Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

CNET UK Credits Claim That Apple Will Release Networked TVs

timothy posted more than 5 years ago | from the logical-progression dept.

Television 110

r2k writes "While the Apple rumours posted yesterday highlight some of the most commonly talked-about opinions, a writer for CNet UK sat down with Mahalo's Jason Calacanis, who told CNet he knew for a fact that Apple is developing fully networked LCD TV sets. As the writer points out, Apple dropped 'Computer' from its company name for a very good reason."

cancel ×

110 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Now this ive gotta see (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338373)

:o

Wi Fi and Security? (5, Interesting)

William Robinson (875390) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338379)

TFA does not tell more except it is 802.11n. Not sure whether I am paranoid, but will anybody on road will be able to hack in my TV and show something I don't want to see?

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (5, Funny)

cloakable (885764) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338423)

Welcome to GoatseTV.

Distended anus, 24/7.

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (3, Funny)

Yvan256 (722131) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340205)

Great, another channel with crappy programming.

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (1)

cayenne8 (626475) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340221)

"Welcome to GoatseTV.

Distended anus, 24/7."

Ewwww....gives new meaning to the Discovery Channel....

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338443)

Like the goatse.cx man?

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (2, Funny)

Firehed (942385) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338567)

Yeah, hence the 'GoatseTV' quip.

But I'm only commenting to point out how much the thinkgeek advertisement I got when expanding this post bothers me. "MORE FLEXIBLE SCREWING". Yeah, just the mental image I needed on a Saturday morning. Thanks a lot.

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338717)

At least it's ThinkGeek and not something else...

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (3, Informative)

dimeglio (456244) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338615)

I think you are indeed paranoid. I guess it wouldn't be any different from anything else that's got a wireless connection. Including your laptop.
Unless I'm the one that's not paranoid enough.

This is silly (2, Interesting)

StreetStealth (980200) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339781)

Furthermore, the very idea of hacking into someone's TV to display images on it is pure Hollywood sci-fi.

Think about it for a moment. Even on a completely open network, even imagining some wacky DAAP overflow exploit existing on this imaginary Apple product that allowed local peers to execute arbitrary code over the WLAN, you're talking many minutes of patiently sitting outside, dutifully screwing around in a shell.

No one's going to hack your TV unless they can just drive by, hit a "HACK" button on their laptop, and control your set. Which only happens on TV.

Unless I'm the one that's not paranoid enough.

If you're running WPA or WPA2, you can find much better things to worry about than your wireless network. Such as what happens with your data out on the WAN.

Re:Wi Fi and Security? (1)

Angostura (703910) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340501)

Thank goodness good old fashioned analogue telly had advanced protection against some using a RF transmitter to beam stuff into your home. Errrr

Apple Apple Apple (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338387)

Orange Banana Strawberry Mango Persimmon Tangerine Tangelo

if they did away with the need for the computer... (5, Interesting)

inzy (1095415) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338409)

...they could open up a whole new market.

i see a net-equipped TV, with a minimal ARM-based computer built-in, running a lightweight itunes; shows are bought and played entirely with the remote, which has a simple kb for searching for stuff and entering credit card info.

owners could then download shows straight to the tv, which has an upgradable hard drive/flash module

people don't necessarily want a computer, they want to watch tv

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338519)

There are plenty of network aware TVs. Take off your apple shaped glasses and visit the real world some time. You'll be surprised how many other companies already do products that apple rumor mongers and fanbois desire.

Yep (4, Insightful)

dreamchaser (49529) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338613)

Phillips showed one off back in 2004 [pcworld.com] . A very quick search turns up several [digitrexusa.com] good examples [sharpusa.com] with varying features and capability.

That won't stop the Apple fanbois from drooling and going "OMG STEVE'S SUCH A GENIUS!" and acting like Apple invented it, though.

Re:Yep (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25339051)

Apple didn't invent the mp3 music player, but they sure as well ran with it.

Apple didn't invent the cell phone, but seem to be doing pretty well in their niche.

Apple didn't invent the non-grey-box computer, but they seem happy with the numbers they are selling.

Apple didn't invent the laptop, yet sell a lot of them.

Who cares what they invent. They are apparently very good with taking an idea that was not-invented-here and making it something the average person will not only pay for but pay a premium for.

No doubt, an Apple LCD will cost more than other LCDs. But it will probably do more as well.

ObGripe: So say a few years after buying the LCD I want to upgrade the computer part. Would it be possible? I have a feeling the answer is actually going to be yes, given Apple's patents on placing removable computers/laptops within large screens.

Re:Yep (1)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341349)

But you could replace "Apple" with any number of companies in there! Gasp - Apple make products - big deal!

The point is that Apple fans do try to make some special claim - that they were first to do it, or when challenged, this is then modified with some special qualifier, or some odd reason is made as to way the actual first doesn't count.

Lots of companies make mp3 players, phones, desktop computers (and non-grey ones too, but I'm not sure why the colour matters - that's what I mean by the special qualifiers), laptops. The only market of those that Apple are a leader in is mp3 players.

making it something the average person will not only pay for but pay a premium for.

No doubt, an Apple LCD will cost more than other LCDs. But it will probably do more as well.

There are also lots of other companies that market products in the high end of these markets.

Re:Yep (4, Insightful)

Stan Vassilev (939229) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339413)

That won't stop the Apple fanbois from drooling and going "OMG STEVE'S SUCH A GENIUS!" and acting like Apple invented it, though.

You're missing the point. Not inventing something for the first time, never stopped Apple from dominating the market with their own version.

The key asset here is iTunes. iTunes is the first store of its kind to enjoy simplicity, availability and mass support by content providers and consumers alike.

When other companies add networking, WMV playback and photos slideshows to their TV-s, you have a set of possible uses for that, especially if you're a geek, but you need to figure it out on your own.

When Apple puts iTunes in a TV, you have a complete product your entire family can sit back and use out-of-the-box.

Re:Yep (1)

Kristoph (242780) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340035)

Not to mention that by tying the TV to you MacBook, iMac and iPhone through .Mac (take picture with iPhone, family sees it on their TV) Apple sells many more of their gadgets.

Re:Yep (2, Funny)

rishistar (662278) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340067)

Plus they could feedback system where viewers can say how good or bad they thought the movie was, and call it iRate.

Re:Yep (2, Insightful)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341359)

Not inventing something for the first time, never stopped Apple from dominating the market with their own version.

Well yes, they could become market leader. But then any company could. Any such claims are pure speculation, and there is no reason to consider Apple alone over all other companies.

The fact that they dominated one market before (mp3 players) is no judge of future markets - by that logic, we should be betting on a Microsoft TV to be the winner.

When Apple puts iTunes in a TV, you have a complete product your entire family can sit back and use out-of-the-box.

Pure vaporware. Call me back when they have a product - otherwise I might as well claim that the MS X-TV-BOX will do it better right out of the box.

Toasters (1)

StreetStealth (980200) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339881)

If I invented the toaster, and my model required two minutes of winding a spring, calibrating the heating coils, balancing the ejection mechanism, and still burned the toast half the time, and then you invented a toaster where you just press a button and you get nice toast in 20 seconds, does that make you a lame imitator?

Are your satisfied customers who say "OMG dreamchaser's such a genius!" just lame fanbois? After all, I invented the toaster. You just made one for noobs who can't be bothered to calibrate their toasting device every morning.

Why on earth do they think your product is so cool?

Re:Toasters (1)

crenshawsgc (1228894) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341301)

The problem with your analogy is that these products do work, they're available now, and they certainly cost less than Apple's hypothetical product will. And they're not toasters.

Cars (1)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341455)

Not if there are already toasters on the market that you decide to ignore, that already do it simply in 20 seconds. That's what the situation actually is.

What is this - arguing by coming up with an analogy that has no relevance? What that's easy - I'll just claim that Windows is better than Mac OS, because Mac OS is a car that blows up all the time, whilst Windows drives perfectly. It has no grounding in reality, but who cares if we can just make up analogies?

To pretend that pre-existing mp3 players, phones and networked TVs (not to mention GUIs, computers-with-CD-ROM-drives, 64-bit PCs, computers-with-built-in-monitors, computers-without-floppy-drives, computers-without-fans, and all the other things I've seen people claim Apple did first) are in any way comparable to your poorly made toaster is just an arbitrary fiction created to repeat your assertion. It doesn't support your assertion however - if it's better, you have to tell us why it's better.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338627)

Indeed. I just bought a TV in Japan that can record directly to USB or NAS storage, play media from UPNP servers on the network and subscribe to iptv services. It was on sale because it's been on the market for 6 months and they were bringing in the new models. Maybe things are different within the RDF.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (1)

MooUK (905450) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338635)

That's standard apple practice. They don't really do anything new, they take old ideas and do them well. Mostly.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338857)

Standard Apple practice.

Think Different. Lie.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338531)

What you're describing is Apple TV put into, well, a TV.

Big surprise? Don't think so.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (2, Informative)

ozphx (1061292) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338823)

Yeah wait what?

My windows media center box does that now... with the remote, and the buying and selling, and the bsods. It also does TV, epg, timeshifting, etc. Its also a laptop with a $90 usb dvb-t dongle so I can pick it up and take it on a plane. And apart from installing the crappy korean drivers for the dongle, it all worked out the damn box.

Also full length movies are only like 30c more expensive than the local rental joint (probably less than the fuel cost to get there), and you DRM-Rent them for a month or so.

Oh I see, the reality distortion field, we're not _calling_ it a "computer", we're going to pretend theres not one and call it an "internet tv". Way to innovate, Jobs! GO APPLE!

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (2, Funny)

Kristoph (242780) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340151)

You're venting on Apple because a random blogger - not Apple mind you - used the term 'internet tv'?

Also, you readily, ever gleefully, admit on Slashdot that you have 'windows media center' as your primary laptop OS.

-1, WTF?

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (3, Insightful)

smoker2 (750216) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338839)

This is precisely the opposite of what we want.
People don't want a TV OR a computer, they want to watch/see media. The TV is only a screen with built in receiving components. So separate the screen from the components, and you end up with a controller and a screen. The pc is the best controller possible. It's upgradeable not just in hardware but also software, to enable upgrades of both types of technology while keeping the same display.
You should be able to choose which software you use to manage your media, not just blindly accept whatever comes down the pipe. Your suggestion seems to accept that big media will run the (video based) internet.
Not for me thanks. I'd prefer the stream to be open and I choose what to view. Letting the media companies decide what content my device can view is not an option. If companies want to cater for people who want an easy life then let them cater to that market with simple locked down boxes, but I should be able to build a device to my specs too, and still be able to access the big media content.
Building a set proprietary functionality into a display device is backward.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (4, Insightful)

lysergic.acid (845423) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339127)

exactly. there will be a convergence of the TV with the PC, but it's not the PC that will be replaced. you replace specialized hardware with generalized hardware, not the other way around.

right now we have a bunch of redundant communication networks and hardware appliances. we have radios, telephones, and TV all using very specialized communications networks, and all running on application-specific hardware. but with the widespread adoption of broadband internet access, there's no need to have different communications infrastructure for sending audio data for radios, audio data for telephones, and video and audio data for TV, when all of this data can be transmitted digitally over the internet. soon all of these parallel technologies will be merged into the more generalized/flexible internet.

it's more efficient to run a single generalized data network like the internet than having a bunch of parallel application specific networks because it allows for better allocation of resources and eliminates redundant infrastructure. not only that, but the internet is also an open/democratic network (at least while there's net neutrality). like the computer for which the internet was originally developed, it gives users complete freedom of access, which is a stark contrast with the closed proprietary networks of traditional radio/TV/telecom. this decentralization of media distribution allows independent artists, musicians, film producers, etc. to reach billions of users around the globe without having to go through the traditional distribution channels which are tightly controlled by a handful of media conglomerates.

it's become harder and harder for big TV networks like NBC or radio networks such as Clear Channel to act as the gatekeepers of information. because of this, we're seeing a free culture developing where cultural contribution isn't a privilege reserved for major label artists, Hollywood studios, or corporate execs that have up until now decided what the public watches on TV. neither Apple nor anyone else is going to convince consumers to go back to the cultural bondage of pre-internet media.

a LCD TV is simply an LCD monitor with a built-in tuner card. why buy a TV and a set-top box when you can just have an HTPC or media center pc that can be used to check e-mail, surf the web, burn DVDs, play games, etc., etc.? a computer with a tuner card can watch both, regular TV as well as internet video streams like Miro (Democracy Player). it just doesn't make sense to replace the computer with a locked down and functionally crippled equivalent.

i imagine that once open wireless internet access becomes a common public infrastructure across the country we'll start seeing AM/FM radio being replaced by portable smart devices that can stream internet radio. people want freedom of choice, so that's the direction that media convergence will take.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (2, Insightful)

tm2b (42473) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339169)

From the "No-wireless-Less-space-than-a-nomad-Lame" department:

you replace specialized hardware with generalized hardware, not the other way around.

Which explains why the Nomad totally kicked the iPod's ass.

Seriously: technology enthusiasts make choices from different criteria than most of the market. For most, ease of use and aesthetic appeal are much more important than flexibility as long as the device does its primary task well.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (1)

lysergic.acid (845423) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339493)

what exactly does that have to do with media convergence?

a more appropriate example involving the iPod would be its evolution from:
portable music player -> portable media player -> iPhone

other examples of specialized technology being replaced by generalized technology include:
the PSP: PMP + handheld gaming + internet tablet
the DSi also follows a similar trend
Smart Phones: PDA + PMP + Phone

just because one device sells better than another with less features doesn't change the fact that there's an observable overall trend of technological convergence right now (and throughout the history of technology). technological progress isn't determined by the whims of fashion or consumer fads. TVs won't replace computers any more than cellphones will replace computers. that's just common sense.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (1)

jelton (513109) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340715)

a LCD TV is simply an LCD monitor with a built-in tuner card.

Resolution! Resolution! Resolution!

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (1)

jonbryce (703250) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338977)

You mean a bit like the AppleTV?

The only problem with it at the moment is that you can't actually watch TV on it.

Re:if they did away with the need for the computer (1)

berashith (222128) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339505)

this is almost like duct taping my Wii to my tv and watching youtube, only prettier.

This either won't happen or won't work (1)

StreetStealth (980200) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339933)

Not in 2008. You basically have two markets here:

People who already own an HDTV and just lost 20% of their 401(k) last week aren't in the market to drop $1500 on a new HDTV. Maybe they can be convinced to buy a box for their existing one. But not a whole TV that's so close to what they already have, not in 2008.

People who don't yet own an HDTV are a more likely target market for this. And yet, these folks haven't had the disposable income to buy one so far -- with possible layoffs looming at their employers and rising expenses everywhere, why on earth are they going to buy not just an HDTV now, but a networked, Apple-branded one? Most definitely not in 2008.

Re:This either won't happen or won't work (1)

node 3 (115640) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340553)

What do you think happens in a recession, or even a depression? Do you think people walk around in sacks and barrels, barefoot? Do you think industry grinds to a halt and retools for discount potato peelers and barrel repair kits?

How many $500+ tech items did you buy last year? You don't go from that to barefoot, even in a depression. You go from that to half that.

From that to barefoot isn't a depression, that's a full economic collapse. It's riots in the streets.

Some people seem to be shocked that Apple would release new notebooks during this financial crisis. As if they think the best thing to do is just sell the same old notebooks instead. Same with this. Who knows is Apple is really going to release something like this or not, but if it's something they're planning, it's still something worth selling. It's not like Sony and Samsung, etc, are all going to just shut down their HDTV production.

sort of there already (1)

vlad30 (44644) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338419)

add a USB TV adapter to a imac 24" makes a simple PVR/entrainment system even a non-techie wife can use only downside so far I wish the TV was integrated into frontrow I could get rid of the other remote it is needed to turn on the TV and don't give me the mythTV/ modded xbox argument I said NON-techie wife

Re:sort of there already (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25339083)

Um, if you setup MythTV properly it's very easy for the user to use. It's getting it all setup that's a bit harder than just plugging something in.

Re:sort of there already (1)

cayenne8 (626475) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340295)

"add a USB TV adapter to a imac 24" makes a simple PVR/entrainment system even a non-techie wife can use only downside so far I wish the TV was integrated into frontrow I could get rid of the other remote it is needed to turn on the TV and don't give me the mythTV/ modded xbox argument I said NON-techie wife"

Except 24" is WAY too small for any real TV watching....ok, maybe ok for the kitchen tv, but certainly not large enough for the living room...hell, these days 36" is too small...gotta be in the 50" + range these days to really make a pleasurable watching device, especially if you have one or more friends to come over to watch sports or movies on....etc.

Re:sort of there already (1)

aedan (196243) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341283)

EyeTv which comes with the Elgato USB things can pick up the Apple Remote. It's not part of FrontRow but the remote does work.

I'm of two minds here (3, Insightful)

hcdejong (561314) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338433)

On one hand it's a logical progression: integrate an AppleTV into an LCD screen, analogue to an iMac. On the other hand, you'd expect the TV to be usable long after the computer has become obsolete, so you end up with a TV that contains useless parts (and knowing Apple, limited options for connecting other peripherals).

Re:I'm of two minds here (1)

mzemina (1382935) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338553)

But why perform the integration if the existing AppleTV is not selling well? Everything I have read about that little STB (Set Top Box) indicates it is a yawn. Not many people are buying it. So if people aren't buying the STB why integrate?

Re:I'm of two minds here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338617)

1. Apple hates cables
2. Not everybody has a computer, but everybody has a TV
3. Internet is the future.

This is basically the answer to "Ok Joe Sixpack has an iPhone for Internet on the road. But what will he use at home?".

Re:I'm of two minds here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25339251)

Apple hates cables? Have you actually got anything from Apple? Since getting an iMac (for OS X, the only reason to have anything Apple), the number of cables/sticky-out-things cluttering my desk has gone up impossibly.

1. Second hard drive;
2. Bluetooth dongle (edu iMacs have BT removed, because Apple is that tight);
3. DVD writer, because edu iMacs only have a fucking reader - and even then it's a laptop type drive which reads around a third the speed of my external $40 drive;
4. Floppy drive (ok, I understand this requirement is less than usual);
5. CF/SD/MS etc card reader.

On my PC these were neatly installed internally.

Re:I'm of two minds here (3, Insightful)

uglyduckling (103926) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339809)

It sounds like... just maybe... you bought the wrong mac. Just a thought.

Re:I'm of two minds here (2, Funny)

ClosedSource (238333) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340193)

"2. Not everybody has a computer, but everybody has a TV"

This is an argument for people buying a TV?

Re:I'm of two minds here (1)

Gewalt (1200451) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338707)

You can load XBMC on it now, which makes it partially awesome. it still has a fairly useless HDD in it. Also, there's another app you can install on it called atv, that significantly increases its abilities, as well as enabling USB Mass Storage devices. Sad to say, but the reason the apple TV sucks, is because apple is making it useless by completely strangling its features.

not necessarily (1)

spectrokid (660550) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339269)

If you put a harddisk in it will become obsolete, yes. But Apple already makes media servers and router-cum-usb-harddisk thingies. A TV which can read a MP4 stream will still be very "actual" 5 years from now. Think of it the other way. Any form of input (Digital over the air, cable box, Blue Ray) could be made as a UPNP media server on the home network. Put the Antenna-to-Ethernet box on the attic where it has best reception. Replace it when a new standard comes around without replacing your TV. I think UPNP is the most underrated tech in the house today.

Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

hcdejong (561314) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338447)

The bottom has fallen out of the LCD TV market, and I don't think Apple can compete with the razor-thin margins that result.

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (3, Insightful)

MightyYar (622222) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338465)

You know, except for Apple the PC market has pretty thin margins :)

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (4, Interesting)

Mark Hood (1630) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338503)

Which is exactly why they add value by building in an HD content delivery system...

Why buy a TV, and a Blu-Ray player, and a load of discs when you can buy AppleTV and rent/buy your content without levering your fat ass off the couch?

Now how much would you pay...? :)

Sure, the margins on LCD TVs are low, but if someone says they can save $300 or more by not needing an HD source, they might pay almost that for a shiny Apple logo...

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

danwesnor (896499) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338765)

Why buy a TV, and a Blu-Ray player, and a load of discs when you can buy AppleTV and rent/buy your content without levering your fat ass off the couch?

Picture quality? Cost? Media portability?

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

zax666 (1377571) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338783)

Why are you raising questions nobody can answer yet?

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

danwesnor (896499) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339511)

We've seen the cost, quality, and DRM of Apple TV. Do you think they'll suddenly drop DRM, go from 2 gigs/movie to 40 gigs/movie, and drop the price to be competitive with Netflix?

Re:Your Sig (1)

VVrath (542962) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339129)

No Slashdot comment, no matter how helpful, is worth spending £8.98 on a total stranger.

On the other hand, No Slashdot comment, no matter how useless, deserves the poster being bought a Will Young album...

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341795)

Why buy a TV, and a Blu-Ray player, and a load of discs when you can buy AppleTV and rent/buy your content without levering your fat ass off the couch?

But ... that's how most people already watch things using just a TV.

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (1)

Gerafix (1028986) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338547)

You're forgetting the Apple Tax?

Re:Wrong market for Apple to be in (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25340005)

Just like the bottom has fallen out of the MP3 player, cellphone and laptop market.

Oh wait..

there are bugs in my face (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338517)

they are like miniature squirrels with coconut flatulence

Very Good Reason (0, Redundant)

ThatsNotFunny (775189) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338525)

Apple dropped 'Computer' from its company name for a very good reason

Yes, the reason is Apple Corps, Ltd agreed they wouldn't sue them if they did it.

Multitouch?!?! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338591)

Make it Multi-Touch enabled and I might buy one

That would be damn cool, a big multi-touch TV / computer on the wall

Re:Multitouch?!?! (3, Funny)

Lachlan Hunt (1021263) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338645)

Yes, because having finger prints all over the TV screen is just what everyone wants to improve their viewing experience.

Re:Multitouch?!?! (1)

corychristison (951993) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339567)

Not to mention, y'know, you'll have to GET UP to change the channel..

Wait! Maybe he's on to something! Couch Potato's no more!

Re:Multitouch?!?! (1)

Jesus_666 (702802) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340787)

No, they've thought this through. They will make the display 3.5" wide so you can comfortably hold the TV in your hand. It won't play HD but it will be very convenient. I think the working title is "iPhone", but that strikes me as rather weird for a portable TV.

Re:Multitouch?!?! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338719)

Thank you very much, but I don't want to move my lazy ass from the couch while watching TV.

no thanks (3, Insightful)

ionix5891 (1228718) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338631)

i don't want DRM in my TV set

btw I recently got a big LCD and hooked up the x360 to it, now i get to enjoy all the 1080p goodness without paying a cent for content thanks to usenet and x360 being able to play HD mpeg4 :) oh and you get a games console on side :P

Re:no thanks (4, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338767)

rumor has it you can play all the mpeg4 content you want (and more) on a mac. the DRM only comes into play if you actually buy content... having the option to legally buy content is nice sometimes you know.

besides MS has shown its willing to please content providers over consumers disallowing recording of certain content.

Re:no thanks (1)

ozphx (1061292) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338843)

besides MS has shown its willing to please content providers over consumers disallowing recording of certain content

Name the "certain content". What magical "certain content" does MS block from recording but other companies can record without getting "the crap sued out of them"? I thought so. Back in your box.

I agree on the DRM issue though. I've watched DRM'd movie rentals from the Bigpond Movies store in vista media center. I was playing with media center, noticed the store and really wanted to watch Top Gun (guess that makes me a fag). It was $3.20 for a month of Cruise trying to get up Kilmar's ass. Sue me :(

Re:no thanks (2, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25338779)

You won't tolerate DRM in your TV set but you will in every set-top box (or console) attached to it?

Re:no thanks (2, Informative)

squiggleslash (241428) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339237)

If you big LCD has an HDMI input, it probably has HDCP, a DRM system. Sorry :/

Re:no thanks (1)

Kristoph (242780) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340215)

The person who has an x360 hooked up to an LCD is not really in the target market for this device, I imagine.

With out ture2way what is the point? (1)

Joe The Dragon (967727) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338837)

Without ture2way what is the point? you will still need a cable box. The sat boxes, u-verse and the TIVO boxes can do more then the apple TV can do.

And if apple where to make a DVR then it will need a Much bigger HD + E-sata ports.

The Direct Tv boxes can do some of the stuff that the apple tv can do and there is a new Direct TV coming So I don't see a apple TV for Direct comeing any time soon.

May for cable where the cable co boxes suck but then you need to hope that the cable co don't mess up ture2way for that to happen.

I think apple wanted to make a apple tv with DRV but the tivo cable card mess slowed that down and they are waiting for 2 way cable card / true2way be for they make one.

Re:With out ture2way what is the point? (2, Informative)

Kristoph (242780) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340251)

No need for the TV itself to have storage.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/03/13/apple_tv_dvr_interface_revealed_in_patent_filings.html [appleinsider.com]

The content goes onto your iPod like remote (which might, in fact, be an iPod Nano / iPod Touch with connectivity) which means you can take it with you and display it on any Apple TV.

Knowing apple... (1)

cpotoso (606303) | more than 5 years ago | (#25338851)

... this new device will only display shows that were personally approved by Steve (OH! MAGNIFICENT) Jobs and it will be locked down "tight". Two hours after release, hackers would have figured out how to install SSH and some software manager and there will be a nice microcosmos of hacked applications for "jailbroken" devices. Then apple will release firmware updates to try to brick these devices, and so on and so forth... After a while itunes will sell applications for this device, etc, etc. It is just a large-screen iphone, eh?

The Apple cycle... (5, Funny)

itsdapead (734413) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339005)

  1. Rumours circulate of Apple developing flying cars (iFly) teleportation (iHopeTheresNoFly) and tabletop cold fusion (damn, MacFusion is taken!)
  2. Apple announces press event
  3. Mac fanbois approach orgasm. Badly photoshopped images of imagined products appear and are taken seriously.
  4. More plausible photos of faster Macs with slightly bigger trackpads and new colour options for iPods appear and are dismissed by tumescent fanbois as badly photoshopped fakes.
  5. Apple launches faster Macs with slightly bigger trackpads and new colours of iPods.
  6. MacHaters proclaim the failure to deliver imaginary unannounced products as a sign that Apple is doomed. Fanbois are briefly disappointed, but this is dispelled by the comforting ritual of the unboxing ceremony when their new pink iPod arrives.
  7. Rumours appear that Apple is developing holographic TV (iStrain), faster-than-light wormhole travel (iHole) and an intelligent pop-up toaster that actually works (iWatchTooMuchRedDwarf). Badly photoshopped pictures of perfectly browned bread products appear on macrumors.com...

News about possible news? (3, Insightful)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339049)

I entirely agree - that's two articles in a row now that's not been about actual news, but news - based on rumour - that they might make some announcement in future. Why not just wait until the actual news itself?

There are enough perfectly good articles about actual news that get rejected - why take up valuable space on the page with posts based on rumour about vaporware, that will either turn out to be dupes if the thing's released, or false if it's not?

(On another note, anyone noticed tagging recently seems to be broken in any browser except Firefox? I now have to wait for that to load, in order to tag the article "Vaporware"...)

Re:News about possible news? (1)

node 3 (115640) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340649)

Why not just wait until the actual news itself?

Because people read/click on the rumors? You certainly did.

Re:News about possible news? (1)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340939)

Read the article? Here on Slashdot?

8. ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25339501)

8. Anti-Apple Fanbois post on Slashdot sarcastically detailing the cycle.

9... (1)

itsdapead (734413) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339775)

8. Anti-Apple Fanbois post on Slashdot sarcastically detailing the cycle.

9. Anonymous cowards attempt meta-sarcasm
10. ???
11. This page contains a thread which is taking an unusually long time to finish. To end this thread now, mention Hitler.

12 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25340351)

12. Profit?!?!?! (obligatory)

Re:9... (1)

Jesus_666 (702802) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340435)

11. This page contains a thread which is taking an unusually long time to finish. To end this thread now, mention Hitler.

Adolf Hitler lived from 1889 to 1954.

Oh wait, I think Godwin's Law only applies to comparisons. Steve Jobs is most likely taller than Adolf Hitler was.

There. Totally aced the Hitler comparison.

Re:9... (1)

node 3 (115640) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340683)

You're right. His number 8 really should be at number 3.5. In fact, had you done that, it would have been rather clever. Maybe next time.

Not this time (1, Interesting)

tgibbs (83782) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339211)

The teasers they are sending out clearly indicate that the next event will concern notebook laptops. These days, Apple events are very tightly focused on a particular product line--the last event was for iPods, and they barely even mentioned the iPhone, much less the Mac.

Fundamentally, I think that it is a good idea, and given that they already have the AppleTV name, I imagine that they are looking to go in this direction. But I don't think the Apple TV as it currently exists adds enough value to get an Apple TV set into the high margin arena where Apple likes to play.

I think that Apple has been making a fundamental mistake by tying the Apple TV box too tightly to Apple content. This is different from what they have done with the iPod, which supports mp3 as well as Apple's format. I also think that whereas buy-to-own is king for music, Netflix-style subscription is going to be the dominant model for video distribution.

So if Apple really wants the Apple TV to be more than a minor player in the set-top box market, and to add value to an Apple-branded entertainment display, they need to:

1) Play back or stream video in a wide-range of formats as the XBox360 and PS3 do. This should be easy; everything they need is already available open-source. Just include a UPnP client and something like VLC.

2) Include Netflix subscription capability, as the XBox360 is about to do. Heck, perhaps Apple should just acquire Netflix.

3) Put Safari on it. Even the iPod touch supports Safari. The PS3 and Wii even have web browsers, although they are not very appealing. Add an app to the iPhone/iTouch that makes it function as a touchpad for Safari on AppleTV.

If they do these things, then a TV set with AppleTV built into it would likely be a strong contender.

Did he sit on his lap? (-1, Offtopic)

uassholes (1179143) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339335)

Who gives a fuck if they were sitting or having anal sex.

...sat down with...

Sick and tired of cliche business jargon.

I've got to go sit down with my toilet.

I'll believe it when I see it (1)

gyrogeerloose (849181) | more than 5 years ago | (#25339349)

C-NET has a very bad track record when it comes to predicting future Apple products.

Re:I'll believe it when I see it (1)

eniacfoa (1203466) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341103)

fukn oath they do

It's the end of Physical media! (1)

A Wise Guy (1006169) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340123)

It's the world of physical media! Welcome to "rent world"!

Are you kidding?!?! (1)

multimediavt (965608) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340129)

...a writer for CNet UK sat down with Mahalo's Jason Calacanis, who told CNet he knew for a fact that Apple is developing fully networked LCD TV sets.

Yeah, they're called iMacs.

A Television Set. (1)

walter_f (889353) | more than 5 years ago | (#25340337)

The "next great thing", according to Steve Jobs?

Oh well.

But then again, it's "Apple Inc." now, not "Apple Computer, Inc."

Going, Going... (1)

eniacfoa (1203466) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341037)

one day, its inevitable that apple will stop manufacturing computers...I hope they are extremely successful outside the computer biz, so much so that it is no longer makes financial sense for them to develop computers/OS's. It will be a great day for the computer biz... I would love to see some real competition in the computer market again, Apple dont like to compete hard in computer biz...those of us too young to remember the computer wars of the 80's will never understand how much innovation was happening and how cool it was to get your next machine...it was always a mind blower. Especially if you bought an amiga in 1985. Full preemptive multitasking OS and custom built graphics chips vastly superior to anything on the market. Many features that other home computers would not have until a decade later. Those working at Apple at the time thought they were going to be slaughtered by the Amiga, but they didnt know that Commodore seriously had no idea how to sell computers and in 1994 they went bust after giving a big technological lead away. Apples and PC's looked like typewriters in comparison when the amiga was launched... these days i know my next pc will number crunch more, but its so boring and predictable. fantastic new features seem to take a lot longer to happen, cpu just gets faster....my supposedly super fast dual core doesnt do anything much apart from number crunching and gfx that my 1998 P2 couldnt do pretty much the exact same way. The quest for complete compatibility and mega high profits is holding back computers. My god, if a new architecture/OS was developed with what we know now...damn that would be one crazy computer...I want to be blown away like I was when I bought my amiga in 1985. MS and apple have never ever done that. So let apple get out of the biz with these i-everything products and let someone who actually wants to compete in. No one is invincible. That means you MS/Apple

A Solution is Needed (0, Flamebait)

Manzanita (167643) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341199)

And Apple is just the company to deliver it. The whole system for watching TV, whether it is movies or other regular TV, is broken. It is a pain in the ass. There is too much chaos. Apple has done a very good job, judging by market success, at creating an orderly, pleasing user experience for both music players and smart phones. You can count on it that they are working on something for video delivery, and video on the iPod is not the end of it. As far as it being announced soon, that too is plausible. They have certainly had enough time to work on it. Technology has advanced since the Apple TV, which didn't interest me but, I am certainly curious to see what they come up with next for that space.

-Dan

MythTV (3, Interesting)

viridari (1138635) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341399)

How long before someone figures out how to jailbreak the TV and reload it with Mythbuntu?

Then it might actually be useful.

If the iPod and iPhone are any indication, I don't want the gilded cage of an Apple TV set.

Well, yet another present for my girlfriend ... (1)

PolygamousRanchKid (1290638) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341555)

... she's a graphic artist, and they tend to have a serious symbiotic emotional relationship with Apple products, as Texans have with firearms.

So after a G4 a while back, a MacBook Pro last year, this year will probably be an iPhone G3, provided that it is offered unlocked in the country where we live.

Hey, an Apple iTV in 2009, one less thing to scratch my head about thinking.

I use Linux and AIX because I like to, Windows XP sometimes because I have to. Usually, when I have to do something on those systems that I do not know how to do, I google and even RFTM.

With my girlfriend's Apple stuff, she tells me what she wants the system to do. I have no idea how to do it, but if I don't think, and just click around a bit, things work out ok.

Just my experience Apple stuff.

Tell them to HURRY!! (1)

zmollusc (763634) | more than 5 years ago | (#25341667)

OMG I can't wait, I have been fretting that I don't pay enough via TV license fees and cable charges for repeats of crap films and series from 20 years ago. Can I pre-order yet?

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>