Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Mozilla Messaging Unveils Raindrop

timothy posted more than 3 years ago | from the but-these-are-friendly-buzzwords dept.

Communications 92

mhammond writes "Mozilla Messaging has just unveiled a Mozilla Labs project, Raindrop, an experiment with Open Messaging on the Open Web. Raindrop uses couchdb as a storage engine and to serve the HTML/CSS/Javascript application itself, while the back-end is primarily written in Python. Although it is early days yet, the concept that you own your data may be what sets this apart from Google Wave."

cancel ×

92 comments

First piss (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29840959)

You say raindrop, I say piss stain!

Re:First piss (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841001)

Don't first post on my face and tell me it's raining. Tell me I'm a dirty slut and I need a fat cock in my ass!

Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda

Google Wave (5, Informative)

matt4077 (581118) | more than 3 years ago | (#29840983)

Wave is a protocol. It's just the first implementation that is google's. Build your own server and you own everything.

Re:Google Wave (2, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841081)

Actually, as stated on the Google Wave video (the first one) it's a platform, a protocol and a product /pedant

XD

Re:Google Wave (4, Informative)

GMFTatsujin (239569) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841241)

You can still set up your own server though, and retain total control.

The creators went into a significant explanation of how you can federate your server to the outside world, or leave them entirely internal. The protocol is the really significant part, and the product is more like an expression of the protocol than the end-all-be-all implementation of it.

Re:Google Wave (2, Funny)

Seraphim_72 (622457) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841347)

Re:Google Wave (1)

Cryacin (657549) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841423)

No. It is a desert topping AND a floor wax! [hulu.com]

I'd hate to get the flavours mixed up.

Re:Google Wave (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841623)

Gobi and Sahara? Ewwwwww

Re:Google Wave (3, Informative)

Eil (82413) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841363)

After watching the video linked to in TFA, I can't see how this is anything at all like Google Wave. All they apparently share in common is that they both have something to do with communication and the web.

I have yet to actually try it out, but to me, Raindrop looks like what would happen if you wrote an ordinary web email client and added support for twitter and facebook. I don't see why you couldn't achieve the same thing on the desktop with a few Thunderbird extensions.

Re:Google Wave (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29843081)

It is on top of CouchDB, so it is definitely not an ordinary Web client. It has a document server inside ;-)

Re:Google Wave (1)

Jugalator (259273) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843417)

I agree, Wave shouldn't even be involved in this discussion.

And this product already exists. Actually, from a number of companies, because this is just social media aggregator, right?

Stuff like this...
* http://friendfeed.com/ [friendfeed.com]
* http://www.feedalizr.com/ [feedalizr.com]

Re:Google Wave (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841425)

Not to get too "640k is all anyone needs" here, but having used Wave now for about a week or two, the current client doesn't seem to be much more than a multi-user version of Omni Outliner [omnigroup.com] (with less functionality).

Yeah, you could write new clients that make it work like twitter or IM or email. But those things already exist and work just fine. I don't see it as a very useful way to real-time collaborate on a document (compared with other, better ways- whether google docs or wikis...) So I guess I'm not sure what the hype is about exactly. Does google know what Wave is supposed to be, or is it just putting it out there and hoping it grows into something?

Re:Google Wave (1)

SanityInAnarchy (655584) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843591)

Yeah, you could write new clients that make it work like twitter or IM or email. But those things already exist and work just fine.

Well, and you can extend it. And while IM and email exist, they aren't particularly integrated, nor are either of them at all integrated with a wiki...

So I guess I'm not sure what the hype is about exactly.

Well, let me put it this way...

It could turn out to be like XML, which was incredibly generic, everyone was blown away by the possibilities, and then we came back down to earth and realized that it doesn't really revolutionize anything. It's useful for what it is, but it was completely overhyped, and most places it's used, there's something better (JSON, YAML, protocol buffers, etc).

Or it could turn out to be like HTML and HTTP -- still largely misunderstood, but anyone who has a concept of what they are should understand what an impact they had.

I think it's going to be somewhere in the middle -- not nearly what HTML was, but consider: "Yeah, you could make it work like email. But that exists and works just fine." Webmail was certainly useful.

I hope that will be a non browser client (4, Insightful)

pembo13 (770295) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841065)

As in a desktop client written specifically to utilize this.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (1)

sp332 (781207) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841253)

What's the difference? I already use it for RSS feeds, twitter, and email. The trouble is, I have to navigate to a different web app with different sets of features for each of those. Wouldn't it be better if my web browser had a nice, built-in way for me to manage that, instead of switching between apps every time I want to click a link in an email?

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29841749)

If it's more convenient to shoehorn every activity into a single monolithic application than "switch between applications," then your desktop environment is built wrong.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (4, Insightful)

MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842263)

If it's more convenient to shoehorn every activity into a single monolithic application than "switch between applications," then your desktop environment is built wrong.

That stops being true if there is a lot of overlap between those apps.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842371)

Well yes, of course.

He's on Windows 7.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29851115)

Tell that to any emacs user ;)

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (1)

lennier (44736) | more than 4 years ago | (#29878919)

"If it's more convenient to shoehorn every activity into a single monolithic application than "switch between applications," then your desktop environment is built wrong."

And yes, it is.

The problem is that we have an emphasis on "applications" instead of on data. This assumes that data divides cleanly into task silos, doesn't ever share between tasks, and is only ever accessed with a rigidly defined set of operations.

And that's increasingly not true. What we need is a desktop environment that understands that data is something to be shared aggressively between tasks and views, where every window can be an aggregator of sorts.

Something like Étoilé [etoileos.com] , perhaps, as a start. If Raindrop is a step towards that then cool.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (1)

Hurricane78 (562437) | more than 4 years ago | (#29844629)

Many wrongdoings don't make another wrongdoing right.

The wrongdoing here is, that it's another inner platform [thedailywtf.com] . Which is a failure in software design. (Notice especially the "poor" in "poor replica", and the pointless slowness of yet another layer. As opposed to good abstraction.)

In the Haskell community, we nowadays even go in the opposite direction. Allowing to automatically transform a multi-layer functionality into one single efficient function (aka. "fusion").

Basically, the browser is more like a virtual machine nowadays. So why not use an actual virtual machine with full desktop integration, while retaining security?

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (1)

GMFTatsujin (239569) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841257)

I don't know what that would look like, except maybe a browser with no plugin capability. Wave is designed to integrate so many web-centric technologies ... what you're asking for seems a lot like asking for an email client that didn't require written language to send messages.

Which would be cool, come to think of it. Maybe Google will give us that next?

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29841795)

Google Mind, coming to you in a not-too-distant decade.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (3, Funny)

smallfries (601545) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843491)

Sounds cool. I'm seeing some kind of voice interface to get around the lack of writing. To be honest it would be most useful as some sort of mobile platform, rather than desktop software. Then I could easily carry this voice communication around, and hope that it became pervasive enough that all of my friends did too. Although the email paradigm of bouncing messages off of each other works well it would be really good to have a real-time interface for voice between these mobile devices.

Perhaps a speaker, microphone and some buttons to select who I want to talk to. You know this could be really huge.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (2, Interesting)

value_added (719364) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841341)

The vast majority of people with a computer tend to live in their browser's window. And they like it!

By contrast, in the presentation videos for Google's Wave, the ncurses interface (or what seemed like one) garnered the loudest applause. A narrow audience or limited subset of users? Perhaps, but I expect there's enough of us who find using a web browser for anything other than browsing the web inefficient, if not abhorent.

Still, the march to develop new "messaging technologies" is interesting, especially with respect to certain things like collaboration. Personally, I don't even think web or browser-based email works (at least for anyone other than trivial or casual use), so I'm happy to sit things out and watch on the sidelines. Who knows. Maybe they're onto something.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29841797)

ncurses interface (or what seemed like one) garnered the loudest applause. A narrow audience or limited subset of users?

Doubtful. 1) It was funny, and 2) the protocol is open, something like this is possible = cool. You really think more than one or two people in that audience would ever use that interface? Nah.

Re:I hope that will be a non browser client (2, Insightful)

buchner.johannes (1139593) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843025)

Maybe similar to this persona editor project [youtube.com] . Libraries that are able to tap into proprietary websites (social networks, etc.) to escape from vendor lock-in would be great.

hey white faggots! (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841101)

obama has his dick firmly in your ass. i bet you just love that big old cock up in your faggot ass.

faggot dick suckers.

Yo Dawg... (0)

Monkeedude1212 (1560403) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841129)

I heard you liked Mozilla Lab Projects so I tweeted about this, so you can read about Raindrop while using Raindrop.

Re:Yo Dawg... (4, Funny)

TheRealMindChild (743925) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841427)

Yo dawg. I heard you liked comments so I put a comment to your comment

Re:Yo Dawg... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842269)

Yo dawg I heard you like commenting on comments so I put this comment on your comment so you can comment while commentin'!

A hipster app... (1)

not already in use (972294) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841147)

Written in hipster technologies. If I were a betting man, I'd wager this will never see the light of day.

Re:A hipster app... (1)

phantomcircuit (938963) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841649)

Never underestimate the hipsters ability to drain the parents wallet.

Where do you think they get the money to buy those ridiculous bikes?

Re:A hipster app... (1)

omeomi (675045) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842831)

Never underestimate the hipsters ability to drain the parents wallet.

Where do you think they get the money to buy those ridiculous bikes?

Delivering stuff on them?

Re:A hipster app... (1)

phantomcircuit (938963) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842937)

Never underestimate the hipsters ability to drain the parents wallet.

Where do you think they get the money to buy those ridiculous bikes?

Delivering stuff on them?

Yeah sure maybe the first couple thousand of them. The other hundred thousand or so? Not so much.

Re:A hipster app... (1)

RocketRabbit (830691) | more than 4 years ago | (#29853963)

Look maw, not only do I have to pedal FURIOUSLY to keep a reasonable speed up, but I HAVE NO BRAKES!

Re:A hipster app... (1)

omeomi (675045) | more than 4 years ago | (#29901159)

But I can look cool doing a track stand at red lights.

Finish Thunderbird first? (4, Insightful)

mR.bRiGhTsId3 (1196765) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841165)

Am I the only one who wishes they would hurry up and finish TB 3, and integrate that will all the Web 2 goodness, instead of these random projects?

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841353)

No, you are not the only one.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841407)

They still make dedicated email clients?

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

A12m0v (1315511) | more than 4 years ago | (#29844081)

yes and I use LookOut every day

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

FrostedWheat (172733) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841487)

You're assuming that the same people who work on Thunderbird also work on these projects?

(They might well be... I don't know!)

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (3, Informative)

Zarel (900479) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841547)

From TFA:

Today we’re introducing Raindrop, an exploration in messaging innovation being led by the team responsible for Thunderbird

So he'd be right to assume so. ;)

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (2, Interesting)

Orion Blastar (457579) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842405)

Well I can't wait for TB 3 to be finished soon enough. So far TB 3 doesn't work with the Lightning Calendar add-in so I am stuck with TB 2.X for that.

I switched from Outlook to Thunderbird and I want to have email and calendar options in the same program. Maybe Raindrop can do that, but until it does finish TB 3 for those of us without Wave servers before you finish Raindrop.

In order to update my Timex Data Link watch I have to copy data from Thunderbird to Outlook and then sync up with Outlook using the Timex Data Link software. But I am going to get rid of my Data Link watch as it is old and nothing replaced it. I am going with a solar powered digital watch. I hope to find something that can store my contact and calendar like the Data Link did, but I like the idea of wearable data.

My Cell phone is a TracFone, and won't do data transfers, I cannot afford a BlackBerry, Smartphone, or iPhone, and I can barely afford a PDA and since it isn't wearable I can lose it easily as I lost many others.

Thunderbird needs to be finished and then syncing up with other calendar applications and servers before the team moves on to finish Raindrop, because so far Thunderbird isn't that good a competitor to Outlook yet.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (2, Interesting)

buchner.johannes (1139593) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843039)

Use KOrganizer (Kalendar+KMail). It's great.

More frontends (and editors) for remind would be nice too ... [google.com]

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29843349)

Last time I checked, the windows port of korganizer was buggy and sucked.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Orion Blastar (457579) | more than 4 years ago | (#29848773)

Sounds good for Linux but I use Gnome on my Fedora 11 install not KDE.

The Windows port doesn't seem to be working properly for KOragnizer. Too buggy. Maybe once it matures I'll try it again later.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Joe Enduser (527199) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843441)

> So far TB 3 doesn't work with the Lightning Calendar add-in so I am stuck with TB 2.X for that.

Eh? The reason I am using Thunderbird 3 beta is because that allows me to use Lightning Calendar 1.0pre.

You should give it a try.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Orion Blastar (457579) | more than 4 years ago | (#29848723)

I get a message that the plug-in is not supported by TB 3.0 and I tried the latest plug-in. Should I hack the file or something to get TB 3.0 to accept it?

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Joe Enduser (527199) | more than 4 years ago | (#29855039)

It looks like you are using the latest stable release 0.9. This is the latest release which works with TB2. To get Lightning for the TB3 beta's, get a nightly build. You can find a link to the nightly build for your platform at the bottom of the download page:

  http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/download.html#nightly [mozilla.org]

Cheers,
Stefan.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Orion Blastar (457579) | more than 4 years ago | (#29866149)

Thank you but I usually only use stable builds. I don't want to crash my system.

But I'll give it a try in a virtual machine first, before I put it on my real machine.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

ran93r (671906) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843639)

Seconded, running beta 4 with 1.0pre and the nightly to pull in google calendar.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (4, Funny)

ChaosDiscord (4913) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841497)

I'm with you! How dare these people that I don't pay, who give away their creations, source included, not focus on the specific tasks I care about? What is with these layout volunteers working on whatever happens to tickle their fancy? Why aren't the paid employees all focusing on one particular project, adding manpower to a slow software project is guaranteed to make it faster! [wikipedia.org] The internets are serious business, and I don't have time for this!

I saw we get together and refuse to pay another dollar for any Mozilla products until they comply with our demands!

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (2, Insightful)

mR.bRiGhTsId3 (1196765) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841517)

You do realize that Mozilla Messaging was created specifically as a steward for Thunderbird because it wasn't getting the love it deserved from the Mozilla Foundation right?

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

jonadab (583620) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842145)

> Am I the only one who wishes they would hurry up and finish TB 3

Why?

There are approximately six hundred bajillion email clients out there. Half a dozen of them are actually any good, and another thirty are mediocre but still at least as good as Thunderbird. Half a dozen more are not as good as Thunderbird but nonetheless more popular. Heck, there are at least three web-based ones that are so much more popular, more Firefox users use them than use Thunderbird.

Mozilla (and Netscape before it) has always been all about web browser technology, and they mostly do a pretty good job with that, which is important, since there are (excluding ones that use the Mozilla rendering engine) only a handful of other decent browsers out there. I mean, there's Opera and about one other choice (IE, Safari, or Konqueror, depending on platform), and that's pretty much it. So the Mozilla.org browser is *important*. They should focus on that.

The world does *not* need them to also make Yet Another Mail Client. We've got plenty of those, and then some. I think there are more mail clients than there are Tetris clones.

Now, if they could make one that's actually really *good*, in a way that stands out from the crowd, that would be another matter. But Thunderbird is just middle of the pack, nothing particularly special as mail clients go.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

mR.bRiGhTsId3 (1196765) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842165)

I think Thunderbird 3 has some pretty compelling features like account auto-setup, full-text search including integration with local search services (Windows Search/Spotlight) and some other guis. Sure, the world is moving to webmail, but Thunderbird 3 has some really nifty stuff that they do on a local client using some of the cool technologies in Firefox. It sure beats the crap out of Live Mail which is the only other "easy" option I've heard of for windows.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (2, Insightful)

Have Brain Will Rent (1031664) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842755)

the world is moving to webmail

Some of the world may be moving to web based email but not everybody. I'm certainly not - I want my email on my machine where I can control it, especially since much of it is confidential in nature. If I want off-site access I'll tunnel.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

Have Brain Will Rent (1031664) | more than 4 years ago | (#29853189)

I agree with the sentiment of finish Thunderbird first. To do that forget the tabs and other attempts at flashiness, the attempts to make messaging more sophisticated etc. and address basic functionality first. Get calendaring, tasks and scheduling fully integrated and working well; make it able to read Outlook calendars and address books; have supported and good syncing to/with phones... if all that happened that would make Thunderbird a major winner in my eyes.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842179)

Name one free email client as good as Thunderbird that has PKCS#11 support.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

jeffstar (134407) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842271)

what mail client do you use?

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

WuphonsReach (684551) | more than 4 years ago | (#29846631)

Because Thunderbird is one of the few good IMAP clients?

(I've looked..)

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

nine-times (778537) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842275)

I'm using the beta, and haven't had a problem yet. If you're so anxious, maybe you could give it a try? And maybe if you do have problems you could submit some feedback and let the developers know.

The only thing I dislike about v3 is the tabs. What's the point? I read my email in a preview pane, and if I want to do anything other than that, then it's because I want it in another window. I would just say, "to each his own", but they won't let you get rid of the tabs. Even Firefox lets you not-use tabs if you want, and that's in a program where tabs make sense.

Oh, but I've gone terribly off-topic. I'll shut up now.

Will Thunderbird 3 not blow massive chunks? (1)

SuperBanana (662181) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843239)

Someone ranted to me about how great Thunderbird was, so I downloaded it and gave it a shot.

Worked great, right up until I wanted to write an email to someone and cc'd to three other people. Someone needs to be drug out into the street and shot for the user interface around composing/viewing/editing to/cc/bcc headers. *Points to Apple Mail as an example*.

For example, creating an email to one person and with three people cc'd means an endless amount of fucking around with the mouse creating new "fields" and setting them to "cc".

For example, it's impossible to open a message, select the recipients, and create a new message and paste them in.

Nevermind that options and settings are so absurdly scattered across menus and dialog boxes it's not even funny. Firefox 2 called, it wants its horrible, gaudy, 1990-esque UI back.

Re:Will Thunderbird 3 not blow massive chunks? (1)

mR.bRiGhTsId3 (1196765) | more than 4 years ago | (#29845623)

I think you are doing something wrong. I just downloaded beta 4 and was able to do what you described without moving my mouse once. shift+/tab moves left to right, top to bottom on the to: and address fields and the to/cc fields can be switched with up/down arrows.

Re:Will Thunderbird 3 not blow massive chunks? (1)

Chelloveck (14643) | more than 4 years ago | (#29846121)

Worked great, right up until I wanted to write an email to someone and cc'd to three other people. Someone needs to be drug out into the street and shot for the user interface around composing/viewing/editing to/cc/bcc headers. *Points to Apple Mail as an example*.

Wait, are you seriously suggesting that Apple Mail has the superior interface here? You gotta be kidding me. The auto-complete is nothing short of pathological. I use both TBird and Mail.app on a daily basis, and neither one is particularly good at entering addresses. I certainly wouldn't view Mail.app as a shining example of a better way to do things.

Re:Will Thunderbird 3 not blow massive chunks? (1)

defaria (741527) | more than 4 years ago | (#29847819)

Just because you don't know what the fuck you are doing (and can't be bothered to read/research any documentation) does not mean that TB is bad. Just because you resort to the mouse because you don't have the foggiest notion of already built in and standard to most modern GUIs keyboard translations like tab to get to the next input box means that you're an idiot - not the program. You can easily type in your to, cc or bcc recipients without the use of a mouse - type a frigging comma will ya! Geeze. Setting the "field" to cc is but a tap of the "c" key but did cha try that?!? Hell no! Cause you're a frigging idiot! Perhaps you can't paste in recipients but most of the rest of the human race can. Next idiot please...

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

sherriw (794536) | more than 4 years ago | (#29844869)

You aren't the only one. I've been using TB2 for so long now, it's gone beyond stale. I hope TB3 comes with support for organizing emails into 'conversations' like gmail does.

Re:Finish Thunderbird first? (1)

bluefoxlucid (723572) | more than 4 years ago | (#29845281)

They're not too worried. Evolution is the big competitor (it's shipped on Ubuntu in the same way IE is shipped on Windows), and of course when I open Evolution I wait 10-15 minutes for a window to appear, just so I can edit my calendar. I made the mistake of leaving it open once, and eventually it filled my RAM and my OOM killer failed, the machine locked up hard and I had to reset it after 20 minutes of waiting for the screen to unfreeze. I had just run top to see wtf was eating all the memory (thanks to the system monitor running in the Gnome panel), saw Evolution with like 3 gigs of VMA and 1.8 gigs resident, and me with a full swap file, hit q, started to type 'killall -9' but didn't quite make it... sooo close.

Think about how worried the Firefox team would be if its major competitor was IE5 for MacOS9.

TFS is ludicrous (4, Insightful)

DragonWriter (970822) | more than 3 years ago | (#29841245)

Although it is early days yet, the concept that you own your data may be what sets this apart from Google Wave.

The centerpiece of Wave is a server-to-server federation protocol that lets anyone control their own data that can be made accessible through Wave. So, with all the things that might set Mozilla's product apart from Wave, "the concept that you own your data" is not one of them.

Re:TFS is ludicrous (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841265)

shut your filthy fucking sewer, you fucking shitbag pud whacker.

Re:TFS is ludicrous (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29841757)

No, because any user can edit waves. Raindrop seems to be more directed at aggregating messaging from a variety of sources, so it would probably see a wave extension (though, it could go the other way too, or people could write their own tools to aggregate into a personal wave). :)

Re:TFS is ludicrous (1)

Nerdfest (867930) | more than 4 years ago | (#29841961)

One of the Google Wave extensions integrates Twitter data, so this may be covered at least to some degree by Wave as well.

Re:TFS is ludicrous (1)

MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842267)

shut your filthy fucking sewer, you fucking shitbag pud whacker.

Do you kiss your mom the same way I do with that mouth?

Re:TFS is ludicrous (1)

ei4anb (625481) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843607)

yeah, sure. We're all going to host our own Wave servers or use a provider other than Google ?
It might happen in large companies and a few geek basements but the majority are going to just use Google's Wave servers. How many people set up their own sendmail/postfix/qmail server compared to how many people use gmail/hotmail/yahoo. OK, I know /. is the wrong place to ask that question, I run a sendmail server myself, but you get my point.

Re:TFS is ludicrous (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29843917)

You're concerned people won't run their own wave servers, but you think they will run their own raindrop? They're both hosted systems, both could be hosted yourself, or use a central supplier. Like with email systems the choice is yours.

I don't think it's "the concept of owning your own data" that sets this apart from wave.

Frost Pist (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#29841579)

end, we need you were nuulified by shitheads. *BSD BSD fanatics? I'7e is part of the Paper towels, There are some

I read TFA (2, Insightful)

Grimnir512 (1449641) | more than 4 years ago | (#29841963)

I read TFA over a few times and I'm not so sure what this is or how it works. It seems to be some sort of email/twitter/facebook aggregator. Have I understood this correctly?

Re:I read TFA (1)

Jugalator (259273) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843421)

Looks like it, like FriendFeed...

Meta (5, Funny)

lastomega7 (1060398) | more than 4 years ago | (#29842077)

Looks like with the current trend of new 'universal aggregators' we'll soon need an aggregator aggregator. I think they planned for this though, with possible titles such as 'mozilla monsoon' and 'google tsunami.'

Re:Meta (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842211)

Yo dawg I heard you like aggregating, so I put an aggregator in your aggregator so you can aggregate while you aggregate

Re:Meta (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842741)

Yo dawg I heard you like this meme but it's annoying and I'm gonna kill you if you keep it up, mkay?

Re:Meta (1)

Jugalator (259273) | more than 4 years ago | (#29843425)

Feedalizr already does that. :-p It aggregates from FriendFeed, among others, which itself is an aggregator.

Re:Meta (1)

KnownIssues (1612961) | more than 4 years ago | (#29850589)

That will work just fine until the proliferation of aggregator aggregators, at which point we'll need an aggregator aggregator aggregator. Which is why they need to just make an aggregator than can aggregate itself. They can name it Aggregator(Aggregator).

Interesting... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842243)

Raindrop looks interesting.

Gmail meets all my email needs right now, but I don't visit facebook often because it's annoying to load the site. I like the idea of being able to see the most important message interests me for both personal and business purposes.

Incidentally, Bryan Clark (the presenter of the first video) was the Teacher's Assistant for my Op-sys class. Always nice to see a familiar face out there working on interesting concepts.

Supplier Coogi suit man,ED and CA Drawstring Pants (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29842465)

Welcome to our website: Http://www.tntshoes.com

    basketball shoes,men's shoes,sport shoes,air shoe,force shoe,shox shoe,max shoe,JD shoes and other fusion shoes
1)Small order and dropshipping avaliable
2) Various styles and color on our website
3)Our shoes are all coming with original boxes, tags and cards
4)The more you order, the lower price you will get
5)You can mix any items from our store together
6)shippment: (5-7 business days)

Our company have many other brand products,if you are interested in our products .contact me directly

OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

                                                                    Http://www.tntshoes.com

Re:Supplier Coogi suit man,ED and CA Drawstring Pa (1)

bluefoxlucid (723572) | more than 4 years ago | (#29845211)

Will somebody botnet ban this site?

This could actually be the new wave client... (1)

v1z (126905) | more than 4 years ago | (#29844085)

Now, this looks very interesting. It's got nothing do to with wave -- except -- it might be nice to implement wave support for Raindrop ? Before looking at the raindrop source, it's hard to tell -- but from the videos it appears Raindrop handles i/o along several protocol streams, along with a seperate ui.

Stands to reason it should be feasable to implement a wave-backend -- the question then would be if the best way to handle that was encourage widespread wave-server-federation (every couchdb/raindrop-instance it's very own wave server) -- or connect the raindrop-backend to standalone wave-server(s) (more like how email is presumably handled by raindrop).

Open opening iz open! (1)

Hurricane78 (562437) | more than 4 years ago | (#29844515)

Raindrop, an experiment with Open Messaging on the Open Web.

Shouldn't that be "OpenSoft Open Raindrop, an open experiment with open Open Messaging on the open Open Web of openness."?

P.S.: Not a critique against openness.

It's CouchDB, therefor it's evil (1)

bluefoxlucid (723572) | more than 4 years ago | (#29845203)

It's CouchDB. It's that thing that tries to suck all the contacts and personal information off your computer if you're running Ubuntu, and store it with Canonical. It must be evil; at least Google doesn't up and install Google Desktop on my computer when I upgrade Firefox, without loudly asking (hey here's checkboxes. We want to install Google Desktop, since you're updating Google Earth.), and then immediately start transferring copies of my non-gmail e-mail conversations and my address book and Firefox bookmarks to Google.

Re:It's CouchDB, therefor it's evil (1)

jsight (8987) | more than 4 years ago | (#29846043)

It's CouchDB. It's that thing that tries to suck all the contacts and personal information off your computer if you're running Ubuntu, and store it with Canonical.

I think you have misunderstood exactly what CouchDB [wikipedia.org] is. Its just a document db.

Re:It's CouchDB, therefor it's evil (1)

bluefoxlucid (723572) | more than 4 years ago | (#29846477)

That's not important in the real world. It's like diesel. Toyota and Volkswagen have awesome diesel, but it's slow to catch on in the US because 30 years ago GM made really shitty cars that had a diesel engine, therefor we know diesel engines mean horrible cars with no power and lots of noise and smog and horrible fuel mileage. Well Ubuntu has used CouchDB to migrate all user data to Teh Clouedz, so CouchDB obviously means spyware.

Douchebag of the year award goes to... (1)

GooberToo (74388) | more than 4 years ago | (#29846685)

Although it is early days yet, the concept that you own your data may be what sets this apart from Google Wave.

Whoever wrote that part is either dumber than a bag of hammers or is purposely attempting to confuse and mislead people with misinformation. Wave is a protocol, not an application. One of the purposes of Wave is to provide a reference implementation (what everyone has been testing) such that others are free to either run the reference implementation, some variation thereof, or create their own server (via publicly available documentation) such that they can run their own servers and maintain ALL DATA INTERNALLY. Even the video purposely makes it clear you can run as many Wave servers as you like and NEVER HAVE YOUR DATA EXPOSED OUTSIDE OF YOUR OWN COMPANY.

The Wave protocol is built from the ground up such that everyone is free to own as much or as little of their data as they desire. Period. Anyone who says otherwise is full of bullshit.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...