Attempts to extract minerals using ion exchange started shortly after World War 2. In the 2002, Japanese researchers at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute advanced a method using flexible plastic fibers braided into mats and impregnated with an absorbent chemical. The costs involved are around $1,200 per kg using this method, as opposed to the approximate $120 per kg from traditional mines.

Recently researchers at the US Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) have more than doubled the amount of uranium that can be extracted from seawater using refinements on the Japanese method. They've successfully brought the costs down to about $660 per kg.

Why all the effort? The world's oceans contain around 4.5 billion tons of uranium, enough fuel to power every nuclear plant on the planet for 6,500 years.

cancel ×

1 comment

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Uranium availability isn't a constraint. (1)

RockDoctor (15477) | about 2 years ago | (#41082115)

It's far from the world's rarest mineral, and there are multiple reasonably good, cheap enough sources of it. The nuclear industry is far from being constrained by unavailability of uranium. NIMBYism, to a small degree coloured by legitimate concerns about safety, and to a large extent coloured by hysterical knee-jerk reactions to "nasty, dangerous, slow, invisible", is the real problem for nuclear.

I'm pretty neutral on the (potential) benefits from multiple points of view of things like thorium reactors. They certainly sound interesting ; but without the military benefits, they don't have any real force to drive their adoption compared to uranium reactors.

NIMBYs are the problem ; not uranium availability.

Extract rhodium or platinum from seawater ... now that would be a neat trick!

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>