Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Yahoo! Opens Floodgates On Homepage To Devs

ScuttleMonkey posted more than 4 years ago | from the facebook-jealousy dept.

The Internet 49

alphadogg writes to mention that at their "Open Hack Day" conference today and tomorrow, Yahoo plans on opening the floodgates to their homepage in hopes that developers will start building massive numbers of applications for general distribution. "Announced in April 2008, YOS [Yahoo's Open Strategy] aims to open all of the company's online services, sites and applications to third-party developers, as well as give end users a 'social profile' dashboard to unify and manage their Yahoo services. Swinging wide open the doors of Yahoo.com to external developers is a big milestone in this ambitious effort. Until now, Yahoo has erred on the conservative side when it comes to allowing tightly-integrated applications for its home page, opting to work individually with hand-picked partners."

cancel ×

49 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Yippee! (1)

Ethanol-fueled (1125189) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697297)

Too bad "social networking" is soooooo 5 years ago.

Re:Yippee! (1)

Threni (635302) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697379)

And Yahoo is lame. They added sigfiles to my emails a full year after the world cup offering some sort of competition to win tickets for...the world cup. I emailed them and didn't get a reply. They just don't get it.

Re:Yippee! (1)

sconeu (64226) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697487)

Well, they tried to follow the links and get tickets to the Cup. When they found out the Cup was over, they got pissed and decided to leave you hanging.

Opens floodgates? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29697521)

The homepage is now being held this [goatse.fr] wide.

just dont try to develop a better government (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29697523)

Re:just dont try to develop a better government (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29697779)

This is a total BS story.

(Cr)apps (1)

PumpkinDog (1253988) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697605)

oh great, now I get to get superpoked by my friends when i search for something on yahoo.

Re:(Cr)apps (1)

0110011001110101 (881374) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697763)

where do I get these "friends" you speak of?

Re:(Cr)apps (0, Troll)

mcgrew (92797) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698141)

Poor guy, your user page says 0110011001110101 (881374) is all alone in the world. [slashdot.org]

You do have four fans though, and only one freak, so that's not too bad.

If you're talking about meatspace, go to a bar, church, gym, park, etc.

Wait, Yahoo!? (3, Funny)

pegr (46683) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697617)

They're still around?

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (1)

Zortrium (1251080) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697795)

I've often wondered who actually uses Yahoo. People who don't know/care just use what's in the browser search bar (Google 9 times out of 10), and people who do care use Bing. Wait, no, they use Google too. Then there's my grandfather who still uses AOL, but I wouldn't want them to lose 5% of their marketshare by having him switch.

They are top 2nd site at USA market (4, Informative)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698089)

Yahoo is used as a gigantic portal, "Internet utility" and some kind of communication platform. They were never a good search engine, their hopes went away as early as DEC got Altavista.com up. Inktomi gave them some band aid but they finally figured it is a good corporate search engine, not something to race with Google.

While Internet was small, their directory was good, that is all. In fact, this is what Yahoo was, originally: http://dir.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com] . People tend to forget that for some period of time, they completely gave up "search" and used Google backend. They are switching to Bing now which interestingly surprises people.

Google is the clear "lets do a portal like them" wannabe(!) guy here, their iGoogle isn't at My.Yahoo of 1999 level yet. They also deal with a huge problem as even Joe Sixpacks started to say "enough with your leech of my data" to them. That was never a problem with Yahoo.

You should travel to Asia, especially Japan and Hong Kong to see their real power.

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (1)

ArhcAngel (247594) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698503)

I've often wondered who actually uses Yahoo.

For starters AT&T [yahoo.com]

AT&T consumer grade internet customers get an email address "Powered by Yahoo" and are directed to the My Yahoo portal page when they install the starter kit that comes with the service. How many of those consumers do you think even know they can change it? Let alone actually want to mess with it.

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (1)

Macrat (638047) | more than 4 years ago | (#29705921)

I've often wondered who actually uses Yahoo.

For starters AT&T [yahoo.com]

But ATT is down so often, can you really say people really USE the service "powered" by Yahoo?

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (3, Insightful)

bahstid (927038) | more than 4 years ago | (#29699119)

Japan uses Yahoo. Massively. In fact it wasn't that long ago that I would get blank stares from people when mentioning google, and having to substitute yahoo instead... more recently people at least know what you are talking about, even if they aren't using it. Part of the reason for this is that they achieved huge brand recognition (if not much profit) when their subsidiary company Yahoo!Broadband did a pretty massive campaign to gain subscribers, giving away routers outside train stations, offering free three month connections and so on. (They are also tied into Softbank, one of the larger mobile phone companies here.)

E-bay is another pretty unheard of site, while Yahoo! auctions alone would probably keep the company afloat on its own over here. They are heavily used as a portal site and the usual first stop for people wanting to buy plane tickets or check the weather. For many people I think Yahoo is actually thought of as "the internet" and don't seem likely to go anywhere soon...

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (1)

axl917 (1542205) | more than 4 years ago | (#29701047)

I still use it as the start page. It has a bit more going on than the austere google homepage, but not as garish as bing/MSN/whateverMS.

Before that, my start page for the longest time was altavista.digital.com

getting bored (2, Insightful)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697965)

I hope you are karma whoring with such lame post which is guaranteed (somehow) to get "score".

Do you have a clue about the real web, the web companies/people really care about? Check table 3 at http://ir.comscore.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=366591 [comscore.com] . You will see Yahoo is still around, at second place after Google with 146 freaking million unique visitors. Can you render that number in your brain? 146 million unique visitors on Yahoo properties and they open their main property to developers.

Do you think MS was joking when they tried to buy them for 44.6 billion dollars? Grow up really...

Re:getting bored (1)

SteveFoerster (136027) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698011)

You will see Yahoo is still around, at second place after Google with 146 freaking million unique visitors.

Actually, I expect many of those unique visitors are normal, and that the freaks are going to places like redtube and adultfriendfinder....

They are "normal", we are "freaks" in market (1)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698143)

I wonder how many huge router, server, software high end suits race to sell something to those "freak" sites you mention.

I am talking about real web, the web of Joe Sixpacks and hell, they go to Yahoo. Even their Real Estate sites which are very big deal now (economy) are easily beating anyone on market.

BTW, Comscore keeps track of those sites you mention too, they just don't release it to general web.

Re:They are "normal", we are "freaks" in market (1)

SteveFoerster (136027) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698965)

Oh, I know. I meant freaks in this sense [urbandictionary.com] .

Re:getting bored (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29698697)

Whoa, dude take a valium...

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29699189)

Yeah, they're still around.

PING yahoo.com (69.147.114.224) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from b1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (69.147.114.224): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=56.5 ms
64 bytes from b1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (69.147.114.224): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=56.6 ms
64 bytes from b1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (69.147.114.224): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=59.5 ms
64 bytes from b1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (69.147.114.224): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=55.0 ms
64 bytes from b1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (69.147.114.224): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=56.2 ms
^C
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 55.006/56.804/59.536/1.517 ms

Re:Wait, Yahoo!? (1)

v(*_*)vvvv (233078) | more than 4 years ago | (#29699237)

Ya. And you can't miss them with all the damn marketing they've been doing the past week!!!

I can't &%"$# stand their new yodel!!!

And WHAT THE "'#&$%&# are they advertising!?!

"You you you you you... YAAAAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooo!!!"

Ya, get out of my face. I have plenty of me, thank you very much.

Yes, as a Bing portal (1)

HalAtWork (926717) | more than 4 years ago | (#29699323)

Yes, Yahoo! is now a Bing! portal, along with the other services they used to provide. They no longer provide search themselves, so they are basically a Bing! portal and entertainment site, I guess.

Re:Yes, as a Bing portal (1)

Macrat (638047) | more than 4 years ago | (#29705933)

Chandler Bing?

Yeah, wow... (2, Insightful)

nametaken (610866) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697641)

So it's a bit like the Facebook platform only less social, fewer eyes, and years late? I know that's being awfully critical, but c'mon... Yahoo! has had the day-late, dollar-short affliction for a long time now.

Re:Yeah, wow... (1)

gujo-odori (473191) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697851)

No kidding. This is more like trying to use a defibrillator on a heart attack victim who's been dead for a couple days.

Yahoo has spent years flipping the bird to third party developers, whether open-source or closed, and now zombie-Yahoo is trying to attract third-party devs. While I welcome the move despite its being terminally late, I don't think it's going to save them. Five or six years ago, this would have been big. Ten years ago, this would have been world-changing. I like Yahoo, I really do. I prefer Yahoo mail to Gmail and I prefer Yahoo Messenger above all other IMs, but I also believe I'll one day have to stop using them because Yahoo will be gone.

Re:Yeah, wow... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29698355)

Fewer eyes? 'Fewer' is an odd way to spell 'More'

Re:Yeah, wow... (2, Informative)

Trepidity (597) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698933)

Yahoo has about twice as many daily unique visitors as Facebook, so I'm not so sure about the "fewer eyes" part.

Re:Yeah, wow... (1)

sootman (158191) | more than 4 years ago | (#29701259)

So it's a bit like the Facebook platform only less social, fewer eyes, and years late?

Well, the good news is, at least it's ugly as fuck.

Seriously, I went to my yahoo mail today (yes, I use it, and I prefer it to gmail) and not only was all this shit on by default (quick! options -> mail options -> uncheck "Enable Connection-related features") but its styling came straight out of 1996. If you're going to jump on social networking this late, at least make it look like all the other Web-2.0 sites currently out there.

Re:Yeah, wow... (1)

smartr (1035324) | more than 4 years ago | (#29704901)

On the upside in terms of platform, it is compatible with OpenSocial...
http://developer.yahoo.com/yap/guide/yap-opensocial.html [yahoo.com]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSocial [wikipedia.org]
I admit, that's not much of an incentive to make a Yahoo specific app, but it's certainly good for developers.

Brrrrrrrr..... (1)

jmerlin (1010641) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697675)

*shivers*. It's kinda chilly here in my office in Hell. I'm afraid the place might freeze over tonight.

yahoo home site (2, Insightful)

RazzleDazzle (442937) | more than 4 years ago | (#29697811)

If i can make the home page look more like a search engine and less like all the cable news sites (full of crap) then maybe i will actually try their service out.

Re:yahoo home site (2, Informative)

emurphy42 (631808) | more than 4 years ago | (#29700027)

Their search page [yahoo.com] looks more like a search engine. I still don't use it, but clutter isn't the problem.

Retarded. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29698171)

Retarded.

PSSSST (1)

Mekkah (1651935) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698335)

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Binoculars?o= [reference.com]

*moves Yahoo CEO until he's facing the Google building* Pssst, Maybe you should try stealing! It'll keep you closer to the curve.

Get ready for the iYahoo deployment next week!

(All in all I think it'll be a good move for Yahoo, but obviously a bit late to matter..)

Re:PSSSST (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29699571)

He's a she. And iGoogle was a my.yahoo.com clone. Seriously, I know the google koolaid tastes good, but come on...

Ok, I'll fess up.... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29698451)

For what it is worth, Yahoo Mail is the ONLY online service I have paid for over the last 10 years. $19.95/yr.

Music? Nope.
Movies? Nope.
Software? Nope.
Games? Nope.

Yes, I am a cheapskate but I do not care what you think of my behavior. I only post this as anecdotal evidence that Yahoo does have some valuable web properties. At the top of the list is Yahoo Mail.

Ok, Gmail fanboys....your turn. I've said my piece.

Re:Ok, I'll fess up.... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29698793)

what a waste of money...

open hmm (1)

corvax (941506) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698633)

will they be open sourcing anything? will they stop using windows only codecs and standards? will that message "your platform is unsupported" go away when i login to my mail under linux? will their search engine actually return hits for things im actually looking for? If they use open standards their technology would work on every platform and they would actually save money in the long term IT only makes sense since their company was built on top of opensource

Re:open hmm (1)

tqft (619476) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698835)

Let us see if this openness includes chat - yahoo messenger for linux is a joke. Gyachi is best of the rest, but hamstrung but stupid yahoo.

Maybe if yahoo do something like - publish the chat specs, people would really take them seriously.

I won't hold my breath.

One of the Unwashed Masses (1)

MonsterTrimble (1205334) | more than 4 years ago | (#29698855)

I actually use Yahoo. Seriously. It is my main messenger and I get the vast majority of my sports news from it and in fact like a number of their journalists/bloggers. I am actually very pleased with Yahoo opening up their stuff. Their compatability with 3rd party messengers SUCKS and having some more stuff that works with KDE's social desktop would be A-OK with me.

Re:One of the Unwashed Masses (1)

RAMMS+EIN (578166) | more than 4 years ago | (#29701997)

``Their compatability with 3rd party messengers SUCKS''

This is a problem with all proprietary instant messaging services. Which is why I still use IRC. All features are documented, so if you want to interoperate, you can. There is a plethora of clients to choose from. And you can actually chat with people on the large IM networks, too (through BitlBee [bitlbee.org] ).

Yawn.Who? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29701367)

Yawn.Who?

Spam-3-2-1 (1)

BlueBoxSW.com (745855) | more than 4 years ago | (#29701423)

Go!

Yep (1)

deanston (1252868) | more than 4 years ago | (#29701575)

Every other story ends up with 200+ replies. This one: 40+. That says it all about Yahoo.

i hope they open up their IM infrastructure (1)

yanyan (302849) | more than 4 years ago | (#29702483)

I hope they open up their IM infrastructure. It's really annoying when they change (read: break) stuff in the protocol and pidgin has to play catch up. Pidgin usually does catch up after 1 or 2 days but i still see lingering issues with logging into YM after the last major change yahoo made. Also it would be nice to finally have YM voice and video support in linux and BSD. Better yet, they could release an up-to-date, GPL'ed yahoo messenger for linux and i wouldn't mind switching to that. I hate to admit it but pidgin's bugs piss me off a good deal sometimes.

I only have one question (1)

BlindRobin (768267) | more than 4 years ago | (#29702703)

Yah, Who ?

Yahoo Mail (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29706345)

I'm seeing lots of grief here about Yahoo products, but I've had excellent service for both my web page and mail. If there's an alternative for these products that's just as easy, but cheaper or more open, I'd like to hear about it.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>