Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

CrunchPad Will Be a 'Dead Simple Web Tablet'

Soulskill posted about 5 years ago | from the tablets-going-crunch-is-usually-a-bad-thing dept.

Portables 145

Hugh Pickens writes "TechCrunch's Michael Arrington has been talking for a year about building a touch-screen tablet for Web surfing and now it appears that the CrunchPad is close to becoming a reality. 'We're going to make some really big announcements,' said Arrington, who predicted a prototype would be ready for unveiling by the end of July. The purpose of the CrunchPad will be very simple: surfing the Web. Turn it on and up comes a browser — 'an Internet consumption device,' for reading, checking e-mail or watching video. The CrunchPad will not have a hard drive or keyboard and photos of the latest prototype show a device with a 12 inch screen. 'The screen is now flush with the case and we've decreased the overall thickness to about 18 mm,' writes Arrington. 'The case will be aluminum, which is more expensive than plastic but is sturdier and lets us shave a little more off the overall thickness of the device.' The CrunchPad boots directly into the browser with a Linux-based operating system and a WebKit-based browser. A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash. 'The next time we talk about the CrunchPad publicly will be at a special press and user event in July in Silicon Valley,' writes Arrington. 'We're full on. These prototypes are real.'"

cancel ×

145 comments

you could have a virtual keyboard (1)

cryophan (787735) | about 5 years ago | (#28580609)

click it with the mouse. Nice spacesaver

dumb terminal (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580617)

wonderful, what will they think of next

Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (3, Insightful)

da5idnetlimit.com (410908) | about 5 years ago | (#28580619)

Then please add a strong (8\10 meters) IR interface.

It can then become my universal remote AND my (potato) couch web browser.
Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (2, Interesting)

sam0737 (648914) | about 5 years ago | (#28580717)

Build an embedded system, hook to your LAN that serve an Remote Control Webpage...Emitting IR when command is received.

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (1)

michaelhood (667393) | about 5 years ago | (#28581561)

An embedded device with an IR transmitter..

I'm off to the patent office to file for protection on this! "Remote controller," I'll call it.

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (2, Informative)

bjwest (14070) | about 5 years ago | (#28581179)

An iphone for general browsing? You're kidding right? There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing. A quick lookup or banking transaction maybe, but if you're doing your daily browsing (news sites, research, what ever) you need more than a couple of five or six word lines at a time, and forget about serious posting. A remote replacement, yeah, general browser replacement, no way.

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (1)

ceoyoyo (59147) | about 5 years ago | (#28581285)

It works great for reading RSS feeds or flipping through Slashdot comments (before the redesign started putting them all over the place). I wouldn't want to use it all the time, but it works quite well for on-the-couch type stuff.

You're not going to be doing any "serious posting" with this thing either. It doesn't have a keyboard.

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (1)

iluvcapra (782887) | about 5 years ago | (#28581603)

I've posted some relatively long comments [slashdot.org] from an iPhone, it's when you want to start linking to things the impractical aspects start to show thru.

Re:Wanna sell them like hot bread ? (1)

node 3 (115640) | about 5 years ago | (#28582499)

An iphone[sic] for general browsing? You're kidding right? There is no way a device with a 3.5 inch display could be used for serious browsing.

You've clearly never used an iPhone. The 3.5" screen is very high resolution, so the text is quite sharp and readable at smaller sizes. Safari's ability to zoom the page (scaling everything, not just increasing the font size), its ability to zoom to specific sections of a web page, and the overall speed and smoothness of the multitouch interface makes it a very viable web browsing device.

Coupled with the fact that it's always with you (pocketable, which is not possible a larger display), and always connected increases its utility.

I'm not saying a larger screen wouldn't make web browsing better, but to say (as you did) that a 3.5 inch screen can't be used for serious browsing is demonstrably false.

Too much masturbation renders Iphone useless (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581989)

>Otherwise, I already found some solutions to browse from the couch (aka iphone)

Yes because, everyone enjoys reading for more than 2 minutes on a 3 inch screen.

Stop comparing apples to oranges.
Literally.

Obligatory... (5, Insightful)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28580643)

It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.

Re:Obligatory... (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580763)

It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.

I hope i'm missing your sarcasm. The 4th of July alcohol is getting to me.

Sony Reader [google.com]
Amazon Kindle [google.com]
TC1100 [google.com]

For certain applications, a tablet is often an ideal device for human interfacing. (for me) It's easier to curl around a tablet on a bed, in a chair, on a hammock with a tablet than a laptop. It's also more enjoyable for me to read comic books and other full screen files on my tablet (Tc1100) than on my netbook or my 17" laptop.

If it isn't expensive, the tablet format is great. My only concern with any device such as this is what's the battery life going to be like.

Re:Obligatory... (1, Insightful)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28580823)

Yes, the 'larger screen in a format that is easier to hold' was supposed to be a dead giveaway to the sarcasm.

Re:Obligatory... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580863)

Fair enough, Cheers pal!

Re:Obligatory... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581551)

Troll moderation, really? I'm extolling the benefits of a slate, which is the same goal as the snarky grandparent is doing... How exactly is this a troll post?

Re:Obligatory... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28582933)

It's not a netbook and I don't see why anyone would possibly prefer a larger screen in a format that is easier to hold to something with a keyboard.

Less space than a Nomad?

It needs some method of data entry (1)

Kupfernigk (1190345) | about 5 years ago | (#28580655)

"Browsing the web" also involves buying online. For this to be useful for many users, it needs a reasonably efficient means of basic text entry that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard. A small Bluetooth keypad/touchpad combo would be better.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (4, Insightful)

tiananmen tank man (979067) | about 5 years ago | (#28580729)

... so you would hold some small keyboard in your hand and your other hand could be holding the tablet? Sounds horrible.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (4, Insightful)

generic.individual (1590219) | about 5 years ago | (#28580927)

I was thinking something like a slide out keyboard, like g1 phone style. A keyboard is really so much nicer than touch for entering data. In my book it is an essential requirement for serious web browsing and email but shouldn't get in the way or be there when you don't need it or you might as well just be holding a laptop.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580955)

I was thinking something like a slide out keyboard, like g1 phone style.

Or the Nokia 810.

Maybe the next revision.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (-1, Troll)

larry bagina (561269) | about 5 years ago | (#28581377)

Is suspect most of /. will hold a small penis in one hand and the tablet in the other.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (3, Insightful)

eric-x (1348097) | about 5 years ago | (#28581521)

Put a keyboard on the back which can be folded to the front, depending on the position you can use it as a pad or a netbook.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (2, Funny)

edittard (805475) | about 5 years ago | (#28581757)

I'm sure I've nevr seen anything like that!

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

sootman (158191) | about 5 years ago | (#28582655)

Hmm... I think you're on to something. Maybe if the screen and keyboard were attached... perhaps with a hinge...

Re:It needs some method of data entry (2, Interesting)

Captain Splendid (673276) | about 5 years ago | (#28580771)

that is not some horrible onscreen keyboard

As someone who uses the Ipod touch onscreen keyboard, and has huge gorilla hands, an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss. Of all the criticisms of the Crunchpad, this is the one that baffles me the most.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28581107)

Do you thumb type on the Ipod? A 12" tablet may not be conducive to that, especially to people with normal monkey hands.

(I don't think the lack of a physical keyboard matters, but I don't think the devices are directly comparable either)

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

Captain Splendid (673276) | about 5 years ago | (#28581813)

Yes and no. Thumb typing works best in landscape mode, but not all apps provide that, so sometimes I do a one-handed, 2 to 3 fingered hunt and peck. I suspect that method would work best on the Crunchpad for me, although, with my hands, thumb typing would probably be quite feasible.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

FlopEJoe (784551) | about 5 years ago | (#28582737)

"an onscreen keyboard on a 12" screen will be a piece of piss"
Way to sell it! Are you in advertising? :p

Re:It needs some method of data entry (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28583127)

If not for "Of all the criticisms of the Crunchpad, this is the one that baffles me the most." I would have thought he was saying the onscreen keyboard will be horrible. Shouldn't a piece of piss be slightly less terrible, but still quite bad, compared with a piece of shit?

Re:It needs some method of data entry (2, Insightful)

Soul-Burn666 (574119) | about 5 years ago | (#28580835)

I've got a 8.9" tablet-convertible netbook installed with Windows 7.
Even with this relatively small screen, the built-in onscreen keyboard is really quite nice.
While I can't easily touch-type on it, I can definitely "hunt-and-peck" with 2 hands. On a 12" screen I should be able to use all my fingers.

In a previous video of the Crunchpad, they used some clunky looking onscreen keyboard and I hope they switch to something better (like the Win7 one).
A multi-touch screen will make it even better.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

Procasinator (1173621) | about 5 years ago | (#28581051)

How about making a detachable touch screen. Oh wait, these guys have done it [alwaysinnovating.com] .

I know I'd prefer to use a design more similar to Always Innovating, as:

  • I can get the same usage from it as the CrunchPad, if I want
  • I can use the keyboard if I keep the screen attached, and use it like a normal laptop (with a fully feature OS)

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

zarzu (1581721) | about 5 years ago | (#28581111)

i am still waiting for a small tablet with a keyboard on it's back. that might sound kind of crazy and it probably is, but i imagine it being absolutely awesome. a keyboard that doesn't take any additional space and can be used by just normally holding the device, it would be split, one keyboard-half for each hand (stuff that already exists for desktops) and obviously would be rotated some. the only problem is that you can't see it and need to actually know where the keys are, but any frequent user wouldn't have a problem with that, so gimme my tablet with back-keyboard, now!

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

edittard (805475) | about 5 years ago | (#28581801)

the only problem is that you can't see it and need to actually know where the keys are

Just stand in front of a mirror. And, er, learn to read miror writing or hack the screen driver to reverse the image.

Re:It needs some method of data entry (1)

ceoyoyo (59147) | about 5 years ago | (#28581307)

This thing is obviously designed to be your lounging-on-the-couch, don't-want-to-have-your-notebook-in-your-lap machine. Have we degenerated so far that any new device is useless if it doesn't allow us to buy stuff and that we're too lazy to get off the couch and walk over to our regular computers when we want to buy stuff?

Intgrate an E-book/PDF reader into it to (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580661)

And let it play MAME with some SD storage.

CrunchPad (3, Funny)

Renderer of Evil (604742) | about 5 years ago | (#28580667)

A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox.

Sign me up.

Re:CrunchPad (1)

SlashGordon (1127617) | about 5 years ago | (#28580755)

Yes, isn't this a step backwards? Do we really want to go back to carrying three different single use gadgets around?

Re:CrunchPad (1)

FlyingBishop (1293238) | about 5 years ago | (#28580871)

It's a browser, e-reader, and ssh client. If the Flash support is sufficient, it's a TV. So it's not a phone. You try to cram too much crap into one device, all you get is something that does none of its intended tasks well. I would probably just use this thing around the house so I don't have to bother with my more power-hungry computers.

Re:CrunchPad (1)

tolan-b (230077) | about 5 years ago | (#28581891)

Unfortunately Flash's video performance in Linux is awful, and I'm doubting the Crunchpad is going to be sporting a very fast processor, so I wouldn't hold out for full screen video. A video linked from the article shows it doing fullscreen flash video (not Flash's idea of HD either) and it looked like it was managing a few FPS.

Still, I'm quite tempted by one of these. I was considering getting a netbook for the livingroom / kitchen, or just to hand to my girlfriend when she wants to look something up online but can't be bothered to wait for her Ubuntu box to boot.

The price is looking a little high to me though. It might end up being a netbook after all.

Re:CrunchPad (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28582491)

Unfortunately Flash's video performance in Linux is awful, and I'm doubting the Crunchpad is going to be sporting a very fast processor, so I wouldn't hold out for full screen video.

I wouldn't necessarily sign that claim.

Overall, the open source version of Flash is horrible on Linux. However, after I switched to using Adobe's own version of Flash, I've had no problems at all.

Granted: I do have a rather powerful computer and 64 bit version of flash but the fact that Adobe even brings that to Linux (and I think that 64 bit beta for Linux predates 64 bit beta to Windows!) shows that Flash on Linux is far from the horrible piece of... Well, far from what it used to be.

If they have some sort of licensing with Adobe and perhaps been able to get something optimized for their software and hardware...

Anyways, I'm looking forwards to that. I have 12 inch laptop but when I'm sitting in a crowded train and want to browse the Internet, the keyboard is just in the way. In addition, with more power comes more heat and battery consumption.

Re:CrunchPad (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581305)

A $300 digital photo-frame that runs Firefox. ... with a touchscreen, built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, USB and runs Linux.

I'm sure nobody can think of use for that.

Re:CrunchPad (1)

SaDan (81097) | about 5 years ago | (#28581553)

It's not about finding a use for it, it's a question of "How many can we sell?"

This device is going to flop. I thought it was originally supposed to be sold for $99? Then it was $200. Now it's $300, and I'll bet they can't even sell it for less than that once they get production rolling. If it sold for $99, it might have a chance. At $300, it's now in competition with much more capable (if not the same form factor, close to it) hardware and more flexible software.

Toss Android on it, and you immediately have access to thousands of apps, brand recognition (Sorry, but TechCrunch is so obscure, it's not even funny), and a mature interface. Partner with T-Mobile for even more exposure and outlets to sell your hardware.

For someone who's supposed to be some kind of valley insider, this guy has really missed the boat.

Re:CrunchPad (1)

larry bagina (561269) | about 5 years ago | (#28581447)

WebKit, not firefox.

Re:CrunchPad (1)

cbhacking (979169) | about 5 years ago | (#28582699)

Well, more like it run Chromium (WebKit-based, not Gecko-based). Still sounds pretty cool. Quality of the input is going to be the real gotcha, though - on-screen keyboards can be done well, but usually aren't. They have enough screen real-estate it shouldn't be too hard, though.

Old News (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580673)

Article originally posted June 3rd. Old news.

Re:Old News (1)

gEvil (beta) (945888) | about 5 years ago | (#28580713)

Article originally posted June 3rd. Old news.

Someone apparently can't tell the difference between June and July.

Re:Old News (2, Informative)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28580723)

The newspaper articles/blogs are from July (one is even from 2 days in the future), but the TechCrunch article (arguably the 'original') is from June.

Re:Old News (1)

gEvil (beta) (945888) | about 5 years ago | (#28580783)

So the incorporation of Crunchpad, Inc. and the mention of prototypes by the end of July are supposedly sourced from that "original" article, even though it makes no mention of either of those? Interesting...

Re:Old News (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28580851)

I didn't say 'certainly', I said 'arguably'.

flash video (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580689)

A video of an earlier CrunchPad prototype in action shows a device which, unlike the iPhone, runs flash.

Yes, it's quite impressive. I like watching my YouTube videos at 1 frame every 3 or 4 seconds.

Virtual Keyboard (1)

dean.collins (862044) | about 5 years ago | (#28580691)

Will it have a virtual keyboard though? I cant wait for these to be released to use for watching baseball games and chatting on http://www.livebaseballchat.com/ [livebaseballchat.com] but the only problem is that with a netbook and wifi i'm not sure what additional value this is going to be offering. I think i'd miss the keyboard for typing. Cheers, Dean

Re:Virtual Keyboard (1)

1 a bee (817783) | about 5 years ago | (#28580931)

Will it have a virtual keyboard though?

Sort of. About 40 seconds into the demo video [youtube.com] cited by the story, you see a so so virtual keyboard overlayed on top of a dimmed background.

It's a shame that the virtual keyboard is so small that the user must type with one finger. There's plenty of screen real estate there to have a very nice large (virtual) keyboard. (I imagine this single finger text input interface might be deliberate--e.g. multiple fingers touching the screen might confuse the touch-screen hardware?)

vapourware (0, Troll)

ionix5891 (1228718) | about 5 years ago | (#28580701)

perfect for the cloud computing age...

But, but... (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28580725)

It has no tabs!

Why? (0, Flamebait)

skreeech (221390) | about 5 years ago | (#28580747)

Looking past the very basic needs of searching and typing addresses I find that most web use today involves typing something

Web "Consumer" device (4, Insightful)

presidenteloco (659168) | about 5 years ago | (#28580777)

Overall cool - iphone with big enough screen

But they really should focus on design of a virtual keyboard that is large and ergonomically laid out.

We have to avoid trending toward encouraging passive web surfers who are only "channel surfing"
just like the advertisers want you to.

The internet is way more interesting and useful when it is truely two-way, peer-to-peer.

Re:Web "Consumer" device (1, Flamebait)

ceoyoyo (59147) | about 5 years ago | (#28581323)

Really? I've found that it's particularly inane when it's too easily two way. Publishing something should at a minimum involve getting off the couch or picking up and opening your notebook.

Re:Web "Consumer" device (1)

cbhacking (979169) | about 5 years ago | (#28582731)

Dont' forget Flash support. I don't personally *like* Flash, but it's a pretty important part of the modern web. The fact that the iPhone lacks it (and don't give me any of Jobs' crap as to why; lower-spec ARM devices support it) could be a big deal in promoting this thing. Additionally, the larger (and presumably much higher-res) display should make a big difference... except it's too big for a pocket.

Missing from the feature list (1)

CubicleView (910143) | about 5 years ago | (#28580779)

It must come with velcro on the back to hold it to your lap like in the picture.

Once more around the block my friend (3, Informative)

westlake (615356) | about 5 years ago | (#28580799)

With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.

Which no one wants and no one buys.

Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.

The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure.

The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games - available as dirt-cheep downloads from places like Gog.com [gog.com] ["Good Old Games"]

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28580879)

No one wants a shitty, expensive web appliance.

I would guess that the market for a nice, affordable web appliance will surprise you (I'm not sure this device will meet either of those criteria...).

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

Fallingcow (213461) | about 5 years ago | (#28580937)

This sucker's a portable smart screen big enough for two people to view comfortably.

If you can't think of a dozen awesome uses for this, you must consume very little media (or lots of it, but all alone)

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28581007)

If the software is slow and cumbersome, it will fit the definition of shitty. If I am broke, $300 (for what is mostly a toy) may not be affordable.

The first of those questions is yet to be answered, and the $300 is what they sort of hope they can charge for it, not the actual launch price. So I agree that the general idea has lots of potential, but 'this sucker' isn't something we can have a concrete discussion about just yet.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

basementman (1475159) | about 5 years ago | (#28580909)

Not just MSDOS games, my netbook can run counter strike source.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

0xdeadbeef (28836) | about 5 years ago | (#28580967)

The Kindle stores 1500 e-books for your off-line reading pleasure
The Atom netbook running XP or Win 7 can play hundreds of MSDOS and Windows games

A pitifully small library of crappy books, and games I didn't want to play when they were state of the art? Where do I sign up!

I seriously can't believe there are people who don't understand that there is a market for lightweight, touchscreen tablet. It's the fucking Internet, stupid! How much time do people spend on their ass, surfing the web? Who wouldn't rather do that in a comfy chair, in a manner doesn't give them carpal tunnel or make their balls sweat like the foolishly named "laptop"?

Re:Once more around the block my friend (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581083)

With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.

Or do you mean a Star Trek DataPad...

Re:Once more around the block my friend (4, Interesting)

iluvcapra (782887) | about 5 years ago | (#28581729)

With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance. Which no one wants and no one buys.

It's a challenging use case. For the form factor we're talking about, lacking a keyboard but being very thin, having limited proc, and being only marginaly cheaper than a netbook, the real competition in its market is paper. If this thing isn't as useful as paper, why bother getting this for someone to use when an actual nominal "computer" is only marginally more expensive.

I think it's clear that someday something like this will replace a lot of paper, not all of it, but lots of ephemera. I already use my knidle to read my screenplays, and that's already saved 500 sheets in the past 3 months. If something like the kindle had better searching and browsing, and could actually read HTML documents in the manner they were intended, I could be keeping phonebooks full of film codebooks and sound library stuff in their right now.

Something I've noticed with my iPhone, on the other hand, despite the fact that it's a little small to use properly as paper, is that it's extremely difficult to be browsing something on my computer, and then to continue my browsing session on the phone, or vice versus. The only way to do it is to email links to yourself, and that's a supreme pain.... Something I still think about from Minority Report were the larger pad-like storage devices they used to move files from one rig to another, like when Tom Cruise's assistant would look up a series of mugshots on one machine and bring them over to his. The assistant would collect the mugshots, drag them off his screen and ONTO the screen of the pad, as if the pad, by nature of touching the computer, were an extension of his monitor, and then he could take the pad, which had a display and could show everything it held, and carried it to the other computer. From there, the pad then became an extention on Anderton's monitor, and he could look at the material directly on the pad or drag it to his system, completing the loop. Why the fuck can't someone build an internet tablet that can do that? All that haptic stuff was cool, but for some reason, in my work, I'm constantly wishing I could take something I'm working on at this moment, drag it to a pad, and carry it somewhere, perhaps to move, perhaps just to work in-situ on the pad.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

evilviper (135110) | about 5 years ago | (#28581767)

With each new generation of hardware the geek seems determined to re-invent the web appliance.

It's exceedingly clear that people want a computer which:
    A) Works better (fast, responsive, stable).
    B) Is simpler (UI & maintenance).

Which no one wants and no one buys.
Not in the numbers which matter to WalMart.

You could have said the same thing about MP3 players, before the iPod came along.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

westlake (615356) | about 5 years ago | (#28582033)

It's exceedingly clear that people want a computer which:
A) Works better (fast, responsive, stable).
B) Is simpler (UI & maintenance).

I'm not so sure.

There have been many attempts to make a go of an alternative UI. Sugar, The Simputer, and so on.

But the traditional school desk has been around at least since the 1890s - and I have a strong suspicion your great great-grandad would have found the desktop UI easy to understand and easy to learn.

His dad's "secretary" was most likely a great walnut cabinet with dozens of pigeon-holes. Files and folders. Drag and drop.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

nurb432 (527695) | about 5 years ago | (#28581811)

Netbooks and 'pads' are different markets.

Lets hope they don't price themselves out of their target market.

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

lawpoop (604919) | about 5 years ago | (#28581829)

My thought exactly. Didn't Nokia have a somewhat unpopular product in their web tablets, which did slight more than just surf the web?

Re:Once more around the block my friend (1)

JesseL (107722) | about 5 years ago | (#28582519)

Yep. The N series of tablets. I just got an N810 from buy.com fro $179. It's got an 800x480 touch screen, slide out keyboard, 802.11b/g, bluetooth, GPS, flash enabled browser, webcam, mini-sd for expansion, huge battery life, can function as a USB host, etc. It also has a nice selection of free software available. And it fits in a pocket.

For something with a 12" screen like the subject of the article, I'd rather just use a netbook.

What is the need ??? (1)

Archfeld (6757) | about 5 years ago | (#28580807)

I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100. Seems like this device is a dead end niche minus the niche. Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ? Read but not reply ? While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.

Re:What is the need ??? (1)

quasigenx (843945) | about 5 years ago | (#28580981)

It's probably not for you, then. Buy I netbook. I'm getting two of these things.

Re:What is the need ??? (1)

mrchaotica (681592) | about 5 years ago | (#28581511)

I can buy a laptop that will do everything this does and MUCH MORE for like an additional $100.

A $400 laptop isn't one pound and a quarter inch thick (my estimate from the pictures). A $400 laptop can't be easily held like a clipboard. A $400 laptop doesn't have battery life nearly as long as this ought to have. And even if a laptop did manage to have one of these characteristics, it sure as Hell wouldn't have all three and still be $400!

Without a keyboard, how much email can you do ? Read but not reply ? While a virtual keyboard might work for a few keystrokes, a simple 2 paragraph email becomes torture using a non-existent KB.

It's got a USB port; if they include USB-host (and they'd be brain-dead not to), you can just add one of those roll-up keyboards or something.

Of course, I'm personally hoping for a stylus and handwriting recognition (or at least character recognition, which they could add easily).

Re:What is the need ??? (1)

SaDan (81097) | about 5 years ago | (#28581665)

If you watch the demo video, this thing looks chunky, way more than 1/4" thick.

A $250 netbook will cream this thing's capabilities in every aspect. That's my prediction, anyways... It's been in the design phase for four years, before netbooks even took off. This device will now have to compete with hardware that didn't exist at the time of its conception, because other corporations moved faster.

Re:What is the need ??? (1)

mrchaotica (681592) | about 5 years ago | (#28582027)

A $250 netbook will cream this thing's capabilities in every aspect.

A $250 netbook creams this at having a 12" screen? I don't think so!

Re:What is the need ??? (1)

cbhacking (979169) | about 5 years ago | (#28582765)

Wow, try readking the fucking SUMMARY at least.
18mm / 25.4mm/in = .71 in. It's a bit short of 3/4 of an inch thick. Based on similar devices, weight will probably be in the 2-3 lb range. It will have a larger screen and probably much better battery life than a netbook (lots of room inside that case, and netbooks have much poorer battery live than I would have expected when I first heard about them).

Android? (1)

MaggieL (10193) | about 5 years ago | (#28580849)

Sounds like a natural for http://www.android.com/ [android.com]

Re:Android? (1)

SaDan (81097) | about 5 years ago | (#28581409)

If it doesn't run Android, it should.

If you make it dead simple... (1)

dvh.tosomja (1235032) | about 5 years ago | (#28580901)

If you make it dead simple, only brain dead will be using it

do touch screens need wind shield wipers? (1)

1 a bee (817783) | about 5 years ago | (#28581033)

Compared to my screen, my keyboard is awfully dirty. It's shiny with grime, even though I clean it about once month. I'm thinking if I had a touch screen, I'd have to wipe that screen clean about once an hour, at least.

Either that, or stop licking my fingers.

Michael Arrington is a Troll (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581049)

For proof, check out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsV-lgnAjps

Re:Michael Arrington is a Troll (1)

SaDan (81097) | about 5 years ago | (#28581697)

He makes his living writing a blog. What do you expect?

This is the solution I've been looking for (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581067)

for a while.

I already do all my computing from my couch, on an expensive, ugly, and loud computer (and a decent tele, with a freaking awesome keyboard). It is nice to play video games while watching Star Trek. It is also nice to be able to set my data a'calculating or code a'compiling and maximize my ...HD-DVD.... of The Bourne Identity.

But writing, drawing, and graphics/design are frustrating. I would prefer to have my typing directly in front of me. I have flirted with the idea of mounting an additional monitor on a swingarm beside my couch, so I could write or do graphics, but I don't want a monitor cable running across my floor, and I do not want to invest heavily a wireless solution for a monitor. 'They' say a bluetooth 3 system is in the works.

I've often considered that computing on a tablet would be great. However, the loss of computing power makes doing anything resource intensive prohibitive.

So my next solution was going to be to 'dumb terminal' the setup on a tablet, and park my tower in a closet. But that makes 80% (even more?) of the resources of a good tablet a waste.

With one of these and browser desktop, like logmein, I'd have exactly what I was looking for. I imagine you'd use a free (and local) solution, considering that your intranet could handle all the bandwidth necessary for a reasonably fast terminal. I've only used a few 'pro' (ie. expensive) solutions* for rdping over a network and over the tubes, but they really sucked compared to logmein.

I think if this thing comes out affordable, and is a little less fruity then prototype C, this may be the next component for my PC.

*Offtopic note: I will absolutely never, ever buy a Firebox, thanks to WatchGaurd and their fantastic 'Enterprise' vpn solutions. Ever.

Will it be possible to close the browser? (1)

arrenlex (994824) | about 5 years ago | (#28581269)

Is it at all possible to close the browser and use the tablet as a proper computer? That would be magical.

Re:Will it be possible to close the browser? (3, Insightful)

drgould (24404) | about 5 years ago | (#28581355)

Is it at all possible to close the browser and use the tablet as a proper computer? That would be magical.

It runs Linux and I find it difficult to believe that they are making any serious attempt to "lock it down."

If you can't access at least a shell prompt out of the box, I'm sure someone will post a youtube how-to video within 5 minutes of release.

adblock? noscript? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581291)

no thanks if it makes browsing worse

But will it tweet? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581407)

It's not a crunch product if it isn't all about twitter.

Dead simple products, for dead simple people! (1)

Hurricane78 (562437) | about 5 years ago | (#28581413)

For users like
- Simple Jack
- President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho
- George W. Bush
- Joe Sixpack
- The drooling guy in the wheelchair.
- Your baby that is still in the womb.
- And even Flippy the chimp!

Nobody has to feel left out from the forums because he can't even enter some simple letters. The possibilities are endless!

With just one clickwheel, you can wheel all day long! Whooo! Wheeee! *lisping* It's so simple!

Company Boss (deep voice, huge pack of muscles, looks like a peasant in a suit): "Our clients love it! Some of them even came to company headquarters to.. stand there... and... like... drool... and make cavemen noises for no reason. Of course there is also some grunting. But we take that as a suggestion, about where to make our system even simpler, and what feature to remove next. We always listen to our clients, and fullfill their every wish, no matter how lazy and stupid, and lazy and fucking idiots, and stinking creepy retards and stupid and backwards and plain and simple the most retarded stupid fucks that mother nature ever shat out of her ass they are." *takes out hankie* *wipes sweat* *pops his pills*

Now for only one plus one plus one plus one plus one ...(goes on for half an hour)... plus one credits from that big hole in the ground where you hack the dirt out of the ground for the great monkey of steel that tells you what to do!

Don't miss it! Buy now!

Re:Dead simple products, for dead simple people! (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28581815)

It must be awfully hard, going through life thinking you are that smart.

Re:Dead simple products, for dead simple people! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28582927)

Was this supposed to be funny?

I'd buy it if.. (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28581583)

it was double the price and had an apple logo on it.

Got Impatient and Got Myself a Real Tablet (2)

jacksonyee (590218) | about 5 years ago | (#28581805)

Between waiting for the Pandora and the Crunchpad, I found a real tablet at BetaMacs - the Motion Computing M1300 with a USB keyboard for $310 including shipping (They no longer have any stock here at the time of this writing, unfortunately, but GainSaver still has a couple). The battery only lasts about two hours, but I can run a full Windows XP/Ubuntu installation with almost 640x480 x264 playback (stutters a bit during busy scenes).

Thanks for the concepts, Mike. If you had used a Cortex A8 with a 7 inch screen and slide-out keyboard, I might have had a niche for you in my gadgets collection. See you next time!

I'll take two (1)

Bysshe (1330263) | about 5 years ago | (#28581935)

For the two most important places in my house: The kitchen table and the porcelain throne. More real-time than tucking a newspaper under my arm!

Apple's Safari Pad (1)

Udo Schmitz (738216) | about 5 years ago | (#28582017)

John Markoff in the NY-Times in March 2008:
"Apple's multitouch technology began life not as a cellphone, but as a notepad-sized skunkworks project internally dubbed Safari Pad, run by Tim Bucher, then Apple's head of Macintosh hardware. To his credit, Mr. Jobs seized on the technology and morphed it into the iPhone.
At Macworld, when I asked Mr. Jobs about the idea of an iPod Touch in a larger "Safari Pad" format, he snapped at me, "I can't talk about unannounced products.""

Originally at http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/reading-steve-jobs/ [nytimes.com]

Yeah, and the iPhone is just a phone... (1)

cjonslashdot (904508) | about 5 years ago | (#28582245)

A dead-simple web tablet. That's like saying that the iPhone will be just a simple to use phone.

I believe the real appeal of the thing will be in the simplicity and elegance of its design, but also in its ability to do just about everything once one installs add-on apps to it. After all, it has a CPU and Linux - why woundn't one do other things on it?

Now if only it can eventually have a super low power display (like the Kindle, but color), so that we are finally free of the tyranny of being near an electric outlet.

Horrible UI (1)

vertigoCiel (1070374) | about 5 years ago | (#28582501)

The UI gestures on this thing are terrible. They're not at all obvious. I don't imaging anyone will be able to figure out how to bring up, say, text entry without being told. It's also unclear how some of the gestures (such as the upward swipe) are distinguished from scrolling. Just stick an address bar and a few buttons in there, it'll make all of your user's lives easier. There's definitely room. Sacrificing usability for a "full-screen-web" aesthetic isn't a good idea.

Where oh where have I seen this before? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28582661)

oh yeah, webtv.

People like to have some extra functionality in their computers other than web browsing, even if they never use that other functionality.

Same goes for people who want 600 HP cars, in reality, they'll never use all the power of the car, only a fraction of it, but they want it because it has *more*

Netbooks sold well not because of limited horsepower or features, but because of the functionality they provided in a small form factor, plus they didnt lack all that much horsepower.

I'm sorry but the crunchpad will fail because it being design with a fad in mind, you know, the whole web 2.0 cloud computing? It might fly, but it will fall like a stone afterwards.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...