Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Skiing Robot May Not Be Useful, But Fun To Watch

timothy posted about 5 years ago | from the rescue-me-in-the-alps dept.

Robotics 64

kkleiner writes "Bojan Nemec from the Jozef Stefan Institute in Slovenia recently presented his skiing robot at the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). The robot won't be winning skiing records anytime soon and its usefulness as a ski instructor or in any other capacity seems quite a ways off. Nonetheless, the videos of this robot taking a ride down the ski slopes are well worth watching. In case you are wondering, this is a completely different robot than the one Slashdot covered earlier."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

I'll take 2! (1)

orsty3001 (1377575) | about 5 years ago | (#29828341)

And it hardly ever snows here.

Robotic Rescue (1)

timlash (1320631) | about 5 years ago | (#29828725)

Will a robotic St. Bernard assist in case of avalanche?

Re:Robotic Rescue (1)

skine (1524819) | about 5 years ago | (#29830237)

There's a good chance that the myth of (robotic) St. Bernards may even come true, given that we all know robots run on alcohol.

Take note (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29828867)

J.R.R. Tolkien insisted that Disney have nothing to do with illustrating his books. He found them horrible. And so do I. Yech.

I got a pussy in my panties. (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29828405)

She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong
She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong

I got a pussy in my panties
I got a pussy in my panties
I got a pussy in my panties
I got a pus- I got a pus- I got a pussy pussy pussy

Got a pussy in my panties
Im just right
Got a clam in my cloth
It's a curious sight
I got a pussy in my panties
Wet and tight
Wrap my thong around your dick
And put your dick in my eye.

She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong
She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong

She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong
She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong

I got a pussy in my panties
Wet and dank
The nasty secretions
Make my underwear stank
I got a pussy in my panties
Soft and pink
Put your head between my legs
And have yourself a drink.

She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong
She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong

She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong
She got a pussy in her panties
She wore a pussy thong

Re:I got a pussy in my panties. (1)

Molochi (555357) | about 5 years ago | (#29830455)

Needs more "Panka, Panka"

Jump (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29828409)

Let's see it do an Olympic size ski jump!

Wallace and Gromit (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29828427)

Can it ski on cheese?

Re:Wallace and Gromit (1)

skine (1524819) | about 5 years ago | (#29830267)

Pixilation (not to be confused with pixelation) is apparently popular in the scientific community.

Get Off My Mountain Lawn (4, Funny)

dmomo (256005) | about 5 years ago | (#29828451)

This is nothing new. I've strapped many an unsuspecting robot to a pair of skis and shoved it down a hill. They get down just fine without any of your fancy whirring gizmo's.

Turns out it works for other things too. Campers, bears, trick-or-treaters and the Law.

Re:Get Off My Mountain Lawn (3, Interesting)

boristdog (133725) | about 5 years ago | (#29829201)

Just be sure to give them Charles De Mar's instuctions:

"Go that way, really fast. If something gets in your way, turn".

Re:Get Off My Mountain Lawn (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29830309)

This is nothing new. I've strapped many an unsuspecting robot to a pair of skis and shoved it.

But this robot can be pushed as well.

Re:Get Off My Mountain Lawn (1)

Rapid Supreme 17 (916052) | about 5 years ago | (#29831091)

Agreed. Your method doesn't even have the requirement of snow being on the hill!

Re:Get Off My Mountain Lawn (1)

quarterbuck (1268694) | about 5 years ago | (#29831617)

Pretty much what I thought too. I can't understand why these guys made their robot so high off the ground. I'd have thought a really low design would work better. Then they could use a weight on a retractable arm mounted to sides to steer -When you want to turn left push the weight to the left side, causing friction to increase on the left and Ski to turn towards that side.
They should have been thinking of Tobagganing or Sledding instead of "Ski-ing".

Re:Get Off My Mountain Lawn (0)

mspohr (589790) | about 5 years ago | (#29832215)

But then it would be sledding and not skiing.

Money (1)

prakslash (681585) | about 5 years ago | (#29828535)

Compare this simple robot to the high-tech Japanese one [physorg.com] covered by Slashdot earlier. Makes one realize the difference in research money available to the Slovenians versus to the Japanese.

CPU (1)

0100010001010011 (652467) | about 5 years ago | (#29828623)

And both make you realize how much processing power the brain actually has. There are people that do this at the Olympics that do it better and faster.

All taken in with two little tiny organic cameras and processed in something that only weighs a few pounds.

Re:CPU (1)

Devout_IPUite (1284636) | about 5 years ago | (#29828791)

Don't forget that our computer runs on less than 100 watts (2000 Calorie diet is less than 100 watts and we're running two cameras, mics, other sensory organs, and a bunch of gyros).

future plans (3, Funny)

naeone (1430095) | about 5 years ago | (#29828557)

are all down hill from here

Cue the montage (2, Funny)

seanonymous (964897) | about 5 years ago | (#29828585)

Soon it will race the captain of the ski team to save the mountain from the giant corporation and get the fembot.

Re:Cue the montage (1)

e2d2 (115622) | about 5 years ago | (#29828807)

Soon it will race the captain of the ski team to save the mountain from the giant corporation and get the fembot.

And we shall name it "Lane Meyer"

I WANT MY TWO DOLLARS!

2nd Comment on TFA (3, Funny)

kevinNCSU (1531307) | about 5 years ago | (#29828603)

The second comment on the article page itself reads:

how do you get funding? Is your daddy influential? I want some (for something more useful, and along the same lines as your skiier) CONTACT ME, I dare you. gpscOSPAMruise@gmail.com

That guy is seriously going to regret that now that this page is on slashdot, lol.

Re:2nd Comment on TFA (3, Funny)

swanzilla (1458281) | about 5 years ago | (#29828859)

how do you get funding? Is your daddy influential? I want some (for something more useful, and along the same lines as your skiier) CONTACT ME, I dare you. gpscOSPAMruise@gmail.com

My father would never fund anybody who does not have his/her own email server

Re:2nd Comment on TFA (1)

rthille (8526) | about 5 years ago | (#29829653)

But but, maybe 'gmail.com' _is_ his email server, and he just lets lots and lots of other people use it!

Re:2nd Comment on TFA (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29828897)

That guy is seriously going to regret that now that this page is on slashdot, lol.

This isn't /b

Re:2nd Comment on TFA (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29830527)

The worst of /b are scriptkiddies that downloaded their 'sploits from a /. troll.

Pull this guy's funding! (5, Funny)

eln (21727) | about 5 years ago | (#29828637)

This sort of nonsense is taking time and effort away from truly valuable sexbot research. This is a totally irresponsible use of scarce money and talent.

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (3, Funny)

interkin3tic (1469267) | about 5 years ago | (#29828771)

What are you talking about? The sex part of the sexbot is easy, they've even combined it with a flashlight (was going to put a link, but I'm at work, and besides, ew.)

It's the -talking- to the sexbot after the sex that needs work. What are you going to talk about while you're smoking? The battery charge left? Polynomials? Sure they could program the sexbot to tell you you were the best he/she's ever had, but you'd want more variety after a little while: they need a hobby. One hobby? Skiing. If you're a skiier you probably like to talk about skiing after sex, and it will be really obvious he/she is lying if the sexbot can't actually ski. Plus maybe you like to have sex on the lift. If the sexbot can't go down the hill, it's not going to be able to go down on you on the way up.

Disclaimer: the above really wrote itself. It might sound like I spend a lot of time thinking about this stuff, but I don't. I don't know if that's to or against my credit that I'm not actually trying to advance the sex toy industry, but it's not the case, I was just making a joke and then it started sounding a little too believable...

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29829325)

Let me know when that flashlight moves on its own while I just lay there, cleans itself up afterwards and then makes me a sammich.

Righhhtttt (1)

djupedal (584558) | about 5 years ago | (#29829333)

> It might sound like I spend a lot of time thinking about this stuff, but I don't.

And yet, you are surprisingly fluent in the small details involved in both design and execution. Fair to say where there's smoke....there's chaffing of the loins - just don't get too excited over the in 's & out's, ok?

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (1)

jason.sweet (1272826) | about 5 years ago | (#29829583)

It's the -talking- to the sexbot after the sex that needs work.

You have clearly missed the point of having a sexbot.

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (1)

faffod (905810) | about 5 years ago | (#29836373)

why did you think that someone on slashdot would even know what to do with a sexbot, much less what to do with one "after"?

Mod Parent Up!!! (1)

yurtinus (1590157) | about 5 years ago | (#29828819)

This is Slashdot for god's sake, here we are allowing *skiing* to get between us and *fembots* ?? Think of the geeks!!!

On a more serious note, if you have sex with a sexbot... does that make you not a virgin?

Re:Mod Parent Up!!! (1)

rrrhys (1475013) | about 5 years ago | (#29829509)

On a more serious note, if you have sex with a sexbot... does that make you not a virgin?

Considering the circumstances, I'd say yes, you still would be. (sorry).

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (1)

need4mospd (1146215) | about 5 years ago | (#29829461)

And if you design it after my wife, it doesn't even have to move!

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (1)

ignavus (213578) | about 5 years ago | (#29829663)

This sort of nonsense is taking time and effort away from truly valuable sexbot research. This is a totally irresponsible use of scarce money and talent.

Aw, come on! Haven't you ever heard of snow bunnies?

http://blog.peta2.com/va_colleen_snow_bunnies.bmp [peta2.com]

Re:Pull this guy's funding! (1)

blhack (921171) | about 5 years ago | (#29829801)

This sort of nonsense is taking time and effort away from truly valuable sexbot research.

Have you seen how attractive snow bunnies are?

Very attractive, kind sir, very attractive indeed.

I support this research whole-heartedly.

Skiing Robot May Not Be Useful, But Fun To Watch (1)

Z1NG (953122) | about 5 years ago | (#29829067)

Skiing Robot May Not Be Useful, But Fun To Watch

Sounds like a Jessica Beal movie about skiing.

In other news (1)

Marko DeBeeste (761376) | about 5 years ago | (#29829095)

Wright brothers sand-sailing contraption pretty gol-durned worthless. This is the last straw, I'm resigning the patent office because everything worth inventing has been.

Put it to a real test (1)

gapagos (1264716) | about 5 years ago | (#29829301)

I'd like to see how this robot does against me on a double black glades trail on Jay peak.

This could be useful.. (1)

tiks (791388) | about 5 years ago | (#29829341)

OK OK before you mod me down hear me out.

This can be used to provide some really good coverage of ski sports if you mount a camera on it. Imagine the kind of angles this can follow if this was one of the 'fellow skiers'.

I think ESPN or winter Olympics coverage folks can definitely make good use of this technology in situations where human beings cannot be present with a reasonably decent photography equipment.

Re:This could be useful.. (1)

randy of the redwood (1565519) | about 5 years ago | (#29830033)

What could possibly go wrong?

"Bodie Miller wiped out at last gate of the downhill finals by runaway camera..." :-)

Seriously though, you do get a creative thinking award. It looks smooth enough to carry a camera.

Re:This could be useful.. (1)

destroyer661 (847607) | about 5 years ago | (#29830821)

It may be smooth enough going 2-3km/h, but will it be smooth/stable enough to hit 50-60km/h* down some steep slopes? I highly doubt it, most humans aren't stable enough when moving that fast because of reaction delay's and such - unless robotics and gyroscopes make huge leaps forward very quickly I can't see this happening.

*Downhill Speeds [britannica.com]

What's with the apparent negativity? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29829423)

It seems like the gist of the article and review are assuming this is random and useless technology. Who knows what kind of cool stuff could come out of this.

Re:What's with the apparent negativity? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29829511)

Exactly. WHO knows? Certainly not the author of the article and, apparently, not you either.

Curse you, Slovenia! (1)

BearRanger (945122) | about 5 years ago | (#29829543)

In the coming Robot Apocalypse (tm) I was planning to flee to a snowier clime, knowing full well that my bipedal and wheeled adversaries would not be able to easily pursue me. Indeed, I had visions of blasting the mechanical horrors with my trusty shotgun as they slipped, tumbled and performed various pratfalls, or otherwise became bogged down in the glorious white stuff. I counted on them becoming flustered and immobile, rather like a Dalek faced with a steep flight of stairs. But no! You had to go and teach them how to ski. Next you'll likely make them with self-deploying and self waxing skis. And doom the entire human race to robot servitude.

Sloveeeennnniaaaaaaaaaa!

I can 't wait to see them in a Warren Miller film (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29829729)

I think that this robot really does have something to offer for skiing instruction contrary to the original post.

import balls (1)

Rideak (180158) | about 5 years ago | (#29829843)

To me, it looks like the robot is focused on keeping the acceleration due to gravity between the skis. I know it must be considering the centripetal force, Yet it does not seem capable of 'hanging it out there', in a turn steep enough to support an acc due to gravity that doesn't point between the skis. I think this is part of what's holding it back, and if so it would mean a snowboarding robot wouldn't work as well with the same tech.

Re:import balls (1)

omuls are tasty (1321759) | about 5 years ago | (#29830575)

Huh? Dude, look at the second video, he's cutting the turn short by riding on his inside ski. That's a classic Hermann Maier right there! Doesn't get much ballsier than that...

fir5T (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29829971)

dim. Due to the of th3 founders of

What university? (1)

randy of the redwood (1565519) | about 5 years ago | (#29829997)

From TFA -

Shiro Shimzo (University of Fuk UI) -spacing mine- where another skiing robot is being developed.

Isn't that university in Redmond?

Not useful? (1)

abbynormal brain (1637419) | about 5 years ago | (#29830625)

Tell that to the military. You think they train only in the desert? BigDog needs skis!

Ski is so old school... (1)

SYSS Mouse (694626) | about 5 years ago | (#29830843)

Now build a robot that can snowboard...

Fun to watch only if it... (1)

Tablizer (95088) | about 5 years ago | (#29831367)

...wipes out in a spectacular way. It's like watching humans wipe out, but without the pain of guilt and empathy.

Missed last gate? (1)

malignant_minded (884324) | about 5 years ago | (#29831621)

From the video it appears that it missed the last gate. It seems to identify a gate, maneuver around it and try to counter back to identify the next gate which seems like the logic you would use. Its hard to see what looks like the last gate as there appears to be a person standing behind it and maybe that is what threw it off, but it looks like it over steered on the second to last gate and could not identify the last gate because of it.

The coming slashdot effect (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29831863)

But can it ski on the waves of the IP traffic generated as a result of posting this article on slashdot?

Obligatory (1)

Agent of Nowhere (1392777) | about 5 years ago | (#29832073)

I for one welcome our new alpine automaton masters.

been there, done that... (1)

kova70 (520896) | about 5 years ago | (#29832423)

it's a known fact that the moon is populated by at least one steampunk robot capable of skiing much better than that. The expedition led by Cmdr. Gromit brought us those videos a long time ago,

Strategia (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 5 years ago | (#29833477)

Now we just need a robot that can ski AND golf, and we could replace all the managers in the world.

This is the harbinger of the robot revolution. The harbinger, I tell you!

Crappy form (2, Funny)

gatkinso (15975) | about 5 years ago | (#29833609)

Skis closer together, lead ski forward into the turn, and for gods sake Robot keep your shoulders facing the fall line!

I won't even comment on your pole technique... oh wait, you have no arms.

How many times... (1)

drinkypoo (153816) | about 5 years ago | (#29834867)

How many times has James Bond escaped on skis? I count at least three times. Skiing robot + sentry gun = no more bond, if you have them knocked out in the hundreds by toy companies anyway.

All things are possible (1)

DinDaddy (1168147) | about 5 years ago | (#29841045)

But can it ski through a revolving door?

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?