Spammer settles with MS and Texas 36
RedOregon writes "One of the world's most notorious spammers has settled lawsuits with the state [of Texas] and Microsoft Corp. that cost him at least $1 million, took away most of his assets and forced him to stop sending the e-mails."
We still lose... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:We still lose... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:We still lose... (Score:3, Insightful)
Sending spam without giving users the chance to opt-out would still be applied.
Sending spam through open proxies or machines without the explicit written authorization of their legal owners should be illegal, with jail penalty.
Re:We still lose... (Score:1)
Re:We still lose... (Score:3, Interesting)
The Chinese government can deal with Chinese spammers however they want. This guy's in the US, and subject to US law. Let's work on cleaning up the spam problem in our own country, before we worry about foreign spammers, ok?
Re:We still lose... (Score:2)
Re:We still lose... (Score:2)
No, I'm not actually serious, but when your country is kidnapping foreigners to torture them in some third-world hell-hole, you either have to make jokes about it or shoot
Re:We still lose... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:We still lose... (Score:2)
I see no reason why his kids (if he has any - I wouldn't think so, if he's 24 and just got out of college) should suffer for his actions.
As for needing a new throat, well, that probably wouldn't be consistent with the 8th Amendment.
Re:We still lose... (Score:2)
The article says he has to sell the house and the BMW in order to pay the fine, plus he's agreed to stop sending spam. How does that mean we lose?
Personally I don't care if this punk goes to jail or not. I
Dear reader... (Score:3, Funny)
Corporation == Person (legally) (Score:1)
Re:Corporation == Person (legally) (Score:1)
Both wrong and misleading! Can corporations vote in general elections? In addition, rights is only half of the issue. Corporations have far fewer OBLIGATIONS than people.
Re:Corporation == Person (legally) (Score:1)
Re:So sad (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So sad (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:So sad (Score:1, Insightful)
There are remedial measures, ways and methods of dealing with these things - and they have been codified as laws. If some authority gets the right to sieze everything you have, then
Re:So sad (Score:2)
I've got a nice book for you, my friend. "Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do" written by Peter McWilliams. I've already once been a victim of a full-seizure (my fault for having ONE JOINT in my apartment.) In fact I think that book should be mandatory reading for anyone who wants to hold a political office. Maybe then we'd have some useful
Re:So sad (Score:3, Interesting)
And yes, spammers steal - everytime they send an email, the recipient pays for it and all intermediaries that carry it. Even if it only costed 1 cent per spam in total costs (bandwidth, electricity, hardware - to h
Re:too bad (Score:1)
Re:too bad (Score:1, Funny)
Dear Mr. Slashdot (Score:1)
Contact me at Gully_B_L_Fool@nevertrust.ng or if our service is not working, send a copy to U_R_A_Sucker@aol.com just in case.
Hoping to hear from you soonest, and not from Texas,
I remain,
Pay-ing v
Re:Dear Mr. Slashdot (Score:2)
[OT] Block Spammers For Good...Essentially. :) (Score:2)
My badmouthed, 99.67% effective solution to spam.. [slashdot.org]
My approach used behind public email addresses will make spam email essentially unprofitable. It will be impossible to conveniently convey 'spam' as we now know it to people with such 'extreme filtering' in effect while still allowing email communications to take place. Sure, the desparate spammers can still spam but it will be painfully obvious and can be ignored. If 'too much'
Re:[OT] Block Spammers For Good...Essentially. :) (Score:1)
But he's turned a new leaf, don't ya see?? (Score:1, Funny)
http://combatspam.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
How's this for inside info from a veteran spammer?
"Do not put your email address on your website. Email spiders look across all websites looking
Poor kid ... (Score:1)
Cruel and unusual punishment should really be brought back for instances like this. I say make an example of this jerk for the other Ralsky's of the world to take notice of. As a mail admin who has to continually clean up the messes morons like this create, I'd love to get a few sucker punches in myself.
Sorry, but no sympathy whatsoever here