Dwarf Galaxies Discovered

Dwarf Galaxies Discovered 42

Posted by Hemos on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @08:46AM from the reading-the-skies dept.

d'alz writes "Two new satellite galaxies have been discovered in the Milky Way. These dim dwarf galaxies bring the total number of galaxies in the Milky Way's cosmic neighborhood to a total of 14. Of course, theorists believe there could be a hundred more. The two dwarfs were found in the direction of the constellations Canes Venatici (the hunting dogs) and Bootes (the herdsman), scientists studying the Sloan Digital Sky Survey said in a statement. However, even though these galaxies are presumably quite close, they are difficult to spot, as they are very dim, which is a defining characteristic of dwarf galaxies."

Dwarf Galaxies Discovered

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Load All Comments

Search 42 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

PC (Score:4, Funny)

by Deltaspectre ( 796409 ) writes: on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @08:49AM (#15300144)

It's *NOT* PC to call them that guys!

They prefer size impaired galaxies...

- Re:PC (Score:2)
  
  by suso ( 153703 ) * writes:
  
  impaired is a negative word, let's use the term "large multi star solar systems".
- Re:PC (Score:3, Funny)
  
  by Spy der Mann ( 805235 ) writes:
  
  They prefer size impaired galaxies...
  
  They don't want your help. Remember that NOBODY tosses a dwarf!
- Re:PC (Score:3, Interesting)
  
  by thewiz ( 24994 ) * writes:
  
  Um, my wife is a dwarf and often corrects people who are PC.
  She's been called:
  Altitudenly-challenged
  Vertically-challenged
  Height-challenged
  Diminutive
  Little lady
  Little mom (by kids)
  etc.
  
  and she's always quick to say, "I'm short/small! Get over it!"
  
  I'm sure these galaxies feel the same way.
- Re:PC (Score:1)
  
  by RareButSeriousSideEf ( 968810 ) writes:
  
  Whatever you call them, if they come in an incestuous, siamese, hermaphrodite version, sign me up at the prerelease price.
Dim dwarfs? (Score:2, Insightful)

by BadAnalogyGuy ( 945258 ) writes:

Surely you mean "challenged little galaxies" not "dim dwarf galaxies".

Freaking bigots...
- Re:Dim dwarfs? (Score:2, Funny)
  
  by mcsestretch ( 926118 ) writes:
  
  They were going to call them the Stupid Midget galaxies but cooler heads prevailed at the last minute.
I've heard this before (Score:2, Insightful)

by DarthChris ( 960471 ) writes:

I remember hearing something about this [b]years[/b] ago. Is this old news or have they found galaxies additional to those already known?
- Re:I've heard this before (Score:2)
  
  by Jugalator ( 259273 ) writes:
  
  Is this old news or have they found galaxies additional to those already known?
  
  You need to start reading the first sentence in the Slashdot article summary.
  - Re:I've heard this before (Score:3, Funny)
    
    by tverbeek ( 457094 ) writes:
    
    And stop using BBcode in your comments. :)
    Combined with the almost-a-million ID number, somehow "You must be new here" seems redundant. ;)
  - Re:I've heard this before (Score:2)
    
    by Morrigu ( 29432 ) writes:
    
    No one reads the articles, why read the summary?
    
    Post first, think later. That's the Slashdot way. :)
    
    Who needs that pesky "Preview" button anyway?
- Re:I've heard this before (Score:5, Interesting)
  
  by porkchop_d_clown ( 39923 ) writes: <mwheinz@nOSpAm.me.com> on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:11AM (#15300286)
  
  These are new.
  
  Through various techniques we're building up a more detailed understanding of the shape of our own galaxy - this is easy to do when looking at other galaxies, but quite hard to do for our own - imagine trying to get a detailed map of the human body from inside the stomach.
  
  Since it's hard to tell how far away stars are, what they've been doing is gathering motion and spectrographic maps of them - figuring out which stars are obviously affecting each other, which stars are chemically similar and so on, and building 3d models from these.
  
  It was just a year or two ago we figured out the Milky Way is in the middle digesting another smaller galaxy in the direction of Saggitarius.
  
  - Re:I've heard this before (Score:1)
    
    by DarthChris ( 960471 ) writes:
    
    It was just a year or two ago we figured out the Milky Way is in the middle digesting another smaller galaxy in the direction of Saggitarius.
    
    I hope our galaxy, the Milky Way, doesn't get indigestion then.
    - Re:I've heard this before (Score:3, Funny)
      
      by powerlord ( 28156 ) writes:
      
      It was just a year or two ago we figured out the Milky Way is in the middle digesting another smaller galaxy in the direction of Saggitarius.
      
      I hope our galaxy, the Milky Way, doesn't get indigestion then.
      
      Don't worry, Milky Way of Magnesia will fix that right up.
    - Re:I've heard this before (Score:1)
      
      by Malakusen ( 961638 ) writes:
      
      Depending on where in the Milky Way Galaxy, it could be the death of us all...
      
      millions and possibly billions of years from now.
Basic question on naming... (Score:5, Insightful)

by porkchop_d_clown ( 39923 ) writes: <mwheinz@nOSpAm.me.com> on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:04AM (#15300229)

Seeing how these "galaxies" are smaller than many clusters, why are they called "galaxies"?

Is this just another arbitrary thing, like the difference between a "planet" and an "asteroid"?

- Re:Basic question on naming... (Score:3, Interesting)
  
  by Anonymous Coward writes:
  
  I can't answer your question, but I can share my suspicion that the distinction is made based upon such criteria as the trajectory of the little galaxy. If you had a galactic disk with a pretty uniform orbital speed and plane, you'd pretty much conclude that stars in that plane and orbit were original to the formation of the galaxy. But if you find a group of stars that are just way different, going faster and out of the plane, or whose trajectory could be traced to originating outside the galaxy, then you
- Re:Basic question on naming... (Score:2, Informative)
  
  by mazarin5 ( 309432 ) writes:
  
  There's no exclusiveness there. Clouds and clusters are galaxies, there's no distinction.
  Really, the only place you could contest whether something was a galaxy or not would be multiple star systems on the small side and whether or not two galaxies are actually separate on the large side. Really though, multiple star systems move together, so that's not really a question, and most of the stars in a galaxy tend to orbit in the same general direction and in the same plane. If a large grouping of stars moved t
Oy vey... (Score:5, Funny)

by The-Bus ( 138060 ) writes: on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:06AM (#15300247)

"These dim dwarf galaxies..."

I know Gimli wasn't particularly clever but I think this is borderline offensive. Lousy dwarfist editors. You deserve a kick in the gloin.

*groan*

- Re:Oy vey... (Score:2)
  
  by GMFTatsujin ( 239569 ) writes:
  
  I think instead of "kick" you mean "head butt."
Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:2, Insightful)

by Rob T Firefly ( 844560 ) writes:

in 3.. 2.. 1..
- Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:3, Funny)
  
  by Cheapy ( 809643 ) writes:
  
  So Gimli, a Dreugar, and Mini-Me walk into a bar...
  - Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:1)
    
    by Malakusen ( 961638 ) writes:
    
    ...which everyone else simply steps over.
    
    Nerd moment incoming
    
    BTW, it's duergar, not dreugar. [/nerd]
    - Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:2)
      
      by smellsofbikes ( 890263 ) writes:
      
      I was gonna say "and the bartender says, 'What is this, a joke?'" but yours is much funnier.
Color.... (Score:4, Funny)

by Churla ( 936633 ) writes: on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:09AM (#15300262)

Any of them Red perchance?

And are any of them broadcasting us pictures of Hitler?

So that's why (Score:5, Funny)

by sharkey ( 16670 ) writes: on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:17AM (#15300330)

I understand now why I don't see Orion in the sky all year round: He's off with Perseus and Hercules drinking and dwarf-galaxy tossing!

Picture here (Score:4, Funny)

by Anonymose Coward ( 961878 ) writes: on Wednesday May 10, 2006 @09:27AM (#15300381)

Dwarf galaxy picture [google.com].

- Re:Picture here (Score:1)
  
  by tukkayoot ( 528280 ) writes:
  
  Here [nintendo.com] is the other of the two newly discovered galaxies.
- Re:Picture here (Score:2)
  
  by pimpimpim ( 811140 ) writes:
  
  Actual pictures from the Dwarf Galaxy here [msstate.edu], here [msstate.edu], and here [msstate.edu]
  - Re:Picture here (Score:2)
    
    by Farmer Tim ( 530755 ) writes:
    
    Four stars does not make a galaxy.
- Re:dark matter (Score:3, Insightful)
  
  by budgenator ( 254554 ) writes:
  
  Mostly arrogence I'd guess, a "if we haven't seen it yet, it most be un-seeable" kind of a thing. These drawf galaxies are really just a speck of fly shit in the grand scale of things, and comparing them to the missing matter is like comparing mosquitoes to brontosaurses. So we'll just chuckle to ourselves and remember which was the last to bite us in the ass, and how much room there is for little specks of flyshit in the universe; then yell out "Hey , did you look over there yet?", like my wife does after
Shock (Score:1)

by shoma-san ( 739914 ) writes:

Oh my God! There's stars in the sky that we haven't counted!
Did them found Chappa'i Network there yet? (Score:1)

by glozano ( 660053 ) writes:

Are StarGates present in those galaxies? I Think yes, Alterans were covering all the neighborhood.. Are Furlings hiding there? You never know :)
Begs the relativistic question... (Score:1)

by BaronHethorSamedi ( 970820 ) writes:

Do astronomers in the newly discovered galaxies point their telescopes at us and claim credit for the discovery of a "freakishly tall" galaxy?

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Dwarf Galaxies Discovered 42

Dwarf Galaxies Discovered More Login

Dwarf Galaxies Discovered

PC (Score:4, Funny)

Re:PC (Score:2)

Re:PC (Score:3, Funny)

Re:PC (Score:3, Interesting)

Re:PC (Score:1)

Dim dwarfs? (Score:2, Insightful)

Re:Dim dwarfs? (Score:2, Funny)

I've heard this before (Score:2, Insightful)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:2)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:3, Funny)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:2)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:5, Interesting)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:1)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:3, Funny)

Re:I've heard this before (Score:1)

Basic question on naming... (Score:5, Insightful)

Re:Basic question on naming... (Score:3, Interesting)

Re:Basic question on naming... (Score:2, Informative)

Oy vey... (Score:5, Funny)

Re:Oy vey... (Score:2)

Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:2, Insightful)

Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:3, Funny)

Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:1)

Re:Cue the D&D/LOTR/Mini-me jokes (Score:2)

Color.... (Score:4, Funny)

So that's why (Score:5, Funny)

Picture here (Score:4, Funny)

Re:Picture here (Score:1)

Re:Picture here (Score:2)

Re:Picture here (Score:2)

Re:dark matter (Score:3, Insightful)

Shock (Score:1)

Did them found Chappa'i Network there yet? (Score:1)

Begs the relativistic question... (Score:1)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot