×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Copyright Protection Business Model Expands, Plagiarizes Others

ScuttleMonkey posted more than 4 years ago | from the time-to-exercise-the-rico-lawyers dept.

The Courts 50

Techdirt has an amusing story about the expanding adoption of the RIAA-style business model of collecting settlement money from threats of litigation based on copyright infringement claims. This story comes with an amusing twist with the two cited companies, Davenport Lyons and ACS, being clearly related and ACS publishing an article with clearly plagiarized selections. Anything to make a buck I guess. "TorrentFreak noticed that an article apparently published by ACS Law was actually plagiarized from a variety of different sources, basically cut and pasted together with no credit or citations given at all. Remarkably, in some cases, articles with the exact opposite view of ACS Law were copied with paragraphs that just had an added sentence to the end which completely contradicted what the original article said."

cancel ×
This is a preview of your comment

No Comment Title Entered

Anonymous Coward 1 minute ago

No Comment Entered

50 comments

Lawyers Rules, Sadly (3, Insightful)

gpronger (1142181) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169495)

He with the smartest lawyer wins.

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (4, Insightful)

Z00L00K (682162) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169535)

Don't forget that a good lawyer also costs money which means that with enough money you can buy the ruling of the court too.

Just look at the Pirate Bay trial.

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28169627)

The Pirate Bay trial was perfectly 100 per cent fair. If those faggots didn't want to go to jail, they shouldn't have been hosting links to illegal copyrighted files. People who download music without paying deserve to be thrown in jail, and people who distribute said files such as The Pirate Bay's operators should get the chair.

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28169691)

And you'll be first up against the wall when the revolution comes. The death penalty isn't even legal in Sweden, you cockgobbler.

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170799)

Anonymous cowards unite!

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28172455)

I would, but I'm too cowardly.

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (-1, Flamebait)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28169661)

Humans are greedy [wikipedia.org], dirty [wikipedia.org], animalistic [wikipedia.org] scum [wikipedia.org] who would pimp [wikipedia.org] their own grandmothers for a few bucks. [wikipedia.org]

Dirty, filthy, disgusting Jew-bastards [wikipedia.org] is what humans are. Total [wikipedia.org] planet [wikipedia.org] cancer. [wikipedia.org] Where is Ozymandias [wikipedia.org] when you need him?

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170425)

[Citation needed]

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170933)

Don't forget that a good lawyer also costs money which means that with enough money you can buy the ruling of the court too.

Just look at the Pirate Bay trial.

No need to have good lawyers if you can buy the judge...

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28179349)

Golden Rule: The one with the gold rules. ~ Prof Hustein

Re:Lawyers Rules, Sadly (2, Interesting)

Chabil Ha' (875116) | more than 4 years ago | (#28174429)

Along that vein, having spoken with a number of lawyers, they all had admitted to 'borrowing' text from other agreements. One in particular took a fancy to Apple legal speak and regular used its legal copy, substituting its name for the company he was doing work. Why work for the hours you're billing? 1 min copy/paste/substitute, 100 hours playing golf to 'think' about what else to include.

Isn't this just fair use? (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28169501)

Sounds like this is just ACS's version of the Grey Album.

Quick Memo to the Team (5, Funny)

eldavojohn (898314) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169507)

From David Lyle, Acting Executive Director of ACS Law
To ACS Law Staff

Team,

I'd like to talk to all of you today about a very important issue that is right now affecting our public image. So serious that major news outlets may even pick up on it. It is in regards to our publications on copyright and as members of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, we need to look after each other. We have learned an important lesson today and we must share it with everyone so we can't make the same time wasting mistakes in the future.

That lesson, friends and coworkers, is that violating copyright is totally fucking awesome.

I mean we used to spend how many man-hours on one of these reports? 120? 240? Wasted wasted time. The information is out there just waiting to be copied. At first I thought this brilliant new technology would be expensive. I mean, how much do we spend just on the software that turns our computers on? Nope, just two simple commands: ctrl-c ctrl-p. These are the shake-n-bake methods of success.

That shit we did on Democracy and Voting? Yeah, take note. I just discovered that using this thing called Google will pull up page upon page of data that is as good as if not better than the crap we've been slaving over! Ever heard of a site called blackboxvoting.org? Fire up the goddamn presses. Frank LoMonte, that piece you did on the First Amendment was good. But Wikipedia's article is better. Next time save yourself the trouble, they're practically giving the stuff away out there--work smarter and faster people. Don't work harder.

And if any of you pansies come up to me like our now ex-employee Jenkins did about credit and citations, you'll be getting a citation yourself. You'll be fired. Now that's a citation. I just wrote a five hundred page report on the Second Amendment in five minutes, I don't have time for citations. Hell, you're lucky I don't fire the team that figured this out months ago and didn't tell us! I mean, we're a team people. We need to work together.

And if you're worried about the media, don't be. I've already bragged to them about this and told them they should pull their heads out of their asses and use it. Maybe that's why they're all dying business models? Ever think of that? This shit's free and they're paying for it. Morons. And the real icing on the cake is that since this hit the news, page views has tripled. It's fucking win/win no matter how you look at it.

I'll bet you think I'm a chump typing all this out when I could have just ctrl-c ctrl-p from The Onion and if you caught that, good for you. I'm still learning here, let's grow together.

Your friend and boss,

David Lyle, Acting Executive Director of ACS Law

Re: Quick Memo to the Team (5, Funny)

DeskLazer (699263) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169859)

"From David Lyle, Acting Executive Director of ACS Law
To ACS Law Staff

Team,

I'd like to talk to all of you today about a very important issue that is right now affecting our public image. So serious that major news outlets may even pick up on it. It is in regards to our publications on copyright and as members of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, we need to look after each other. We have learned an important lesson today and we must share it with everyone so we can't make the same time wasting mistakes in the future.

That lesson, friends and coworkers, is that violating copyright is totally fucking awesome.

I mean we used to spend how many man-hours on one of these reports? 120? 240? Wasted wasted time. The information is out there just waiting to be copied. At first I thought this brilliant new technology would be expensive. I mean, how much do we spend just on the software that turns our computers on? Nope, just two simple commands: ctrl-c ctrl-p. These are the shake-n-bake methods of success.

That shit we did on Democracy and Voting? Yeah, take note. I just discovered that using this thing called Google will pull up page upon page of data that is as good as if not better than the crap we've been slaving over! Ever heard of a site called blackboxvoting.org? Fire up the goddamn presses. Frank LoMonte, that piece you did on the First Amendment was good. But Wikipedia's article is better. Next time save yourself the trouble, they're practically giving the stuff away out there--work smarter and faster people. Don't work harder.

And if any of you pansies come up to me like our now ex-employee Jenkins did about credit and citations, you'll be getting a citation yourself. You'll be fired. Now that's a citation. I just wrote a five hundred page report on the Second Amendment in five minutes, I don't have time for citations. Hell, you're lucky I don't fire the team that figured this out months ago and didn't tell us! I mean, we're a team people. We need to work together.

And if you're worried about the media, don't be. I've already bragged to them about this and told them they should pull their heads out of their asses and use it. Maybe that's why they're all dying business models? Ever think of that? This shit's free and they're paying for it. Morons. And the real icing on the cake is that since this hit the news, page views has tripled. It's fucking win/win no matter how you look at it.

I'll bet you think I'm a chump typing all this out when I could have just ctrl-c ctrl-p from The Onion and if you caught that, good for you. I'm still learning here, let's grow together.

Your friend and boss,

David Lyle, Acting Executive Director of ACS Law"

All credit for this article goes to DeskLazer, who painstakingly used sources all over the internet to assemble this article.

Re: Quick Memo to the Team (1, Funny)

c0d3g33k (102699) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169895)

For want of modpoints, the kingdom was lost.

Brilliant, brilliant. Mod this up Insightful, please.

Re: Quick Memo to the Team (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170391)

ctrl-v, not ctrl-p

Re:Quick Memo to the Team (1)

hairyfeet (841228) | more than 4 years ago | (#28170787)

Uuuhhhh dude? It is ctrl-c and ctrl-v, not ctrl-p. Just FYI.

Re:Quick Memo to the Team (3, Informative)

cbiltcliffe (186293) | more than 4 years ago | (#28172109)

No...he's copying it to the clipboard, then printing out a hard copy.

This guy's violating copyright TWICE in TWO KEYSTROKES!11!1!!!

Ooooh...hardcore!

Re:Quick Memo to the Team (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28194723)

Nope, just two simple commands: ctrl-c ctrl-p.

C-h k C-c C-p: C-c C-p is undefined

What major mode are you using? I don't have riaa-mode, theft-mode nor copyright-infringement-mode.

Oh, I get it! You're using vim...

So the internet eats itself again (4, Interesting)

Drakkenmensch (1255800) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169513)

It's about time those RIAA lawyers went after the REAL criminals - those dang RIAA lawyers!!!

Present Imperfect (5, Funny)

gpronger (1142181) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169585)

Hitchhiker's Guide made a killing by copying information off of a cereal box, passing it through a wormhole to an early time, and then suing the cereal company.

From this the term "Future Perfect" was dropped.

I would propose that the term "Present Imperfect" is currently too fitting.

Heh - even the Brits are not immune! (1, Flamebait)

filesiteguy (695431) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169601)

I figured this to be occurring from a Wall Street company. But am surprised to see a British law firm. Of course, it sounds liek the old Shakespeare quote, "he doth protest too much." (I hope that isn't still copyrighted...)

Re:Heh - even the Brits are not immune! (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170223)

That'd be "the lady doth protest too much".

Re:Heh - even the Brits are not immune! (1)

MaskedSlacker (911878) | more than 4 years ago | (#28170393)

No problem when you misquote it.

Re:Heh - even the Brits are not immune! (0, Redundant)

filesiteguy (695431) | more than 4 years ago | (#28170533)

LOL!

I'm not sure how my comment is flamebait, but I suppose I should have checked out my source material better. I guess I'm just wiped from working on a bibliography (in MLA format) for my eight-year-old last night.

Re:Heh - even the Brits are not immune! (2, Funny)

cbiltcliffe (186293) | more than 4 years ago | (#28172145)

I guess I'm just wiped from working on a bibliography (in MLA format) for my eight-year-old last night.

You should have just copied and pasted....

Evolution is slow (1)

revjtanton (1179893) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169639)

Is it me or does it seem like the idea of intellectual property is evolving? I guess all this legal round-about is simply the growing pains? To me it all just seems irrelevant (the situation, not the article). In the end we're just arguing over what to do with ourselves...kinda like debating in the mirror over which hand to service yourself with and this time each hand is wearing the other's glove?

I can't tell if that's an accurate analogy but it talks about servicing oneself so I guess that's funny.

This story is nothing... (4, Funny)

hplus (1310833) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169667)

Yeah, but did you all hear that TorrentFreak noticed that an article apparently published by ACS Law was actually plagiarized from a variety of different sources, basically cut and pasted together with no credit or citations given at all? Remarkably, in some cases, articles with the exact opposite view of ACS Law were copied with paragraphs that just had an added sentence to the end which completely contradicted what the original article said.

Re:This story is nothing... (2, Insightful)

thedonger (1317951) | more than 4 years ago | (#28170351)

I didn't hear it third hand like you, but I read on Slashdot that Techdirt reported that TorrentFreak noticed and article published by ACS Law blah blah blah.

The Internets are creating circular blog references in order to control our minds.

Re:Torrent! (1)

TaoPhoenix (980487) | more than 4 years ago | (#28176065)

I thought a TORRENT was a method of cutting and pasting stuff together from a variety of different sources with no citations at all.

Well, they could... (3, Funny)

memphis.barbecue (1402253) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169711)

take a cue from Slashdot...

Plagiarized articles would be modded -1 redundant.

amount demanded (2, Interesting)

geniice (1336589) | more than 4 years ago | (#28169919)

hmm £600 thats about what getty and corbis ask when people use their images without permission. It there some standard legal fee that adds up to that amount somewhere?

Re:amount demanded (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170577)

Nah, it's modified usually by the media form. You know, text or images about what you say there. If it was music, it'd be in the range of 93 million.

It seems that many of those (2, Insightful)

Jane Q. Public (1010737) | more than 4 years ago | (#28170849)

who are trying most diligently to make mass money off of copyright claims, tend to know the least about copyright law and the way it is supposed to work.

When one High rise in downtown Seattle (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28170867)

has more lawyers then the entire country of Japan, I think I know were our problems really lay.

Re:When one High rise in downtown Seattle (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28177863)

Exactly. We need more Japans and less high rises in Seattle.

It's not just the RIAA any more (4, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#28172559)

Monsanto has applied for a patent on pigs here [greenpeace.org] and here [blogspot.com]

They are also seeking to enforce [naturalnews.com] these patents on independant farms across the globe.

Don't just take my word for it - a small investment of your time will yield sufficient information to scare the hell out of anyone who can really see where this is going..

The RIAA was just the start - and all they wanted was our money - Monsanto wants nothing less that to dominate the worlds food supply. And our silence will allow them to succeed.

tion Business Model Expands, Plagiarizes Oth (1)

deathtopaulw (1032050) | more than 4 years ago | (#28172771)

nies, Davenport Lyons and ACS, being clearly related and ACS publishing an article with clearly plagiarized smoney pleaseelections.by ACS Law was actually plagiarized from a variety of different sources, basically cut and pasted together with no credit or citations given at all. Remarkably, in some cases, articles with the exact opposite view of ACS Law were copied with paragraphs that just had an added sentence to the end which completely contradicted what the origin Anything to make a buck I guess. "TorrentFreak noticed that an article apparently published by ACS Law was actually plagiarized from a variety of different sources, basically cut and pasted t money please ogether with no credit or citations given at all. Remarkably, in some cases, articles with the exact opposite view arized selections. Anything to make a buck I guess. "TorrentFreak noticed Techdirt has an amusing story about the exp money please anding adoption of the RIAA-style business model of collecting settlement money from threats of litigation based on copyright infringement claims. This story comes with an amusing twist with the two cited companthat an article apparently published by ACS Law was actually plagiarized from a variety of different sources, money please
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...