Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Google Apps Leave Beta

Soulskill posted about 5 years ago | from the why-so-soon dept.

Google 116

Today Google announced that they're removing the "beta" label from Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Docs and Google Talk. They said, "We've come to appreciate that the beta tag just doesn't fit for large enterprises that aren't keen to run their business on software that sounds like it's still in the trial phase." Quoting the NYTimes: "'Obviously we haven't had a consistent set of policies or definitions around beta,' said Matt Glotzbach, a director of product management at Google. Mr. Glotzbach said that different teams at Google had different criteria for what beta meant, and that Google felt a need to standardize those. ... Practically speaking, the change will mean precious little to Gmail's millions of users. But it could help Google's efforts to get the paid version of its package of applications, which includes Gmail, Calendar, Docs and other products, adopted inside big companies."

cancel ×


Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Beta (3, Insightful)

TheSpoom (715771) | about 5 years ago | (#28609721)

Well, duh. Google marks apps as beta so they have no uptime or reliability requirements to the end user. You can't blame businesses for wanting software they've paid for to not have such an inherent disclaimer.

Re:Beta (5, Insightful)

bemymonkey (1244086) | about 5 years ago | (#28609913)

Wasn't the paid version non-beta all along?

IIRC only the free versions were marked beta...

Re:Beta (0, Redundant)

TheSpoom (715771) | about 5 years ago | (#28610131)

Honestly, having never used the paid versions, I'm not sure. Sorry if that's the case; though since they're based on the same code, I'd then wonder why the free version is marked beta.

Re:Beta (2, Informative)

bemymonkey (1244086) | about 5 years ago | (#28610317)

I think it had something to do with new features only being integrated into the paid version when they'd been thoroughly tested in the free version - or something along those lines.

Maybe I'm just imagining it, but I think I remember reading something about that a while ago. :)

Re:Beta (4, Informative)

eldaria (1051866) | about 5 years ago | (#28610393)

I have used the premium Google apps for a little over a year, and only today the logo had the beta label removed, I were actually reading about it on Engadget, flipped to the tab with my mail and saw that it had beta on the logo, refreshed the page and the beta label was gone.

Re:Beta (3, Informative)

Zarel (900479) | about 5 years ago | (#28613839)

Did you check "Enable pre-release features" or "Next generation" in the Google Apps domain settings? It's my impression that only explicitly enabling beta features like that would cause the "beta" label to appear. If those are unchecked, you should see no "beta" label.

Re:Beta (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610871)

I used the paid version of google earth. It sucks. I bought into their claims. I'm out a lot of money. Did I mention I couldn't download it without installing their crapware updater. Which installed other shit even though I didn't check the checkbox. Fuck google. Their search sucks now too. It's all about who pays the most money other than that it just all adware sites(this domain available, game cheats, blah blah). Of course no content what so ever. Did I mention fuck google?

Re:Beta (5, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610489)

>Wasn't the paid version non-beta all along?

Yeah, and it's reliable. There's really no reason for small and medium businesses to run their own mail servers anymore.

Re:Beta (4, Funny)

MyLongNickName (822545) | about 5 years ago | (#28610633)

Thanks for sharing your opinion, Sergey.

Re:Beta (2, Interesting)

Lucky75 (1265142) | about 5 years ago | (#28610723)

You mean except for privacy concerns?

Re:Beta (1)

644bd346996 (1012333) | about 5 years ago | (#28610851)

Businesses generally don't have privacy concerns. They have concerns over liability arising from privacy problems. Who wouldn't want to shift that liability over to a bigger corporation with more privacy expertise and more lawyers?

Re:Beta (2, Informative)

hesiod (111176) | about 5 years ago | (#28613785)

I congratulate you for the immense work you must have put in to achieve such an astounding level of ignorance. Of course businesses have privacy concerns! That's why big corps will pay a shitload of money to really good IT people to keep their systems secure, instead of relying on the honesty unknown people at some other company over which they have no (or little, at least) control. The best way for them to mitigate the risk of liability would be to keep all that data off the freaking Internet, and on their own systems.

Re:Beta (2, Insightful)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28611423)

If they aren't already encrypting their mail, using Google isn't really changing anything.

Re:Beta (1)

skarphace (812333) | about 5 years ago | (#28615075)

If they aren't already encrypting their mail, using Google isn't really changing anything.

What company out there does this on a regular basis? And you know, CIA and NSA don't count.

Implementing PGP/GPG organization wide seems almost impossible to me. Can I expect my users to generate keys, make sure they have revocation keys, and submit them to a key server?

Re:Beta (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28615185)

My first comment was a little quick, internal communications are more private if they are on an internal server, but external communications...

Even in the case of internal communications, I bet there are lots of paranoid (especially smaller) companies that don't know that Larry is emailing stuff home to work on, or whatever.

Re:Beta (1)

Vu1turEMaN (1270774) | about 5 years ago | (#28611871)

For most businesses, using https is enough.

Plus the ability to sync everything with your blackberry sorta outweighs alot of other issues.

Now if only they could get thunderbird more user-friendly with a calendar app that was better integrated into the program, then I feel that more people would be switching alot of their stuff instead of paying for Office 2007 and an Exchange server.

Thank god for TechSoup.

Re:Beta - no, it's not reliable (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28611609)

your account can get shutdown any minute, randomly, and good luck on trying to retrieve it:
read all the replies, not as lucky as a high profile blogger i guess.

Re:Beta (0, Flamebait)

innocent_white_lamb (151825) | about 5 years ago | (#28613511)

There's really no reason for small and medium businesses to run their own mail servers anymore.
unless you're outside of the USA and don't want your email subject to warrantless Patriot Act intercepts.

Re:Beta (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28613905)

The Patriot Act simply legalized domestic spying from the US government to the US citizens without a warrant.

The US government was always free to spy on you blokes outside the US without cause. In-fact, before the patriot act there were many "You spy on my back, I spy on your back" deals with friendly countries. I would assume we are no longer outsourcing our domestic surveillance anymore (Hence the patriot act), but if you think we aren't still spying on you... Good luck.

Re:Beta (1, Offtopic)

raddan (519638) | about 5 years ago | (#28610369)

Paying for software that comes with guarantees (uptime other SLAs) also ensures that an IT department can pass the buck when the thing stops working. This is a big factor in IT purchasing decisions, and the reason why lots of IT folks pay the exorbitant costs for support contracts, when most of the time, you really could just stock the parts or run the thing yourself, often at a considerable discount.

Re:Beta (1)

m.ducharme (1082683) | about 5 years ago | (#28610659)

True enough. Of course, every other software company just hides their liability disclaimers in the EULA. That's ever so much more honest.

Re:Beta (1)

operator_error (1363139) | about 5 years ago | (#28612985)

But is it honest to make those damn things As Difficult To Read As Possible? Let's be clear, there's the legal rights claimed and supposed, and then there's the blatent attempt to obscure as much intent as possible by hiding it on hard to navigate to pages, (for example a google telephone number maybe, or at least the process to request some kind of verbal reply, for the press perhaps, I don't know), or the classic microtype, tiny scrolling window, etc., etc. etc.

Ads are also readable, hard to ignore in-fact. But Our Rights?

Re:Beta (1)

m.ducharme (1082683) | about 5 years ago | (#28613105)

I was being snarky. Burying a liability disclaimer in a EULA is less honest than sticking a Beta label on your product, even if it is legal.

Re:Beta (1)

JCZwart (1585673) | about 5 years ago | (#28611103)

Except they're free... And who would pay good money for a beta anyway, sounds like stupidity to me.

No, free beta apps that do their jobs well enough are for people like you and me, people that think it's cool to have their agendas online.

Business users use Outlook and/or Exchange. However, these 'casual users' of free beta apps DO provide valuable input - and they probably won't be abandoning their free beta apps as well, since those might not be bug-free yet, but ARE still in development - and, well, free.

So that's where Google is: they have their broad user base, providing them with the necessary info to improve their apps, and a considerable 'fan base' as a nice side effect. The next step would obviously be to get out of the beta stage, so the Google apps will be seen as mature enough to compete with the Serious Business level's applications!

Really, I think Google is employing a cool PR strategy here.

Re:Beta (1)

SlashDotDotDot (1356809) | about 5 years ago | (#28611461)

I read the summary and then hit ctrl-tab to go to my Gmail tab, which had been open for about 4 hours. It still said beta by the logo. I hit ctrl-r to reload and the beta was gone! Easiest upgrade ever.

wtf (3, Insightful)

trybywrench (584843) | about 5 years ago | (#28609803)

If they don't have a definition for "beta" then why was it there in the first place?

Re:wtf (4, Funny)

gnick (1211984) | about 5 years ago | (#28609951)

They have always had a definition.

The problem was that it was just a beta version. They'll be unveiling the 'Release' definition shortly.

Re:wtf (1)

mr_lizard13 (882373) | about 5 years ago | (#28612441)

I think you'll find they'll be unveiling the Release Candidate shortly.

Re:wtf (1)

lptport1 (640159) | about 5 years ago | (#28612661)

Sounds like people have acclimated to Microsoft retail releases being more like public betas.

If Google made non-business users pay for Apps, would people be more tolerant of "beta testing"?

Re:wtf (4, Insightful)

nine-times (778537) | about 5 years ago | (#28609963)

That's a good question, but if you think about it, it's pretty understandable. If you remember, Gmail used to by an invite-only thing that they were testing. When each of these services were first introduced, they were unstable (both in terms of reliability and the unpredictability of changes) enough to warrant the "beta" tag.

So they probably had a vague and intuitive notion of what "beta" meant to them. However, if you don't have a clear and specific definition of "beta", then there will never be a moment when it clearly makes sense to drop the label.

Re:wtf (2, Funny)

dontmakemethink (1186169) | about 5 years ago | (#28613235)

But the press release says they lifted the beta term for marketing reasons, meaning no new standard of functionality or reliability has been met. So as far as anyone knows, they will always be beta. Their PR certainly still is. They should have made some visual changes to denote a significant upgrade. I guess their spin department is still in alpha.

Re:wtf (2, Informative)

fishbowl (7759) | about 5 years ago | (#28610521)

>If they don't have a definition for "beta" then why was it there in the first place?

They don't need a definition. If you were going to sue Google, they'd be able to say "Not only did it have no warranty, but it was also marked 'beta' which is common vernacular in the software industry for 'in testing' or 'if it breaks you get both pieces.'"

It would not be hard to get an expert witness to say that to a judge. I would.

Re:wtf (1)

Tanktalus (794810) | about 5 years ago | (#28611295)

Right, but before you said anything to the judge, you'd have to start with some Sponsored Statements before you could get to saying anything actually on topic, and the order of what you actually did say would be determined by a proprietary weighting algorithm that stood a good chance of putting some squatter information prior to your main point.

Re:wtf (1)

Hurricane78 (562437) | about 5 years ago | (#28610899)

Also, why would I trust a company, that does not even know if its products are still beta, or no, or what it means, or anything?

Has there been a bug tracker site? Was it linked from inside the program? Did no new bug report come in for 3 months? Did they fix all the bugs in the tracker? (Without the feature requests and bugs depending on them.)
I haven't seen any of those. So to me it still is beta, it always will be (Microsoft style), and the only reason it is relabeled, is for money reasons (again Microsoft style).

Do no evil. Yeah. Right. :/

Re:wtf (1)

mcgrew (92797) | about 5 years ago | (#28611067)

Of COURSE they have a definition of Beta - Beta is commonly used.

"Alpha" is an in-house test of software. "Beta" is test software released "out of the shop", so Google's "beta" was apt.

I don't think you can have "alpha" or "beta" to noncommercial software. Ubantu can have a beta, but not Linux. Then again, maybe Google was/is taking a poke at Microsoft, who is notorious for releasing buggy yet still expensive software. Microsoft only seems to get it right after a long time; Excel is a good example, a fine spreadsheet, far better than Lotus or Quattro, even though Lotus used to eat its lunch and Microsoft had to resort to OS trickery to get the upper hand (people used to accuse Microsoft of having the motto "DOS ain't done 'til Lotus won't run), but they have no need these days; Lotus is its own worst enemy. Access, on the other hand, may never get out of beta. When you get an error message that says "there is no message for this error", you're dealing with beta software.

Re:wtf (1)

log1385 (1199377) | about 5 years ago | (#28611633)

Oh, but they do have a definition.

Beta (bay'-tuh) n. 1. A tag that doesn't fit for large enterprises: "We've come to appreciate that the beta tag just doesn't fit for large enterprises that aren't keen to run their business on software that sounds like it's still in the trial phase." 2. Something that looks cool: "for those who still like the look of "beta", we've made it easy to re-enable the beta label for Gmail from the Labs tab under Settings."

I use Google Apps, but (3, Informative)

C_Kode (102755) | about 5 years ago | (#28609805)

We use Google Apps for business purposes, but selectively. It just doesn't work for all my documents. By the term "all", I mean most. We basically use it to keep track of certain project details among other things, but not for any of our real documents.

Re:I use Google Apps, but (1)

bogaboga (793279) | about 5 years ago | (#28609881)

I am curious to know how satisfied or otherwise you are with Google Docs. In my case, I find that this particular application needs more love from Google.

In addition, I would love to have GMail display the calendar in much the same way as YahooMail does. It's sweet to see important dates scroll by at the bottom as you type an email in Yahoo.

Re:I use Google Apps, but (1)

eldaria (1051866) | about 5 years ago | (#28610527)

Not sure about the free edition, and not sure when this was enabled. I noticed a new link on top called Lab, in there are a bunch of Tweaks where you can enable different features. One of them is to have a widget with your calendar, another one I really like is that you can change the placement of how many unread messages you have, so instead of - Inbox (20) -" you get "Inbox (20) - - domain.comMail., this way you can see how many mail you have on a firefox tab, very handy. I just noticed today that they also added the option to re-enable the Beta logo, funny, for people who miss the Beta logo i guess. :-)

Re:I use Google Apps, but (1)

darkmeridian (119044) | about 5 years ago | (#28609909)

Google Mail and Calendar are great for small businesses. I expect Google Voice to be a game changer as well. Most small businesses have but Google Mail allows you to have with the ease of Gmail.

Google Apps needs a localized server option (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610213)

I agree.
I work in an industry were privacy laws mandate that I maintain complete control of our emails/docs.
I would kill to be able to use Gmail, but legally I can't have my emails sitting on Google's servers.
When are they going to come out with a localized server I can maintain control of?
I know not Google's MAIN revenue idea, but IIRC they had localized servers for searching a while back.

Goggle Apps now.. (1)

system1111 (1527561) | about 5 years ago | (#28609809)

in Beta Gold.

Re:Goggle Apps now.. (1)

oodaloop (1229816) | about 5 years ago | (#28610083)

The Goggle! It does nothing!

Re:Goggle Apps now.. (1)

system1111 (1527561) | about 5 years ago | (#28610321)

It does everything but spell check! =)

Re:Goggle Apps now.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28611221)



indre1 (1422435) | about 5 years ago | (#28609819)

VICTORY, at last I can start to use Gmail!

Today is a good day (5, Interesting)

SilverHatHacker (1381259) | about 5 years ago | (#28609859)

So many things today I didn't see coming!
-We finally get a straight answer from Microsoft on C#, in favour of OSS
-Russia and the US agree to disarm
-Microsoft admits there's a security flaw in ActiveX
-VLC reaches 1.0
-Google's stuff gets out of Beta
Either I need to pay more attention, or drop my cynicism. I guess I kind of expected them to happen, just not for a while yet.

Re:Today is a good day (3, Funny)

sigmoid_balance (777560) | about 5 years ago | (#28610055)

Makes you check calendar to see if it's April's Fool, doesn't it?

Beta Calendar (2, Funny)

Atmchicago (555403) | about 5 years ago | (#28610423)

Yes, but with my Google Calendar being in Beta status (up until now) I wouldn't have been able to trust it!

Re:Today is a good day (4, Funny)

ratnerstar (609443) | about 5 years ago | (#28610271)

Yeah, and I didn't even have to use my AK!

Re:Today is a good day (1)

zx75 (304335) | about 5 years ago | (#28610281)

Just more things to add to the list of things that have happened since Duke Nukem Forever was announced.

(Yes, I know it's dead...)

Re:Today is a good day (1, Interesting)

nine-times (778537) | about 5 years ago | (#28610339)

Yeah, really it's been weird all year. The first black president, record labels drop DRM, Duke Nukem Forever is finally cancelled, The Watchmen is released as a movie, HTML5 and CSS3 are starting to be implemented in almost all the major browsers, and...

...what else? I bet we could keep it going. That stuff was just off the top of my head.

Re:Today is a good day (5, Funny)

SilverHatHacker (1381259) | about 5 years ago | (#28610385)

I expect GNU Hurd by the end of the week.

Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28612019)

And Duke Nukem Forever!

Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28612483)

There has been a Debian GNU/Hurd for a long time now, even if there are no official releases.

Do you expect one by the end of the week?

see for status. Debian tracks Hurd development pretty closely.

Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28615331)

Eh, it's ugly and broken as hell (notable things missing out of the box include uh, a random number generator...), but there you go! Have fun.

Re:Today is a good day (1)

Capt.DrumkenBum (1173011) | about 5 years ago | (#28610363)

You missed CompuServe closes down. :)

Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610511)

So many things today I didn't see coming!

-We finally get a straight answer from Microsoft on C#, in favour of OSS

Except it's probably a lie.

-Russia and the US agree to disarm

Except this is the worst possible thing for the US to do right now (in the face of Iran, North Korea, etc.)

-Microsoft admits there's a security flaw in ActiveX

Talk is cheap.

-VLC reaches 1.0

OK, you got me there.

-Google's stuff gets out of Beta

translation: Google gives up on telling the truth about where their apps are.

Either I need to pay more attention, or drop my cynicism. I guess I kind of expected them to happen, just not for a while yet.


Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610539)

-Russia and the US agree to further disarm. They didn't agree to disarm.

Re:Today is a good day (1)

Tweenk (1274968) | about 5 years ago | (#28611059)

I can see where it's going:
- CAFC declares all software-only patents invalid
- Microsoft releases ODF compatibility pack for all versions of Office as a critical update
- SCO is officially dissolved
- Apple declares it will implement Theora in HTML5
- Adobe open sources Flash Player
- Kim Jong-il's residence blown up in a North Korean nuclear test mishap
- Michael Jackson jumps out of the coffin and performs "Thriller" at his funeral to a shocked audience

Re:Today is a good day (1)

TuringTest (533084) | about 5 years ago | (#28614205)

and better yet...
- Slashdot readers DO profit!!!!

Re:Today is a good day (1)

Hurricane78 (562437) | about 5 years ago | (#28611083)

Wait for tomorrow! It will be like when Al Bundy got four aces, because the horror with the scope said "Good luck's a-comin'"!

Re:Today is a good day (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28611215)

it was a karma trade for killing michael jackson and billy mays

No MJ? (1)

antdude (79039) | about 5 years ago | (#28612117)

Nothing for Michael Jackson?

So...ummmm..... (0)

morgan_greywolf (835522) | about 5 years ago | (#28609885)

Does this mean that Duke Nukem Forever will be released soon?

Re:So...ummmm..... (1)

mcgrew (92797) | about 5 years ago | (#28611105)

Forget DNF, where the hell's my flying car?

Re:So...ummmm..... (1)

maxume (22995) | about 5 years ago | (#28611953)

These jokers are working on a street legal airplane (They have completed flight testing a proof of concept): []

i demand you mod me down (-1, Troll)

nausea_malvarma (1544887) | about 5 years ago | (#28609899)

fuck cock shit motherfucker asshole

holy shit! (3, Funny)

jollyreaper (513215) | about 5 years ago | (#28609905)

I haven't been this surprised since Amazon turned a profit.

Re:holy shit! (2, Funny)

bigngamer92 (1418559) | about 5 years ago | (#28615441)

"I haven't been this surprised since Facebook turned a profit."

Fixed that for you.

Nooooo! (4, Funny)

bomanbot (980297) | about 5 years ago | (#28609947)

This is just great. Google Mail is finally out of Beta. Duke Nukem Forever is cancelled. If finally there is a year of Linux on the Desktop, only an unfinished GNU Hurd stands between us and the Apocalypse... ;-)

Re:Nooooo! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28613581)

Not to worry. From GMail Labs:

Back to Beta
by Darren

Soothes the soul by putting the familiar beta sticker back on the Gmail logo.

"BETA" Already gone (1)

PhilHibbs (4537) | about 5 years ago | (#28609959)

I just hit Shift-Refresh and the "BETA" suffix is no longer there on Gmail.

Two definitions of "stable" (3, Insightful)

Darkness404 (1287218) | about 5 years ago | (#28609961)

The problem is, there are two different definitions of "stable" one is, the application doesn't crash or have lots of downtime, the other is the application doesn't change. Gmail was stable by the first and most common definition, however I don't think Google imagined Gmail was stable by the second definition. However, a few years later, it became clear that Gmail was more or less stable by both definitions.

Re:Two definitions of "stable" (1)

Bigby (659157) | about 5 years ago | (#28610959)

A "stable" medical device is far more stable than a "stable" website. It is a matter of reaching the metrics stated in the system availability requirements.

Docs and Android (2, Interesting)

Speare (84249) | about 5 years ago | (#28609991)

Glad to see they're out of beta. So, when can I create, edit, view and share documents on Google Docs from my Google G1 Android phone? So far, you can edit and view spreadsheets (to a limited extent) but you can't create them, nor use any of the other doc types.

Google translation tool (1)

hcs_$reboot (1536101) | about 5 years ago | (#28610127)

Google mail was working fairly well for a long time while flanked with a Beta label. Amusingly, Google translation being probably at its best does not have any "Beta" label - while the quality of the translations (I'm interested in the Japanese to English translations) is so desperately poor that I usually have to do a manual lengthy kanji by kanji research all the time. Translation is certainly the least of Google worries - it should deserve a big Beta somewhere (or even Alpha).

Re:Google translation tool (1)

Kushieda Minorin (1453751) | about 5 years ago | (#28611913)

Do you use Firefox? If so, try the Rikaichan extension.

Is a bird! Is a plane! (1)

gmuslera (3436) | about 5 years ago | (#28610141)

Is a pig flying!

By the time you finally accepted the fact that the full name of the product wasnt "Gmail", but "Gmail Beta", they changed the rules, say that all was a joke, and that the real name was all the time Gmail, that was in beta stage.

Re:Is a bird! Is a plane! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610517)

You think that's confusing? What about users in the UK [] ?

The good news: Google apps are all out of beta! (5, Funny)

sootman (158191) | about 5 years ago | (#28610427)

The bad news: they're all entering 'Gamma'

Too bad (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610461)

Web applications suck and will always suck

Why not just charge for removing the label? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28610719)

Just like everyone else, you don't want my name in the bottom of the app, then pay for the "Enterprise" version with that removed...

You want Enterprise Gmail, the "beta" is removed, where everyone else on the "free" version still gets the "beta" label...

What's so hard about that model?

I got my google voice invite yesterday (1)

qwertyatwork (668720) | about 5 years ago | (#28611199)

Has anyone got their invite? Are they opening it up now? For the record, I put in for my invite April of last year.

Simple Marketing (4, Interesting)

malevolentjelly (1057140) | about 5 years ago | (#28611505)

Calling Google Apps "Beta" was likely a pragmatic move on the front of both marketing to bleeding edge internet enthusiasts who are addicted to novelty and engineering in limiting the expectations and liability of google products. They could maintain beta quality products and code and levels of support as long as they kept the beta moniker.

However, I feel that the web's incestuous advertising scheme is beginning to dry up in these times of economic peril, so google needs to go for harder sources of money, like enterprises. Now they're no longer circumventing Microsoft in the market but facing them head to head for a position in the enterprise. Microsoft has as strong position in this market, so they have a certain legacy and stability, which enterprises appreciate.

The first step for Google in combating this will be the simple rebranding of their products to give the semblance of maturity. In reality, any recent changes to the code are minimal to superficial, so this is merely a marketing maneuver and says nothing about the practical roles of beta and gold software in software engineering. It's a welcome change, but it is yet to be seen whether google has the attention span to maintain stable enterprise products. Offering a consistent platform will also open them up to the sort of demonization that Microsoft has faced up until now, as expectations may rise above what they can deliver.

In short, Google is growing up.

It does not mean what you think it means (3, Insightful)

DNS-and-BIND (461968) | about 5 years ago | (#28611569)

"We've come to appreciate that the beta tag just doesn't fit for large enterprises that aren't keen to run their business on software that sounds like it's still in the trial phase."

That's what beta means, you idiot! It means it's in the trial phase! You mean I've been right all along, and the beta tag was just an excuse to eliminate complaints? Well color me shocked. The attitude has got a whiff of evil about it.

Some say that the freebie version will end, too (2, Interesting)

Julie188 (991243) | about 5 years ago | (#28611909)

Seeking Alpha [] says that Google may be killing off the free "Standard" edition now that Apps is no longer beta. "The current sign up page makes no mention of the previously free Standard edition." That would leave only the Education version as the freebie.

Take a gander at Network World's Google Subnet []
Google news for the enterprise.

Re:Some say that the freebie version will end, too (4, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#28612111)

This is not true. From the Google official blog [] :

We've heard some questions about why the link to Google Apps Standard Edition disappeared from the Enterprise Apps home page, so we wanted to share the answer. As we explored a few design changes to the page, the link to Standard Edition was inadvertently dropped, although the free version of Apps was, as always, available here. We've put the link back where it belongs so that it's easy to find.

We have no intention of eliminating Standard Edition, and we apologize for any confusion.

Re:Some say that the freebie version will end, too (1)

trogdor8667 (817114) | about 5 years ago | (#28612665)

It's still there, it's just moved on the page. Under the big "Try the 30 Day Trial" button is the "Or explore Google Apps Standard", which does have a sign up page. []

Re:Some say that the freebie version will end, too (1)

curunir (98273) | about 5 years ago | (#28615789)

I know it's not ending, but I would be fine with them ending it so long as they created a price tier between $0 and $50 per user per year. Even if they didn't drop the free version, I'd be willing to pay for a few extra features. If I could pay $50 per year for specific users, I'd probably go for it for my own account and those of my immediate family. But I've got about 30 friends who I've given email accounts to and there's no way I'm paying $1500/year.

I think there's a real opportunity for them to make a bit more on Apps if they separated out some of the enterprise-level features (SSO, support, etc) from the non-enterprise-but-pay-for features (no ads, increased storage). Give me a chance to pay $200/year or below for increased features and I'll do it, if only because the service is worth $200/year to me in its current free form.

Remnants Of A Power Struggle (2, Interesting)

v(*_*)vvvv (233078) | about 5 years ago | (#28612181)

that aren't keen to run their business on software that sounds like it's still in the trial phase.

This is the precise moment the last developer with a say in business, died at google. May they rest in peace.

The beta label issue has been around about as long as gmail itself, and every time they were asked about it, the answer was always the same: it's trial software. Because, IT WAS, and STILL IS.

Now we have google announcing on their own their graduation from beta, but for all the wrong reasons. The marketing heads had to make it known that they won. They should have just said, "it is now stable software." But no, that is what a responsible developer would say. They basically denounced the beta label being there in the first place, giving strategic reasons, and not technical ones. The worst part? If they had known better, they would have still pretended to be responsible developers.

They are idiots, and they are taking over. If I had google stock, I would sell it right about... NOW.

Distinguishing from Bing (1)

AttilaSz (707951) | about 5 years ago | (#28613343)

Maybe they want to start distinguishing their services from Microsoft's Bing? "Our products are stable, not like that Bing thing; it's still in beta"

Beta or not... (1)

Ross Finlayson (17913) | about 5 years ago | (#28614697)

Serious professionals do not use "" email addresses.

Re:Beta or not... (3, Informative)

Tacvek (948259) | about 5 years ago | (#28615637)

Yes, but Google Apps uses your own domain name. Hence the reason why it was originally named "Google Apps for Your Domain". The name has since been shortened, but that fact still remains.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>