Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Dearest Anonymous

smitty_one_each (243267) writes | about 2 months ago

User Journal 24

Ain't got time to read or reply.

Ain't got time to read or reply.

cancel ×

24 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

now we know (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47255927)

i was wondering what conservative butthurt looks like. thank you for the clear demonstration.

Re:now we know (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47258251)

i was wondering what conservative butthurt looks like. thank you for the clear demonstration.

That prison talk always makes me wonder if one is a prison veteran, or just watched Oz a lot.

Won't You Come Out To Play? (1)

Jeremiah Cornelius (137) | about 2 months ago | (#47256041)

The wind is low the birds will sing
That you are part of everything

Re:Won't You Come Out To Play? (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 2 months ago | (#47256375)

Ah, the Beatles.

Just AC's? (1)

RailGunner (554645) | about 2 months ago | (#47257185)

I can think of plenty of logged-in accounts that are completely worthless as well.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47257479)

ha! you're amusing. you write too often about such accounts - and with too much detail - to support any notion of you not reading their writings. no wonder people think you're a phony.

Re:Just AC's? (1)

RailGunner (554645) | about 2 months ago | (#47262153)

you write too often about such accounts
Wrong
and with too much detail - to support any notion of you not reading their writings

Wrong again. There's no need for anyone to read their writings, because their writings are utterly predictable and unchanging. It's called pattern recognition, you should research it.

Otherwise, your argument distills to "You say the sun is yellow, therefore, you must stare at it a lot."

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47268479)

Otherwise, your argument distills to "You say the sun is yellow, therefore, you must stare at it a lot."

that would be true if your complaints about ac's and people you don't like were consistent. instead you frequently write new complaints that contain details from what they write. you couldn't make that shit up by just banging randomly at your keyboard.

or are the accounts you complain about actually you, and when you write as railgunner you're just an act? the argument in favor of you expressing the opposite of your actual beliefs in this account are becoming stronger on a routine basis.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47271357)

the argument in favor of you expressing the opposite of your actual beliefs in this account are becoming stronger

Well, now we know the AC is damn_registrars. Figures.

Re:Just AC's? (1)

RailGunner (554645) | about 2 months ago | (#47271403)

instead you frequently write new complaints

LOL - nothing I do on this site is "frequent".

you couldn't make that shit up by just banging randomly at your keyboard

Don't need to. The liberal trolls (like yourself) are nothing if not completely predictable.

or are the accounts you complain about actually you, and when you write as railgunner you're just an act? the argument in favor of you expressing the opposite of your actual beliefs in this account are becoming stronger on a routine basis.

Gee, that sounds strangely like something d_r would write, as well as being completely ridiculous. This further proves that all liberal trolls are essentially redundant, and that the world will be a better place if they all went and played in traffic.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47273315)

you sure do talk about her a lot...

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47274281)

"Her". I've heard that one before. Are you bringing back all your sockpuppets or creating new ones?

Not that it matters... I know who you really are.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a month ago | (#47280185)

i do know who i am. i also know who you are not. and i know that you do not know who i am, because i know that you are not me. what's your point?
 
we can keep going around if you like but i think we all came here to watch rg squirm. he's like an ant under a magnifying glass at this point.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a month ago | (#47284061)

i think we all came here to watch rg squirm.

From what? Personally, I believe rg when he says he doesn't give two shits about you. I don't think he gives two shits about anyone but himself, and even that's debatable.

he's like an ant under a magnifying glass at this point.

Seriously, damn_registrars, do you really think you're fooling anyone with this shtick? It was lame the last time you did it, it's lame now.

I know, you'll post a response with some lame crap about "Alice" or maybe jimmy_slimmy will show up or something. We've seen this before.

I hate to give him credit -- but I have to say I think Red is the most correct about you.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47286971)

should we count the evidence supporting you being railgunner yourself? like the fact that you keep talking about d_r while claiming to not care about her? we could go on but r_g doesn't like to count past so likely you don't either.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47297585)

Log in, damn_registrars.

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47312267)

gee, which cowardly fool is obsessed enough with d_r to make that claim? the list is awfully short...

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47318919)

gee, which poster has the OCD required to continually respond? the list is awfully short...

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47323069)

... for when you can just never get your fill of talking about damn_registrars...

OBSESSION!

Re:Just AC's? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47323977)

Only damn_registrars is dumb enough to keep responding.
YHBT.
HAND.

(And stop being such a marionette. Pulling your strings and making you dance is far too easy.)

Re:Just AC's? (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 2 months ago | (#47257895)

Right, but for reasons of time and disinterest, I'm liquidating A/C comments in the Reply list.

What a baby (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 2 months ago | (#47258477)

In other words, he's going to put his virtual fingers in his virtual ears and virtually sing, "IM NOT LISTENING!!!! LA LA LA LA LA LA !!!!"

He could, of course, ban AC's from his journal. But what fun is that? This way, he can still complain like a child.

He requires people he can complain about to surround him in order to validate his binary good/evil world view. He's not a well man.

T'wasn't me (1)

fustakrakich (1673220) | about 2 months ago | (#47258871)

But since somebody is trying to hose my account, I shall start a new one to leave the moderation abuse for all to see on this one.

I have to say some of the ACs had a few pretty righteous comments which anyone can figure would leave you "speechless". So your response to such is expected. You got a real bear trap of a mind there, rusted shut, as noted by the conversations you have within your echo chamber.

*You've all been such a lovely audience*

- thankyouverymuch

Re:T'wasn't me (1)

smitty_one_each (243267) | about 2 months ago | (#47258983)

Just straight deleting the noise.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>