Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Here we go...

FortKnox (169099) writes | more than 12 years ago

Slashdot.org 10

My love of the moderators...

In the WC3 review, my opinionated comment about RTS's being dead gets a flamebait moderation, while an AC comment (entitled "WHORES") that trashes the community for backing Blizzard gets Modded up 4 times (and still rising).My love of the moderators...

In the WC3 review, my opinionated comment about RTS's being dead gets a flamebait moderation, while an AC comment (entitled "WHORES") that trashes the community for backing Blizzard gets Modded up 4 times (and still rising).

Am I flaming or is it something the mods just don't agree with.

Any ideas on a better moderation system?

cancel ×

10 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

I read the comment (0)

Dead Penis Bird (524912) | more than 12 years ago | (#3208103)

Hard-hitting, but not outright flamebait. That's what you get when you present a well-formed opinion here.

The Grim Reaper mods hit me, too. Simply illustrating [slashdot.org] a good use for the for the DOE Science Grid, I got hit with a Troll and the dreaded Offtopic. Even though it was on-topic. Schmucks!

Re:I read the comment (1)

FortKnox (169099) | more than 12 years ago | (#3208355)

True... it isn't flamebait outright, but it coulda been approached more maturely.

It's (5, Insightful) now (2)

turg (19864) | more than 12 years ago | (#3208119)

It's (5, Insightful) now, and it's only been half an hour since you wrote it.

Not that bad... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3208236)

Right now you've got one negative mod (flaimbait) and three positive for a total score of 4.

I've certainly seen far worse cases of moderator abuse :)

Re:Not that bad... (1)

FortKnox (169099) | more than 12 years ago | (#3208414)

True, but at the time of the writing, I just had the negative hit. Plus, I'm in a whiny mood and haven't whined about something in a while :-P

HAIKU! (-1)

real_b0fh (557599) | more than 12 years ago | (#3218079)

sissie
always bitching about moderation
put yer karma where the sun does not shine

Working on new ideas (1)

Iron Chef Japan (531022) | more than 12 years ago | (#3208321)

I have been trying to think of a new way to do comments for about two weeks now. I didnt really think about it really hard until this past weekend, when I came up with many good ways, but none of them are implementable on the web.... they all work great in theory but you run into many problems. When I say a new way of comments I mean like a new way to show the relationship between commments, and if there should be any at all. I believe there is something better than threaded comments as we know it today, i just cant put my finger on it. I guess I will now have to think about a new mod system as well, but I know on my site I wouldnt like not having the 'ultimate power'.... but I know I would not abuse it. Maybe the problem is not the moderation system, maybe its the moderators.

Looks to me like the situation fixed itself (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 12 years ago | (#3208405)

The AC sits at -1 and you at 5.

/. moderation is far from perfect, but more often than not it works around in the end. I had a 5 comment once that for no reason somebody modded as flamebait. It sat as one of those odd "4, flamebait" comments for awhile. Then about 4 hours later or so somebody modded it back up.

Shrug, such is life. It's only karma anyway.

Moderation is good in general but really bad. (1)

eugene ts wong (231154) | more than 12 years ago | (#3209033)

Just recently, I got modded down as overrated, here on slashdot. The post was a couple of weeks old and buried deep in the thread. What really bothered me was the fact that I was never rated up at all. How can anyone call it overrated, when it was never rated up at all? That's stupid. I think someone was just trying to get rid of my karma. It makes slashdot such a waste of time.

I wish I wasn't so addicted. *sigh*

Slashdot's moderation system needs work, but (2)

leviramsey (248057) | more than 12 years ago | (#3237383)

I think it's the best thing yet. K5's scheme doesn't do anything for me.

I'm working on a Slash-like site (using a 100% brand new codebase, that's why there's no comments yet). You can check it at my site. I'm going to implement a couple of modifications to Slashdot's moderation system.

First, I will reward good moderators by giving them more mod power. Metamod is ideal for this purpose. Each moderator has a modkarma, which is the net metamoderation over the last 2000 metamods, divided by 20. The sqrt() of this karma is then added or subtracted from their five standard mods (with a minimum number of moderations of 1). Modkarma also is a factor in total karma.

I also plan to add an automatice moderation: "Provocative". This would be based on the quantity and quality of replies to a comment.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>