TheOpenCD 1.4 Released 278
Lykos writes "From OpenCD's website: 'TheOpenCD is a collection of high quality Free and Open Source Software. The programs run in Windows and cover the most common tasks such as word processing, presentations, e-mail, web browsing, web design, and image manipulation.' This is a great little package to leave lying around your friends' workplace to convince them to go opensource. =) Lots of quality programs in one convenient package."
My problem (Score:5, Funny)
Re:My problem (Score:2, Funny)
Re:My problem (Score:3, Funny)
Torrent (Score:5, Informative)
but just in case...
torrent [sunsite.dk]
Re:Torrent (Score:4, Funny)
Anyone have another copy of this
Re:Torrent (Score:2, Funny)
thanks you.
Re:Torrent (Score:5, Informative)
Though, given what happened to the
Re:Torrent (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bittorrent sucks ass! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Bittorrent sucks ass! (Score:2)
edonkey P2P *is* quite popular here, but slashcode won't let you paste a working ed2k link [ed2k] (the slashes and pipes are stripped), and the plaintext workaround has inconvenient whitespace added: ed2k://|file|DeDRMS.cs|7389|55CBF56C77D2BF0CC9B050 A3DE139753|/
--
Re:Torrent (Score:5, Informative)
and here [lineone.net]
Re:Torrent (Score:2, Informative)
here [sunsite.dk]
eD2K Link (Score:3, Informative)
Re:eD2K Link (Score:2, Informative)
The mirror list, mirrored here [theopencd.net], been updated.
Dude track one kicks ASS on OpenCD!! (Score:5, Funny)
Miguel De Icaza -- Banjo
Alan Cox -- Washboard
Re:Dude track one kicks ASS on OpenCD!! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Dude track one kicks ASS on OpenCD!! (Score:3, Funny)
Darl McBride -- Cowbell
Fred Fish (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Fred Fish (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Fred Fish (Score:2, Insightful)
Oh, I completely agree. Not that there would be room on the disks. :) But back then the Fish Disks were invaluable for legally spreading around good free/shareware software at a time when the internet wasn't so commonly available.
I think TheOpenCD is a good idea for increa
Re:Fred Fish (Score:3, Interesting)
In the early days a lot of the Fish disks had source code on them. And they were pretty much all PD. And you used to get a lot of different things on each disk too. Then slowly everything began to go all shareware and massive, until eventually you got just one or two crippled programs on each disk.
I lost interest in them about then, and I would just pine
CD Program Contents (Score:5, Informative)
Office & Design
OpenOffice.org, AbiWord, PDFCreator, GIMP
Internet & Communication
Mozilla, Miranda IM, FileZilla, TightVNC, WinHTTrack, PuTTY
Multimedia & Games
Audacity, CDex, Tux Paint, Crack Attack!, Sokoban YASC,
Neverball, Celestia, Really Slick Screensavers
Utilities & Other
7-Zip, SciTE, WinPT, NetTime
No firewall? (Score:4, Funny)
There is also no firewall? Come on...
I can't recommend it, anyway, because it doesn't have Nethack.
Re:No firewall? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No firewall? (Score:4, Interesting)
I've since switched to AVG Free Edition [grisoft.com] Which also works great and has regular incremental updates.
Re:No firewall? (Score:2)
Re:No firewall? (Score:2, Informative)
It doesn't do continuous scanning, but I usually switch that off, on the basis that if I'm scanning everything as it comes in I'm not likely to have written a virus to file in the first place.
Nice easy installer, and everything. http://clamwin.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
Re:No firewall? (Score:2)
If you use the IE and Outlook alternatives on the CD and a little common sense, you virtually don't need AV. I haven't used it in years, and I've never had a problem.
I can't recommend it, anyway, because it doesn't have Nethack.
At risk of sounding entirely humorless, I don't think Nethack is released under the GPL.
/.ed (Score:2)
previous coverage (Score:4, Informative)
Also take a look.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Also take a look.. (Score:3, Informative)
Like FlightGear, glTron, SodiPodi, Blender.
Sweet.
Re:Also take a look.. (Score:2)
Really cool idea (Score:4, Interesting)
Seems like a good list of programs, firefox may be a nice addition, though.
Wouldn't a Web portal be a better idea? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wouldn't a Web portal be a better idea? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wouldn't a Web portal be a better idea? (Score:2)
Re:Wouldn't a Web portal be a better idea? (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, it would for people who are already interested enough to follow through with the effort it would take. The cool thing about the CD is that it's portable, easy and cheap to reproduce, and most important: it's very convenient.
I'm using Linux for most of my computing because somebody handed me a throw-away Knoppix CD. If he had told me, "Hey, there's this cool Knoppix thing that lets you try Linux with no hassles. You can download all 658 Megs for free!" I'd probably still be using Win98 exclusively.
T
Too bad broadband has me craving latest version :P (Score:3, Funny)
Mirror here (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Mirror here (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Mirror here (Score:3, Insightful)
I guess you don't want Windows users e-mailing you (unless they have Cygwin installed, that is).
Sounds like a good plan if you ask me...
It's interesting... (Score:5, Interesting)
Can't even get Google Cache? (Score:2)
Sasser, or is it just me?
Another free CD that is handy (Score:5, Informative)
This CD and the Open CD are about all you need to get your friends computer working in tip top shape.
http://ubcd.sf.net/
Re:Another free CD that is handy (Score:3, Informative)
No it isn't. (Score:5, Insightful)
As the Purchasing Agent and the entire IT Staff I get all sorts of DemoCD Crap sent to me all the time. All sorts of "Look at how awesome our crap is!", "Try it once and wonder how you ever did without it!"
Most of it is all the same, they come from silly 'Microsoft Partners' all selling the same thing... Some kind of 'Revolutionary Business Management Software' that we would have to build our business around to get anything out of it. The rest of it is a mess of various CAD/CAM systems, most of which are the worst crap you ever did see...
Do you know what I do with it all? I dump it into the trash first thing. I don't read the marketing hype, I don't waste a moment attempting to load something that then demands I 'Register' the Demo to get a Demo unlock code that does nothing but mark me as a 'target' to their sales drones...
If we need software, my job is to head out and find it. I look at OSS first, because most of the little side software packages we need won't require massive retraining, like zip software or other utilities like that...
So, would a CD Found laying around our office end up in any PC? Heck no, especially if it is unmarked... There could be all sorts of nasties on it we don't want/need on our network...
Keep your CD to yourself unless someone mentions looking for a mess of free software, then give them the CD.
Re:No it isn't. (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes. There are people who read spam. There are people who open random attachments. There are people who use AOL cds. There will be people who would read an unlabled CD.
In fact, I have a feeling that quite a few people would be interested in a CD that has a good picture and something like "Open CD" and url ending with
Re:No it isn't. (Score:4, Interesting)
Unfortunately, I'd have to agree based on my experience with using TheOpenCD and GnuWinII as tools for evangelizing free software. For me, the results were really disappointing. I teach physics at a community college. A lot of my students don't have much money, and it seemed to me like they'd just naturally be interested in free alternatives to Office, etc. I handed out free CDs on the first day of class, and got exactly zero interest. Not a single student mentioned having used the software. Not a single student started using OSS for doing graphs in their lab reports.
Some possible reasons:
I've gotten better results simply by putting my old FreeBSD box in the lab alongside the school's Windows machines. KDE is installed, and I think a lot of them just start using it without even realizing at first that it's not Windows. After a while, the message may sink in that this alternative at least exists.
Figures (Score:2)
Good thing I hadn't gotten around to burning it yet, I guess.
Shows free GUI software's problem (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Shows free GUI software's problem (Score:2)
Re:Shows free GUI software's problem (Score:4, Insightful)
Look at winamp. It's always had a non-standard interface and before microsoft started bundling the same features into windows, was the de-facto standard media player.
Another example was the old Napster. Remember how it used buttons instead of tabs for the tabed-like interface? That took me, a slashdot reading geek a few extra minutes to figure out, yet it still managed to be the biggest thing in the news for several months.
Re:Shows free GUI software's problem (Score:2, Insightful)
Many people probably used these applications in
Now, not to say there isn't some innovative FOSS software out there; but a lot of it is rather mundane, i.e. apps that already exist in the closed-source world. In the midst
Does it matter? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Does it matter? (Score:2)
macromedia products?
Give me a break those guys all use custom widget sets so what the hell is the difference. Go troll on zdnet or something would you.
Re:Shows free GUI software's problem (Score:3, Insightful)
The web has taught people that buttons can look like just about any damn thing the designer pleases, and they'll happily point'n'click at anything that looks vaguely clickable. Different skins for media apps prove that.
I'm not arguing that it's efficient, mind, but anyone who is confused over different widget sets has other, worse problems.
Is this approved by the HSD? (Score:4, Funny)
Have they approved its use on windows longhorn?
sheep go baaaaah.
Re:Is this approved by the HSD? (Score:4, Funny)
question about open source (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:question about open source (Score:5, Insightful)
Your second point is good but I do not know that it is a correct assumption. Yes, most people who are going to use linux are more tech savvy, but that doesnt mean they are smart about things like securing their systems. They may be more equipped to deal with a problem, but the smart ones know enough to avoid the problem to begin with. Dont you think that 10 years is enough time to improve a product so that it doesnt fall victim to some of these hideous data destroying worms that happen monthly (sometimes weekly)? I'm not trying to bash Microsoft for their flaws so much (they do, after all have 100x more people working against them than for them), but they have not focused on making their product better over the years, just more desireable. Nowadays they are so big, the only thing they really need to concern themselves with is how can they make people (and companies) buy more of their products, any improvements they make are only done so to placate their customers.
Does having the source code make something more of a security risk? The answer is really, only if it was hidden to begin with. The benefit to having everyone staring at your code, is that the people who intend to use the code will make sure that youve done a good job coding it and will point out the grevious errors youve made. Opening up closed souce is going to allow people to suddenly find all of those flaws at once because noone ever pointed them out before. Open source code is in a constant state of having its (if any) flaws fixed, and stable releases of such software should be significantly more bug/error/flaw free than similar closed software (again this all varies depending on who is writing the code).
'About' TheOpenCD from the website (Score:2, Informative)
The Open CD project aims to introduce users of MS-Windows to the benefits of Open Source Software. We include only the highest quality programs, which have been carefully tested for stability and which we consider appropriate for a broad audience. We provide a description and screen-shots of each program, so you can get an idea of what it does before installing. All these applications install and un-install cleanly, so you can be comfortable testing them with the knowledge that they will not ad
Wondering out loud (Score:2)
Are most of you really going to burn copies like crazy for the next few days and flood your friends with them?
Re:Wondering out loud (Score:2)
Having said all that, be careful what you download. Just because somebody releases a collection of open source software does not mean that there are no nasties o
Introducing... (Score:5, Funny)
Open Source for Grandma? (Score:2)
I'd rather stay Windows than Linux because it's what she know how to use. She only does web browsing and email.
With all this amazing open source software available it should be possible to set up a computer that's easy to use for a novice, and safe from malware.
Re:Open Source for Grandma? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Open Source for Grandma? (Score:2)
(not trolling, I really don't know)
Re:Open Source for Grandma? (Score:4, Funny)
Why don't you just try telling Granny to lay off the porn sites?
More (Score:5, Informative)
Re:More (Score:3, Informative)
http://pmw.myip.org/oss/ [myip.org]
Please tell me what you think.
Re:More (Score:3)
Zinf Is Not FreeA*p! [zinf.org] Just thought you'd like to know, since freeamp.org no longer exists (they had to change the name because of trademark issues or somesuch).
Re:Don't just leave it around (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh great (Score:5, Informative)
Like this? [ebay.com]
Re:Oh great (Score:2)
The CD being sold is $.99, which is a pretty good price. But the shipping and handling is $5.99, to ship one lousy CD, and $1.99 for each CD after that.
Re:Oh great (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh great (Score:5, Insightful)
And this is bad why? It spreads the free software to people who wouldn't have otherwise gotten it.
"I believe in parting a fool and his money as soon as possible" -- someone
Re:Oh great (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Oh great (Score:2)
Re:Oh great (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Oh great (Score:3)
When installing OpenOffice, it's hard not to notice that it's open source. ("Did you know that you can get help from the community?"...) So even people who would buy such an nondescript product would be pleasantly surprised.
Re:Oh great (Score:2)
The saying is: "A fool and his money are soon parted."
This is a statement of the way things are, not what someone thinks ought to happen. That's why it's insightful.
Belloc
Re:Oh great (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Oh great (Score:3, Insightful)
I've seen some really bad examples on eBay. One guy was rebranding everything, QCad was LuxuriosityCAD, and then there was Luxuriosity Office. Basically, trying to profit from the work of others, or trick people into buying something they could have gotten for free.
If your eBay blurbs do stat
Re:Oh great (Score:2)
Re:Oh great (Score:5, Insightful)
People like SuSE and RedHat, for instance?
Check www.gnu.org if you're still unclear on whether you can sell free software.
Hint: you can.
Re:Already Slashdotted (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Mirror For TheOpenCD ISO (Score:3, Informative)
It's probably going to take a little while for all the mirrors to catch up with the latest release (especially with this slashdotting...)
Re:Mirror For TheOpenCD ISO (Score:2)
Re:Mirror For TheOpenCD ISO (Score:2)
Re:No Frozen Bubble? (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriosuly, isn't this the first item on *everyone's* install list?
When I install Windows XP, it goes something like this:
The only thing Microsoft has on any Windows system I install is Windows itself. The rest of their junk is just that: junk. The OS is decent if you put it behind a firewall, even better if you never plug the computer in.
Re:No Frozen Bubble? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Words change (Score:3, Funny)
The Windows Classic settings are very dull and grey in comparison to the flashy colours of the default XP, so I don't see it as a big leap, or being negative, to call it "gayified". I would think it would be a bigger negative to suggest that "dull and grey" i
Disable Themes Service (Score:4, Informative)
Re:convince...? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:convince...? (Score:3, Interesting)
As I see it, it's more like advocating buying from local coffeshops and video stores rather than giving your money to Starbucks and Blockbuster. The programs themselves are tools, but who gets your money does make a difference. Also, those producing the tools benefit from having more users.
The sad fact is, there's a company out there producing software with monopoly power. At times it has even been known to abuse that pow
Re:convince...? (Score:5, Insightful)
Nevertheless, because I'm avoiding studying for finals, I'll dish out the standard reply:
There are two reasons to choose a piece of open source software. The first is the pragmatic, is-this-the-best-fit reason. You choose an OSS app because it does what you want better than any of the alternatives.
The often low-to-zero price is sometimes a big advantage from this perspective, but it is just one part of the overall fit. The availability of source code is another. Availability from multiple vendors and adherence to standards can also be attractive from this viewpoint.
The second reason, of course, is all about freedom [gnu.org]. This is the one that causes many people to embrace open source applications even when the proprietary world is kicking its butt as far as features and ease of use go. The freedom to explore, to experiment, to use in virtually any way you see fit. The freedom to modify and redistribute. Also, because anyone can take the product and fork it if they're unhappy, OSS packages generally have to avoid doing nasty things to annoy the user base. Spyware, malware, ad-ware, all becomes virtually impossible. Why? Because people don't want it, and because it's *free* nobody can force it on them.
Look at the web browser situation. When IE doesn't have stiff competition, everyone writes HTML with an eye towards IE, not towards accepted standards. This gives Microsoft a great deal of control over how most of us experience the Internet.
This is just one of many examples of how ordinary software users are affected by their choice of tools, and why software can be considered a worthwhile cause for non-developers.
Re:convince...? (Score:5, Insightful)
That's like somebody advocating the use of torx screws as opposed to phillips head.
Oh yeah, TOTALLY the same thing as Free software versus proprietary software.
Because, you know, phillips head screws come with 8-page LICENSES that tell you what brand of screw you can use, and how many toolboxes you can move it between, and, oh yeah, here's a 16-digit SCREWDRIVER ACTIVATION CODE! If you need to move to another room in your house, you have to re-enter to code. It only takes 30 minutes, tops!
For me the best tool is the one that doesn't have strings attached. If I can't find one, I'll take the strings-attached version, but it better be *GOOD* (Photoshop, Mac OS X, VMWare .. that's about it).
Have you tried, say, OpenOffice? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Have you tried, say, OpenOffice? (Score:2, Informative)
Speed is the number one thing. X11 apps just don't compare to Aqua apps in terms of responsiveness and speed, so they feel slow when used side by side with 'native' Mac apps. Also, launching X11 apps, OpenOffice in particular, is pretty slow. You have to launch the X11 server, if it isn't already running, and then launch whatever app you are trying to use after that. On my (admitte