Darwin Awards 2006 199
ms1234 writes "The year is coming to and end so it is time to see how our genepool is doing. Darwin Awards 2006 includes everything from whacking RPGs with hammers to recreating experiments by Franklin."
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn
Fool me twice... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, no. There is a nugget of fact at the base of the story; but it is often liberally rewritten for entertainment's sake.
There was a "Darwin Awards Winner" from my state a few years ago. A lot of people (including me) were familiar with the real story from when it happened. Most of what was cited in the Darwin Awards text was fabricated; but it was true a guy was injured at the location menti
Scooped! Arghhh. (Score:3, Informative)
We owe the winners a debt of gratitude!
Here's what it looks like to be slashdotted: In the past seventeen hours, my top referers are:
646 www.bluesnews.com
649 www.fazed.org
Re:Fool me twice... (Score:4, Informative)
Slashdot covered it here: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/14122
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re:Fool me twice... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Fool me twice... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do people make things up? To see how many people they can fool, perhaps?
A few months back I received a forwarded email from my parents with the 2006 Darwin Awards. Naturally I was suspicious as not only was it a few months before the end of 2006, but a lot of those stories seemed really familiar. After checking into it, one of them was a Darwin Award from the late 90s, one from early 2000s, and assorted others. So they all were verified Darwin award winners, but someone felt the need to slap together a bunch and make themselves feel important by being the first one to produ
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, considering jihad means effort or endeavors against man's own self and to work hard to do right things, then yes, it does warrant a jihad to correct your improper use of the term.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm tired of people saying that because jihad has a personal meaning it should not be used to refer to a Muslim holy war. That's just absurd.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This guy [sptimes.ru] really should've been on the list.
Lightsabre fuel duels (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
With things like google news, it's certainly not hard to find five or six million versions of the same article, so until they do this, the Darwin awards are just a collection of mildly funny stories that happened to someone's Aunt's cousin twice removed. ( Seriously - one of them starts with "
Re: (Score:2)
I believe! (Score:5, Informative)
It was later that same year when I heard of the Darwin awards, as someone mentioned that this well-known story was nominated.
Real news (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Fool me twice... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
he believes that if you power something, such as a car, with a battery and use said device to recharge the battery, it will run forever
Nitpick: if the car was electric, then yes, that's retarded. However, this is the norm for petrol or diesel powered cars.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand your comment. Dynamos can't be made anymore than they could "magically appear."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Another group of professionals that often have bizarre ideas about physics are automotive mechanics. You would not believe some of the things I've had them tell me. Of course, I'm never sure if they actually believe what they're saying, or are just trying to get more money out of me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Be glad it was the fuses which blew and not the equipment being powered by it.
Re:Fool me twice... (Score:4, Informative)
My website has some cruft; however, I do my best to sort truth from fiction. And remember, I've improved over the years, and so has Internet-accessible news.
There was this one time I was fooled "backwards" over a story I KNEW was an Urban Legend. It happened in the ocean off Pee Wee beach, near Darwin, Australia. The woman (a woman!) supposedly drank a case of beer before submerging to give head to her boyfriend... and never came back up. The man's lawyer was supposedly named Ms. Cox, and his last name was Payne. Plus the identical story was submitted hundreds of times. Urban legend for sure!
A few years later... a few people have written to say the story is true, but you know, Pee Wee Beach? Ms. Cox? I still think it's an urban legend, until the Australian court reporter launches himself at me, irate, defamation of his reputation, something like that... Oops!
Who knew?
I have only quite recently started to link to the original submissions. But since late 2001, anyone can search the Slush Pile / Reject Pile and find the original sources. I try my very best to not alter facts, and to incorporate all the relevant facts, but well... sometimes I err on colorful ways of expressing things, or say what he might have been "thinking" which of course no one can know.
Darwin Awards: The tree of life is self-pruning.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a true story, which turned up in that estimable journal of record, the NT News.
As far as I know it's not called Pee Wee's beach, but there is a restaurant on East Point called "Pee Wee's on the Point".
Cheers.
Re: (Score:2)
If they are real they should list their sources and specific information. Instead they read like a chain-email, "I am 14 and know this to be true" WTF!
I agree, Boring and piteous indeed!
true (almost darwin) story... (Score:5, Interesting)
Because he hadn't read the directions he had routed the pump's electric cord IN FRONT OF THE SAW BLADE, and it would have been cut in two and dropped into the water pan when he started up the saw. What's more, he had it plugged into a 30-amp circuit. Luckily for him, I saw how he had put the saw together before he fired it up.
The scary thing? He still won't read the instructions.
"Stuff that matters" (Score:3, Insightful)
What would be really nice and noteworthy is if we could actually let Darwinism take its course. You just have to love how current laws and modern medicine continuously allow these people to live in our society, not only endangering themselves but also endangering the rest of society. "Only the strong survive" just isn't applicable anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps, but if the Darwin Awards prove anything it's that the truly foolish still manage to sort themselves out!
let Darwinism take its course (Score:2)
Re:"Stuff that matters" (Score:4, Interesting)
The species is lost if there is only one survivor; or even two, three, etc.
The full implication of Darwinism is best captured by, "From a diverse pool of candidates, only the strong thrive."
Right now the effect of current law and modern medicine is to increase the diversity of our gene pool. We now have untold genetic richness what with decreasing disease and infant mortality and high levels of inter-racial mixing. When (not if) a catastrophe occurs we will have a sufficiently rich gene pool to survive such a catastrophe.
Such as, for example, an airborne AIDs epidemic. Until it happens no one (not even you) can predict which gene sequences and which individuals will survive. That is why it is good for as many people to exist before such an event occurs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Modern Darwinism has evolved since Darwin elaborated on "The origin of species".
Again, even in pure non human societies such as wolves, ants, and birds, nonfit are allowed to survive as long as they are "fit enough".
This is allowed, even encouraged, to increase diversity otherwise you get unwanted founder effects, such as all cheetahs being related closely enough that you can perform skin grafts from one to another.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Fool. (Score:5, Interesting)
"Current laws"...one could argue helmet laws. Other laws that diminish our intelligence are all the disclaimers we have to put on everything now. "Do not stick fork in eye", "coffee is hot", etc. If someone doesn't have the common sense not to stick their hand in a blender while it is on, they probably should learn a lesson one way or the other.
I by no means want people to get hurt. It just pains me to see common sense going down the drain...and the people with lack of common sense being "rewarded" with lawsuits that pay them for their lack of common sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Coffee has traditionally been common... (Score:2)
Irrelevant n
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This annoys me too. I have this urge to fill a spraybottle with water and start spraying it in very very close proximity to smokers. Then proceed to explain to them that it's "just urine, it doesn't cause cancer or is harmful in any other way, quite opposite to what you're posioning me with".
Somehow I don't think they'll appriciate it so I should probably brush up on my wushu before attempting this. In case I need
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't drive a car, or use electricity, I might be able to sympathize with your plight.
Re: (Score:2)
RPG? (Score:5, Funny)
Here I am thinking one of my favorite MMOs got nerfed. I need to get out more.
Re:RPG? (Score:4, Funny)
OK, maybe if you gave a d8 a hard enough glancing blow, it might shoot off at a bizarre angle, blast right through your eye, and lodge in your brain?
Re: (Score:2)
Whacking RPG (Score:4, Funny)
Just malicious (Score:4, Insightful)
Your name is "badzilla?" (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Just remember, for every moron that tries to light a campfire in an ordinance dump, China kills a democrat, a stray not-so-smart-bomb kills an Iraqi math whiz, and a chemical plant releases phosgene into a river valley.
Stupid people kill themselves a hundreth as often as they kill others, either by accident or malice. And in the second case, it's always the smart people they kill first.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Slashdot reader Darwin award. (Score:5, Funny)
Not so funny candidate--Christine Boskoff (Score:4, Interesting)
So why is it funny when probably uneducated people do something stupid while it isn't funny for someone who used to be an "electrical engineer working for Lockheed Aeronautical in Georgia", "a pilot", and who "designed software for a lighted control display for the C-130J" to do something equally stupid to eliminate herself from the gene pool? Articles I have read such as the above article from 2002 [nwsource.com] indicate she had no children, so Christine Boskoff removed herself from the gene pool through her stupid actions. Evidently being a former electrical engineer and then becoming a mountain climber/entrepreneur is something that Darwinian evolution selects against. (Even her former husband killed himself in 1999.) So why aren't we all laughing at that?
Re: (Score:2)
Because it's not humorous/entertaining? I mean, many people die from these expeditions, but I would bet that not many would intentionally fly a kite in a thunderstorm...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Mountaneering and other "Extreme Sports" exempted. (Score:5, Informative)
http://darwinawards.com/rules/rules2.html [darwinawards.com]
"Those who participate in extreme sports are not automatically eligible, as they knowingly assume an increased risk of death. They are, in a sense, correctly applying their judgment that the entertainment is worth the risk. However bizarre the sport, an additional misapplication of judgment must be present in order for the deceased to qualify for a Darwin Award."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It takes a sick, cruel person to laugh at a Darwin Award... so I'll be the first: Ha Ha!
Favorite Darwin Award Classic (Score:3, Insightful)
"the staff of the Darwin Awards decided it was such a funny story to "grandfather" it in and let it keep its award."
cultdeadcow link at the bottom has the most amazing recent version.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Favorite Darwin Award Classic & SNOPES (Score:2)
Faithful Flotation (Score:5, Interesting)
The one about the pastor who couldn't walk on water is either particularly hard to believe, or else it is leaving out the most critical/entertaining part of the story.
When I imagine someone trying to walk across a river, the picture that comes to mind is that the fool steps into the river and notices that his feet are wet. Then he takes a few more steps and notices that he's up to his thighs in water. At this point, he's neither dead nor still under the illusion he can walk on water.
So what happened? Did he, having lost face, decide to continue into the water and drown himself? Or did he begin his water walking in a deep part (e.g. take the ferry halfway into the river and try walking from there?). Or did he successfully walk on water until he got to the deep part, then realize how impossible it was and suddenly suffer a loss of faith and fall through the surface? ;-) Or is the story just bullshit?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
a lot of our rivers have rocky banks so that the first step will put you thigh deep in water, these same rivers are extremely fast flowing (not to mention VERY cold) if you take that first step, you're done for, the current will sweep you off your feet the instant you land in the water, and even an expert swimmer is unlikely to be able to recover before their head is smashed in to a
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Faithful Flotation (Score:4, Funny)
I give him props for strongly believing whatever it was he preached, though if he's in heaven now, Jesus is probably bitch-slapping him sayin, "you don't know nothing about faith!"
Great story in any case.
Re: (Score:2)
From the sound of the story, I assume that he started in deep water. The Biblical story has Jesus & Friends on a boat when the water-walking happens, so perhaps he was emulating that...
No integrity (Score:2, Insightful)
Some jackass flying an airplane in conditions that he had not been certified for and kills himself, his wife and his sister-in-law and they call it a "lapse of judgement" not worthy of a Darwin award.
LK
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First Prize goes to; (Score:4, Insightful)
The lesson: when Don Rumsfeld sells you Chemical Weapons precursors to use in gassing domestic political opponents, don't cross him, or he'll FUCK you.
Stupid Spearfisher (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, from the 'man-tries-to-jump-from-train' story:
"I am 14, and I know for a fact this story is true."
Convincing. Actually, only one of these stories h
Re: (Score:2)
Missed stop train story is fake.. (Score:2)
First, the are no overground trains that cross the hudson river, only the east river.. The closest one to the hudson are the amtrack bridge going grom riverdale into manhhatan, and the 1 subway line going from riverdale/kindsbridge to manhattan as well, over the spuyten devil channel that connects east and hudson rivers..
And even if it had been one of these bridges.. ( one of the BMW east river bridges or one of the aforementioned two ).. they all have over h
Re: (Score:2)
Refrence.. Gladly
http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_122906_
Aren't the Darwin Awards... (Score:2)
I'm not looking for a reason of why someone would do something stupid but it seems that just about half of the crap that normally gets credited to the Darwin Awards turns out to fall somewhere between technically impossible to incidents with no credible evidence.
Or is this just people using the name "Darwin Awards" in association with any urban legend that involves vast quantities of idiocy?
Re:Fake -- Not! (Score:5, Informative)
The story you are refering to is on page 36 of my copy. References to eight news sources are given for the story. And the story says nothing of the gun being unloaded. It does say that the man was tryign to pin the snakes head with the butt of the gun to catch it alive.
The book lists stories in four categories, Darwin Awards, Honorable Mentions, Urban Legends, and Personal Accounts. Stories in the first two categories "are known or believed to be true". Urban legends "should be understood as the fables they are". Personal Accounts "are plausible but usually unverified". The also rates each of the first two categories as Confirmed by Darwin, meaning multiple credile sources, or Unconfimred by Darwin, for stories believed to be true but with fewer or unverifialbe sources. (Quotes from pages six and seven of The Darwin Awards.)
SteveM
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I guess if I couldn't work google, I'd post AC too.
Irrelevant. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I strenuously disagree. Death by over-hydration happens frequently because people don't realize they're overhydrated. The symptoms of overhydration are similar to those for a lot of other medical conditions (bizarrely, a lot of them mimic the symptoms for dehydration).
Re: (Score:2)