Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

return of the +0 bonus

Comments Filter:
  • You'll just have to whore a bit harder then. I realise that this could be tricky for people like yourself who lack my wit and intelligence, but I'm sure even someone of your lowly calibre could manage to trap a few moderators once in a while.

    Just one word of advice: you sound like a sixteen-year-old jerk. This guy [slashdot.org] is similar. Please try to sound at least vaguely educated.
    • by tps12 ( 105590 )
      First, props for dissing me in my own journal.

      Second, props for trolling me in my own journal.

      Third, props for comprising half the traffic in my journal.

      Fourth, could a sixteen-year-old jerk do this [slashdot.org]?
      • Well, he attached that to *my* comment, so seems he was trolling me in your journal, ROFL!!!

        Interesting that he chose 16 of all the ages he could possibly choose too...
        • Huh? That is the first post you have left under this journal entry.
        • No, I trolled you somewhere else, and you bit. Might have been a different account, I forget... Anyway, glad to see that I'm on your foes list.
      • Congratulation, you've just given objective proof that a sixteen-year-old could write that kind of comment. You wrote that comment, you are a sixteen-year-old, therefore a sixteen-year-old could write that comment. Quod erat demonstrandum (sorry, I should remember my target audience -- it's Latin for question easily done).

        Ah, that is circular logic, I hear you cry. Fear not, my friend! I have other evidence to back up my claims. Let us, for example, engage in a little linguistic analysis of said comment. I quote "please have patience, and try to give this argument some credit", for example. This just reaks of highschool essay, but it could be a coincidence.

        Another giveaway is your first, futher, lastly (which should, of course, be finally -- some USian abuses of the English Language are unpardonable). This construct is only ever seen in the kind of essay written by a person who does not have real-world experience of English -- in other words, a pointy-haired boss (which you cannot be, since you are using a computer) or a school kid.

        Still not happy? When you get to university, try writing "In conclusion" and see how much stick you get for it. Unless you attend a really down-market university (or maybe even a college), you would not get away with it.

        Ah, and the killer... That slavery paragraph... How could that not have been written by someone aged under eighteen?

        I must admit, though, that the leap of logic that lead you to believe that I am a troll is outside even my superior powers of reasoning. Me being smarter than you does not make me a troll; I can only conclue that your inferior mind seeks to cower behind the modern-day equivalent of crying "Witch!".

        Still, it has been nice talking to you. I hope I have enlightened you somewhat.
        • by tps12 ( 105590 )
          You forgot to point out that the passages quoted are fictional. You are the only one to notice the "first, further, lastly", so you get a point for that.

          I did not mistake you for a troll. I correctly identified you as a biter.

          HAND

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...