Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Writing Privacy Policies – Lessons From Indymedia

timothy posted about 6 years ago | from the right-to-remain-silent dept.

Privacy 10

somebody-with-too-much-time writes "Privacy policies have recently come up quite a bit on Slashdot. One Indymedia administrator explains why privacy policies are so complicated to understand, shows some examples of good ones, and shows you how to roll your own."

cancel ×

10 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Honestly... (4, Insightful)

religious freak (1005821) | about 6 years ago | (#24879379)

Does anyone read these things? I can say though I may have read over a few, I don't do so on a regular basis.

It's rather pointless when every single one of them (of the few I've read) says "subject to change at our discretion without notification".

Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?

Re:Honestly... (2, Funny)

corbettw (214229) | about 6 years ago | (#24879431)

Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?

I know this one guy who doesn't. I can't reveal his name due to privacy concerns, however.

Re:Honestly... (2, Funny)

Kingrames (858416) | about 6 years ago | (#24879673)

You mean Joe?

Privacy != Security (3, Funny)

Zero__Kelvin (151819) | about 6 years ago | (#24879961)

"You mean Joe?"

I know his password !!! ...

Re:Privacy != Security (1)

Kingrames (858416) | about 6 years ago | (#24883819)

Well, knowing is half the battle.

Re:Honestly... (2, Interesting)

vux984 (928602) | about 6 years ago | (#24880339)

Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?

Yes. I don't avoid google entirely; their search engine is too useful, but I block their scripts, and don't use a single one of their services.

Ok ok... I do have a gmail account (along with other webmail accounts) that I use from time to time to confirm that an html newsletter I send (yes, to double-opt-in-subscribers) renders correctly, but that's it.

Re:Honestly... (1)

story645 (1278106) | about 6 years ago | (#24884013)

Does anyone read these things?

Yes, but only forum ToS's, and even then it's so that I can explain why something's not allowed. Forums that don't use a boilerplat ToS tend to have really clear and understandable ones cause it's less of a headache if a mod can just quote the ToS when banning someone.

Dupe: CmdrTaco doesn't read Timothy's posts (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 6 years ago | (#24880481)

That's no surprise. The bigger question is why Firehose didn't catch the dupe.

privacy (3, Informative)

mlc (16290) | about 6 years ago | (#24881221)

Here is a lesson from Indymedia on how to really protect users' privacy: http://riseuplabs.org/privacy/apache/ [riseuplabs.org]

Odd that the author of the linked article seems not to use it.

tenth psot (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 6 years ago | (#24887471)

!toow

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>