Microsoft Says H-1B Workers Among Those Losing Jobs 612
CWmike notes that after a US Senator urged Microsoft to lay off H-1B workers first, Microsoft says it is cutting a 'significant number' of foreign workers as part of the layoff it announced last week. But experts say there is nothing in the law requiring a company to cut the jobs of H-1B workers before US workers. David Kussin, an immigration attorney, said, 'In fact, the law is very well designed to say that you have to treat H-1Bs the same as US citizens in all regards.' Another H-1B critic, UC Davis professor Norman Matloff, said the Senator's letter would help their fight. 'If Microsoft doesn't state that they will lay off the H-1Bs first — and they won't state this — then it would be awfully tough for Bill Gates to come back to the Hill and urge an H-1B increase, wouldn't it?'"
Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
It's an easy thing to fix - require that H1B visa holders receive the same pay and benefits for their work as the rest of the workforce. If companies really have problems finding citizens to fill jobs, and aren't just trolling for lower paid wage slaves, then it ought not to be a problem, right?
Man, I'd love to see the tech industry try to talk its way out of that.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The biggest danger could be that overseas workers are cheaper to keep therefore 'let's get rid of our own people first' which would really add to the economic problems.
I guess that's why Ms had to be pushed to do the sensible thing.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Interesting)
There should not be workers here on visas. Especially for high-tech jobs.
Give them full legal residency and give them the option to stay instead of sending them home after 6 years and perpetuating the "shortage".
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Absolutely we should be recruiting them to the US. Plus, how much of our problem are H1Bs? I want to see the government twisting arms to fire offshore employees and doing harm to companies who have moved their engineering out of the US entirely.
H1Bs pay the same rent we do, they pay the same "cost of living", and are subject to the same workforce protects the US has. They may be a little cheaper, but they can't be that much cheaper or they couldn't afford to live here.
US labor is expensive not entirely beca
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Informative)
Actually that's not true. H1B's often accept a dramatically reduced standard of living, with the intent to make as much money as they can for the duration of their visa, then take it home with them. Sometimes this is still much better than the conditions they left at home.
H1B's make on average 23% less than their citizen counterparts [ddj.com].
The citizen counterparts tend to want things like kids, gadgets, a nice car, good clothes, a house, etc. The H1B tends to have 1 week's worth of clothes, takes public transportation or has an inexpensive used car, lives here alone (maybe with family back home), lives in a one-room studio apartment, and maintains a minimum of optional expenses.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Insightful)
H1B's make on average 23% less than their citizen counterparts [ddj.com].
And I'll bet that that's an age bias. H1Bs are mostly young guys. Some go home, others get green cards and stay (and so aren't H1Bs any more). So the H1B dataset will be dominated by entry- and low-level salaries. The citizen dataset includes those people, but also includes much better paid engineers with 30 years of experience, senior managers and the like.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Interesting)
Then let it be fair... (Score:5, Interesting)
I mean if you do not see why a company should pay more for my services when someone is willing to do it for less, then I would like to see the following:
Microsoft should outsource management or hire H-1B visa personnel for management positions as well. It will be cheaper for the company too. How about that?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Really? I thought that the company existed to serve the CEO and his hand-picked board of directors. Not the workers, and heaven forbid they look after share-holders (unless the CEO is a founder). That's why CEO pay rises are at the highest level since the Great Depression.
Heck, a CEO doesn't need to outperform their competitors. A company that performs dismally compared to their competitors will still rise or fall (in share price) based on wide-ranging market forces, not whether or not the company was well
Re:Then let it be fair... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sure some CEOs are worthless turds, but I'm sure there are others that *are* worth their exorbitant salaries. I mean, businesses fail all the time. In a competitive market, it's not like companies have a whole lot of cash to throw around for things that don't return the investment. The argument that CEO salaries are typically so huge that just one could pay for an n-dollar raise for all the other employees actually highlights my point - Unless *every* single company is engaging in some sort of "CEO Salary collusion," the ones who pay big money for turd-CEOs instead of more, or better paid workers, or else a CEO that performs, will fail.
Personal incredulity that, "one person can't possibly make such a big difference to justify those salaries," isn't really a valid argument. I mean, really? *You* could run GE, or Microsoft, or Lockheed-Martin, or whatever just as well as anyone? That's what everyone who's never led, or been close to the top-level leadership of an organization thinks...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's actually interesting, because whenever you quiz a board of directors about high CEO pay, they always say the same thing: it's to be competitive with what other companies are also doing.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
> Unless *every* single company is engaging in some sort of "CEO Salary collusion"
That's actually pretty much what's going on. CEO salaries are determined by CEO salary consultants, who base them on average CEO salaries plus a bit (to attract an above average CEO). The result is a relentless upward spiral of CEO salaries.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Then again, some of the smartest people I have *EVER* worked with have been H1B holders.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
I really don't understand why a company should "hire locally" first when its not in its best interest to do so.
I didn't used to see why either but somebody who is wiser than I am put it this way: Michael Dell is too cheap to pay for the country that created him
In other words, the United States (for all it's pluses and minuses) got Microsoft/Dell/etc going, why aren't they giving back to the United States? I'm not some hippie liberal douche but I tend to believe that there are more important things than the bottom line. We owe it to future generations not to undercut our own population in the perpetual search for lower wages.
I would also say that this applies to consumers as well as to CEOs. If you aren't willing to buy anything more expensive than the cheap plastic shit sold at Wal-Mart then you are part of the problem.
(And before I get modded troll the 'hippie liberal douche' remark is a South Park reference)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Here I was thinking that our society is supposed to be built on competition. If you can create a scompany that can compete and be successful then that's good.
Why should it be different for a country? If they can't compete by providing the skilled labour necessary why should a company be forced into 'purchasing' the less skilled labor?
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Insightful)
Training and Education are not the answer (Score:3, Interesting)
"Hay, maybe if there weren't HB-1 visa holders filling the slots, there would be more American how got trained and got training for those positions."
Training and Education are not the answer to the lack of skilled workers.
Education is only a part of an answer if the person in question is educable. And then they have to have non-economic motivation for getting that education; with one exception, I've never had a good experience with a person who entered into a field of endeavor solely due to an economic mot
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
These big companies (and their CEO's) have a responsibility,
and it is not with their employees. Don't bring any emotions
into the issue, there is only one responsibility - to keep the
SHAREHOLDERS happy.
They will (and they do) step on their fellow Americans to make
money. Money for themselves and also for SHAREHOLDERS. At
that point, their part in the capitalistic system is performing as
expected/intended.
You have no "Right As an American" anymore, you are their
consumer or your are their employee. You are nobo
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Jesus, use enough line breaks in your post?
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
Why should it be different for a country? If they can't compete by providing the skilled labour necessary why should a company be forced into 'purchasing' the less skilled labor?
Because it's not fair when companies can shop all around the world for the cheapest prices on necessities (e.g. labor), while the common US citizen cannot shop all around the world for the cheapest prices on necessities, such as food, housing, education and health care. In other words, the competition is between US employers and US labor, and the employers have an unfair advantage.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Interesting)
People look at me like I'm a friggen lepper when I say I don't shop at WalMart sans crisis.
Buying import crap (literal meaning) is almost unavoidable in some cases. In other cases you can find import crap (figurative) that is better made. I do try to buy American/Canadian especially for food products (often cheaper, always seasonal), and my art supplies tend to be from the UK or Germany. Where I do willingly stoop to Chinese knock-off quality is glassware for the kids chemistry set, and even then I buy the higher end. My personal glassware is all "proper" German and American glass. I try to buy at least American owned company computer components.
But to quit rambling:
Country of origin is not always a choice, but is one often enough that the consumer *should* pay attention. In addition to steering money to American companies, often the build quality is so much better that you will not be needing to replace that POS a year or so down the road. (My German(?) built toaster is serviceable for contact wear, is your Chinese one?
-nB
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Informative)
Shopping around the world for labor and materials ultimately lowers the price of goods.
No it doesn't; it increases the profit margin of the people providing the goods. Why on Earth would they lower prices when they're making good money? Demand is not perfectly elastic in the real world (especially for necessities like food, housing, health care, etc.), so lowering the price won't necessarily make a seller more money by increasing the amount demanded. Therefore, it's in their best interests to just pocket the money, and that's exactly what they do.
Re:B*cough*s*it (Score:5, Informative)
No, actually they can't. Take a look into the rules those countries have in place to protect their workers from immigrants.
Re:B*cough*s*it (Score:5, Insightful)
There are no work visas to apply for if you want to move to India.
None, zero, zip.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Interesting)
Here I was thinking that our society is supposed to be built on competition
Ah, the dog eat dog extreme of the far right. Eventually people will wake up and realize that it's no better than the "from each according to his ability to each according to his need" extreme of the far left.
I wasn't advocating for a socialist solution. I was bemoaning the fact that the Michael Dell's of the world grew up with all of the advantages that the United States offers and can't even bother to employ American workers to answer their goddamn tech support numbers. They've taken all of the advantages that American society offered while contributing as little as possible in return. You may respect that but I don't -- and it's this extreme that business has shifted to in the last few decades that has emboldened the far-left into seeking further expansions of the nanny state that will eventually erode our competitiveness on the global stage.
Read up about welfare capitalism sometime. Read up about the CEOs of yesteryear that sought a square deal for their workers and in so doing helped to create a market for their products. Everybody won to a certain extent. Now we've traded that all away for the cheapest labor or the cheapest stamped plastic POS product that breaks every 12 months.
why should a company be forced into 'purchasing' the less skilled labor?
At no point in my post did I advocate for forcing anybody into doing anything. I was bemoaning what we've become -- not advocating for any specific solution. So nice way to distract from my underlying point.
WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:2, Insightful)
So Michael Dell OWES it to us. His hard work, his identifying a need and filling it, somehow makes him indebted to society as a whole because that is what is morally right? So guilt the producers of wealth by claiming that the non producers are the only reason why they were able to produce in the first place.
Have your read Atlas Shrugged? Perhaps you should. The most selfish people in this world are those who demand others to give of themselves.
I am a trader. I earn what I get in trade for what I produ
You do realize what you are quoting, right? (Score:3, Informative)
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AtlasShrugged [tvtropes.org]Meanwhile, contrast the "reality" described in that book with the current news.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But for those states that have given his company tax breakes to locate his offices and factories in there cities and towns? Yeah, I think he owes them a little. They cut him breaks that helped him become successful, and he really ought to pay a little of that back if he can.
Those states went without certain tax revenue, and they'll be losing even more if he starts dumping American employees in that state in favor of imported la
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Insightful)
You miss the whole point of those tax breaks. The states didn't sacrifice anything to attract his business there. If they hadn't offered tax breaks, they wouldn't receive ANY tax revenue from Dell because the company wouldn't have set up shop there. It was a calculated decision by the state that resulted in a large net gain in tax revenue, and a net gain in employment, regardless of the makeup of that employment, and it was an agreement entered into willingly by both parties. Dell has no obligation to the state beyond that.
I sincerely hope that people with such attitudes never buy imported products. It's always easy to criticize others' decisions to use their own resources in the most efficient manner, but when the tables are turned they claw for rationalizations to make themselves exceptions to their rule.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:4, Insightful)
And how successful would the US be without these businesses?
The US was successful before it was an economic superpower. We had relative peace (our soil hasn't been invaded since the War of 1812), freedom and liberty.
It's a symbiotic relationship.
It should be. Lately it feels more like a parasitic one. What's symbiotic about locating your headquarters offshore so you don't have to pay income taxes? You get all of the aforementioned benefits of the United States without having to pay for them. Seems like the definition of parasitism to me.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Mod parent up. People would do well if they read a book about the ideas that made this country great and those that are tearing it down. If one can't at least see that a man has the right to his own life and what he has earned through legitimate business, contracts to the mutual benefit of both parties, then perhaps one lacks the capability to reason.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, if one espouses and believes a philosophy that says that "Whatever I can do to make myself more money at the expense of the group is both moral and reasonable", well, you wind up with the current GOP ideology of selfishness and greed and you can see where that has gotten us.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:4, Insightful)
Could you be any more petty and childish? Surely you can't believe that the Republican ideology is 'DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO MAKE MONEY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE GROUP!'. No one has ever stated that, and it's as ridiculous and stereotypical as believing that every Democrat is a tree hugging homosexual. I'm sure some of you don't hug trees.
Republicans, and even libertarians believe that nobody should be able to make money by fraud. Your hypothetical 'Expense of the Group' example is retarded, and what brought this house of cards crashing down was low interest rates by the government, and forced home loans to people who didn't deserve it. While the propaganda to blame free markets has been plentiful, repeating a lie doesn't make it true.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Insightful)
Republicans, and even libertarians believe that nobody should be able to make money by fraud.
Look at the legacy of the Bush administration. The reality does not reflect your arguments. Roll back regulation, roll back enforcement, protect the guilty, victory at any cost. If the president does it, it is legal. To the victor goes the spoils. Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing. Who is John Galt? I am, motherfucker.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, if one espouses and believes a philosophy that says that "Whatever I can do to make myself more money at the expense of the group is both moral and reasonable", well, you wind up with the current GOP ideology of selfishness and greed and you can see where that has gotten us.
Thank you, you hit it right on the head. The part of Ayn's ideas that makes sense at first blush is "Hey, don't take from me what I created, let me choose to do what I want with it." That goes right back to the American Revolution with "Taxation without representation is tyranny." Yes, taxes are the price we pay for a civil society but a civil society would also let us say what should be done with it.
The part that Ayn completely misses is capturing the true costs and debts represented by a society. Her heroes are idealized men who never quite existed in the real world, only in the adventure pulps. Her heroes are like Doc Sampson, Johnny Quest's dad, Rusty Venture's dad, etc. You could sit them down on a desert island with nothing but coconuts and surly natives and five years later he'd have a modern society and space travel. This just doesn't happen in the real world.
In the real world, the Edison's and Gates' and other robber-barons are building their empires upon the groundwork laid by society. Public money paid for the national defense so they aren't growing up as slave labor for a foreign power. Public education provided for them, likely not for their own schooling but the schooling of their employees. Imagine if they were to set up shop in Haiti and had to start educating their workforce in the ABC's before they could ever get to producing things of value!
A healthy economy is like an ecosystem. The plants grow, get eaten by something that gets eaten by something eventually eaten by the apex predator. The apex predator dies, decays, and the biomass enters the ecology once more.
The problem with the Randites is they simply don't want to play fair. They'll gussy up their arguments with all sorts of sophistry but the fact of the matter is they're greedy and don't want to pay their fair share.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Informative)
So medical doctors would be the richest people in the world. I can choose to go without a car. I can choose not to use roads. I can choose to raise my own food and make my own clothes. However, when I get very sick, I can either find a doctor and pay them whatever they want, or die. Sure, if I want to hold strongly to my beliefs, I can tell the doctor to go screw themselves. However, death is kind of a big deal. You don't get to change your mind.
Plus, this was the attitude that allowed Crassus to become one of the richest people in history. His fire brigade would show up at your house fire and refuse to work unless you sold him everything for pennies on the dollar. Again, I could hold to my beliefs and watch it burn, or I could sell it and salvage something from the fire.
Re:WHO IS JOHN GALT? (Score:5, Interesting)
You seem to think that medical doctors would be able to set arbitrarily high prices and people would have no choice but to pay them. That would not happen because people have a choice about which doctor to go to.
If doctors were making insane amounts of money then more people would become doctors, which means more competition and lower prices. So, medical doctors would not necessarily be the richest people in the world by any stretch of the imagination.
However, in a pure market system there would be people that could not get care (as there are now) because they are unable to pay the market price. Free markets maximize overall wealth (barring externalities), not the number of products sold or people served.
If this is unacceptable, which it may very well be in this case, then that is your argument for why health care should not be subject to the free market, NOT because doctors might get rich.
You'd better be damn careful that what you replace it with actually is better. Doctors must be paid enough to get the best people. I sure as hell don't want to be under the knife of some second rate surgeon kept on by some government bureaucracy.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So Michael Dell OWES it to us. His hard work, his identifying a need and filling it, somehow makes him indebted to society as a whole because that is what is morally right? So guilt the producers of wealth by claiming that the non producers are the only reason why they were able to produce in the first place.
Wow, you're quoting Ayn Rand without a sly and ironic wink? You've fallen for it? Just remember, Alan Greenspan was a disciple and bedmate of hers.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
John Galt is the protagonist of an irritating book espousing a failed theology.
I'm sorry -- was that a rhetorical question? How about this, then:
Microsoft could be created in part because of American ideology -- an ideology that pays massive dividends to the rich. Are you Wal-Mart? Isn't it nice that there are good, cheap roads going everywhere. Along these roads are thousands of towns, each of which *could* stop you and make you pay a "customs fee". (they used to do this along the Rhine). But instead
Galt? You have your character sketch wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
First, let me note that I have read the book, and I take exception to some of the things in the book. I'll throw my exceptions at the end, for those who don't want to bother with them.
You seem to be comparing Michael Dell to John Galt, or the two or three other main characters (president of the railroad, president of the copper company... I don't remember.)
You forget that there were more character sketches in the book than those three.
There were those who ran companies, but were all the time on the dole of
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How does the act of defining something negate its truth? We are just trying to get an agreement on a definition.
Mutual benefit occurs when both parties enter the contract willingly and exchange goods, money, or services at an agreed upon rate. Each party receives something of more value than what they lost. If they didn't then they obviously shouldn't have entered into the contract.
Selling alcohol is ethical if it is sold to a person who wants to buy the alcohol.
One may say, "but wait, the person who bou
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Insightful)
Too late; we've been sold out to China. Globalization tends toward global equality. There simply isn't enough available energy (because we haven't invested in efficiency and improved harvesting and energy management) for us all to live at current American standards. The American lifestyle depends on cheap energy of all flavors; we have not been paying the real cost of energy -- the cash equivalent of the energy deficit we have accumulated makes the budgets of the world's governments look feeble. Once we get a few places in America down to *average* Chinese or Indian village standards this will be clear.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I think it can be put in simpler terms: When H1B visas were requested and utilized there were many more Americans with jobs. While the workforce market allowed for foreign workers then, it does not necessarily do so now. Foreign and temporary workers should make up the bulk, if not total, of workers laid off now. Don't give me crap about how they spend money here in the USA too. It's about keeping a job, feeding families. Sorry, American families should come first in these hard times. Yeah, I know we just d
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
The people laid off should be the ones with the lowest skill-set, regardless of their location. Or does equality only apply domestically?
If companies lay off their best employees (foreign or domestic) because they're the most expensive to keep on board, those companies will suffer in the long-term, which is good for exactly zero people. I'd argue that companies have been forced to do this in order to help the short-term bottom line for idiotic shareholders who refuse to see R&D as a good thing because it doesn't bring in revenue next week, but it's that kind of stupidity that brought us this situation in the first place.
I'd like to think that most companies aren't so short-sighted to think that getting rid of their highest-paid employees is a good idea in the long term, but they've been forced into a position where they have to do so because it makes the shareholders happy. It's the asshole day-traders trying to ride the stock market to immediate infinite riches that are killing your precious American jobs.
Yes, I'm saying that Americans are causing their own replacement by H-1B foreign workers. Blame Wall St., blame the guys with the annoying accents doing your tech support, blame whoever the hell you want. I'm blaming all of the people happy to get rich at anyone else's expense, probably including whoever manages your 401k.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
I blame the inequality of the current system. Give H1B's more rights and this becomes a level playing field. As it is, companies have h1b's by the balls.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why mark you troll for "hippie liberal douche" when this comment is enough? You sound more like a communist that demands people buy what YOU want them to buy. Free will and choice be damned!
Oh go fuck yourself. I didn't demand that people buy what I want them to buy and I didn't advocate for legislating Wally World out of existence. All I said was that if you buy that cheap shit from China then in one way or another you are part of the problem. I buy that cheap shit myself when there is no alternative but if there is an alternative and I can afford it then I'm going to take it. Odds are that alternative will cost me more money but odds are that it will also last a lot longer and I won't be
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Insightful)
it is not allowed to hire any dirty foreign brown people. I thought we'd got past that xenophobic attitude.
And I thought we'd got past playing the race card as a way to distract people from the point that someone else was trying to make.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
and it turns out there is actually nothing more important than the bottom line from the companies perspective.
Actually it turns out that ignoring the long term for short term gain is a surefire way to run your business into the ground. Tell me, how is Dell going to be doing in another generation or two when there's no American middle class left to buy their products?
Pay less and tax the difference (tariff) (Score:2)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
If someone can do your job as adequately as you can, and will do it for less, then they should get the job.
I've worked with outsourced workers who were located in India, and trust me, there's no functional equivalency there yet. Not even close. but when that person is making $5,000 USD a year or less, their salary covers a multitude of shortcomings.
If your company doesn't do it, your competitors will, which will render your margin much higher than theirs. And if they outlaw it here in the US, foreign competitors will still do it, and thus, you'll still lose.
This is why tampering with market forces is in most cases ill-advised.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Mmm. Market forces work just fine in a nearly homeostatic state. There's a real choice to be made between cutting costs (bad for the employees) or increasing productivity (good for everyone).
Unfortunately when you throw a market wide open to widely disparate providers - and we're talking about a ratio of 5 or even 10-to-one in salary costs - then market forces dictate that purchasers go for the low cost bidder. Increasing productivity - i.e. training and retaining skilled staff - isn't a realistic opti
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
You're right, they shouldn't be required to hire locally. The government, conversely shouldn't be giving them tax breaks, special immigration exemptions, bailouts, and all the other bits of corporate welfare that are regularly given to large corporations like this.
If you want to argue for the "free market" and the laissez-faire approach to letting businesses do whatever the hell they want to, then you had damn well better remember that it cuts BOTH ways. "Free market" also means no handouts.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Insightful)
The Slashdot editors seem to still be enjoying laying all of Microsoft's faults at Bill Gates' feet, despite the fact that (as you say) he left a while ago.
They seem to be living in a parallel universe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Funny)
Could someone explain to me, why Bill Gates would be arguing for H1-B Visas before congress now? I thought he left Microsoft?
Because he's still chairman of the board.
He's also their lovable nerdy Horatio Alger philanthropist mascot, over which which the senators will swoon. They would not react so favorably if forced to listen to a sweaty chair thrower.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, really easy. Claim that people do not have equivalent experience, qualification, competencies, whatever, so should be rewarded less (even if they are in practise doing exactly the same job). HR shills justify the impossible all the time...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That said I think it would help America Greatly to setup a special low-pay VISA program that has strict guidelines for what types of job can be performed under it IE Cheap labor for working land/child care/house maids/packing plant jobs no one els
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think before we setup a special low-pay VISA program for jobs no one else would want, we should employ our own citizens first. Not wanting to do a certain job should not be a valid excuse to sit on your ass and draw unemployment or welfare. Put welfare recipients to work in our fields, houses and packing plants. Subsidize them with food stamps if they can't make it on the wages. There is no reason we should be using immigrant workers for unskilled labor when we have such a large pool of unskilled leac
Re: (Score:2)
It's an easy thing to fix - require that H1B visa holders receive the same pay and benefits for their work as the rest of the workforce. If companies really have problems finding citizens to fill jobs, and aren't just trolling for lower paid wage slaves, then it ought not to be a problem, right?
Man, I'd love to see the tech industry try to talk its way out of that.
Ah, with regards to equal pay and benefits, are you certain it is the companys fault?
Prospective Employees A and B are applying for the same job, but B happens to be a single man holding an H1-B. He also knows that while he is trained well and has some experience, one of his competitive edges is he is willing to ballpark a lower salary requirement when asked.
If you have two equal prospects but one is willing to work for $10K less, who are you going to hire?
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
Let me fix that for you:
"B happens to be a single man holding an H1-B. He knows that if he doesn't find a job in 60 days his visa will be canceled and is willing to work for significantly less than prevailing market wages to avoid being forced to leave the US and have to start the visa process all over again from scratch."
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
There is a shortage, of American tech workers. Many of the out of work onces complaining about this still haven't adjusted to the fact that there tech bubble back in the 90's was indeed a bubble, and are still trying to find Web Designer jobs that pay excess 100k a year to use Front Page.
Unfortunately the truth about tech jobs, is that it is support role position, It is a professional careerer but you are not going to be rich from it, it pays about the same as a teacher, which isn't bad, and allows us to live at middle class levels.
Even when there is a shortage qualified people will still get left out for various reasons.
Poor Resume/Self Promotion skills
Unable to relocate to an area which has more jobs.
Personalities don't match corporate culture
Out of date, or different focus on skills
Just aren't trying.
Just poke around your college especially in the masters levels, for Computer Science and Engineering. Look at those classes listen to the accents of the people talking. Even in MBA classes Americans are just not trying to get smarter and be competitive anymore.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe in Mars you can fire a ton of tech workers and then claim a shortage of qualified workers (or in the Capital) but in reality you just fired a bunch of qualified tech workers (they were qualified enough to be hired in the first place). So go figure.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
NO Evidence of Shortage (Score:3, Interesting)
Studies by Rand and universities have shown that this is FALSE. There is NO demonstrate-able general shortage.
Now there are *spot* shortages, but we need spot shortages to allow us to transition from the surplus spots. Otherwise, citizens would be fired from the surplus specialties but not get the shortage spots because they are filled by H1B's. Think about it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow...I don't think I've ever seen someone contradict themselves quite so fast.
If there really is a shortage, then there are few-to-no out of work.
If a company is having trouble finding people for their job, that's the free market telling them they need to pay more.
OK. So how about lettuce pickers and such? (Score:2)
Lets get those low end jobs protection too.
After all we want to be fair.
I can talk my way out of the scenario you presented easily.
1. You won't move
2. You don't have the skills I need
3. You think your worth more than I think the job is
4. Your attitude sucks (by your posting I doubt I'd want you around, sound like a fairness whiner
Really, #1 and #2 are big reasons why H1-B work so well. People go where the jobs are, people with families rarely do, or worse act insulted if asked to.
The majority of jobs peop
Offer citizenship to H1B holders (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes. And let them stay as long as they want, rather than kicking them out to bring new H1Bs in to replace them. That's pretty much a formula for accelerating the movement of tech jobs overseas, taking inexperienced engineers, showing them the ropes, and sending them back to offshoring outfits in places with low wages.
I don't want to frame this as a kind of nationalistic struggle, but India and China don't need a US funded technology and tech jobs transfer program, which is what H1B really is. They are quite capable of developing their own, robust indigenous industries.
If a talented and educated person wants to move here for a while, and can support himself, I don't think it hurts us very much if at all. If after a few years he decides he'd like to stay here, that's good. Productive people create wealth, and wealth creates jobs. The very best create companies, even industries.
What's really bad for the country, not just American engineers looking for a job, is a revolving door program which drains the country of experience gained by work being done here. The knowledge gained by work is a capital resource, and kicking H1Bs out who want to stay here is like sending boxes of cash out of the country.
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:4, Informative)
You don't get it.
It's not immigration of people with engineering degrees that drives down wages. It's continually bringing in entry level people and expelling experienced people that does that.
Everyone here seem to grasp that the fact that music files are so readily and perfectly copyable changes the economics of sharing copies. What some people miss is how the same kinds of things make the economics of knowledge different than, say the economics of automobiles. Even having and automobile industry creates lots of related jobs, in suppliers, distribution, sales, advertising and the like. But if you brought in a bunch of low wage braseros to run your automobile plant, you'd definitely have that many fewer jobs for American auto workers.
But has Linus Torvalds living in the US decreased the net employment of American software engineers by one?
Software is different in that making software tends to generate more jobs making software.
Think about it. Some team comes up with this great software framework that makes doing something that was hard before, easy. Does this mean people who were doing that stuff lose their jobs? No. What happens is that there is a new demand for people who can use that framework to do things that weren't possible before.
Let's say we're talking about Geographic Information Systems. You can do the kind of things GIS does by programming in Fortran with nothing but bare metal and a library with a handful of trig functions. But back when this was the the only way to do GIS, almost nobody did, except maybe in the oil industry or defense. But when GIS becomes so simple minded that non-technical managers can do simple analyses of store siting decisions, none of those few people are going to lose their jobs. In fact, there's a whole new industry of people employed doing jobs that didn't exist before.
Employers make their hiring decisions based on marginal calculations. In the Fortran-and-bare-metal days, many things were theoretically valuable, but not worth the expense and uncertainty to try. When what was hard before becomes easy, this opens up a new universe of things to do, which equals new employment opportunities.
Re: (Score:2)
I believe that Grassley and others are requesting these companies open themselves up to discrimination suits. I see no reason why a concerted effort to eliminate all H1 jobs before others would result in any fewer lawsuits than say, eliminating all the workers over 45 first, or all the pregnant women who are likely to have enormous
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Informative)
It's an easy thing to fix - require that H1B visa holders receive the same pay and benefits for their work as the rest of the workforce.
It's already required. [wikipedia.org]
You're ignoring two things:
1. Companies have ways of working around this rule. This typically involves saying that the visa holder has skills not available in the U.S. workforce.
2. By importing workers, the company effectively shifts the supply curve [wikipedia.org] and lowers wages across the board.
I will also add, laying off foreign workers first is a form of protectionism. [wikipedia.org] Protectionism is never a good economic policy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why are you so sure H1-B visa holders are paid less than the rest of the workforce?
There is quite a bit of competition over this limited number of visas, so a lot of them are rather highly qualified, and paid accordingly.
I don't see any evidence that the H1-B program has a depressing effect on engineers wages. Typically, an American engineer is paid two or three times as much as his equivalent in western European countries, which either don't have H1-B type positions, or are unable to attract the highly qua
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score:5, Informative)
One place I worked at, it was no secret why were hiring H1-B workers. It was much cheaper.
Whenever we hired Americans my boss would interview them, I'd interview them, another peer would interview them. Indian workers just kinda showed up.
One guy was fresh out of training and needed a lot of hand holding to do basic things. Any random CS grad would have been the same.
The best people we had were American. That sounds ethnocentric but the people I'm talking about included Russian-American, Indian American, etc. either first generation or immigrants.
I remember another time when someone contacted me about developing a small site for them. They explained how they hired an indian firm for $2,500 and after months of not getting the project done hired another for $3,500 and the didn't complete it either. He decided to share this information with me after I quoted him $10k for his project. He ultimately decided to try and find another outsourcing firm. Months later I checked and he didn't have the site done. He wound up spending almost the same in and got nothing in return.
Not tought to urge an H-1B increase after rec'sion (Score:2)
'If Microsoft doesn't state that they will lay off the H-1Bs first â" and they won't state this â" then it would be awfully tough for Bill Gates to come back to the Hill and urge an H-1B increase, wouldn't it?'"
During the recession yes, and rightly so. I don't see any problem if there is a shortage situation when the session ends and they urge for more visas. I am no M$ fan, but they seem to be doing the same as everyone else has to; lay people off when there is less work then take them on when there is more.
Let Microsoft import as many people as they like (Score:5, Insightful)
The United States wants to be the leader in technology, but it won't encourage kids to go into science and engineering, and won't let many talented and better educated foreigners come and work at their companies.
And then they bitch and complain when companies like Microsoft move jobs to other countries that either do have the people they want, or will let those people come and work there.
Re:Let Microsoft import as many people as they lik (Score:4, Interesting)
That is so true. The university i am working in (somewhere in new england) has a bunch of foreign grad students. I would say that about 80% of them are foreigners. I am myself a postdoc and a foreigner, all but 2 postdocs are foreigners. Americans should see the things straight: without foreigners research in the US would take a big hit. I do not understand those xenophobic republicans bitching about us. There is nobody to replace us. The foreign postdocs got hired because there was no american up to our job. Not surprising as few get a PhD anyway. Of course getting a green card is awfully hard and guess what, people do not really like being treated like disposable toilet paper.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
like disposable toilet paper
Ummm, there's another kind of toilet paper?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
There are plenty of American kids who go into science and engineering. But when you compare the population of the US (300 million) to that of India ( just for example--1.2 billion), it's easy to see why there are so many "qualified" Indians compared to Americans.
The problem isn't necessarily a lack of technically qualified Americans--just a lack of technically qualified Americans who will sacrifice things such as quality of life (living anywhere just for a job) or for lower pay. The real problem is Mic
Re H1B should go first (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's a red herring. A European with an H1B is still an H1B. The issue is immigration status, not ethnicity. Most H1Bs tend to be from India, Pakistan, or the far East, so naturally most H1B "victims" tend to be from Asia.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I for one complain about H1B's from ANY country that we are running a trade-deficit with. The huge trade deficits are partly to blame for the financial meltdown. Such countries refuse to stoke local consumer consumption, creating lopsided trade conditions. And, many H1B's are from eastern Europe, I would note.
You shouldn't buy a house or an expensive car if you're on the H1B pro
Know what disgusts me ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Heh, H-1B workers don't vote. Now of course, if the senator had asked them to fire gay people first...
The gut reaction of many slashdotters to migrant workers is simply disgusting. It combines basic misguided tribalism ("Yeah we're in the same group of 300M people") with a rent seeking behavior ("I want a higher wage at the expense of the consumers")
I won't even get started on the total immorality of the concept that the govt grants you or not a "right" to work for a willing employer, grants you or not a "right" to rent a house from a willing landlord, etc.
Re:Know what disgusts me ? (Score:5, Insightful)
What disgusts me is the double standards. America was and is the land of the immigrants and dreams. The country was born out of immigration. America is proud of the American Dream, IMHO H1-B visa holders carry the torch of that dream more than born citizen. They come to this country in that hope. Unfortunately the dream is being hijacked by a few rick business men on the top for cheap labor that is willing to throw in 120 hr weeks.
If you really want to fix this, then transform the H1-B program and give the H1-B visa holders right equivivalent to that of greencard holders. The problem will mitigate itself. All of a sudden the employers will realize that immigrants are not slaves and if u lower wages and expect 120 hr weeks, they will find a better opportunity. Also remove the concept of "sponsor" for H1-B. Sure a employer can sponsor, however an immigrant steps into US, he is free to work anywhere.
This will level the playing field for Americans, as employer will really find a local before he attempts H1-B.
Re:Know what disgusts me ? (Score:5, Insightful)
I couldn't agree more. The H1-B program seems not that much different from indentured servitude. We got you over here - either you work for us, at the wages we dictate, or you leave.
The problem is that the people here don't want the dream. They want prosperity, and they feel entitled to prosperity. Immigrants present competition, which threatens that entitlement. The American dream, America itself, was never about entitlement. It was never about deserving something. It was about being free to use what you had to achieve what you could without being oppressed. We've lost that.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Rights are not privileges, they're rights. You don't need to have contributed anything to have the right to work, it's not a reward, it's a natural right.
You're the kind of asshole that prevent lovely associations between employers and employees. Mind your own fucking business will you?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
WRONG. As an H-1B holder, and a former TN-visa holder, I pay all the same taxes an American citizen or Green Card holder does. My employer pays the same 6.2% (or whatever it is) Social Security Tax that he pays for my American citizen co-worker. How do I know this?
'Significant Number' (Score:5, Insightful)
!difficult, !hypocritical (Score:3, Insightful)
TFA said:
Actually, no. If the H1-Bs are specialists in something Microsoft have desperate need for [1], and the people being laid off are in some area Microsoft don't need any more [2] then it's not difficult at all.
Perhaps someone subscribes to the fallacy of fungibility?
[1] HCI jockeys, security specialists... I could go on
[2] Sucks to be on the Zune team. From what I've heard the games division might be taking an early bath too.
You mean Ballmer (Score:3, Funny)
>>> then it would be awfully tough for Bill Gates to come back to the Hill and urge an H-1B increase, wouldn't it?'
Yes, especially as he doesn't work for Microsoft any more.
I was an H-1B worker at Microsoft (Score:5, Interesting)
I worked at Microsoft in Redmond with H1B work status for four years. In 2007, I left MS because I found a job opportunity that was better for my family. (This new job happened to be back in my country.)
I can't comment about the overall H1B program in the US, or the overall US labour market, or even on any new changes at MS over the past year, but I do definitely know about the experiences of H1B employees in the developer and testing roles at MS.
I (and all other non-US-citizen employees) were treated exactly the same as every other employee. We had the same job descriptions and responsibilities as other employees and the same opportunities for promotion. We were integrated in teams that included US citizens, other H1B-status workers, and people with other immigration statuses. We were certainly paid the same as any other employee with a similar job and similar experience.
I also know that Microsoft has very high hiring standards for developer and tester roles. I was not in a management/lead position, but I occasionally reviewed resumes and took part in interviewing applicants. Interviews were tough all-day affairs, including questions that required the use of logic, math, programming, and testing methodologies. The point wasn't to see if the applicant could regurgitate the knowledge, but to view his or her thinking process, creativity, and problem solving abilities as they tried to come up with a solution, and handle complications or restrictions that the interviewer throws at the candidate after they come up with an initial solution.
During the time I was there, my group and most others were always trying to hire more people. The major bottleneck was waiting to get any resumes for candidates that seemed worth interviewing. Most interviews ended with frustration that the candidate wasn't up to standards. Just because you applied to MS and didn't get a job or even an interview is not proof that Microsoft didn't need to look outside the US to find candidates up to their standards.
So, you might have valid criticisms about the quality of Microsoft software, but MS really does have very high standards for their employees, and employees with H1B status are treated the same as any other full-time employee there.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Really? Folks openly talked about how much they were being paid? Hmmm. Interesting.
No, my co-workers didn't tell me their salary or bonus. But my manager showed me tables showing the expected salary ranges for each "job level", as preparation for my yearly performance review. Those ranges weren't really that wide, I obviously knew where my salary fit in the range, and I had a good idea of which "job levels" my co-workers were in. Besides, when some of my American co-workers who became my friends told me how much they spent on their new house, car, etc, I had a good idea that I wasn't b
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah except as rare as it is some H1-B visa immigrants actually DO come from Europe and such... I'd be willing to bet its something like 1% of all of them though.