jmccay's Journal: Liberal Geeks

Liberal geeks have proven to be the same as all other liberals. So much for the so-called intelligence of these geeks--reasoning and thinking gets lost in the blind obsession with liberalism. They ignore evidence presented to them. They cry unfair when they think someone is suppressing their write to free speech, but when evidence is present about John Kerry, and the Democrats, attempting to hide and silence the voices of 250 vets who think John Kerry is unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the United States of America, they are a joke. They don't believe in free speech. Free speech only applies when what people have to say agrees with their liberal beliefs! All else doesn't matter.
      It's funny that the only response to my post is an anonymous coward calling me a "f*cking retard". In true liberal fashion, when the face with evidence they can't refute, they resort to calling people names. It would be even funnier if it wasn't for the fact that a lot of the liberal socialist elite (i.e. the Hollywood so-called-know-it-alls and other top liberal who are trying to turn America into a socialist paradice) resorts to the same tactics. They are incapable of defending their own point of view when faced with the reality that their point of view is completely without substance and is built on top of lies.
        It's good thing that not all liberals are that stupid. At least, I can still have decent discussion with nebaz. Now, I wait and see what new names the liberal geeks can think of next. Maybe it will be more original than "f*cking retard".

      Apparently, printing skin with old inkjet printers is not science enough! It must have been too complicated a subject for the slashdot editors! There is researching going on to use inkjet printers to print skins. Google for it if you want more information

After you're done felating your party of choice ..

[scotch]

There's not much use discussing things with someone who believes in the artificial dicotomy (liberal vs. conservative) prevalent in American. If you think you can paint "liberals" with the same brush or that all of "liberalism" is bad, you should probabably step back and think about it a little harder. This country was founded on and developed with both liberal and conservative ideas. Most of the truly interesting things that happened in the evolution of the US were "liberal" ideas. Most non-political-p

Re:After you're done felating your party of choice

[jmccay]

I understand what you're saying, and I have thought of it and considered it. The liberals of yesterday are not the same liberals as today. Yesterdays liberal values become todays conservative values as a generation or two grow up.
Liberals as they stand today, have gone too far in my opinion. Truth is now irrelevant as long as they are trying to achieve their goal. The end justifies the means no matter what.
Let me ask you a question. When has the progressive values...or the assult on our everyth

Re:After you're done felating your party of choice

[scotch]

Let me ask you a question. When has the progressive values...or the assult on our everything the that is held dear end?

I really don't understand your question; if you're asking when society should stop growing in new ways (moral, ethical, economic, political, etc), the answer is never. When society is stagnant in those regards, you can bet that a culture is about to die. Of course, not all new ideas are worthy, and much of the stuff that seems important today will be forgotten in the future. But yo