Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

cancel ×

47 comments

That is, of course, (4, Funny)

jmknsd (1184359) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857615)

Until Apple bans it because they want to carve their logo into the moon, and can't support a competing application.

Re:That is, of course, (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29857625)

Aplle can't compete with the goatse [goatse.fr] man anyway.

Re:That is, of course, (1)

Minwee (522556) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858801)

With any luck, Steve will only get as far as "CHA" before he gets thwarted.

Re:That is, of course, (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29858871)

I wander if anyone else got you rather obscure The Tick reference ?

Re:That is, of course, (1)

TaliesinWI (454205) | more than 4 years ago | (#29860371)

Welcome to my friends list, fellow "The Tick" reader/watcher. (Which is it, out of curiosity?)

Soo very OT. (1)

rdwulfe (890032) | more than 4 years ago | (#29862195)

I'm not Minwee, but I discovered The Tick long before they aired the show. Best. Villains. Ever. Besides, who can not love a nigh invulnerable super hero that... well, let's face it, isn't really sure he's in the same headspace with himself half the time?

      Wulfe

Re:That is, of course, (1)

Godji (957148) | more than 4 years ago | (#29859185)

The fact that you have (correctly) been modded Insightful instead of Funny is depressing.

Want Mars? (1)

davidwr (791652) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857643)

There's an app for that.

"Selected" Spacecraft? (1)

cjfs (1253208) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857691)

The mission orbit tracking screen (available for some missions that are in orbit around the Earth, like the International Space Station), shows the current orbit position of a selected spacecraft.

How am I supposed to avoid hitting them if it only shows "selected" ones? The app isn't of much use if I have to go back to my computer to find the others.

App Slashdotted (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29857707)

Looks like the app is slashdotted... "NASA iPhone Downloads Failed". LOL

Why? (4, Insightful)

stepdown (1352479) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857757)

What part of this couldn't be achieved with a website? Is there really any reason to be developing iPhone apps for a service like this rather than letting us all use it?

Re:Why? (4, Informative)

c_forq (924234) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858017)

Publicity and exposure. Making into the top apps is basically free advertising to everyone with an iPhone AND everyone that reads tech sites (and maybe mainstream news in the next few days). Do it as a webpage and it will probably only make a buzz on tech sites and the crawl of 24 hour news channels.

Re:Why? (1)

rekees (1420453) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858073)

None; there are good space and aero news feeds on the web. Apple should get on track with making the basic iPhone features useful to people in the industry; for example, we can't even use the iPhone as a pager since its audio notifications are too short. Of course we can break into the phone and make them longer if we care to swallow the iPhone dev hype. The coolest feature about this app is where a spacecraft is, right? Who cares? If one flies or knows how to track a bird they know where it is using much better tools. Pretty soon we're going to be sold to cooking our eggs on the fancy iPhone. Caramba.

Re:Why? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29858303)

Cause it's cool you troll.

Re:Why? (1)

YourExperiment (1081089) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858335)

Is there really any reason to be developing iPhone apps for a service like this rather than letting us all use it?

Yes - if this had been "just another NASA website", it wouldn't have garnered anywhere near as much press attention.

For some reason, creating something that only a tiny proportion of the population can see creates a far bigger buzz than creating something universal - providing, of course, the tiny proportion in question is "iPhone owners".

Re:Why? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29858361)

http://www.nasa.gov/missions/current/index.html

Welcome to other smart phone owners club (1)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858667)

You don't ask: What kind of iPhone specific technology and coding advantages (remember:NASA) made this app available on iPhone while other smart phones having same capabilities (even J2ME big screen!) existing for years?

That is one hell of a question we Symbian, J2ME and possibly Windows Mobile users are asking every single day. Of course, Nokia, Sun, MS should ask it themselves first. It seems Nokia got what was wrong and trying to change its attitude but it will take months/years to overcome "Symbian is hard" prejudice. Sun? They do nothing... Absolutely nothing at all and I speak about near 1 billion mobile devices.

Re:Why? (1)

Eternauta3k (680157) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858895)

Because all of this is already offered in NASA's website?

Re:Why? (1)

acoustix (123925) | more than 4 years ago | (#29864335)

This is true of 99% of the iPhone Apps out there right now. Almost all of the functionality of these apps already exist on a website.

But for some reason it's cooler to waste time looking for the apps on Apple's site, downloading/paying for it, and then searching for the icon among your hundreds of icons on the screen.

Conspiracy Theorist App (2, Interesting)

allknowingfrog (1661721) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857761)

How long until someone releases a "We Didn't Really Land on the Moon!" App?

Re:Conspiracy Theorist App (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29858147)

I'm curious if they include the faked missions as well.

Re:Conspiracy Theorist App (1)

dotgain (630123) | more than 4 years ago | (#29859131)

I'm going to check now because I'd be quite surprised if there wasn't already one.

Re:Conspiracy Theorist App (1)

dotgain (630123) | more than 4 years ago | (#29859199)

Okay, while I haven't found one specifically about the Lunar Landings (in the NZ/Australia app store) there is one (cr)app called "Conspiracy Video!" for NZ$1.29 covering many uhm, 'debated' events in history, the Lunar Landings, JFK, 9/11 of course, and even up to the minute coverage with Michael Jackson.

Like I said, I fully expected by now someone would have made a Moon Landing Hoax app by now - I was close - perhaps nobody has, perhaps Apple won't let it fly.

Re:Conspiracy Theorist App (1, Informative)

allknowingfrog (1661721) | more than 4 years ago | (#29860917)

On second thought, I'm also surprised that there isn't one already. Maybe they blew the budget on tinfoil hats.

Seems a bit late... (1)

damn_registrars (1103043) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857769)

... they release this as the shuttle is about to be permanently retired, with no similar replacement due anytime soon. Granted we will still be sending plenty of astronauts up in rockets, but I suspect the shuttle launches generally drew more public attention.

Great, Now Poor Kids Can Learn All About Space! (1)

theodp (442580) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857775)

NASA Press Release [nasa.gov] : 'Making NASA more accessible to the public is a high priority for the agency,' said Gale Allen, director of Strategic Integration and Management for NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate in Washington. 'Tools like this allow us to provide users easy access to NASA information and progress at a fast pace.' Apple Insider [appleinsider.com] : 'New study shows iPhone users to be in a class by themselves'.

Your tax dollars at work (1)

obarthelemy (160321) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857785)

Gosh, am I glad they're not mine: I would be mightily pissed off, a web site would be accessible by everyone, not just an elite, and if the IS a website, the app is redundant.

Re:Your tax dollars at work (1)

aristotle-dude (626586) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858817)

Gosh, am I glad they're not mine: I would be mightily pissed off, a web site would be accessible by everyone, not just an elite, and if the IS a website, the app is redundant.

Wow. You've never really develop complex website or client server applications have you? A website and client server app like the iPhone can feed off the same raw XML data and image store and just present the data in a different form. You don't really think that they type out those pages each day straight into the HTML file do you? They could be running a server URL rewrite command in the config file that takes any request for a flat file HTML file and presents that request back to a CGI script which then returns the content for that request.

I wrote a system like that consisting of a perl cgi script that appeared to browsers and spiders as flat html files but it fact were dynamic and capable retaining session state information seamlessly in the background. Nasa could be using a similar system.

SETI@iPhone? (1)

Culture20 (968837) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857845)

How long until someone writes a distributed computing app like this where the "main function" uses little CPU but uses a lot of time (like reading does).

And thats why... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29857869)

I am a PC.

Google.

Life without walls.

Re:And thats why... (1)

A12m0v (1315511) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858933)

Life without walls.

Why would you then need Windows?

Cool! (1)

mhollis (727905) | more than 4 years ago | (#29857949)

Now I can look for water on the Moon -- from my iPhone!

Ease up, naysayers (5, Insightful)

HisMother (413313) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858011)

To everyone posting to say that "It should be a website!1!!": It is a website, [nasa.gov] of course -- or rather, all this info is already available on NASA's website. NASA has a fabulous web presence, and has for a long time. The iPhone app just makes selected information available in a nice form-factor for mobile. Could this have been done as WAP pages, so Blackberry/Android/whatever users could see it? I guess, sure, but it wouldn't be as nice as the iPhone app. It's an experiment, guys. Not wasteful, not elitist. Lighten the hell up.

Android? (1)

damburger (981828) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858493)

Surely NASA shouldn't be showing favouritism to Apple in this way, by only releasing the app on one platform?

Re:Android? (1)

ultrabot (200914) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858671)

Surely NASA shouldn't be showing favouritism to Apple in this way, by only releasing the app on one platform?

Don't count out the possibility of "marketing money" exchanging hands.

Or, anything? (1)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858695)

App must be getting its data from some site, possibly in XML form (too tired to run Wireshark). They could make the API available to any developer wanting to make an application like that with basic (non apple like) guidelines.

That could prevent a lot of questions. They are lucky that I am not an American tax payer. I would have some real questions to them and people in charge.

Re:Or, anything? (1)

c6gunner (950153) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858789)

I'm sure they're real worried about your real questions. Why, the thought of getting angry e-mails surely has them shaking in their boots.

Oh yea, they are worried (1)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29859049)

Look to BBC Website comments on every single stupid technical change they propose. British start the sentence with "I am paying my license fee." If you pay taxes, you have paid for that iPhone/iPod application too.

Of course, enjoy your passive, slashdot comment mocking, that is what they trust while making an exclusive for a single brand's closed platform.

Re:Oh yea, they are worried (1)

c6gunner (950153) | more than 4 years ago | (#29860101)

Look to BBC Website comments on every single stupid technical change they propose. British start the sentence with "I am paying my license fee."

Yep, they're a bunch of self-important jerkoffs, just like you.

Of course, enjoy your passive, slashdot comment mocking, that is what they trust while making an exclusive for a single brand's closed platform.

Yes They are in league with Them to brainwash the sheeple! I bet this app won't track the Chemtrail missions, and the CIA mind-control satellites! The Truth Is Out There ....

Re:Oh yea, they are worried (1)

Ilgaz (86384) | more than 4 years ago | (#29861961)

Those "self-important jerkoffs" prevented BBC from launching MS Silverlight/DRM based iPlayer. It seems like they know their rights better than you and it sometimes helps to remind those bureaucrats who is the boss.

Re:Android? (1)

aristotle-dude (626586) | more than 4 years ago | (#29858899)

Surely NASA shouldn't be showing favouritism to Apple in this way, by only releasing the app on one platform?

Are you saying that the android cannot just use the website? The problem with Android is that it is not popular and it is not as easy to develop for. There are over 30 million iPhone/iPod Touch devices out there that can take advantage of this application. How many Android devices are out there in use?

JPLClock and STSOrbit... (1)

jim_deane (63059) | more than 4 years ago | (#29859529)

Reminds me of some great software from the late 80s/early 90s by the late Dave Ransom. JPLClock made its way around the BBSes pretty rapidly, and was one of my favorite pieces of freeware.

To all you whiners out there (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29860573)

Is there really any reason to be developing iPhone apps for a service like this rather than letting us all use it?

or

What kind of iPhone specific technology and coding advantages (remember:NASA) made this app available on iPhone while other smart phones having same capabilities [...] existing for years?

or

I would be mightily pissed off, a web site would be accessible by everyone, not just an elite

or

they are lucky that I am not an American tax payer. I would have some real questions to them and people in charge.

ad nauseum. Poor babies. No fun getting a taste of what Mac users have been dealing with for years, is it? At least you have the option of getting access to the material on NASA's Web site. It's not always that easy for people on non-Microsoft platforms.

what's the point? (1)

Punto (100573) | more than 4 years ago | (#29861183)

from that description, it sounds like a website. Why bother making a whole app when the web browser already exists, and it's open and standard?

It'll be cool when ... (2, Funny)

PPH (736903) | more than 4 years ago | (#29861225)

... we can turn on director's comments, view the storyboard, alternate endings, deleted scenes, bloopers, etc.

Cool huh? (1)

Degro (989442) | more than 4 years ago | (#29862989)

Why the sales pitch? The app is from NASA isn't it, and this is slashdot right? A headline like that, on this site, makes me not trust it at all...

3.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#29907109)

These assholes made it for 3.0 and later only, and I'm not paying apple a penny more for it, so sorry NASA

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...