Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

The Guardian Shifts To Twitter After 188 Years of Ink

Soulskill posted more than 5 years ago | from the save-the-trees dept.

The Media 211

teflon_king writes with news that renowned British newspaper The Guardian will be abandoning its paper-and-ink distribution scheme and publishing all articles and news as Tweets. Quoting: "A mammoth project is also under way to rewrite the whole of the newspaper's archive, stretching back to 1821, in the form of tweets. Major stories already completed include '1832 Reform Act gives voting rights to one in five adult males yay!!!;' 'OMG Hitler invades Poland, allies declare war see tinyurl.com/b5x6e for more;' and 'JFK assassin8d @ Dallas, def. heard second gunshot from grassy knoll WTF?' Sceptics have expressed concerns that 140 characters may be insufficient to capture the full breadth of meaningful human activity, but social media experts say the spread of Twitter encourages brevity, and that it ought to be possible to convey the gist of any message in a tweet. For example, Martin Luther King's legendary 1963 speech on the steps of the Lincoln memorial appears in the Guardian's Twitterised archive as 'I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by,' eliminating the waffle and bluster of the original."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Interesting... (5, Funny)

LingNoi (1066278) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417295)

I wonder if this will make the guardian more interesting to read..

Re:Interesting... (2)

Kentaree (1078787) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417357)

Less reading time to get bored in though ;)

Re:Interesting... (4, Funny)

orclevegam (940336) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417735)

TL;DR

Re:Interesting... (1)

Leafheart (1120885) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417381)

Less verbose for sure.

Re:Interesting... (1, Informative)

sp1nl0ck (241836) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417435)

You realise of course that this is an April Fool. The author of the article, http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology [guardian.co.uk] , is Rio Palof - an anagram of "April Fool"...

Not April Fools. The End of the World. (1)

AKAImBatman (238306) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417573)

So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 13:49-50).

/me Looks at "jokes" posted for April Fools

I think we're in hell.

*weeps*

Re:Not April Fools. The End of the World. (4, Informative)

robthebloke (1308483) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418195)

In other news, the release date for Duke Nukem Forever has been announced....

Re:Not April Fools. The End of the World. (4, Funny)

eln (21727) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418323)

You know, I remember when April Fools jokes about DNF's release date were fresh and new.

When even april fools day jokes about your release date become stale, that might be a hint you've waited just a tad too long to release your product.

Re:Interesting... (1)

enrgeeman (867240) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418023)

that's nice, but where's the other L?

Re:Interesting... (2)

MaxwellEdison (1368785) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418157)

Parent is sitting on it, accounting for the overly serious tone decrying this article as an April Fool's Day prank, as if he is protecting the poor innocent idiots who can't realize this immediately.


...


Just going for a flamebait achievement...

Re:Interesting... (2)

lorenzo.boccaccia (1263310) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418181)

no shit, Sherlock!

Re:Interesting... (1)

chdig (1050302) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418209)

5 minutes after the article is posted, you feel the need to jump in and blow the joke?! I was hoping to enjoy the posts by people who didn't get it, but your pride at picking out a supposed anagram spoiled that.

I could have understood if you'd pointed out that it wasn't a real anagram, and is missing an 'L'.

Whoever modded you up as "informative" has absolutely no sense of humour. -1 spoiler would have been more sensible.

They'll still Tweet Less Than (1)

gurutc (613652) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417325)

My favorite Tweeter, Lance Armstrong

cmon! enough already! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417327)

tsop ts1

"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1, Insightful)

eldavojohn (898314) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417343)

Martin Luther King's legendary 1963 speech on the steps of the Lincoln memorial appears in the Guardian's Twitterised archive as 'I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by,' eliminating the waffle and bluster of the original.

I couldn't find anything when googling for "waffle and bluster" aside from this story [google.com] so I looked up each of the words.

waffle [wiktionary.org]

Speech or writing that is vague, pretentious or evasive. Example: "This interesting point seems to get lost a little within a lot of self-important waffle."

bluster [wiktionary.org]

Pompous, officious talk.

I guess we think more highly of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. in the states.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (4, Insightful)

aristotle-dude (626586) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417551)

*Whoosh* He was a great man. He was a preacher and a political activist who played a pivotal role in the history of the US but I think he would be disturbed by this "worship" of him given that he was a humble man of faith. You act like someone was disrespecting a revered prophet or something. It's a joke. You are supposed to laugh. For crying out loud, christians can take light hearted jokes and even tell them to each other but this cult of personality surrounding King Jr seems to have no sense of humour.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1)

Zontar_Thing_From_Ve (949321) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417965)

*Whoosh* He was a great man. He was a preacher and a political activist who played a pivotal role in the history of the US but I think he would be disturbed by this "worship" of him given that he was a humble man of faith. You act like someone was disrespecting a revered prophet or something. It's a joke. You are supposed to laugh.

Until I read this post, I didn't get that it was a joke, but now I understand that you're right. Unfortunately British humour (spelling it in the British way for all you Brits out there) doesn't always translate well for Americans. Honestly, I can now understand that it's a joke, but I don't think it's particularly funny.

Yes, I do like Monty Python and Rowan Atkinson's various projects, but as a general rule I'm not sure I'd say that just being British means you have a leg up in the funny department.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (3, Insightful)

Cube Steak (1520237) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418173)

Until I read this post, I didn't get that it was a joke,

So you didn't get that a line in a story that is clearly an April Fools joke is a joke? Were you born with no sense of humor or did you have it removed later in life?

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1)

Hal_Porter (817932) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418297)

I think you'd appreciate Benny Hill and The Two Ronnies. Though some of the later contains political parodies that you might be confused or angered by.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1)

Gerafix (1028986) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417637)

Hey, they're British, they don't think highly, give 'em a break.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417681)

no, in the states you simply don't understand irony [wikipedia.org] .

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1)

notarockstar1979 (1521239) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418083)

The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention....now that IS irony. --Bender

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (2, Informative)

benwiggy (1262536) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418047)

I guess we think more highly of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. in the states.

In the UK, we think so highly of Dr. King that it is clearly absurd and comic to suggest that his speeches are full of waffle and bluster.

It's almost as if the writer of the article doesn't expect to be taken seriously.

Re:"Waffle & Bluster"?! (1)

plague3106 (71849) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418225)

Hmm... I think you didn't get the memo..

Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

ReverendLoki (663861) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417347)

The line of people who want to post in this thread just to get an "achievement" can start here...

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

beardape (1060618) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417453)

Give me my archievement

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

mrdoogee (1179081) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417589)

Ha Ha! I achieve!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (3, Funny)

OK PC (857190) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417971)

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe, and from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip-malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moments lost in time; gone like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (5, Insightful)

AvitarX (172628) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417459)

Achievement Whore, the new Karma Whore.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

Samschnooks (1415697) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417843)

Achievement Whore, the new Karma Whore.

I've always been doing those things without the achievement points. Does that make me a slut?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

sherpajohn (113531) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417863)

I, for one, welcome our new Achievement Whore Overlords!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27418091)

Meet the new whore, same as the old whore.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

lordandmaker (960504) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417461)

*achieves*

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

iainl (136759) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417511)

Start where?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (0, Redundant)

ShadowRangerRIT (1301549) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417541)

Wait, I thought the achievement was for posting in the original Achievement April Fools thread? Not that it matters, /. was useless even before the achievement spamming.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

ShadowRangerRIT (1301549) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417565)

Dammit. Forgot the qualifier. It was useless *on April Fools*. It's only *mostly* useless on other days.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

Shadin (1521367) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418117)

So, is it this one, the other, or one not yet posted?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (5, Funny)

bigtomrodney (993427) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417557)

Screw the achievements, where are all the PONIES?!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (5, Funny)

Em Emalb (452530) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417821)

Your post advocates a

(X) moronic ( ) Totalitarian (X) consumer-driven (X) Charles Brosonish ( ) Governmental

approach to humor. Your "OMGPonies!" will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular post, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

(X) Your post was simply unfunny.
(X) Mailing lists and other legitimate websites would not bother stealing it from you
(X) Monkeys simply can't aim that well.
( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
(X) Slashdot will attempt to use this as an unfunny meme
(X) Users of email will not put up with it
(X) Linus Torvalds did not even chuckle
(X) The police will tour again
(X) Requires the attention span of a gnat
(X) Requires immediate total cooperation of God in Heaven
(X) The meme is tired and worn out and I'm just as likely to get a -1 troll as a +5 funny.

Specifically, your plan fails to account for

  (X) Asshats
  (X) Asshats
  (X) Asshats
  (X) Asshats
  (X) Asshats
  (X) Technically illiterate politicians
  (X) Extreme stupidity on the part of people in general
  (X) Outlook
  (X) Asshats

and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

  (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown funny
  (X) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
  ( ) Incompatibility with open source or open source licenses
  (X) unfunny jokes do nothing to solve the problem
  (X) Temporary/one-line jokes are cumbersome
  ( ) I don't want the government thinking your lame
  (X) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

  (X) Sorry dude, but that is simply unfunny.
  (X) Once you go OMGPonies! you can never go back.
  (X) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
  (X) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!
  (X) What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this site is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27418301)

Well it seems my friend you have underestimated that comment, overestimated your own and if your signature is anything to go by you've attacked a fellow Irishman. Bravo!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

vandiemen007 (1035444) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418295)

Shhh that's their 2010 April Fools surprise!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417563)

Does posting anonymously count?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417701)

achieve!!!!!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

SputnikPanic (927985) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417905)

Please, sir, may I have another (achievement)?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

Etrias (1121031) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418009)

Okay great! I'm here. What did I unlock by the achievement? Do I get a new Submit button that flashes up Hot Grits and Natalie Portman?

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

Apotekaren (904220) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418025)

Plonk, YAY! I don't play WoW(life has a tendency to take all my time) but I'm slightly excited about this.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (2, Funny)

eXonyte (842640) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418079)

Well I'm going to pride myself in being one of those who does NOT have the achievement!

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (2, Funny)

nico60513 (735846) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418217)

No thanks. Even if I get all of the achievements they'll just add more achievements to get me to buy new slashdot downloadable content.

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

s!lat (975103) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418247)

*post*.... No really though, someone somewhere will do this. It's just a matter of time

Re:Pandora's blog has been opened (1)

thesp (307649) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418275)

Achievement please :-) Thank you kindly, sir...

This is how all news should be (2, Interesting)

notarockstar1979 (1521239) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417359)

There is no good reason for tons and tons of information in news articles. This boils everything down to the essentials and puts it into a format that everyone can understand. Good for you The Guardian! /joke

Hahaha (2, Insightful)

Calabacin (1358875) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417369)

This post seems legit ;-)

Re:Hahaha (1)

im_thatoneguy (819432) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417999)

It's actually pretty plausible. Here in Seattle one of our largest and oldest newspapers, the Seattle Post Intelligencer, just ended its print operation and is scaling back to be an exclusively digital operation.

But then it got into the twitter bit and I realized it was an april fools joke.

Sweet (5, Funny)

Em Emalb (452530) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417379)

Since I have the attention span of woah, Britney Spears just ate an entire bowl of rusty nails on live TV.

What was I saying? Oh, right. As I was saying, if cars continue to run on haha, nice bewbs! then we'll definitely need to see improvement in the White House.

ZOMG!!11!11!! (1)

JCSoRocks (1142053) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417391)

It's about time these lazy journalists got with the times.

Re:ZOMG!!11!11!! (1)

Kentaree (1078787) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417575)

Of course, moving to a form of media which encourages short posts is a really good way to get rid of lazy journalists...

Re:ZOMG!!11!11!! (1)

itschy (992394) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417689)

It's about time these lazy journalists got with the times.

So the Times already twitters, do they?

Arrg twitter this twitter that. (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417399)

Twitter: Micro Blogging Service
Tweet: To send a message on twitter.
Twat: Any journalist that reports on/about twitter.

Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. (1)

rokel (986883) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418273)

Seriously if I hear one more reporter on NPR talk about Second Life and Twitter I.... I may be forced to give in and assimilate. :(

Re:Arrg twitter this twitter that. (2, Insightful)

MightyDrunken (1171335) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418373)

I thought to twitter was to talk incessantly about inane crap.
Oh wait!

R U Sure ? (5, Funny)

elcorvax (1395311) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417415)

And are they going to post the news in the Lolcat language ??

Re:R U Sure ? (2, Funny)

CaptainBruce (1066858) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417467)

Just the commentary.

google news (2, Funny)

themacks (1197889) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417421)

let's just hope this doesn't mean google will start aggregating tweets

It's the right thing to do (1)

Jeremy Erwin (2054) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417429)

and it solves GMG's dispute with Google News [slashdot.org]

Maybe Now (1)

Chlorine Trifluoride (1517149) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417431)

People will actually pay attention to the news.

tinyurl link works, is serious :( (1, Funny)

adavies42 (746183) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417443)

the good news is tinyurl.com/b5x6e is real. the bad news is it goes to the wikipedia article on WWII--come on guys, how hard would it be to slip a rickroll in there?

muppet (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417451)

anyone that thinks this isn't an april foolds day prank

Better idea... (1)

rotide (1015173) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417463)

Instead of publishing via "Tweets", publish on Teats!

I would definitely subscribe. For the articles of course.

Re:Better idea... (1)

Wolvenhaven (1521217) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417599)

You might want to specify which species, or we could end up with cat, dog, and cow stories.

Re:Better idea... (1)

Qzukk (229616) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417837)

publish on Teats!

I think that idea has already been patented by goldenpalace.com

Some day.. (1)

Warlord88 (1065794) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417487)

If you will it Guardian, it is no dream.

Nice try... (1)

ratinox (582104) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417503)

...but no cigar. I might have bought it if the story had been about The Sun, or The Dail Wail, though.

Re:Nice try... (2, Informative)

milas (988484) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417591)

I might have bought it if the story had been about The Sun, or The Dail Wail, though.

Yeah, but those papers aren't actually clever.

Re:Nice try... (1)

ratinox (582104) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417765)

Indeed, but they are likely to jump on any passing bandwagon. Besides, it would probably improve the quality of their journalism...

Re:Nice try... (1)

ratinox (582104) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417621)

I meant, of course, the Daily Wail. Stupid fingers.

Re:Nice try... (1)

reverseengineer (580922) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417781)

That was actually my favorite line of the story:

Most now offer Twitter feeds of major breaking news headlines, while the Daily Mail recently pioneered an iPhone application providing users with a one-click facility for reporting suspicious behaviour by migrants or gays.

Utterly believable.

Poor April Fools Day (4, Interesting)

Azaril (1046456) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417537)

You'd think that after the story yesterday [slashdot.org] , they would come up with something a little less obvious. The whole premise of the fools joke is to get people to believe it, at least temporarily. How can a paper, who only 24 hours before complained about the lack of funding on the internet, possibly goto an internet only distribution system? I might be getting old, but in my eyes, no april fools joke will ever match up to the seminal BBC prank [bbc.co.uk] . Now to stop those damn kids skateboarding on the sidewalk...

Sigh ... (3, Interesting)

krou (1027572) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417569)

... whatever happened to believable April Fools stories? It was a lot more fun when you could really get fooled instead of just being able to discount a story within the first line. (Kids, get off my lawn, too!)

This has made today's jokes worthwhile (1)

ptbarnett (159784) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417579)

A mammoth project is also under way to rewrite the whole of the newspaper's archive, stretching back to 1821, in the form of tweets. Major stories already completed include "1832 Reform Act gives voting rights to one in five adult males yay!!!"; "OMG Hitler invades Poland, allies declare war see tinyurl.com/b5x6e for more"; and "JFK assassin8d @ Dallas, def. heard second gunshot from grassy knoll WTF?"

I have to give kudos to the Guardian... it's going to be hard to top this one.

Re:This has made today's jokes worthwhile (1)

squiggly12 (1298191) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417825)

I totally agree, that was the only part I really enjoyed. :)

Oblig... (1)

ausekilis (1513635) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417607)

new headline:

OH HAI! I UPGRADED UR GARDIEN KTHXBYE

(that's right... mod me down... care--)

Twitter is pervasive (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417625)

Even birds are twittering [qtoverload.com] .

Ha......ha, ha.....ha...another lame April Fools (0)

Ynsats (922697) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417655)

Is anyone else tired of these stupid jokes?

Kia released one yesterday with a half assed photoshop of a new Soul with "wind catchers" for the Soul "Wind powered hybrid".

Re:Ha......ha, ha.....ha...another lame April Fool (1)

wikki (13091) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418093)

It may be a lame april fools joke, but in the long term I wouldn't be surprised if stuff like this starts to happen. There are already a lot of news organizations that put out updates via Twitter. 140 characters a little hard to fit an entire news story in, but people are giving less and less attention to the news these days anyway.

OMG Tweets (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 5 years ago | (#27417663)

I got the fail whale while trying to RTFA..or should that be RTFT? @the_guardian: This is so OMGWTFBBQPONIES! crap. fail whale again!

dailywtf.com did it better. (1)

jholder (22001) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417667)

But nice try anyway.

Should fix the headline to... (1)

Phizzle (1109923) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417763)

The Guardian is about to twat!

"waffle and bluster" NO (1)

Pope (17780) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417785)

Give me waffles and maple syrup any day of the week (side of bacon, please), bluster just doesn't have that same yummy taste.

already follow it (1)

dominux (731134) | more than 5 years ago | (#27417899)

The guardian reporters have been out in force today twittering about the G20 riots - they probably outnumbered the protesters. The technology section twitters here: http://www.twitter.com/guardiantech [twitter.com] or it does when the fail whale isn't showing.

Twitter is over capacity. (1)

0x537461746943 (781157) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418041)

Twitter is over capacity. Too many tweets! Please wait a moment and try again.

Good luck with that.

In the same spirit... (1)

bluenirve (470125) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418049)

1849: "OMG gold @ cali. we're leaving in 10." Oct 8, 1871: "Flamers in chicago http://bit.ly/SaAdB [bit.ly] " Dec 7, 1941: "omg.. azn invasion!" Sept 11, 2001: "2planes1catastrophe" March 31, 2009: "any suggestions for hilarious april fools pranks? DM us!"

Looking forward to (1)

drunkenoafoffofb3ta (1262668) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418073)

Rants by George Monbiot over Guardian Twitter then! : )

http://aprilfoolsdayontheweb.com/2009.html (1)

Picass0 (147474) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418081)

Instead of posting every single April Fool's prank separately

if it wasn't 1st april this would be a shame. (1)

oliverthered (187439) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418143)

It would be quite a big step for a newspaper like the guardian that prides it's self on contect to reduce all it's stories down to something that would be worthy of the sun.

I know it's a joke... (1)

mdm-adph (1030332) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418197)

But this made me think back to the Times' "headlines" that Winston had to create in short Newspeak blurbs in 1984.

Why this is preposterous!! (1)

MaxwellEdison (1368785) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418215)

Now if you'll excuse me...

OMGPONIES

April Fools? (1)

ericrost (1049312) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418223)

Just trying to get the stupid achievement if its real.

Re:April Fools? (1)

Azmiik (899361) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418367)

What is real. The achievement or this post. You must take the Blue pill to find the answers.

This isn't what I heard (1)

Hasney (980180) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418307)

I heard the whole company was moving to post only on 4chan and every story would have some releveance to a power rating or other.

And.... (1)

MarkGriz (520778) | more than 5 years ago | (#27418331)

...nothing of value was lost.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?