Journal RailGunner's Journal: Once again - I was right. 19
Barack Obama is a fascist who is authorizing the use of the US Military against US Citizens ON US SOIL.
Link this story with the militarization of Federal Agencies (such as the Post Office, the DHS Hollowpoint ammo buy, and others, and you can see HOW he's doing this.
If you aren't concerned about this... you aren't paying attention. And if you're not paying attention, when the shit hits the fan, you'll deserve what you get.
Link this story with the militarization of Federal Agencies (such as the Post Office, the DHS Hollowpoint ammo buy, and others, and you can see HOW he's doing this.
If you aren't concerned about this... you aren't paying attention. And if you're not paying attention, when the shit hits the fan, you'll deserve what you get.
USDA also (Score:2)
Oh please! (Score:1)
Read up on the Whiskey Rebellion. Your pretty little constitution wasn't even four years old when it was violated by a bunch of dirty old men. On the other hand, read a little closer, and you find the president is allowed to do that. Article 1 Section 8, plain as day. In the past it was a lot more than a mere threat. I believe there was a somewhat famous incident of military use against the citizens back around 1860, or so. Ah, but you and Smitty, it's all Marsha Marsha Marsha!. You know nothing* We all kno
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Bunch of Cliven Bundys.. I have to admit, sometimes I wouldn't mind putting up a fence around those people, but it goes against the grain.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Without a pickup truck, what's the point?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I was thinking more of offering them a "Texas ride-along".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Who, this guy? [slashdot.org] Or maybe his normal day to day account [slashdot.org]? I mean, everyone knows both accounts are owned by the same guy.
But to answer your point -- no, I'm not trolling that asshole as he's foed, not worth my (or your) time, and can't post in this journal. He can take his crazy OCD shit elsewhere.
Re: (Score:1)
...everyone knows both accounts are owned by the same guy.
I think you might be very surprised on that some day. Hell, I don't know who I'm responding to. It doesn't matter if the whole thing's a gag. I'm just rolling with it.
As for *Once again - you were right*, well shit, that's like saying the sun will rise tomorrow. The laws of nature are inviolable. The hedonistic lust for power/wealth (thus sex) is just part of the show.
Re: (Score:1)
I doubt it. Fits the overall pattern of behavior too well. Mindless homunculi are nothing if not consistent.
Re: (Score:1)
On the other hand, some people might be good at what they do. Remember Dr.Bob [slashdot.org]? Now there was a real pro. Definitely shows finesse (like Smitty, as Harpo in the mirror gag) that d_r totally lacks, but d_r can still attract flies and keep 'em around for a while. He just has to pump it a little harder, but the overall effect is pretty much the same. He gets some people aroused. You just gotta jump in with the same attitude he has. Have some fun.
Re: (Score:1)
So does a mound of dog shit. At least the dog shit has a little more value than all of d_r's posts (maggots and the ciiiiiiiiiiiiircle of liiiiiiiiiiiiife)
Re: (Score:1)
So does a mound of dog shit.
Well, put an M-80 under it and ring the door bell. Even dog shit has a purpose.
it's in the plans (Score:1)
The plan is for the military to become an international Red Cross [cnsnews.com] (fighting the catastrophic effects of global warming), and then the rest of the domestic agencies to arm themselves to the teeth.
(I wonder if this constrast has anything to do with the likelihoods that those in the military might tend to be against America's fundamental transformation Leftward while those in federal government civilian agencies might tend to be for it.)
Giving an indication of what those running the federal government think is
Same old same old (Score:2)