Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google, Circa 2001

timothy posted more than 5 years ago | from the blast-in-the-present dept.

Google 355

An anonymous reader writes "If you have 10 minutes to spare, take a look at an archive that Google has posted to mark the company's 10th anniversary. The search engine and its results are based on data from 2001, but it's interesting to see what turns up when popular 2008 terms are entered. For instance, iPod generates a reference to Image Proof of Deposit Document Processing System, and the 771 Barack Obama results centered around his duties as an Illinois State Senator."

cancel ×

355 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

no, i don't have 10 minutes. (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25224851)

sorry.

This is fucking cool (3, Insightful)

zappepcs (820751) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224883)

Try searching for 'sarah palin' or 'conspiracy theory' for a few minutes of fun

Now you'll see why snapshots are good :)

Re:This is fucking cool (-1, Troll)

suck_burners_rice (1258684) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225001)

Actually, the search for Sarah Palin did bring up some results but after going through a few pages, I saw nothing about conspiracies or the like.

I wonder what a search for Barack Saddam Hussein Obama Bin Laden will bring up?

Re:This is fucking cool (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225167)

I wonder what a search for Barack Saddam Hussein Obama Bin Laden will bring up?

Maybe a list of all the times Obama merely voted "present" in the Illinois State Legislature?

Re:This is fucking cool (0)

Captain Splendid (673276) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225227)

Man, having shitty karma sucks, eh Naq?

Re:This is fucking cool (2, Funny)

dangitman (862676) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225009)

Ahhhh, so she was the 2001 Foxy Boxing champion!

Re:This is fucking cool (5, Funny)

cortesoft (1150075) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225017)

Awesome: "It was so Wasilla." Sarah Palin, Wasilla mayor, after officiating at a wedding at the local Wal-Mart store.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010306214613/www.alaskamagazine.com/stories/120199/ktob.html [archive.org]

Re:This is fucking cool (5, Funny)

Daimanta (1140543) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225075)

Can you imagine her taking a state visit to Germany?

Reporter: How would you describe this state visit?
Palin: It was so Germany.
[Reporters in the room all scribling]

Re:This is fucking cool (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225213)

Your search - "Sarah Palin" - did not match any documents.

Re:This is fucking cool (5, Insightful)

The Good Reverend (84440) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225391)

This is odd, though:

http://www.google.com/search2001/search?q=%22Sarah+Palin%22 [google.com] ("Sarah Palin") returns no results for me, but http://www.google.com/search2001/search?q=palin+Wasilla [google.com] (palin Wasilla) returns quite a few, including many with the term "Sarah Palin" in them.

Any thoughts?

Weird! (1)

loteck (533317) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224891)

Your search - "sarah palin" - did not match any documents.

Re:Weird! (4, Funny)

LSD-OBS (183415) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224979)

She only took on her human form around 2003.

I, for one, fear our ancient reptilian overlords!

Your search - lolcats - did not match any document (5, Funny)

default luser (529332) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224899)

PLEASE TAKE ME BACK TO TEH FUTURE!!!!111

A world without LOLCATS is a world I don't want to live in!

Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25224959)

Keep in mind that it's also a world without /b/tards.

I'm just sayin'...

Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225121)

newfag.

Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225231)

Funny, that's the result I was most excited about.

Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum (4, Interesting)

Gat0r30y (957941) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225249)

Results 1 - 10 of about 681 for wikipedia. (0.01 seconds).
but plagiarism
Results 1 - 10 of about 35,400 for bit torrent. (0.01 seconds)
and piracy were so much harder back then:
Now: Results 1 - 10 of about 264,000,000 for wikipedia. (0.27 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 67,500,000 for bit torrent. (0.07 seconds)

2001 called and wants its search engine back. (2, Funny)

syousef (465911) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224915)

Sorry, couldn't help myself. Oblig.

Re:2001 called and wants its search engine back. (1)

maxume (22995) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225159)

Maybe try to get someone else to help you.

Nice to see what's missing (3, Insightful)

Lev13than (581686) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224927)

It was so refreshing to search for 9/11 [google.com] and not have any of the crap from the last seven years show up. A simpler time indeed.

Re:Nice to see what's missing (1)

Icarus1919 (802533) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224969)

Yes, absolutely. A simpler time, a simpler peoples - oh how jaded I've become after the last seven years of repeating human history.

Re:Nice to see what's missing (5, Interesting)

SEE (7681) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225037)

Try al qaeda iraq [google.com] .

Re:Nice to see what's missing (2, Informative)

xtracto (837672) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225233)

others that came on the top of my head:

katrina [google.com] was Katrina Leskanich

gmail [google.com] was "a linux (unix) email client for the Gnome desktop."

Re:Nice to see what's missing (5, Interesting)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225347)

Interesting, from #2:

"In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."

Re:Nice to see what's missing (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225091)

It was so refreshing to search for 9/11 [google.com] and not have any of the crap from the last seven years show up. A simpler time indeed.

I hear ya! "saddam hussein" returns a puny 163,000 results in these archives, by now it's 12,200,000 hits on a google search..

The score for "Bin laden" is 175,000/21,500,000, but "al-qaeda" takes the prize by going from 1,640 to 17,500,000!

This stuff has been clogging up the news since 2001... Wish I had a flux capacitator..

Re:Nice to see what's missing (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225371)

>> Wish I had a flux capacitator..

For that, you really will have to go back to the past while going back to the future.

Re:Nice to see what's missing (1)

megamerican (1073936) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225101)

Don't worry, there were still plenty of information about reptiallian aliens. [archive.org]

Re:Nice to see what's missing (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225123)

September 11 [google.com] is nicely boring also. The above "Al Queda Iraq" points out something hard to find amongst today's leftist deniers:

"In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."

Re:Nice to see what's missing (3, Informative)

Martin Blank (154261) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225273)

To be fair, that is from a grand jury indictment, and a statement in an indictment isn't necessarily a proven fact. That it got past the grand jury suggests little more than that the grand jury believed the chances of it were high enough to turn over to trial; without transcripts, there's no way of knowing how strong their belief may have been.

Re:Nice to see what's missing (4, Funny)

Yvan256 (722131) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225299)

I searched for 9/11 and it gave me 0.818181818181818

This could be usefull (1)

bobwrit (1232148) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224929)

When you think of politics in general, you could search for what the person has done and see it before they started posting propoganda.

9/11 (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25224935)

Oh, to once again live in a world where a search for "9/11" or "9-11" brings up nothing about terrorist attacks.

Then again, "Ubuntu Linux" doesn't bring up anything at all...

Subtle political trolling (4, Funny)

Gizzmonic (412910) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224947)

The submitted article contains a subtle dig at Barack Obama, implying that he is unsuitable for the executive office because a primitive version of Google's PageRank algorithm only had 771 results.

I wonder how many results that same algorithm had for Theodore Roosevelt, 7 years before he became President? Few predicted his meteoric rise!

Re:Subtle political trolling (1)

Xuranova (160813) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224993)

No I think you are completely wrong on this one.

Re:Subtle political trolling (5, Funny)

Sasayaki (1096761) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225153)

I don't know. Maybe Google will release their search results from 1898 as well? Then we could google "World War" and go- huh huh huh- no pages found! Life was so much simpler then without all this "Nazi this, Nazi that" being shoved down our throats by the media...

Re:Subtle political trolling (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225193)

Hmmm...

I've got another conspiracy for you. I tried doing what you said, but www.google.com/search1894 doesn't exist. It seems that Google is in on this and wants McCain as president too...

Re:Subtle political trolling (2, Informative)

Enderandrew (866215) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225225)

It isn't a dig against Obama. It merely contrasts how the results back then are completely different from today's results. How is that slandering him?

Re:Subtle political trolling (2, Insightful)

GrimyR (1299467) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225265)

This how you act everytime you read something about Obama that's not in complete admiration?

Re:Subtle political trolling (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225385)

This how you act everytime you read something about Obama that's not in complete admiration?

This how you react everytime you read a joke?

Random searches (3, Interesting)

nizo (81281) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224949)

search term: (old) now

linux: (18,600,000) 558,000,000

microsoft: (15,700,000) 903,000,000

microsoft problems: (13,200,000) 500,000,000

linux problems: (15,400,000) 300,000,000

ubuntu linux: (20) 8,280,000

vista microsoft: (90,900) 20,800,000

vista microsoft problems: (0) 1,550,000

xp microsoft problems: (9,440) 11,900,000

Re:Random searches (1)

Xzzy (111297) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225259)

linux desktop viable (17,800) 196,000

Perhaps the best part is the top link in 2001 was arguing why the linux desktop is a good option.. and the top link today is why it has failed.

Re:Random searches (1)

rugatero (1292060) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225383)

I don't get that result - for me the top link today was this poll [itwire.com] conducted in 2006 where a majority claimed linux would become viable.

Re:Random searches (4, Interesting)

eln (21727) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225263)

nothing (16,500,000) 750,000,000
cotton candy (100,000) 5,520,000

This just in: The Internet is a lot bigger now than it was in 2001. Shocking, I know. However, the most important search result, the one that shows you how truly wonderful the world is now compared to the world of 2008:

porn (4,490,000) 236,000,000

Re:Random searches (1)

eln (21727) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225291)

compared to the world of 2008:

Er...make that compared to the world of 2001.

I'm a dumbass (34,600) 3,080,000

Re:Random searches (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225297)

If the internet had remained static this would have been a pretty boring story though.

Re:Random searches (4, Funny)

nizo (81281) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225339)

The Internet is a lot bigger now than it was in 2001.

Or not:

"penis enlargement": (107,000) 7,410,000

Re:Random searches (3, Insightful)

nbert (785663) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225269)

Even topics which don't get much attention anymore score much higher in 2008:

Napster: (1,130,000) 17.300.000

Millenium: (1,170,000) 23,900,000

Kursk: (98,300) 3,040,000

I guess 3 factors play a role: Google has better spiders, the net is growing and we have more redundancy.

One thing I haven't figured out yet: Have they filtered results which the current version does not display anymore for legal reasons?

Re:Random searches (1)

rugatero (1292060) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225333)

100 gold stars to anyone who finds a search that yields fewer results now than in 2001.

Re:Random searches (1)

cleatsupkeep (1132585) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225377)

vista microsoft problems: (0) 1,550,000

xp microsoft problems: (9,440) 11,900,000

See! Vista has less problems than XP, everyone should upgrade.

Sincerely,
Steve

Re:Random searches (1)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225401)

Ubuntu in 2001? VIsta in 2001?

How odd.

Ugh (2, Funny)

ThanatosMinor (1046978) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224957)

Please stop misusing the word "circa." It should only be used to give approximate dates. It would have been just as easy to write "Google in 2001."

Oh, and while we're at it, that's my lawn you're standing on.

Re:Ugh (1)

FlyingBishop (1293238) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225305)

Well, the circa would be more with regards to the content than to the date. It isn't exactly the results you would've had, but sort of a best guess given this index they had lying around (which may or may not be complete.)

And since they gave the index from specifically January 2001, it is entirely plausible that something from 2000 may have slipped in there (especially if you consider that things would have been spidered in 2001 in one time zone, while in another time zone it remained 2000.)

wow...some growth (3, Interesting)

MoFoQ (584566) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224961)

Entering the keywords "porn" into it in 2001 [google.com] generates 4,490,000 hits vs 236,000,000 hits in
2008 [google.com]

Re:wow...some growth (4, Funny)

Gat0r30y (957941) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224987)

thats not just growth - that is genuine progress.

Re:wow...some growth (1)

Coraon (1080675) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225351)

from avenue Q: The market may go up and down but the one constant is: PORN!

slashdot growth is even more (1)

MoFoQ (584566) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224989)

814,000 in 2001 [google.com]
87,000,000 in 2008 [google.com]

Re:slashdot growth is even more (1)

Daimanta (1140543) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225253)

"Now that VA Linux owns Slashdot, the days of open-source community love are
numbered."

How wrong can a quote be. Thanks Google for unmasking yet another doomsday quote.

Re:wow...some growth (2, Funny)

repetty (260322) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225267)

Entering the keywords "porn" into it in 2001 [google.com] generates 4,490,000 hits vs 236,000,000 hits in
2008 [google.com]

We are much more highly sexed now then we were back then.

Re:wow...some growth (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225327)

I want to use the Google you are using. When I type "porn" I only get 23,200,000 hits.

???

The good old days (3, Interesting)

dangitman (862676) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224977)

Ahhhh... when my real name and company dominated the first few pages of Google results - without spending any money!

Nigerian Scam results (1)

ilovesymbian (1341639) | more than 5 years ago | (#25224995)

Searching for "Nigerian Scam" returns only 4,110 results. Were there more scammers after the introduction of IPv6?

Re:Nigerian Scam results (2, Interesting)

pablomme (1270790) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225295)

And spam [google.com] still meant just meat!

How sex has changed indeed (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225021)

"sex" in 2001: safer sex sites, prevention communities, information.

"sex" in 2008: porn porn porn.

I guess these sites have more visitors...

Re:How sex has changed indeed (1)

FlyingBishop (1293238) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225353)

That doesn't make any sense... the internet has been for porn since at least like 1998.

I think Google has just stopped censoring its search results as overtly.

One Thing Missing (-1, Redundant)

Chagatai (524580) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225025)

You know you've hit the good ol' days when you can type in "September 11" or "9-11" and have absolutely nothing pop up related to that day.

Re:One Thing Missing (3, Funny)

nog_lorp (896553) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225205)

I did that and EVERYTHING was related to the 11th of September!

"Windows Vista" (1)

Psychotria (953670) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225029)

Is kind of more interesting [archive.org] than it turned out to be.

Remember 9/11 (0, Redundant)

4D6963 (933028) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225031)

How delightful [archive.org] . Sorry that's probably redundant but that had to be pointed out.

Your search - "angry dragon" - did not match any d (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225039)

But today? 53,100,000. And what a meme it is.

NO MYSPACE OR FACEBOOK! (1)

xpuppykickerx (1290760) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225089)

great, this mean i actually have to leave my house to meet ladies!

Duke Nukem Forever (1)

rhathar (1247530) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225109)

2001 results:
E3's Coverage of Duke Nukem Forever Preview!

Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac HOLY CRAP (5, Interesting)

aardwolf64 (160070) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225119)

Search for: "fannie mae" "freddie mac" collapse

Hit up the archive of the first link. It's Fred L. Smith, Jr.'s testimony before the House Banking Committee's Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.

He warns that the current setup of those two lenders are working to destabilize the marketplace.

From his testimony: "At best, this mixing of private and political incentives creates marketplace confusion; at worst, it leads to a serious misallocation of capital and an increasing risk for American taxpayers."

Re:Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac HOLY CRAP (2, Informative)

LWATCDR (28044) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225197)

Well there where articles about the lowering of the credit requirements causing problems going back to 1999.

Re:Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac HOLY CRAP (5, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225289)

Search for: "fannie mae" "freddie mac" collapse

Hit up the archive of the first link. It's Fred L. Smith, Jr.'s testimony before the House Banking Committee's Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.

He warns that the current setup of those two lenders are working to destabilize the marketplace.

From his testimony: "At best, this mixing of private and political incentives creates marketplace confusion; at worst, it leads to a serious misallocation of capital and an increasing risk for American taxpayers."

From "http://web.archive.org/web/20010410165029/www.cagw.org/mediacenter/newsrel/search/00-03-09.htm"

"If Freddie and Fannie continue their attempts to expand their reach into subprime and jumbo mortgages, there is a real danger of collapse."

I will wait (1)

Shivetya (243324) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225413)

for history to look back twenty years to finally pin the blame on the people who really caused this mess.

Unfortunately we aren't being told who interfered because its not newsworthy when it doesn't support your cause. Such is the press in the current election cycle.

Re:Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac HOLY CRAP (1)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225421)

Several people said from the beginning it was a bad idea, so no real surprise here.

None of the top 5 results for (1)

antifoidulus (807088) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225125)

get off my lawn exist in the form they did in 2001...maybe because back in my day kids had respect for their elders and I could search google without those damn kids on my lawn, now get off my lawn!

Look what Ubuntu was!?! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225129)

I am looking forward to the restaurant opening!

Nice! (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225133)

Your search - "department of homeland security" - did not match any documents.

Oh make it so again magic eight ball!

(me cries)

Lame! I submitted this earlier! (2, Funny)

teamhasnoi (554944) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225137)

In 2001 I sumbitted this:

Search Google
teamhasnoi writes "Put some words in the box here [google.com] and watch how results for your search come up. Awesome!"

The old one was more polite. (2, Funny)

ivandavidoff (969036) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225143)

In 2001, a search for "Britany Spears" came up with "BRITANY SPEARS NAKED" as the second hit, agruably the desired result.

In today's world, "Britany Spears" comes up with "Did you mean: britney spears?"

I get enough sass IRL, thanks a bunch.

iPhone (1)

Gat0r30y (957941) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225165)

Good that apple agreed to share the term: Results 1 - 10 of about 28,600 for iphone. (0.01 seconds)
vocaltec is the number one hit. Wow.

ignore this. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225191)

This is a comment to remove the stupid moderator styles

Sarah Palin v Barack Obama (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225199)

Your search - "sarah palin" - did not match any documents.

Results 1 - 10 of about 671 for "barack obama". (0.02 seconds)

Just interesting to think about that when the Republicans have been trying to equate Palin's experience (or lack thereof) with Barack Obama.

Try searching for subprime mortgage (1)

Hoplite3 (671379) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225221)

...you get results like:

"Predatory Mortgage Lending Campaign --
  CRC Predatory mortgage lending is a subset of the subprime mortgage industry.
Subprime mortgages are loans that have high interest rates and fees that are made ..."

Too bad no one paid attention.

Wii (1)

bluefoxlucid (723572) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225245)

I was searching for things like Nintendo Wii and other non-existent concepts... :) Prior art anyone?

I just found the website i had back then. (1)

Barryke (772876) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225255)

I forgot all about it..

I'd mod the google engine +1 insightfull, if i had any Google Moderator rights.

I like Google. They like my data. Its a joy world.

Wikipedia -- 42143900% Increase in Results! (3, Informative)

donniejones18 (749882) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225319)

Google Jan 2001:
Results 1 - 10 of about 681 for wikipedia. (0.01 seconds)

Google today:
Results 1 - 10 of about 287,000,000 for wikipedia. (0.07 seconds)

That's a 42143900% increase in results! :)

Good Times! (1)

CrazyTalk (662055) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225335)

Need more than just 10 minutes - looking at all the web sites for the now-defunct companies I used to to work for!

No Toxic Assets (1)

Peter Allan (235555) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225337)

Both "toxic asset" and "toxic assets" return no results because they're an invention to scare and dupe the public into supporting the current swindle. "Moral Hazard" was well known then however.

Scary - They probably have the search logs too... (1)

altek (119814) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225341)

Who knows what kind of pr0n^H^H^H^Hstuff I was searching for 10 years ago!

Seriously though, if they have snapshots of their entire indexes, they most likely have the whole DB snapshots including all search logs as well.

Wikipedia! GITMO! (3, Interesting)

molo (94384) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225349)

"george w. bush" iraq -- 2001: 21,400 results
"george w. bush" iraq -- 2008: 15,400,000 results

interesting find: "Will George W. Bush launch a new US war of aggression against Iraq?" -- January, 2001 [wsws.org]

wikipedia -- 2001: 681
wikipedia -- 2008: 287,000,000

guantanamo bay -- 2001: 33,500
guantanamo bay -- 2008: 7,200,000

waterboarding -- 2001: 43
waterboarding -- 2008: 1,940,000

al qaeda -- 2001: 1670
al qaeda -- 2008: 20,400,000

Simpler times... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225389)

95k results for the Taliban vs. 20M today.

Compact Flash (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225393)

and compact flash was a trenchcoat covered flasher with a tiny dong. ...not really.

Practically no spam (2, Interesting)

orkysoft (93727) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225397)

Looks like things are indeed getting worse. I search in the 2001 index, and find relevant results, uncontaminated by spam!

The Google index of today is full of the results of seven and a half years of gaming the algorithms, making it harder and harder to use :-(

Obama vs All Freshmen Senators from 2004 (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225409)

Hmm, number of hits for all Freshmen Senators from 2004 Election. Seems like Barack is at the bottom, wonder what that's supposed to mean...
  • Richard Burr 62,100
  • Mel Martinez 34,200
  • Tom Coburn 27,300
  • Ken Salazar 14,200
  • John Thune 8,890
  • David Vitter 6,170
  • Jim DeMint 2,990
  • Barack Obama 773

tech bubble (1)

kantellopo (249176) | more than 5 years ago | (#25225423)

there's stuff about a housing bubble on there too. This thing is awesome!

Fuck Google (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25225425)

Yeah

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?