Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Free Internet Access for Hamburgers

timothy posted more than 13 years ago | from the kostenlos-modulo-Deutsche-Telekom dept.

The Internet 141

Get Behind the Mule writes: "The senate of the German city-state of Hamburg, which has a population of about 1.7 million, has announced that all of its citizens will receive free Internet access, an e-mail address ("") and a WWW home page. Citizens will pay no direct provider costs, only telephone costs. The services are expected to be available as of the middle of this year. Those of you who don't sprechen das Deutsch will have to try your luck with Babelfish."

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

As an official for... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232686)

Grits, I am outraged that one food is given Internet access instead of Hot Grits. Everyone knows that hot grits make better breakfast than hamburgers.

It is good (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232687)

I remain skeptical concerning government involvement...even when I agree with the direction being pushed

Being skeptical is probably good, but do you really think that privatization of everything is the right way to go?

Even if you don't trust your government, it doesn't mean that some other government might actually think and do something which is for the benefit of mostly everyone (simply because it's the Right Thing to do), not just for the lobbyers and big money.

I think this is really neat, not only because it gets more people online and makes the net more familiar to people and families, but because other cities will try to follow Hamburg's example and maybe make it even better.

If the high echelon of Slashdot had never gotten on-line, we wouldn't be writing this. Besides, getting more and more people network has other advantages too. (Of course it also has disadvantages, I'm not saying that..) Instead of people taking their cars and driving down to the mall, they order their groceries on-line. Then, the mall delivers the groceries with a big car such that nearby deliveries are grouped together. (It's just a matter of logistics) It helps to reduce pollution.

Pardon that cheesy example, but is there any reason why people should drive to the mall personally if there are other options available? (Other than the obvious whining about impulse buyings and such) On-line ordering gets you more free time too.

Of course more people in the net means more electricity used, but it can be done with other means than burning oil, for example.

I think net access should be free, as in beer AND in speech. I also think the same applies to heating, water, housing and clothing. (You need those in order to survive, and net access is just plain useful in communicating) Although it isn't 100 % free in Hamburg right now and today, but someone has to set the direction.

this is spam (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232689)

you know in germany they have to pay for local phone calls. this is an example of greedy special interests getting the politicos to do their bidding

All danes have that already (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232690)

In Denmark, nobody pays anything else than a fee per minut to access internet. And the fee is reduced compared to ordinary telephony!!

Re:On a somewhat different Note. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232691)

I don't know if it's me who's seeing things wrong, but:

bslsiS (verb) + to fuck somewhat old-fashioned or small town/countryside slang

It should be "bylsiä", the last letter being an umlauted a.

"Perkele" isn't just "devil". It's more like "caramba" but with a Fenno-Ugric "hey let's eat fly agaric mushrooms" flavor.

Dutch providers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232692)

And we pay out the ass. Last month my telephone bill (just internet usage) was over $500US.

Re:New ways to spam to hamburgers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232693)

This may be a problem for some people, but not if you have an unusual name such as mine!

--Otto von Schnitzelpusskrankengescheitmeyer

Re:E-mail seems a little simple (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232694)

If you would just read the translated [] version of the article, you'd see that this won't be a problem.

Re:Interesting economic model (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232695)

I'll assume you weren't able to really understand the article since it's in german. Sorry, but you blamed the evil socialists(TM) too quick, now take your FUD elsewhere.

The costs for getting this up will be paid by private investors, the domain name and the associated public content is all the city adds to the offer, no subsidies there.

How does this work out for the investors? Simple, "Free Internet Access" are a dime a dozen in Germany. Those offers are not really free since you have to pay local telephone charges. These are ca. 1$/minute. This pays off for the companies because they lease the line for less cash from Deutsche Telekom.

Altogether, this is mostly a marketing/political gag. Maybe it makes stuff simpler for some people. Homepage, mail and dialup access already there, no need to subscribe. You can blame the evil socialists for that now.

Re:offtopic flamebait (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232696)

But don't forget to add the fixed charge for "Service and Equipment" of close to AUD 12.00 per month for your line.

Re:Slashdot readers - PLEASE THINK before you post (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232697)

-1 Offtopic ?

What kind of cheap $3 crack are the moderators smoking today ?

This is a perfectly valid posting. It is for the poster, not the moderator to decide whether a posting is offtopic or not. dmg would not have posted here had he/she believed it to be offtopic.

This whole moderation business is unconstitutional, and UN-American. It has all the worst attributes of censorship we would expect to find if Slashdot were a European based forum.

That makes no sense (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232698)

I mean, what the hell was going on in that show?

Re:offtopic flamebait (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232699)

I'm european, even german and I pay exactly zilch for a local phonecall, poor 'wherever you are'eans

You just have to live in the right city and have the right telco.

Re:All danes have that already (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232700)

Right. But you're still paying an arm and a leg for the what north americans consider inclusive. Hamburger telcoms. most likely have an "online-terif", where they make it look like your geting less "screwed" than normally.

Re:Free access nothing new in Europe (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232701)

Er.. Last I checked Telenor (your state owned telco.) owns Nextra (aka Nextel) and has a %70 market penatration in Norway alone! So what if you pay Telenor or Nextra, what's the diffrence? It goes to the same place anyway.

Re:_anyone_ have anything positive to say? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232703)

No it's not positive. It's spindoctoring done by Telecom compnanies trying to keep their grip on the metered access charges. It's a propaganda tool for them that convinces some clueless MPs that metered internet access is OK (because it's 'free').

Re:E-mail seems a little simple (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232706)

Email addressed based on your physical address is no good either - what if you move ? What if there are more people living at the samme address (i.e. a family).

I'd like to point out.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232707)

My dear island Singapore has a similar 'free' service for every fixed phone line in the country (phonenumbers double as userids). All the user has to pay are minute by minute local call charges.

Although this is not a governmental effort but by a major local telco, it nonetheless covers every household with a fixed line installed. Thats adds up to almost 4 million people.

The service is called MySingtel. []


Re:Interesting economic model (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232708)

Exactly my thoughts as well.. Some Hamburger politician got a nice check and a pension plan from the company for the contract. And for anyone who might be skeptical of such accusations, I'd recommend reading up on some central-europen history (sadly enough).

Re:Interesting economic model (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 13 years ago | (#1232709)

It's really amazing how some people will defend and desporatly try to justify their goverment, just because of a meaningless (sic) nationality. My country right or wrong.

Re:Achtung die Hamburglern! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232713)

Hähhhh? Ich bin drin!

Re:Interesting economic model (0)

C.Lee (1190) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232714)

>stifles competition. What happens when the technologies change, but
>you are locked into your city's slow (but free) internet access?
>Although free internet access is a neat idea, I doubt it will hold up
>in the real world.

You're so full of bullshit. All your argument means is a lot of the bullshit technology plauging the internet now like Napster and Streaming Video won't be available to losers like you. Boo Hoo. Sob. Wah. I can't trade MP3's over this slow ass connection. Bleh. Get a life moron.

On a somewhat different Note. (0)

Claude Debussy (138975) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232716)

Check this link out for Linus Torvalds list of acceptable pointer and array names in the linux kernel

-> nish.html

It will still be expensive (0)

trollking (153214) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232718)

Since they charge by the minute in Germany even for local calls, it will still be pretty expensive if you use the net alot.
Thank You,
Troll King

At least AOL Germany won't get the customers!! (0)

trollking (153214) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232719)

I just realised that even though it will still be expensive, at least all those people won't be using AOL Germany!!
Thank You,
Troll King

Re:The real issues (0)

trollking (153214) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232720)

HOt DOgs == Frankfurters

Thank You,
Troll King

Achtung die Hamburglern! (0)

Genghis Troll (158585) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232721)

Die guten deustchen Leuten werden auch kostenlose
Lederhosen kriegen! Das Hamburglar hat es schon
am Weinachten gesagt! Deutschland uber alles!
Ein Freitag im Cambodia fur die Kinder! Gib mir
die wurste -- ich habe ein furchtbares Hunger!
Tenebrae ist von Paul Celan geschrieben. Was fur ein

Microsoft has tried something similar (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 14 years ago | (#1232722)

Microsoft has tried doing something similar in Israel, together with Bezeq, the government-owned telephone monopoly. Every phone line owner in Israel was to be given free email (with Hebrew support) with the phone number as the user name.

Fortunately, it didn't work out. The real motive behind such moves is easy to see: as ICQ and countrless others have shown the biggest asset an internet company could have is a user base. Why struggle in getting users to voluntarily join your service when you can strike a sweet deal with the local government?

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

caolan (2716) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232723)

So your saying the governments should pay for the backbone and leave it to the big corporations to make profit and monopolise the private market?

That's pretty much what Ireland [] just did. Though I view it in a more positive light than you would seem to see it. The government buys the link in bulk and gets it for a discount price and then sells it on to private enterprise passing the discount down to them, which a huge corporation would not have done

Everyone wins in this scenario methinks.

C. this good?!? (1)

stripes (3681) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232724)

...but think of AT&T when it was government run.

The Bell system (in the USA) was never goverment run. There were competing services, one of them convinced the goverment that the competing services would never hook up and interoperate (despite the fact that the services were allready somewhat interconnected, and and more were heading that way). They were granted the right to be the only phone compony (a monopoly). I think this is a simplifacation because GTE might have been allowed to provide phone service as well as Bell Telephone.

The monopoly was not part of the goverment. It was a publicly traded compony. If you don't beleve me get a pre-breakup stock listing and look at the NYSE stock symbol "T" (which is AT and T today). As a publically traded compony it had an obligation to make money for it's stockholders. Were it a part of the goverment it would have had a diffrent mission. As a monopoly it was subject to lots of extra regulation, so the goverment could do things like mandate "universal access", but the Bell System was very not part of goverment. I don't think they would have devloped the 5ESS, or maybe even mechinical pulse switchched calls (the goverment would have been happy to employ many citizens to make the call connections when you lifted the hook and said "Bob Jones in Fairfax please").

The breakup (the Modifyed Final Agreement? Modifyed Final Judgement?) not only tore the Bell System apart, but allowed other componies to compete for phone service (long distance for sure, but local as well, but it just wasn't profitable if you had to string your own wires, so that mostly had to wait for the Telicom Reform Act). If it had been part of the goverment it would have been much harder to turn it into a comperitave compony. Just look at the Post Office!

Who gets to get (1)

m2 (5408) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232725)

There must be a gazillion martins in Germany, and a similar number of schmids, schmit, schmith and whatnot...

No big deal (1)

Renaud (6194) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232726)

I don't know the exact situation in Germany, but here in France there are literally dozens of free ISPs, so giving access and hosting for free is no revolution.
The most significant cost of internet access in Europe is still the phone charges.

Unfortunately, even though one of the main suppliers of xDSL technology (Alcatel) is French, DSL service has only been available here since November, in the biggest cities first.

So those of us in rural areas of Europe are gonna be stuck with slow and expensive V.90 until at least 2001...

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

Florian H. (6933) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232727)

You wrote:
In my opinion, the government should only be responsible to pay the cost of a public good, such as highways, and national defense.
If you had actually read the announcement you are commenting on, you would have noticed that this will be financed by private enterprises. A major partner are for example local banks, which can only marginally be considered as "anti-capitalistic".

Re: this has nothing to do with 'economic models' (1)

El Cabri (13930) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232729)

In all European countries, ISPs make a living out of providing free internet access. They get revenue from telcos who charge on a per-minute basis. There is no subsidy involved. I suppose the city of Hamburg will not setup servers in the town hall, but will rather hire private ISPs to do the job. This is more like a PR operation.
Nobody's locked in anything. If you want to access the internet from your TV cable or ADSL, nothing keeps anyone from providing you that service. You are freed from the phone charges, but have to pay an ISP, that's all.

Re:If it happened in the US (1)

Helge Hafting (14882) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232730)

<I>Imagine the debate about censorware. A child somewhere might see a breast, in his own home on the internet. The same debate, but this time the government would be able to control information flow into my home. The implications could be scary. The Internet is different than other public works because it contains information.</I>

All they get is an e-mailbox and a number to dial. They still have to get a pc or equivalent equipment. Parents can do something about that part, if they want to.

And the internet </I>isnt't</I> different from all other public service. Consider the phone system - most people have a phone. And there are sex lines anybody (including children) may dial. Still, I don't hear anybody screaming for phone censorship.

Oh, and this is Germany. Why would they even bother worrying about pictures on the internet, considering all the porn they show on their TV channels? Live video feed with no delay at all...

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

Bartmoss (16109) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232733)

(1) Free internet access is nothing new, it exists in other countries (UK, etc)
(2) We are not hard-core capitalism over here. We like to tread on a middle road, thank you very much.
(3) I think the way they figure it is that by increased internet usage, they will have more skilled IT workers, more revenues by ecommerce etc. There was an initative started by our chancellor on CeBit to this effect.
(4) Since local calls cost money in Germany, this internet access is not truely free
(5) They'll raise the taxes anyway sooner or later, so they might as well do something "good" with the money.

Not a good thing (1)

Tune (17738) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232734)

They tried the same thing in a limited sense in several cities in the Netherlands, a few years back. These ISP's - called "digitale stad" (digital cities) - were usually sponsored by private companies, such as IBM and SUN as well as the local authorities. (See: Amsterdam [] , Eindhoven [] , Leiden [] , Groningen [] , etc [] )

Huge amounts subsidies (tax money) went into these so-called non-profit organizations blocking independant commercial initiatives. Back then, the monopolitized phone company earned lot's of money, as will the one in Hamburg. Meanwhile, Hamburgers will have no alternative, since THERE SHALL BE ONLY ONE.

In the Netherlands phone bills are slighly lower due to privatization (and new legislation with respect to telecommunications). Only recently, when legislation allowed ISP's to get a percentage of the customer's phone bill, commercial ISPs (such as: Zon [] , Wanadoo [] and Het Net [] ) started to provide their services for free. If it would not have been for the digital cities, these services would have been provided by a free market much earlier...


-- The More You Drink, The W.C.

Re:It will still be expensive (1)

delysid-x (18948) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232735)

It's -1, Troll now... Pretty appropriate considering he's the king of the trolls.

Free access nothing new in Europe (1)

RPoet (20693) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232736)

Here in Norway, almost nobody pays for internet access except for the phone costs. This is thanks to private ISPs, though. Our government could never be bothered into something like this (although they are currently talking of going Linux and tossing MS)...

Antwerp. belgium does the same thing (1)

Mike_R (21485) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232737)

Hi all,

Just last week Antwerp (a town in Belgium) announced to do the same thing. Sadly, telephone rates are rather high here too, so it isn't exactly a free lunch either.

Not 'free' (1)

Jo Deisenhofer (25198) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232739)

This 'free' access will still be more expensive than regular internet access.
Reason: The tariff for local calls at daytime is higher than the tariff for internet access. Around $2.40/h. My telephone costs are higher than the rent.
Or: Bandwith to my local internet provider ist 10 times more expensive than from my internet provider to the rest of the world.

Phone line? (1)

ceeam (39911) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232741)

That sucks. What's the use for the phone line? You can't host a server on the phone line.
What I really would like is a cable connection with unlimited traffic. That would be nice.


Well Burger king has already done it (1)

Egorn (82375) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232746)

Well Burger king has already done it so why can't hamburger???

Note: this is funny not off topic. :)

pedantic translation (1)

penfold2 (88605) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232748)

This may be read as a pedantic comment, or a humourous asside, you decide...

Shouldn't "Those of you who don't sprechen das Deutsch" from the original post read 'sprechen sie Deutsch', it's been seven years since I did German, but doesn't das (or der or die for other genders) mean 'the'?!?

Ok, maybe I should get my coat!

German provider costs (1)

sbryant (93075) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232750)

Most providers only charge 2-3 Pfg per minute in addition to phone fees, so this is only helping somewhat.

Most, but not all! Have a look at Nikoma [] - they're offering Internet access at less than local call price (including the telephone calls), plus DM10/month.

Alternatively, if you have your ISDN line from Arcor [] instead of from the Deutsche Telekom, you can get true flat-rate internet access. This is almost certainly available in Hamburg.

DT are offering 3pfg/min any time of day (same cost as a local call at night) plus DM20/month. If you use the internet a lot (100 hours/month or more) then it works out cheaper to get the T-DSL thingy (the one with 100 "free" hours). Obviously there's a speed difference - I heard yesterday from someone in Stuttgart who gets up to 1.5Mbit (with compression), but there's a higher line rental too (extra DM40 or 50 or something). It's still lots faster than my ISDN!!

-- Steve

If it happened in the US (1)

omnifrog (93180) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232751)

Imagine the debate about censorware. A child somewhere might see a breast, in his own home on the internet. The same debate, but this time the government would be able to control information flow into my home. The implications could be scary. The Internet is different than other public works because it contains information. And in this country, we seem to be heading towards censorship. A free service with censorship is not a free service, and you bet people would try to censor gov't sponsored internet. If the above made no sense, I'll blame it on the fever I have right now :)

Hamburgers? (1)

trave11er (94143) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232752)

Are these (poor) people really called "hamburgers"? Must be pretty annoying for them *snicker*. They should come up with something better... "Hamburgians", probably ;-)

Re:this is spam (1)

Xenex (97062) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232755)

Actully, alot of countries still pay for local calls. Unfortunatly, here is Australia is one of them :(

Doesn't look to be free any time soon here either, with the market recently opened up, all the companies are making too much money....

--== Posted using Mozilla M14 (on a Win2k box unfortunatly). One out of two ain't bad ==--

Free e-mail from the government. (1)

Punto (100573) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232757)

The last president of Argentina did something like that a couple of weeks ago before he left. He sign a decree to give free e-mail to all the citizens of the country.

It's not yet implemented, and I don't think they will implement it. I also can't find any link (so this post is pretty useless).


only telephone costs (1)

xmedh02 (100813) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232758)

Though, you have to consider, that "only telephone costs" might be fairly high. So high, that the price of the dialup access is pretty irreleveant. You pay per minute, I don't know exactly how much in Germany, but here it's something like $2 an hour in peak, and this is the "cheaper" Internet tariff.

Telephone and ISP cost in Middle East! (1)

kbahey (102895) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232759)

I agree with you that Europe is at a disadvantage (over North America) when it comes to telephone cost.

It is because of this cost (and sharing revenue from it), that the UK allows the so called Free Internet providers.

Now look at the Middle East and you find a worse picture, where we pay per minute, plus very high ISP monthly subscription.

It ends up 5 times costing as much a fast broadband Cable connection in Canada (40$Cdn), but for a measly slow 31,000 bps connection with busy signals, disconnects, ...etc.

Check this page [] for further analysis.

Old news in iceland (1)

hreinna (107901) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232762)

Weve had this in Iceland for about 3 months now, yes, you pay for phonecalls. Its a phone company that took the initiative. They of course get a percentage of the minute rate. Which makes the 20$ you pay per month fade in comparison.

Re:It will still be expensive (1)

MeYatch (110355) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232764)

Why is this guys post rated 0? It seems he has logged in. It seems that he has something reasonably constructive to say. His next post is rated 0 as well. Did this guy do something terribly wrong and now he is always at 0 or something? There aren't any words next to his post to make it seem that he got moderated down.

Maybe not so new, but interesting. (1)

AmoebafromSweden (112178) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232765)

We who live in the city of Göteborg in Sweden have already had a similar offer from our local municipality over a half year ago.

(although I didnt need it, since I already have a free cable connection)

Its good if the recognition of internet gets widespread attention.

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

bytesex (112972) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232766)

I think everybody is failing to see the point here. (he said nodding his head omnisciently);
The truth of the matter is that because of traditionally strong socialist-democratic political currents over here, telco's (and other large government companies) were made private only in the 1980's - now they are still struggling to pay their own bills and they are still very close to the minds of the governing people (they get 'rescued' when they're in trouble).
Inet-related companies were never started up by the government or made public; they simply came in too late. Because of this situation there's usually only one telco per european country calling the shots (and next to that several very small ones that have to dance to the tune) while the product 'inet' keeps on inflating. Someone has to pay the bill, 'cos the customer wants it cheaper all the time. 'Not me', says the big telco; 'allright then, let it be me', says the ISP-startup; I'll give you all you want but you have to promise to look at all my banners!'.
This will really only stop when local politicians make the big telco pay for their monopoly (or break them up ? - hey that's a good one!)

_anyone_ have anything positive to say? (1)

Anonymous Sniper (113827) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232767)

Come on! this has to be a step in the right direction... the more people with net access, the more the net will matter to more people. The Fax machine can finally die!, for example.

Re:It is good (1)

nullity (115966) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232768)

Being skeptical is probably good, but do you really think that privatization of everything is the right way to go?

No...certainely not. Which is why I'm merely skeptical ;-) I think its good for slashdotters to make sure we do not judge with a double standard. On the one hand "Slashdoters" tend to stand for technological awareness, on the other hand they often rile against government involvement.

We need to seriously ensure we do not allow for things that benefit us directly, but violate long term "guidelines" we apply liberally to slaughter our foes. Its proper to carefully scrutinize our actions awhen there is vested interest in our violating our standards. We should be more careful and liberal in controlling ourselves, in spite of the nobility of certain causes.

I think the sig I see flying around is appropriate sometimes "Slashdot: open source closed minds". Sometimes I think the truth is that we are so open-minded that our brains leaked onto the floor! About the same effect :) Just wanting people to think w/o mob rushing in a popular direction.


I am nothing.

Oh Dear Addendum (1)

Eamonn O'Synan (119195) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232769)

I don't want to appear like I've got thing about this, but here [] is a good analysis by someone more intelligent than me of why these schemes are foolish. He talks about the trademark-DNS relationship in particular, and has covered the USPTO issue in his mailing list discussions.

It does remind me of the early horseless carriages...

(While you're there, check out the rest of the site, by the way. Ed Gerck is a smart fellow.)


Oh Dear, not again (1)

Eamonn O'Synan (119195) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232770)

This idea is as bogus as the USPTO trying to give an email to everyone's address in the US. It's gonna be great for grannies and the otherwise sessile, but the hip young mobile things that care about the WWW are gonna regret that URL and email address within a year or two....

This is 'cyberspace', not real space, and those old folk don't seem to be able to see the difference.



Re:Telephone (1)

VirtualUK (121855) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232771)

Well, this is an interesting point. In the UK we have had free ISP's for quite some time, infact I'd say roughly 70% of ISP's now are free and the downside has alsways been the high telecom charges. However starting from last month, telecom companies over here have started giving unmetered net access including the ISP charge from £10 (about $16) per month. Although it isn't totally free, I don't think anyone can argue that at that price it's not a good deal. I wouldn't be surprised if this is mirrored around the world pretty soon with telecom companies basically offering IP down the wire. One other interesting point that stems from this however is that I think it's just a matter of time before Mergers & Monopolies Commisions are set up as telecom companies may be judged as having an unfair edge over traditional ISPs.

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

CrazyD (125427) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232772)

response to point
1) Does the UK government pay for the internet access though (they might, but I'm not sure)? There is free internet access in the US too (through NetZero and the like) but its not payed by the government, so it still counts as competition in the private sector.
2) Which is why I'm not suprised that government sponsered free internet is appearing first in Western Europe.
3) I'm sure the plan for governnment payed internet access is well-intentioned. I'm doubting, however, that this will cause internet usage to increase faster than just private competition would have.
4) Local calls cost money in the US, its just typically a small amount. The internet access is not truely free either, because it is being paid for in taxes. 5) Well, I guess it would good to feel that your taxes are being used to your benifit, even if just by a small amount. Thanks for your response. I enjoy hearing the point of view of others, and I don't mean to put you down by with my possibly odd beliefs. :)

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

CrazyD (125427) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232774)

response to
1) The Internet was funded by the government long before it was a viable medium for private industry. Once private industries were shown to be able to sustain the internet, the USA government pretty much backed out of the whole thing.
2) Of course it wouldnt be a large increase. And maybe something else will be cut in some way to free funds for this. But there's no such thing as free lunch, and I doubt this is an exception.
3) The government pays for the roads. But the guy who builds by house pays for the driveway. The driveway is private, for use only by me. The roads are public, and can be used by anyone who cares to. The analogy here is between the "last mile" of telecommunications and the driveway.
4) I dont doubt the city of Hamburgs intentions, only its effectiveness.
Free and unfettered access is all good. I think its more important, however, to be free to chose exactly who gives me free and unfettered access.

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

CrazyD (125427) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232775)

I did read the announcement. Unfortunately I read a translation as I'm not fluent in German.
I based much of my comments off of my translation, which read

"Thus it receives the exclusive right to structure under the name "", a commercial platform open for the economy in Hamburg and to marked out. Further the city will make contents available of the public administration of the society exclusively."

This quote made me believe that the city has pretty much full control over the free-internet-access thing, and that the government is therefore competing against other local ISPs.
It could be the case that the translation is lousy, or I just plain missed something in the text. In which case, I apologize for spreading misinformation.

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

CrazyD (125427) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232776)

I'm not saying that the government must pay for all public goods, such as the backbone. But if the backbone were to go underdeveloped because no private company had incentive to build it up, it should be the governments responsibility to fund it.
I pretty much agree with your second statement though. Historically it seems that when governments try to compete in the private market, when private industries in that market are thriving, it generally a failure. I say, let be.

Re:offtopic flamebait (1)

ectizen (128686) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232777)

nothing like paying 25 australian cents for a four week call, either... :)

Re:E-mail seems a little simple (1)

kapper (133093) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232779)

a better solution, would probably be to create subdomains from the street names ...
So that you could be :
This offcourse would not create entirely unique id's, but a lot better...

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

luckykaa (134517) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232780)

1) Does the UK government pay for the internet access though

No. They do make sure that telephone companies have to make this possible but thats about it. The thing is that different countries have completely different ways of distributing the phone bill.

2) Which is why I'm not suprised that government sponsered free internet is appearing first in Western Europe.

And it probably won't happen in a big way in the US either. The US and Europe seem to have a big difference in opinion of how our governments should spend their money.

3) I'm sure the plan for governnment payed internet access is well-intentioned. I'm doubting, however, that this will cause internet usage to increase faster than just private competition would have.

I agree. This is probably worthwhile as an experiment though.

4) ...... The internet access is not truely free either, because it is being paid for in taxes.

It is free for a fairly subjective definition of free - i.e. if you decide to use it it doesn't cost you any more than if you decide not to (apart from the phone bill)

5) Well, I guess it would good to feel that your taxes are being used to your benifit,

See my comment on point 2. The US has much lower taxes than any country in Europe (I think). Europeans expect their governments to provide a lot more such as free public health, a welfare system, free legal support, and even farming subsidies. Most Europeans seem to be happy with taxes that would shock most Americans, as long as services are provided. This gives us a much broader definition of what the public good is.

I'm not quite sure what the current state of Internet access is in Germany. In England, its available at a reasonable price, and an idea like this would probably not be welcomed. If they have to pay for the phone call and the ISP though, I would think that this would slow down the adoption of the internet quite substantially.

That email address format (1)

luckykaa (134517) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232781)

Aren't there going to be quite a few Johannes Shmidt's or something.

Are they going to have to use numbers?

Who is number 1?

No Thanks... (1)

locutus074 (137331) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232782)

Three words:


C'mon, folks, let's not forget the September that never ended...

I don't want to see this happen everywhere because there are definitely some clueless f*cks out there that would never, ever pay (god forbid) for rudimentary access, but they'll take anything that's (perceived to be) free.

Are more AOLers really what we want out there?

Hell, no! I think it should be harder to get on the net. All this point-and-click GUI shit is lowering the collective IQ of the 'net populace.

This may sound like I'm trolling, but I'm really not. We really need an intellectual barrier to entry. Give out the tools, but make 'em command-line and pass out a copy of an Internetworking-HOWTO.

Yes, I guess I'm one of the "technological elite" or the so-called "digerati" (at least in my own mind). Yes, I guess I'm a hypocrite, too, because I work for an ISP (but I rarely take customer calls during my working hours of 11:30pm-7:30am).

Moderate this however the hell you want to, as always.

Re:That email address format (1)

pe1rxq (141710) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232785)

Who is number 1?

Probably the first guy to send a email to Hamburg's city hall saying 'First Post!'

Re:It will still be expensive (1)

pe1rxq (141710) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232786)

"There is no such thing as free internet"
I am wondering we had free software, now we are getting free hardware (see opencores [] ) what is next? free infrastructure......
A gpl'd fiber optic cable? If you think you can do better you just rip out the original and replace it, but you must let everybody use it.....

Maybe I should patent this ;-))

Grtz, Jeroen

Re:Interesting economic model (1)

pe1rxq (141710) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232787)

So your saying the governments should pay for the backbone and leave it to the big corporations to make profit and monopolise the private market?

offtopic flamebait (1)

nomadic (141991) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232788)

Here we pay a fixed rate for a local call, regardless of how much time we're on. Nothing like paying 12 cents for a 13 hour ISP call... poor Europeans...

Here we go again... (1)

duplex (142954) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232789)

...Some more spin doctoring from Euro telcos. It is as 'free' as a ride on a bus that charges you per mile of journey.

This thing has existed in most EU countries for a few years now and has been used by all the Telcos as an argument against introducing unmetered internet access. It is a pile of crap because in most EU countries local phone calls are around $0.03 per minute. Figure out how "free" that is for yourselves. Besides, offering you that "free service" is actually quite profitable for the free ISPs since they get paid by the the telecos when you use their dial in numbers (they get a share of your per minute charge). Go to CUT [] to see what kind of deal we really get with the European ISPs.

Re:The real issues (1)

pvcf (150815) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232791)

With any luck, Frankfurt will follow suit and maybe next Sandwich, England?

What if your name happens to be...

Re:It will still be expensive (1)

TheScorp (151815) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232792)

I also live in the Netherlands and I've heard that a couple of these "free" providers get paid by the minute from the telephone companies.

So they are actually stimulated to provide you, the internet user, with a crappy connection that is slower than would be possible for them to provide. Slower access usually means, that you are longer online, thus they collect more money.

As a side note, don't get me started on selling the information of customers by these companies... Just look at the law-suit that some of these companies filed against XS4ALL (A provider that DOES charge you for access) and lost, which used part of the EULA of these companies to show the general public that their information could be sold, by these companies.

It's said before, and I'll say it again:
"There is no such thing as free internet"
The money spend must be generated from somewhere, be it from the telephone-companies, the money generated by selling information for "marketing" or by charging the general pulic for it (in the case of government funding).

Just my $0.02


Hambugrgers (2)

Frodo (1221) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232796)

When I've read this headline, I thought: "Free hamburgers? I'd order a couple, but they'll be not fresh because of delivery time... I want such service in my neighborhood!".

Then I thought: "Oh, maybe that's not about that. Maybe this is like online Coca-Cola and coffe machines - now you can go to McDonalds and track preparation of your Le BigMac from your laptop online!"

Re:E-mail seems a little simple (2)

Kris_J (10111) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232798)

I'll take the second part first if I may.

The second point is kinda what I meant - just have an e-mail address for a household, regardless of how many people are there. (It's not like you can't get free e-mail addresses easily. In fact, I recommend [] for a particularly interesting free-ish e-mail product.)

As for the first point. I guess it's valid. In the 'Net, no one can hear you move...

I assume that it will just be "solved" like Hotmail and Yahoo: Chris.Johnson@..., Chris.Johnson1@..., Chris.Johnson2@..., etc. Shame it can't be "nicer".

Re:Interesting economic model (2)

MosesJones (55544) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232800)

1) The internet has its origins and owes much of its early development to the funding of one organisation. The good old DoD a very goverment organisation. So its a case of been there done that got the swatch.

2) Germany already has fairly high taxes so I wouldn't expect an increase, and if they are paying for the phone costs it could actually be a revenue creator.

3) If the goverment pays for roads (and your okay with that) and indeed the road right up to your door, what is the difference between that and paying for the local connection to the public backbone.

4) If Hamburg thinks that by netting all of its people it can gain economic advantage over other cities then good on them.

Free and unfettered access to information is surely the greatest public good.

Re:That email address format (2)

Snard (61584) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232801)

Are they going to have to use numbers?

Who is number 1?

You are ... number 6.

Antwerp, Belgium will also offer free Internet (2)

vrt3 (62368) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232802)

The city of Antwerp also announced that it will offer free unlimited Internet access to its citizens (more info at [] , but it's only in Dutch. The e-mail address will be '.@antwerpen dot be' (which is not such a good choice, if you ask me), up to 5 mailboxes, 20 MB personal webspace (with support for Frontpage and Office 2000 Extensions).

If I understand it correctly, this free access starts 29 February 2000, so I suppose it's up and running now.

But this offer isn't very spectacular. There are a lot of free internet access providers in Belgium; the biggest is, and will be, the telephone cost.

Re:New ways to spam to hamburgers (2)

dsplat (73054) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232803)

Okay, does everyone else remember the story on January 24th about the US Post Office [] handing out e-mail adresses? Many of the same things that we all said then about making spamming easier certainly apply here.

To the best of my knowledge the combination of my first name, middle initial and last name is unique. If I drop my middle initial, there's one other guy with the same name. There's only one other person who shares my middle name and last name. Do I want a way for spammers to attach a contact address to an indentifier that is unique and can also be used in the real world? Not a chance. I could certainly have used my name as my e-mail address. I didn't. For people who know me, through one online context or another, it is unique. But it doesn't cross over directly into the world of legal paperwork, financial records and medical data. I want some privacy.

Telephone (2)

lovebyte (81275) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232804)

The problem is not the ISP cost, as long as we in Europe have to pay ridiculously high telephone costs, the problem will be there.

Free Internet Access: The German Way (2)

Florian Weimer (88405) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232806)

Remember that "Free Internet Access" in Germany means that you still have to pay for the phone line. Of course, even in Germany, there are Internet provider which offer access at rates well below those of ordinary city call, which means that this offer is not very interesting at all, it's just about marketing.

How the Swedes do it.. (2)

cybe (92183) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232807)

Here in Sweden several ISPs (check out Utfors [] ) offer dial-up (PSTN and ISDN) accounts (including email accounts and web space) for free. I call a toll free number, and get billed by the ISP for the online time, at the rate as a local-call (approx 60 cents/hour).

There are no flat rates for dial-up access though, which has been bugging the more connected of us for some years now.

In the latest year the "broadband" market has exploded, and most people living in apartments are getting their homes connected.

On my street (20 houses * 30 apartments) every house has a switched 100 mbit cat6 ethernet, and switches are connected by fibre to the outside world. For this we pay a setup fee of $60 for which we get a 3C905 NIC and cabling, then $30 per month flat.

But of course, free modem dial-up accounts are nice too.. :)

Re:Interesting economic model (2)

spiralx (97066) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232808)

Some answers to your points. The UK government doesn't subsidise net access but the telecom industry is regulated in such a way that ISPs can take a share of the amount you are charged for the phone connection. So these ISPs don't charge you to use them. There are also some companies that have totally free services using either freephone numbers or by asking you to change your phone company to theirs.

Poland was first! (2)

jw3 (99683) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232809)

In most polish cities you can connect to a server of the polish telecom company, TPSA. You don't get an e-mail or Web page -- which you can of course get for free in one of the many free services -- but you pay only for a local telephone connection. This service has been available for at least two years, and, though the connection speed and quality aren't top, very popular.



some reflections (2)

trurl3 (112621) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232810)

  • Babelfish sucks!
    Heute unterzeichneten die Partner ein sog.
    Which in Babelese renders as: Today the partners signed sucked.

  • Aside from that, however, there may be a few interesting implications of this. r?
    If this catches on, the words "global village" already far too cloying, will make you hurl. Everyone has their more or less established email addresses already..but if these are given by the state, they may become part of your official mandated identity. Imagine: all official gov't notifications being sent to your government granted (imposed) address. Sure, you can have another address...but for employment, education, taxes, whatever, you must use the official one? Whenever you fill out a form, it's the gov't address they want. Yeah, this may be slightly (or not so slightly) paranoid, but imagine the degree of control that this could grant. Today, the government can mandate an ISP to give out their records on a given address (I think). All complications disappear when the government IS the ISP. Forget Echelon. That has to spy on *other* systems. With this thing, they wouldn't even have to spy. Other, more creative people can insert their favorite conspiracy theory below. The point is, this can be a very cool and good thing...or, if too many bureaucrats get their sweaty little hands into it, a very, very scary thing.

    On the bright side, if the government does decide to become the national ISP, their systems would run on Windows 2045 or whatever the lowest bidding two-bit company is at the time, so traditional ISP's would still have to exist to provide actual working connections and service!

    Insert random philosophical quote here

The real issues (2)

Nastard (124180) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232811)

I think it's great that hamburgers are getting free internet access. But what about the millions of hot dogs and openface sandwiches that are still paying inet fees plus high telecom bills? I think it's about time we started considering the needs of our other meat-and-bread friends.

And does this mean free ISDN for Big Macs ?

Interesting economic model (2)

CrazyD (125427) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232812)

I never thought I would see the day when Internet access would be wholy subsized by the governent. Perhaps I shouldn't be suprised that these things are occuring in Western Europe before the United States. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch, and this is no exception. Surely the cost of internet access is being paid by increased taxes. Only a reasonably socialist government would even try to get away with this. The entire notion is pretty anit-capitalistic... I'm sure this stifles competition. What happens when the technologies change, but you are locked into your city's slow (but free) internet access?
Although free internet access is a neat idea, I doubt it will hold up in the real world. In my opinion, the government should only be responsible to pay the cost of a public good, such as highways, and national defense. Internet access, however, is unargueably a private good (the backbone bandwith is public, but this is not what the city of Hamburg is providing).

Re:It will still be expensive (2)

pe1rxq (141710) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232813)

And it probably won't be fast either....
In the Netherlands were I live there are a lot of these so called 'free' providers they actually get payed by the telephone companies for providing customers. Most of them deliver crap and sell your personal info for 'marketing purposes'

Grtz, Jeroen

E-mail seems a little simple (3)

Kris_J (10111) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232814)

As if "" is even remotely unique enough for an entire city. It needs to be more like to be for individuals. It makes much more sense to have it based on address;

New ways to spam to hamburgers (3)

VValdo (10446) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232815)

Ok, all obvious jokes aside, it seems that "cold-spamming" (the equivalent of "cold-calling" numbers out of a phone book) will be pretty easy when your address is assigned according to a named rule like

I mean, yeah, for all the chaos resulting in the domain/accountname grab, it does make it harder for spammers to plain guess your address. (Though I do get a lot of crap to admin@, webmaster@, postmaster@.mydomain etc.)

Food for thought (Doh!),

I live in Hamburg (3)

Bartmoss (16109) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232816)

And I don't really thinks this is as cool as it sounds on first glance. In Germany, local calls are rather expensive, during the day it is 12 Pfg (6 cents) per 90 seconds, in the nights and on weekends, it's 12 Pfg for 4 Minutes. Since local calls are still mostly a monopoly of German Telecom, this will not change anytime soon. Most providers only charge 2-3 Pfg per minute in addition to phone fees, so this is only helping somewhat.

Last but not least, with all "free" or cheap offers, this will probably be swamped by people and thus have problems for many years.

I still think they should start selling cable modems instead.

Babelfish output (3)

Mike Schiraldi (18296) | more than 13 years ago | (#1232817)

For those of you too lazy to cut and paste, here's the Babelfish translation:

Strategic partnership for ""

After long and hard, but fair negotiations over the future of the Internet homepage " " an important switch position for the further development was carried out: The free one and Hanseatic city Hamburg a strategic partnership with enterprises wants to be received, which are embodied in the surrounding countryside in Hamburg and. Today the partners signed sucked. Memorandum OF Understanding (declaration/agreement), into which it to the termination of a contract in the next weeks commit themselves. Now can be begun with the transfer of " " on a new platform, which is to be locked in the spring 2000.

The operator company, which wants to extend the past national supply by means of the commercial contents and services, the then LINE Schleswig-Holstein GmbH ( partners are Sparkassen-und giroverband Schleswig-Holstein, savings banks of the country Schleswig-Holstein, the Schleswig Schleswig-Holsteini Landesbank, the Hamburgi Landesbank and the Provinzialversicherung) becomes, the Hamburgi Landesbank, which Harburg belong to Hamburg savings bank and the district savings bank. In order to be able to along-decide in important questions, the free one and Hanseatic city Hamburg will likewise become Gesellschafterin.

The Public private Partnership arranged now it is so created that all took part a use of it have. The financing first on 10 years created of the development of " " is ensured in its entirety by the enterprises. Hamburg brings the names of the already now successful portal " " into the operator company. Thus it receives the exclusive right to structure under the name " ", a commercial platform open for the economy in Hamburg and to marked out. Further the city will make contents available of the public administration of the society exclusively.

A gate to the Internet for completely Hamburg

With a global Internet acces for all citizens and citizens Hamburg sets country widely yardsticks:

Each Hamburgerin and each Hamburg one will receive a free Internet acces; thus no Providerkosten, only the telephone charges develops must be paid.
A free E-Mail address will be able to receive each Hamburgerin and each Hamburg one on (after the sample
Each Hamburgerin and each Hamburg one receive free homepage from up to 10 pages on " ".
These services will be Hamburg inside and Hamburgern starting from center to the 2000 at the disposal, since technically the transition to the new platform must be mastered before.

The new " " is on data base base after sucked. Situations in life to be structured. Since in the future both national and private services are offered, can do the users of " " by input of glossary words (e.g. " marriage ", " removal ", " spare time ") the necessary services of the administration, which suitable commercial and other supplies in the package test. Also a regional containment is possible.

The city saves cash and gets innovation

With the transfer of " " to the operator company needs to pay the city no more Providerkosten. Their coworkers receive free training courses at an editorship system supplied likewise free of charge by the operator company.

The city and the enterprises involved want to supply ever 2.5 millions DM for innovative software developments within the area interactive administration and the products afterwards together together marked out.

Three columns

Apart from the service supply a " citizen column " is to give the administration and the commercial supply structured as the third column. In it are to receive particulars, social groups, organizations and institutions, which cooperate or participate in the honorary structure of non-commercial on-line supplies for Hamburg or that Hamburg surrounding countrysides, the possibility of holding their supplies ready within " ". The operator company will support these supplies in the context of its possibilities financially and technically.

In order to make the advancement of " " a common thing for completely Hamburg, an adviser from representatives and representatives is to be created by organizations and enterprises, which are interested in the development of the Internets in Hamburg. The adviser advises the operator company with the target, which service-orients supply under " ", citizen near, to develop effectively and pluralistisch.

An open platform with advantages for all
For the enterprises united in the operator consortium the president of the savings bank and giroverbandes explained Schleswig-Holstein, Olaf Cord Dielewicz:

" we would like to make available also " " our customers an additional attractive service. This applies in particular to small and medium-size enterprises - we want to smooth the way for them in Internet. We understand ' ' however as open platform and are anxious to use the versatile and creative Potenziale that Hamburg Multimedia enterprises for the structure and the organization of ' '. "

Senator of finance Dr. Ingrid Nuemann Seidewinkel underlined that with the today's direction decision a request was transferred the senate basic coalition partner - they had arranged the structure of a city information system in the coalition contract:

" by all Hamburg inside and and free homepage to receive, going to Hamburg one free Internet acces, a free E-Mail address into Hamburg a crucial step to the democratization of the Internets. And if ' ' is used of as much as possible Hamburg citizens and citizens as well as of enterprises as regional communication and information medium, it becomes also the interesting Standtortfaktor. A successful " " can give important economic impulses and promote the image to our city world-wide. The partners, which we selected ourselves, guarantee for the fact that the common target with long breath is pursued. "

Darn it! (3)

Ratface (21117) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232818)

I read that title wrong and was really looking forward to free hamburgers for everyone with Internet access.

Re:More info (3)

Get Behind the Mule (61986) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232819)

It looks like is a pre-existing portal (I think run by the city - the translation is really bad) and the city has partnered with a private company to actually run it. As part of the deal, the city is going to be putting a lot of its administative functions on the site. Also, it looks like they're trying to get local businesses to move into e-commerce through this thing.

Right. The provider "S-Online Schleswig-Holstein GmbH", which has apparently been newly founded for this purpose (the portal had been run by the state up until now, I think), will be owned and financed by a group of banks and an insurance company. The city will also be part owner in order to be able to influence its decision-making, but is not involved in the financing, except that the city and the private partners will put up a total of DM 2.5 million to pay for development of software to be used in city administration. City employees will also receive free training from the provider for the use of its authoring system.

In addition to providing government services, the platform will also provide commercial content and services. There's something in there about a search engine for the portal for items like "weddings", "free time", etc.

Some of the other posters are quite right that this is going create a difficult situation for private providers, and I wouldn't be surprised if they try to fight it. The two biggest players for private internet access in Germany are AOL and T-Online, a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom, and there is a host of smaller providers (I think the smaller ones are better, personally). At least AOL has already raised objections to Chancellor Schröder's initiative, raised in his speech opening the CeBit, to have internet access in all of the German schools within the next couple of years. They'll probably like this idea even less.

The service may very well be swamped and hence too slow and unreliable, which would give the private providers an opening for competition on the basis of better quality. After all, since the Deutsche Telekom's monopoly was broken a few years ago, most German customers have not gone to the very cheapest telecom providers -- they've been willing to pay a little more for better service. Nevertheless, it's not easy to get someone to pay for a service that they can get elsewhere for nothing.

Those people seem pretty clueless (3)

Markee (72201) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232820)

I believe it when I see it. The article says that Hamburg politicians and a consortium of local banks have signed a document of understanding that says that a treaty is going to be signed -- so nothing is really finished yet.
It seems to me that no-one really knows what their decision really means. The article says that every Hamburg citizen will be entitled to get a free homepage of up to 10 pages -- given that the number of pages a website has is completely irrelevant compared to its size in bytes, I'm pretty sure none of the participants actually knew what everyone was talking about.
I think it's a great idea, but I don't think we will see this in the near future.
  • The participants don't seem to know that the suggested email name scheme is ridiculous for a large town like hamburg;
  • they feel that offering a free online service is a good offering in Germany (which, as posters above have pointed out, isn't true since it's the f#@$ing Telekom minute fees that make surfing hideously expensive (I pay about DM 150 or 70 Dollars per month for surfing),
  • and they don't seem to know what they are saying: Getting 1,8 million potential new customers within days is something that would even challenge the largest ISPs in Germany; the small ISP they seem to be using will be washed away by the wave.

Nevertheless, it's a great idea, and I hope they will get some help from someone who can handle this and finally get it done.

More info (3)

lostboy (79669) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232821)

After whacking the good fish [] upside the head, I think I've made some more sense of this.
It looks like [] is a pre-existing portal (I think run by the city - the translation is really bad) and the city has partnered with a private company to actually run it. As part of the deal, the city is going to be putting a lot of its administative functions on the site. Also, it looks like they're trying to get local businesses to move into e-commerce through this thing.
Some more poking around got me to this [] , which indicates that an EU commission called Telecities [] is responsible in part for this. Created in 1993, its goal has been to help Europe become part of the "Information Society" - and it boasts a pretty impressive set of member cities [] . Interestingly, its sister projects are Car Free Cities [] and something called POLIS [] , which looks to be creating new regional transportion systems. this good?!? (3)

nullity (115966) | more than 14 years ago | (#1232822)

Parts of the US already offer this through the library system...particularly Kitsap County in Washington. This was originally instituted as text-based dialup access over 5-6 years ago...pretty progressive. The idea was that the internet was becoming a major information source, and the library is responsible for providing people with information. Pretty sharp reasoning if you ask me!

That said, this represents still another progression. While a library is often (not always) a government controlled agency, having a city take such a progressive stance is interesting. The question it the city's place?

Now my first reaction to this was pleasure. "Gee...that's really cool. That a city government would be so encouraging of technology." But further reflection begs the question of necessity. For instance, do you think that the internet access will be of the same quality as a commercial provider? Maybe initially...but think of AT&T when it was government run.

While this doesn't sound like a monopoly, per se, it will be much harder for a small ISP to stay in business. Maybe even a large ISP (though big business has a way of bullying government and vice versa). The net effect to the citizens of Hamburg may be sub-par service.

A simple thought experiment makes the danger very clear. This is very similar to the "what if everyone littered" argument...but bear with me. What would happen if every city in every "wealthy" nation began providing internet access to its citizens? The short term effects would be very positive! This sort of connectivity is bound to change life as much as the car or the telephone. The problem comes in the long term. While cities would probably try to continue providing high-quality service, demand for high-tech faster connections would drop dramatically. Small companies with innovative ideas that would have survived in a competitive market will probably go out of business.

Status quo will become the normitive in communication (as opposed to today's computer market where the status quo is actually change!).

I expect to hear a lot of cheering about this on slashdot...and this may be good in the short run (or maybe in the long run if the government quickly pawns this off competitive companies once life is saturated with internet use...a good thing IMHO). But its worth evaluating the potential dangers and not embracing such action based on immediate emotional reactions.

I remain skeptical concerning government involvement...even when I agree with the direction being pushed

History has shown that the most positive trends tend to be towards privatization of technology! Remember that the citizens of Hamburg will be paying for the long run. This isn't just free connections. And it seems likely that the city "ISP" won't run at as low cost/per connection as a struggling private company. Just a guess ;)


I am nothing.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?