Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

DARPA Contract Hints At Real-Time Video Spying

kdawson posted more than 5 years ago | from the i-know-what-you-did-last-minute dept.

The Military 73

The Washington Post has a story picking apart a DARPA contract document to assert that advanced video spying from the sky is on the way. The contract in question was awarded last month and involves indexing video feeds and matching feeds against stored footage. The example given is for an analyst to ask for an alert whenever any real-time Predator feed from Iraq shows a vehicle making a U-turn. "Last month, Kitware, a small software company with offices in New York and North Carolina, teamed up with 19 other companies and universities and won the $6.7 million first phase of the DARPA contract, which is not expected to be completed before 2011. During the Cold War, satellites and aircraft took still pictures that intelligence analysts reviewed one frame at a time to identify the locations of missile silos, airplane hangars, submarine pens and factories, said... an expert in space and intelligence matters. 'Now with new full-motion video intelligence techniques, we are looking at people and their behavior in public,' he said. The resolution capability of the video systems ranges from four inches to a foot, depending on the collector and environmental conditions at the time, according to the DARPA paper."

cancel ×

73 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

one can make a killing (4, Funny)

ionix5891 (1228718) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439269)

selling umbrellas (or tinfoil hats?)

Re:one can make a killing (2, Funny)

Spazztastic (814296) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439345)

And don't forget removing fillings! It's all a conspiracy by the MLB!

Re:one can make a killing (1)

Justin Hopewell (1260242) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439835)

I wasn't aware the baseball leagues were into surveillence now!

Re:one can make a killing (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25440105)

That whooshing noise is Mark McGwire's bat swinging at some "dingers".

Re:one can make a killing (1)

Ron_Fitzgerald (1101005) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440135)

Does no one remember The Simpsons?

Re:one can make a killing (1)

Theoboley (1226542) | more than 5 years ago | (#25442671)

I thought DARPA Was just a made up firm in Metal Gear Solid 2... MAN was I Wrong.

Re:one can make a killing (3, Interesting)

mcgrew (92797) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439633)

What good is a phone call if you're unable to speak, Mr Anderson?

What good is an umbrella when there are ATM cameras, store cameras, red light cameras, etc that the government can switch between in real time at will? That's your biggest threat, not a satellite camera. The satellite camera finds you and perhaps follows your car, although that will be unnecessary since you have a cell phone and On-Star and a GPS mapping system they can use to track you.

As someone's sig says, Orwell was an optimist.

Verizon protects from being tracked by GPS phones (3, Funny)

ToadMan8 (521480) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440161)

Government requests be damned! Verizon charges everybody 10 bucks / month for GPS tracking; even the new debt clock [usnews.com] can't handle that much!

Re:Verizon protects from being tracked by GPS phon (2, Informative)

vux984 (928602) | more than 5 years ago | (#25450471)

Government requests be damned! Verizon charges everybody 10 bucks / month for GPS tracking; even the new debt clock can't handle that much!

Verizon charges you 10 bucks to tell you where you are. But they surely collect that information regardless of whether you purchase access to it. Meanwhile its still available to -them- to be handed over to government, data-mined, and otherwise sold to advertisers.

I'm sure there is all sorts of information you can determine from data-mining cellular gps data... what percentage of church goers visit mcdonalds vs burger king after service... how many different restaurants the user visits in an average month... what percentage of those meals were lunch vs dinner... the correlation between their rate plan and their restaurant choices...

Re:one can make a killing (1)

Warhawke (1312723) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441753)

"I thought what I'd do is pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."

Re:one can make a killing (1)

jtgd (807477) | more than 5 years ago | (#25450205)

What good is an umbrella when there are ATM cameras, store cameras, red light cameras, etc that the government can switch between in real time at will?

Maybe we should all start wearing burkas.

Re:one can make a killing (1)

mcgrew (92797) | more than 5 years ago | (#25453193)

Or George Bush masks (Until january when we'll switch to McCain or Obama masks)

Re:one can make a killing (1)

jo42 (227475) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441027)

Time to paint "FU Bushtard!" on the roof of yer house...

Re:one can make a killing (2, Funny)

Rob the Bold (788862) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441185)

Time to paint "FU Bushtard!" on the roof of yer house...

They coulda read that from satellite. Time to paint it on your car roof and embroider it on your hat. Me, I'll just take a sharpie to my poor bald head.

Re:one can make a killing (2, Funny)

Dare nMc (468959) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441625)

well paint the key 0x09 F9 ... C0 [elliottback.com] Then they will have to blur out your house, or be in violation of the DMCA. (or arrest you, and paint your house; charging you government contractor rates to do so)

This is caused by Italians (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25439273)

Them and their nefarious ices. I say down with Italians and your sister. She is hot in an ugly kind of way.

Italians are modding me down (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25440141)

Possibly they are also Albanians. But I am 95% sure that they are led by and mainly composed of Italians. Down with Italians and their sneaky hats!

Spy on (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25439329)

This [goatse.cz]

Cloudy (4, Insightful)

courteaudotbiz (1191083) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439333)

Well I guess that if I don't want to be caught, I just have to wait 'til it's cloudy to commit a crime...

Re:Cloudy (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25439359)

the one time a invasion a privacy issue comes up and i'm proud to live in the UK

Re:Cloudy (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25439481)

Well, if by "crime" you mean "making a u-turn in Iraq" then I don't think clouds will help you. I'm sure Predator drones are equipped with infrared cameras as well as traditional ones.

Re:Cloudy (1)

Qzukk (229616) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441891)

Well, if by "crime" you mean "making a u-turn in Iraq"

Or u-turns in the other places using such UAVs, like Los Angeles [technovelgy.com] .

Re:Cloudy (2, Informative)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439531)

Well I guess that if I don't want to be caught, I just have to wait 'til it's cloudy to commit a crime...

Sadly, even that is not likely to work. If this article from wayyy back in 2000 is any indication [uq.edu.au] , they can see through clouds, smoke, etc.

Quick, there was that sub? (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440275)

Only way to be safe!? [slashdot.org]

Re:Quick, there was that sub? (1)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440609)

Interesting. Are you implying that you believe that Fossett may not actually be dead, but is hiding out in a submarine somewhere deep below the surface of the ocean? Or am I reading too much into your statement?

Re:Quick, there was that sub? (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440943)

No, rather that the satellites and small flying spythingys probably have a hard time seeing what you are up to under 10 km of water. Maybe.

Re:Quick, there was that sub? (1)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 5 years ago | (#25443005)

You're probably right, although who knows what improvements in advanced SONAR the military might have.

I'm safe anyway (3, Funny)

aliquis (678370) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440217)

4 inches?

They still won't be able to see me masturbate!

Re:I'm safe anyway (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25442855)

Speak for yourself, you insensitive clod!

Re:I'm safe anyway (1)

aliquis (678370) | more than 5 years ago | (#25443791)

Actually in this precise area I consider myself to be very sensetive.

Re:Cloudy (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25450079)

You think they only use the visible spectrum? Not only are UV and IR already in use, but so are UWB to look through brush and thin walls, FYI.

Not very scary (5, Insightful)

FourthAge (1377519) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439375)

Sorry to say that I just can't be paranoid about "spy satellites" in the cellphone era. Satellite imaging won't give real-time coverage of a large area, so it is useless for mass surveillance.

These days, there's no point inventing new privacy threats to worry about, since you already carry an radio tracking device, and there's already at least one database with a list of your recent movements in it. But by all means, do continue to keep your passport in a tin-foil wrapper...

Re:Not very scary (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25439445)

Learn to read. The article refers to streaming video from unmanned reconnaissance vehicles, not satellite images.

But you are right. They are already implementing intrusive monitoring on a grand scale. This is just more of the same.

It is useful to distract (5, Insightful)

SmallFurryCreature (593017) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439475)

Let everyone worry about the tracking and data gathering. It stops people from actually worrying about the slide to a goverment that might use it.

A total surveilance system that is NOT used is harmless. But a goverment that WANTS a total surveilance system can introduce one anytime they want to.

Focus on keep democracy going, not worrying about what some goverment might use someday. Prevent them from coming into power.

Remember that the phone-tapping done by the bush administration didn't use any new tech. Phone taps have been around since phones have been around. Hell, telegraphs and telex was tapped. What happened is that a goverment was allowed into power that used the tech.

Fighting the tech is impossible unless you want society to stop advancing. Stop the wrong people from getting into power instead.

Of course, that would require you to vote for someone on other grounds then the one promising you a tax cut or who seems to a be a likeable guy. America, were a guy looses the election because he just seems to smart.

Re:It is useful to distract (1)

sjdude (470014) | more than 5 years ago | (#25442665)

Stop the wrong people from getting into power instead.

Just take away fiat money and you take away the incentive the "wrong people" have for wanting to be in power in the first place.

Oh yeah, I forgot, that's already happening right now. New currency to replace the US Dollar, anyone?

Re:It is useful to distract (1)

recharged95 (782975) | more than 5 years ago | (#25446767)

"Of course, that would require you to vote for someone on other grounds then the one promising you a tax cut or who seems to a be a likeable guy."

In most cases, who the F* cares about voting? Ok, I dare question voting...

Why? Just uphold accountability with the people in power (i.e. do something about it).

It doesn't matter who you vote for, just that people in power must be held accountable for their decisions. It's all about accountability, instead of just screwing things up, unbelievable networking, and getting a $1million a year consulting gig/book deal after you leave office.

Re:It is useful to distract (1)

DNS-and-BIND (461968) | more than 5 years ago | (#25450683)

Yeah. Because elitism is SUCH a great form of government. It's not like it's ever been tried before...

Re:Not very scary (1)

cusco (717999) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439735)

A few UAVs borrowed from the military are already deployed and functioning along the southern border, and Fatherland Security ordered a whole snot-load of them a couple of months back for its own use. Although they declared that they were going to be used for illegal alien and drug interdiction along the borders I really don't see anything preventing them from being used over New York City if they want.

Re:Not very scary (1)

FourthAge (1377519) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439851)

A few UAVs borrowed from the military are already deployed and functioning along the southern border...

That's interesting, but I think their uses would be very limited if they were over NYC, where there is a lot of cover (buildings) and the number of people is very large. Conversely, cellphone-based tracking continues to be useful in any city, regardless of the population size and the number of buildings.

Radio Tracking Device (1)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 5 years ago | (#25446239)

Speak for yourself, some of us have NOT given up our privacy like you have.

Just because people bend over for violation A, doesn't mean we have to accept violation B, or C.

Resolution (4, Insightful)

ledow (319597) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439485)

"The resolution capability of the video systems ranges from four inches to a foot"

Although impressive to myself, who doesn't keep up with the latest and greatest satellite technology, this is hardly a cause for concern. Imagine yourself from above in four-inch pixels (assuming the accuracy of that statement and that the hardware can *actually* do that in non-laboratory conditions). Maybe a handful of dots total, one or maybe two pixels wide? You'd be able to "spot" a car, but you wouldn't necessarily be able to tell it's make, occupants, etc. You'd be able to spot a person wearing normal clothes in the open air (JUST) but you'd have a hard job telling *how many* people were in that blob of pixels and you'd have no chance at telling *who* they were and if they were adequately camoflauged... no chance. You'd spot more of their shadows, to be honest.

You *might* be able to spot if a vehicle in the desert does a U-turn if you have an AWFUL lot of processing power and a very limited area to monitor. You might be able to easily spot a rush of tanks on your position. You *might* be able to find some WMD's if they are being moved. But, to be honest, I don't see how this is any better than what the military have now except being "real-time" (which just seems to multiply the costs of everything from the satellite to its maintenance to the radio bandwidth required and the processing power needed with little benefit over "snapshot"-style systems if they are quick enough). Although real-time intelligence like this would have a place, it's hardly Enemy Of The State even if we assume a 2x "liar factor".

Useful in wartime - no doubt about it. Useful in peacetime - Highly dubious. And for the conspiracy theorists: Useful for spying on the people - No.

Re:Resolution (3, Insightful)

demachina (71715) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440527)

This isn't insightful, this guy didn't even read the /. front page.

This video analysis doesn't have to be from satellites, the example in the submission is explicitly a Predator which is a UAV. The video has the resolution to see your every movement, just maybe not tiny objects in your hand. In fact the goal appears to be to analyze video from UAV's like Predator and Global Hawk, and there are a number of similar systems for blimps and high altitude balloons. This surveillance isn't even remotely new, its been going on in Iraq, Afghanistan and in the U.S. on the Mexican border for years. In fact its been happening in the U.S. from news and police helicopters since the 70's. I'm pretty sure they've had Infrared video for years too. It sounds like DARPA is just advancing the state of watching the video with computers especially to go back and scan archive footage for an event of particular interest to kick it back to a human to look at to save expensive human time staring at video playbacks, and maybe to allow a dramatic increase in the number of surveillance cameras deployed....somewhere....without the corresponding expensive increase in humans to watch them.

Its not particularly of concern for spying on Americans in their homes since most of the DOD UAV's are in Iraq, Afghanistan and on the borders, unless you live on the border. On the other hand there is nothing stopping it from being turned to spy on people in the U.S. in the name of homeland defense, other than a few flimsy laws, the Bush administration has probably already thrown aside. I news pieces on the blimp video systems were definitely being aimed at the domestic market to watch big sporting events and the like. Of course since we've had news and police helicopters spying on us since the 1970's nothing new here, move along, other than DARPA is funding moving image recognition software.

If you value your privacy close your curtains and buy lots and lots of insulation.

Re:Resolution (1)

jimicus (737525) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440675)

You'd be able to spot a person wearing normal clothes in the open air (JUST) but you'd have a hard job telling *how many* people were in that blob of pixels and you'd have no chance at telling *who* they were and if they were adequately camoflauged... no chance.

So initial identification can be done by people on the ground; once that's done the spy satellite does the following. Just like any police show involving helicopters.

Re:Resolution (1)

e-scetic (1003976) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441241)

You make the assumption that it's only useful for spying on people IFF the resolution is good enough to recognize them if they were standing, walking, etc. You say a few pixels/dots aren't useful. But then you go on to say it's useful for tracking cars. How is tracking cars not the same as spying on people?

Suppose you're considered a troublemaker, you're labeled a domestic terrorist so it's useful to know who you're interacting with. With this technology we'll know you visited a particular restaurant at a particular time. From there, we can get a list of all credit cards and cell phones used in the vicinity in that time frame, each gives us a list of names, addresses, SSN's, etc. From triangulating the cell phone locations we additionally determine which cell phones were used in which cars. Since we'll have, as you say, wide area video footage of all the cars in the vicinity we'll also be able to track the movements of those cars, where they went, and their associations too. Therefore from this "highly dubious" technology we can generate quite a thorough list of all known and possible associations. This is especially true since nowadays most people practically live through their cars.

It's almost guaranteed this will be used against common everyday people, just for holding particular beliefs or political viewpoints, or for voting for the wrong party. Ordinary protesters are already being labeled as terrorists and put on lists, entered into criminal databases, etc. Civil disobedience, violent or not, is already considered terrorism. It might be a good idea to start thinking about how you'll deal with it when it happens.

Re:Resolution (1)

Tibor the Hun (143056) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441455)

So basically it will look like Grand Theft Auto 2.
I hope some of us remember what it looked like before it went 3D.

missing the point slightly (1)

toby (759) | more than 5 years ago | (#25442117)

you wouldn't necessarily be able to tell it's make, occupants,

It can be more important to know exactly where that car travelled for every moment of the past 48 hours, what addresses it stopped at, etc. In other words, the Feds already know who you are - they just want to know everything that you do, and high resolution surveillance is cheaper than gumshoes on the ground. Plus, car tracking and even pedestrian tracking seem feasibly automatable.

Yes, the implications of such a system are horrifying (combined with, for example, the continuous spying on domestic communications that is already in place). No 'free' citizen can accept constant government surveillance.

What about in 10 years? Re:Resolution (1)

dj42 (765300) | more than 5 years ago | (#25446257)

Will your opinion remain unchanged in 10 years, when the resolution increases by 20x?

Patents to Movie Writers? (2, Insightful)

NoobixCube (1133473) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439511)

Seriously, how many science-realities do we have today that were science-fiction a few years (or decades) ago? Did the film writers or book authors get any royalties when corporations suddenly took out patents on their ideas?

Any technology will be abused in the wrong (i.e 'human') hands, so I'm just not going to bother complaining about the huge privacy concerns (I'm sure others will do enough of that, it's Slashdot afterall), instead, I'm going to say it's interesting to see another science-fiction technology become science-reality.

Urban Camo? (1)

gsgriffin (1195771) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439959)

I can imagine the hats that look like a sidewalk from the top. Such paranoid people need to not do evil things that would cause someone to need to track you down or else stop watching conspiracy theory movies. You really think the government is going to start shaving an ID onto your head and force everyone to walk around without hats. The technology here is for tracking vehicles. Wouldn't be cool if they could employ this for the Amber Alert system too? Let them spend money working on these things.

At last - something that wont worry us in the UK (2, Insightful)

Chrisq (894406) | more than 5 years ago | (#25439975)

Just about everywhere is covered by conventional video cameras anyway. One more in the sky won't make any difference!

UAVs with potential (1)

yogibaer (757010) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440075)

There seems to be a a lot of activity in this area (cf.: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/05/1157243 [slashdot.org] ) with not so much satellites as the basic technology but UAVs like the Predator, which - according to this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RQ-1) article is also operated by the CIA. With a service ceiling of app. 25,000 feet you should not be able to see or or hear then coming and it should be able to deliver much higer resolutions than four inches from an altitude of, say, 3000 feet. This could be useful for spying on people. BTW: The software does not care, if it is analysing videofeeds from a (relatively fast moving) UAV, a helicopter or your neighborhood CCTV camera.

There's a perfectly good use for this technology (3, Funny)

mmalove (919245) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440337)

When a politician claims they don't know, don't recall or don't remember a particular event that inconveniently disagrees with the self portrait they're trying to paint, they should get one of these cameras to help them remember.

Re:There's a perfectly good use for this technolog (1)

DrugCheese (266151) | more than 5 years ago | (#25447439)

That's what our cameras should be used for. Instead our employees want to spy on us, the owners, to keep us in line. WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Just lookout for overcast days... (1)

0x537461746943 (781157) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440463)

Those will be the new scheduled attack days I suspect. Nothing is foolproof.

Aria (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25440931)

Cool, let's network all the video into one big computer with a sexy voice...

Grant, not Contract (2, Informative)

feijai (898706) | more than 5 years ago | (#25440955)

And that makes all the difference in the world.

The term I picked up on was "universities". Universities do not get involved in contracts. They live in the world of DAPRA grants, typically at level 6.1 and rarely 6.2 (old terms for "basic research" and "transition technology"). DARPA's grants are often blue-sky stuff: "Imagine that we had sharks with laser beams on their heads. How could we use them?" DARPA is encouraged to think forward even when the technology support doesn't exist. That's what the first "A" in DARPA stands for. So just because this is a system for doing real-time video surveillance (which is fairly common topicwise), and the blue-sky example is a keyhole satellite, doesn't at all mean that there's a keyhole satellite which enables real-time video surveillance. It just means the project manager is being encouraged to dream big.

no new news here (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25441093)

I don't see why the Post considers this news. Our company considered bidding on this contract. The sensor technology is routine and has been around for years. Its true some higher res cameras are becoming available but the UAVs have always had video capability.

UAVs only operate in combat areas for air traffic reasons. They are not used for spying on civilians.

Re:no new news here (4, Insightful)

professorguy (1108737) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441489)

Not used on civilians!?!

What are the people of Iraq considered to be?

Oh, I see, if you CALL someone something other than civilian, they're fair game. No way THAT can be abused.....

Re:no new news here (1)

Fluffeh (1273756) | more than 5 years ago | (#25447133)

They have people in Iraq?

*insert strong political statement*

Given the way the US army counts casualties from either side, I thought the only things that lived in Iraq were camels, insurgents and US Troops doing tours.

Not really sure where that came up from.

Wait... (1)

uxbn_kuribo (1146975) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441341)

A DARPA story that doesn't mention Metal Gear Solid? Hold on, let me try: "What about cameras mounted to the ends of slow-moving rockets?"

Tradition (1)

Ukab the Great (87152) | more than 5 years ago | (#25441593)

- Reasonably attractive hooker to seduce target: $1000
- Hidden spy camera to record target's naughty shenanigans: $500
- Express Mail of blackmail photos to targets' home address: $50
- Making defense contractors look like overpriced idiots: priceless.

Nothing New (1)

hardburlyboogerman (161244) | more than 5 years ago | (#25442015)

Looks like I'm gonna have to repaint the one finger salute on the roof of my home.

Hollywood is helping propagandise it (1)

toby (759) | more than 5 years ago | (#25442053)

Movies like "Deja Vu" are meticulously designed to make this kind of surveillance acceptable to the public.

Would be very interesting to follow the money trail of films like that.

Interesting off-the-shelf technology (1)

PPH (736903) | more than 5 years ago | (#25443369)

I saw a demonstration of some interesting technology that can pick moving objects out of a digital TV feed and analyze their velocity vectors in real time. It is based (from what I gather) on manipulating and analyzing the B-frames from the data stream. I'm wondering if this is what they are trying to develop.

kitware and the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) (2, Interesting)

airuck (300354) | more than 5 years ago | (#25444415)

Kitware was the company founded to support the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) [vtk.org] , an open source software system for data visualization. VTK has a huge C++ library as well as hooks for scripting for very rapid development. Who wouldn't want to build custom 3D views of their data [flickr.com] ?

Re:kitware and the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25447261)

By the way, Kitware [kitware.com] also develops CMake, the build system used by Second Life [secondlife.com] and KDE.

Recorded. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25444915)

How many mils will be surveyed, measured and recorded.

GEO-EYELET (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25445141)

CHET-NUN
Did you say this system is coming? It already is here, and has been in use for some time.

American medical data has been sold to European nations for a long time now.

Full radio spectrum did you say? This means psuedo-scientific health data is being shared on US.

Obviously you all need one of my GEO-eyelet veils:
http://www.visual-vault.com/hawkshare/07bank/notices/sir-veil.gif

Will it signal an alert (1)

nurb432 (527695) | more than 5 years ago | (#25446221)

When i flip the bastards off?

This is REALLY getting out of hand.

starwars goes sky wars! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25447007)

I see more like low-alt. cameras picking gigapixel video on a secured zone, like bagdag.
if there is an explosion, you can select the tile of the image where attack has ocurred, then rewind until the attack and more. you see the terrorist parking the car, and then "split" the image. Image-A goes rewinded and you can track the terrorist to where the attack where prepared, and even you see other people entering the hideout and preparing the attack.
then goes to image-B on the attack moment, and forward to see where has the terrorist gone and where is her actual hideout.

but then you cash a politician involved, and he send killers to your house and make a conspiration against you, and... well, let this to spielberg! :D

I might know someone on this project... (2, Interesting)

NouberNou (1105915) | more than 5 years ago | (#25448521)

A very secretive/private girl I know at a very big university in a certain western state just got a grant (or part of a grant) to do something like this a few months ago. She has for the past few years been interning at a couple large defense contractors and also certain government agencies involved in space.

She didn't go into much and I don't want to give away any more details than I should (losing her funding would suck, she has already spent two years on this as her thesis work).

Basically she said they are working on what the article said, but more specifically tracking specific people via satellite.

I do not know if that means actively passing a person from satellite to satellite as they move into and out of area or what but it sounded pretty spooky.

Re:I might know someone on this project... (1)

JackassJedi (1263412) | more than 5 years ago | (#25451657)

A guy i know recently told me that while being under NDA, he's willing to slip me that such stuff *does* in fact already exist, involves huge supercomputers (think 200,000+ cores) and is already being used in Iraq. Maybe he was also talking about stuff that is going to be introduced. He works in the digital movie business so I'm not sure what his connection with that stuff is, but he is in himself credible.

Non-Military Uses? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#25450487)

How about using this technology to monitor traffic patterns during rush-hour or spot accidents the moment the occur? Certainly a satellite could detect the rapid deceleration of a vehicle hitting a pole, or a car spinning on ice, or a truck traveling the wrong way on a ramp, or spot a car careening off-road. How about just checking for speeding and then tracking the offender until a patrol car can apprehend them? Seems like boundless possibilities.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>