Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

This is Jeremiah Cornelius good

smitty_one_each (243267) writes | about 3 months ago

User Journal 9

My tinfoil hat melted. Ron Paul puked. Good times:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-07/guest-post-false-eastwest-paradigm-hides-rise-global-currency
A taste:

My tinfoil hat melted. Ron Paul puked. Good times:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-07/guest-post-false-eastwest-paradigm-hides-rise-global-currency
A taste:

Clearly, Putin and Russia are just two more puppet pieces on the globalist chessboard, pitted against other puppets in the West in a grand theater designed to distract and divide the masses through chaos. As Kissinger points out, in crisis there is opportunity.
What is the goal? Theyâ(TM)ve already told us, openly, on numerous occasions.
The first great prizes of the New World Order are a global currency and centralized economic control. The elites are not satisfied with quiet dominance of individual economies. They want complete political homogenization and the end of all sovereignty. Period. With a global currency in place, the steps towards global government become quick and small.

My observation: people don't scale. Stuff just keeps falling apart, for all the efforts to build The Bigger, Shinier Things.

cancel ×

9 comments

Conspiracy theories (1)

Arker (91948) | about 3 months ago | (#46949397)

Conspiracies are actually pretty normal and expected features of politics.

What distinguishes a 'conspiracy theory' in the proper pejorative is always the notion of one big conspiracy that somehow rules them all. And I am afraid this guy is just a little over that line.

That said he's probably closer to the truth than most suspect. Each country has a class system, and the 'elite' of each country is likely to sometimes conspire with the others against the 'commoners' of their own country. They can be temporary allies much of the time.

But *permanent* alliances and large, monolithic conspiracies are mythical creatures. The larger a conspiracy gets, the more unwieldy it becomes, and the larger the potential rewards for betraying it. Cartels are one example of this.

Re:Conspiracy theories (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 3 months ago | (#46955375)

The larger a conspiracy gets, the more unwieldy it becomes, and the larger the potential rewards for betraying it.

My theory is that people don't scale. Getting large amounts of people to adhere, e.g. an army, takes an awful lot of applied fascism.

Re:Conspiracy theories (1)

Arker (91948) | about 3 months ago | (#46955605)

"My theory is that people don't scale. Getting large amounts of people to adhere, e.g. an army, takes an awful lot of applied fascism."

It does, and it can be a very fragile thing. Just ask Viktor Yanukovych.

NWO. (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 3 months ago | (#46954303)

Stuff just keeps falling apart, for all the efforts to build The Bigger, Shinier Things.

At the top of the list is military hardware and enforcement systems. "Missile Defense Systems". SDI (The "Star Wars" defense initiative).

We like to pretend that this had something to do with the fall of the same people who are marching through the Ukraine right now. All it's done is enrich a bunch of connected contractors and encourage really bad ideas in the form of interventions. But notice, the only places we have any intention of intervening in are third-world hell-holes that can barely keep the lights on. Actual wars in developed countries are bad for business.

Re:NWO. (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 3 months ago | (#46955401)

At the top of the list is military hardware and enforcement systems.

*cough*HealthCare.gov*cough*

All it's done is enrich a bunch of connected contractors and encourage really bad ideas in the form of interventions.

There are diplomatic, informational, and economic levers, in addition to the military, making up DIME, which is a common model for discussing international relations.

Re:NWO. (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | about 3 months ago | (#46955645)

At the top of the list is military hardware and enforcement systems.

*cough*HealthCare.gov*cough*

You really want to compare the cost of one billion-dollar each military jet that will never be used to the cost of healthcare.gov? No, you don't.

ere are diplomatic, informational, and economic levers, in addition to the military, making up DIME, which is a common model for discussing international relations.

Acronym's aside, it's not a new model. The problems with that ultra expensive hardware, that takes up the majority of the US budget (Ryan's too), is that the neocons and Netanyahu fanbois that control US defense policy gets itchy to take it for a test-spin. To "project power", you know? To "send a message" to whichever dunghole of a country happens to be on our "Axis of Evil" list on any given day.

And at some point, when you're shoveling money into military hardware that will never - can never - be used, it does all the bad things that you claim entitlements do. It's waste, fraud and abuse personified.

The thing that surprises me most is that no matter who's president, this mechanism continues its agenda apace. And they do so while getting all the think tanks to cry that Obama's "cutting the military to the bone". And don't get me started on the "I" part of dime, which Obama has dialed up to eleven. The problem with DIME is that all those things can be used, and are being used, against our own citizens for the past thirty years.

Re:NWO. (1)

fustakrakich (1673220) | about 3 months ago | (#46956491)

The thing that surprises me most is that no matter who's president, this mechanism continues its agenda apace.

Surprised? Why? I don't get it. This has been everyday business through out the ages. It is not necessarily conspiratorial. It is just nature personified. But people prefer the high drama of the grand tale and like the idea of being "unique". But there is nothing unique about our times except now we can deliver "anything anywhere anytime".

Re:NWO. (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 3 months ago | (#46957343)

As I'm fond of saying, human nature is constant; technology is the variable.

Re:NWO. (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 3 months ago | (#46957357)

The thing that surprises me most is that no matter who's president, this mechanism continues its agenda apace.

Part of the issue, I think, is that the 1787 Constitution, while a fine product of the Enlightenment in so many ways, really hasn't got much to say about Globalization. Such was way outside the scope of the 18th century. Thus, while I'm kind of sympathetic to the Ron Paul non-interventionalist argument, I've got to confess skepticism, as it seems a trifle naïve.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...