Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

On social media in the past

jawtheshark (198669) writes | about a year ago

User Journal 2

Yeah, well, I've got a new soapbox. On social media in the pastYeah, well, I've got a new soapbox. On social media in the past

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

AOL (1)

Austrian Anarchy (3010653) | about a year ago | (#45358693)

America Online, ICQ, AIM, and I presume other glorified BBSs, had a friend/foe system that was not labeled as such. You could block accounts, add them to buddy lists, etc. Essentially, they were a combination of messaging/email, Usenet and IRC in a different wrapper. All had filtering capability too.

Re:AOL (1)

jawtheshark (198669) | about a year ago | (#45358963)

Yes, but not really. ICQ/AOL were not broadcast media. (I admit, I only implied that in my post) Chats were mostly realtime, just like IRC.
Newsgroups and BBS had the broadcast non-realtime but not the "linking" functionality. I was not online pre-Internet. Communications were waaaaay too expensive in Europe for BBS to be practical, especially in a small country.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?