Felinoid's Journal: Yet annother SCO analasis

How perfictly Slashdot. Yet annother SCO analasis that really dosen't mean anything to the public at large. Do I care? Nope.

At the core of this is the clame that IBM put SCOs intelectual property into Linux and as a result violated SCOs liccens.
Some of that intelectual property turns out to in fact be IBMs property liccensed to SCO not the other way around.
At the same time SCO violates the GPL and it's own liccens with Novel to resell Unix.

Looks like SCO thinks only SCOs liccenses matter.

The logic (my opinion)

[Felinoid]

Yep more commentary in the comments. I wanted to do it this way so I'm even with everyone who had better ideas as to whats going on.

Here is what I think is the logic behind the actions and all the obveous flaws.

Linux is a very powerful operating system.
Conclusion: Any operating system as powerful as Linux MUST have gotten code from SCOs Intelectual property becouse.
Flaw: SCO is not the first last and only source of greatness.

IBM added code to Linux
Conclusion: Linux must have gotten it's code from SCO
Flaw

More SCO Analasises to come!

[ThreeFarthingStone]

My last position on the Linux-SCO conflict was that SCO was justified in not revealing the proof that Linux contains stolen code. Now SCO is becoming more difficult to defend. So I might write about the conflict in my own Slashdot journal.

I am too lazy to look up "Analasises" and spell it correctly.

Re:More SCO Analasises to come!

[Felinoid]

Don't appologise to me about spelling your still doing a better job that I normally do.