Journal aborchers's Journal: Promoting the Useful Arts or Concentrating Ownership? 3
Does United States intellectual property law, as currently enacted and practiced, fulfill the Constitutional directive "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" or is it leading progressively to the concentration of control of creative and scientific works in a handful of corporate powerhouses? That is the question I would like to ponder in this thread. Comments are enabled, so please contribute!
This isn't the first time (Score:2)
That's why piracy is so important. No, really! It's yet another market force to help guide those that would sell their mothers do the right
Re:This isn't the first time (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't buy it. Piracy plays into the draconian plans of the IP cartels, giving them the leverage they need to bend the law to their intent. If piracy didn't exist, they would have to invent it.
The only legitimate way for the market to resist abuse by of the content industry is by lawful economic counterforce, e.g. active or passi
Re:This isn't the first time (Score:2)
You do understand piracy!