Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Politics

Journal EnronHaliburton2004's Journal: The four kinds of Bush supporters 20

Journal by EnronHaliburton2004

There are four kinds of people who support Bush:

  1. The Fool - People who are too gullible to realize that Bush has lied.
  2. The Coward - People who are too scared to vote for anyone else.
  3. The Codependent - People who enjoy being lied too and live in a fantasy world put forth by the President, where America is still noble, secure and respected around the world.
  4. The Pig - People who agree with the lie and who want to continue the lie for their own nefarious purposes.

What kind are you?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The four kinds of Bush supporters More

The four kinds of Bush supporters

Comments Filter:

  • In 2000 I was #1 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Marxist Hacker 42 ( 638312 ) * <seebert42@gmail.com> on Tuesday September 28, 2004 @11:33AM (#10374083) Homepage Journal
    I have since learned, and I'm back to voting for Kerry this week, until Bush has a lock on my state, or until Kerry has a lock on my state, in which case I'll vote for Badnarik.
  • Give me one reason that I should vote for John Kerry based on Kerry's merit alone
    • He's a Vietnam Vet! heh heh
      • Man, I just have to comment;

        Am I the only one who finds it funny that Moore is calling 4 year university college students slackers?

        Four year universities. Real, legit colleges. If he wants slackers go to a community college. He's just pandering to the "cool", lazy MTV pseudo-counter-culture stereotype which these college bois and grrlz just love being identified with.
    • He has never lied in order to take us into a war, a war which never needed to fight.
      • I am of the belief that the war in Iraq (and one in Syria, Iran and North Korea) is justified. I feel that Bush knowingly lied to the public because he and his advisors felt a pre-emptive strike was necessary and the only way to get public approval for such a strike was by lying.
        • And to think, I always thought lieing was a bad thing. Oh wait, welcome to the land of evil.

          He's your president, and he's a very special person. He rides on the little bus to the white house. But not after this year :) It's over. Landslide for Kerry. Take a look at the new registered voters that are not counted on the ever close polls. It's just plain over for your guy. Nobody is signing up in record mass to re-elect. It's to do a regime change.

          Evil be gone.
    • I'll give you your one and raise you 3.
      His plan for energy independence.
      His work on the Iran-Contra affair.
      19+yrs in the Senate. ( I wonder what his opponent was doing during that time? ) [bushwatch.org]
      19 years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
      If you need more....let me know....
    • Personally, I feel Kerry's merit is mostly irrelevant to the November election.

      IMHO, the one-party rule we've had for the past several years is just THAT BAD for the country. I might well be tempted to say so, for one-party rule on either side. But the Republicans have been much more *efficient* that the Democrats at pushing their agenda, so at the moment, I fear their one-party rule more.

      * I believe unilateral pre-emptive military action is WRONG.
      (Before someone calls me a lame-O coward, pre-emptive m
      • - It was only unilateral because the UN was balking on the Iraq subject. Hussein is a criminal and no amount of sanctions were going to make him behave.

        - I don't believe it is the president's job to worry about energy conservation.

        - I am of the understanding that congress must approve every judicial appointee-- if they approve it, it is not the president's fault for nominating, but theirs for approving.

        - I am not an economist, so I won't argue your point there. It might be right, it might be wrong. Ho
        • -By the same token, why are we waiting to invade Korea and Iran? As near as we can tell, Korea already has some small number of WMD, and their regime is *certainly* as oppressive as Iraq's, if not moreso. Iran is presently thumbing its nose at the IAEA, so maybe they should get it, too. For that matter, look at western Sudan, look in the Congo. There are criminals there, too. Isn't invasion in order there, too. Or Burma, if you want another nasty regime.

          I don't doubt Saddam Hussein was a bad guy. I just do
          • -I don't know why we are waiting. If the countries are housing groups known to have commit terror vs. us and refuse to extradite them, what choice do we have but to go after them?

            -I do agree with you about the Republican nut jobs in Congress.

            -Richard Clarke was still on the job! His policy, as shown during the Clinton year, was to send long range cruise missiles into medicine factories! (Ok, ok that was faulty intelligence), but seriously-- the Clinton era missle stikes did NOTHING to stem Al Queda act
            • Because sometimes subtlety is needed. Any move at North Korea might be taken the wrong way by China, right next door. Plus North Korea has enough weaponry aimed at South Korea to flatten the place before anything significant could be done - and that includes making them a glassy, radioactive ruin.

              Even though Saddam was a bad guy, he was bad to Iraq, and funded some "life insurance" for Palestinian suicide bombers. He was no threat to us, even though he was trying to wiggle out of UN sanctions, etc. As 2 wa
        • I see a lot of people forgetting why this "war" was all about: terrorism. When people began questioning the linking between Al Qaeda and Iraq, it was about WMD. When we knew it wasn't likely to be any, it became about hunting Hussein because he's a bad, evil man. The USA took unilateral only because God-knows why; the UN had grounds not to support an invasion.

          Bush and it's team lied, it's as simple as that. I find it hard to beleive people can accept it so easily. The UN is there to act as world polic
  • Which kind is Ralph Nader?

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Close