Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Your Phone Number Is Going To Get a Reputation Score

timothy posted about 10 months ago | from the how's-my-driving-call-1-800 dept.

Cellphones 136

Jah-Wren Ryel writes "Yes, there's yet another company out there with an inscrutable system making decisions about you that will affect the kinds of services you're offered. Based out of L.A.'s 'Silicon Beach,' Telesign helps companies verify that a mobile number belongs to a user (sending those oh-so-familiar 'verify that you received this code' texts) and takes care of the mobile part of two-factor authenticating or password changes. Among their over 300 clients are nine of the ten largest websites. Now Telesign wants to leverage the data — and billions of phone numbers — it deals with daily to provide a new service: a PhoneID Score, a reputation-based score for every number in the world that looks at the metadata Telesign has on those numbers to weed out the burner phones from the high-quality ones."

cancel ×

136 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Both ways? (5, Interesting)

BasilBrush (643681) | about 10 months ago | (#45447903)

Will it work the other way too? To weed out the tele-sales numbers from the people who's calls you do want to receive?

Re:Both ways? (1)

Threni (635302) | about 10 months ago | (#45447915)

Follow the money. Is there any money for the tele-sales companies, or phone the companies, to prevent phone calls from taking place?

Re:Both ways? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45447963)

Maybe the phone the companies could monetize the this if they try the tried enough hard.

Uhhh... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45447983)

Huh?

Re:Uhhh... (2)

shentino (1139071) | about 10 months ago | (#45448015)

There's all those missing words from accidentally the whole thing!

Re:Uhhh... (4, Funny)

flyingfsck (986395) | about 10 months ago | (#45448129)

That must have been a comment from a NSA employee. It was 2 paragraphs before it was redacted.

Re:Both ways? (2)

S.O.B. (136083) | about 10 months ago | (#45448205)

Yoda? Is that you?

Re:Both ways? (4, Funny)

ShanghaiBill (739463) | about 10 months ago | (#45448567)

Follow the money. Is there any money for the tele-sales companies, or phone the companies, to prevent phone calls from taking place?

Yes. It costs money to make the calls, and it is especially expensive to deal with jerks like me that always press one to get a live operator, pretend to be very interested in the product, agree to place an order, and then give them a sequence of made up credit card numbers until they finally hang up. I make a game out of keeping them on the line as long as possible. My record is 43 minutes. If they filtered out my number it would save them a lot of money.

Yes, I am already on the national-do-not-call-list, but I still get a few auto-calls almost everyday.

Re:Both ways? (1)

znanue (2782675) | about 10 months ago | (#45448871)

While your post is hilarious, I've never bought anything from a sales rep on the phone and I'm definitely not uncharitable with my frosty condescension if they happen to mislead me into thinking its a phone call I want to take. If I developed a reputation at all, I'd be the guy in the house that the traveling salesman decides to just skip. And, while tracking systems are scary, there can be some incidental positives for the reputation one develops. Who knows, I bet not talking to every telemarketer has a positive correlation with credit score.

However, I'm on the national DNC list and I get a call once a fortnight, maybe. Most of the time its in a foreign language, anyway. I love those Spanish robots. My understanding is you have to reup on the list every year.

Re:Both ways? (5, Interesting)

AmiMoJo (196126) | about 10 months ago | (#45449413)

I find the best thing to do is press 1 to speak to an operator, then when they answer say "oh, sorry, I'm interested but can you hang on just a sec, my pot is boiling over..." Then they get put on hold, where the "music" is just a generic household background sounds track I downloaded from somewhere. Sometimes they hang on for 10 minutes before giving up.

Re:Both ways? (2)

jbolden (176878) | about 10 months ago | (#45448733)

Sure. I'd pay $3 / mo for a "non telemarketing accessible number".

Re:Both ways? (2)

mwvdlee (775178) | about 10 months ago | (#45449031)

I'm sure there will be companies that will take your $3/mo and block your number from all associated telemarketing service (singular on purpose).
Ofcourse, this will not cover advertorials, market research, purchase assistance, telesales or whatever other name they can think of.

Re:Both ways? (1)

qbast (1265706) | about 10 months ago | (#45448921)

Sure there is. Allow auction system - you pay phone company to prevent telemarking, telemarketers pay to allow their calls to get through. Whoever paid more wins and phone company gets all the money anyway.

Re:Both ways? (4, Interesting)

Alain Williams (2972) | about 10 months ago | (#45447967)

That was my first thought, then I realised that if this database listed my number as ''a grouchy bugger who is just rude to unsolicited 'phone calls and does not buy things'' then I will get what I want: not be be bothered by span 'phone calls.

Re:HR filtering (2)

Billly Gates (198444) | about 10 months ago | (#45448587)

When I hear reputation I hear HR drones trying to make up some character correlation flaw for a filtering mechanism.

I am cautious as I view this as another way for banks, insurance companies, and employers to screw you.

Re:HR filtering (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448959)

Banks like my credit score, it tells them the probability that I'll repay them.
Insurance companies like me because I'm healthy.
Employers like my low price tag.
My phone number is only liked by your mom, because she knows she'll have a good time...

Re:Both ways? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45449383)

With my cynical view, I'm sure this info will end up affecting one's future employment or promotion prospects when another aspect of credit scoring is responding to them.

Re:Both ways? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45447971)

I don't give a damn 'bout my reputation
You're living in the past, it's a new generation
A girl can do what she wants to do and that's what I'm gonna do

An' I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
Oh no, not me

An' I don't give a damn 'bout my reputation
Never said I wanted to improve my station
An' I'm only doin' good when I'm havin' fun
An' I don't have to please no one

An' I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
Oh no, not me, oh no, not me

I don't give a damn 'bout my reputation
I've never been afraid of any deviation
An' I don't really care if you think I'm strange
I ain't gonna change

An' I'm never gonna care 'bout my bad reputation
Oh no, not me, oh no, not me
Pedal, boys!

An' I don't give a damn 'bout my reputation
The world's in trouble, there's no communication
An' everyone can say what they wanna to say
It never gets better, anyway

So why should I care about a bad reputation anyway?
Oh no, not me, oh no, not me

I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
You're living in the past, it's a new generation
An' I only feel good when I got no pain
An' that's how I'm gonna stay

An' I don't give a damn 'bout my bad reputation
Oh no, not me, oh no, not me
Not me, not me

Re:Both ways? (1)

nurb432 (527695) | about 10 months ago | (#45448009)

Caller ID?

Re:Both ways? (2, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448209)

people who's calls you do want to receive?

The correct word is "whose", not "who's", you uneducated turd.

Re:Both ways? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448353)

people who's calls you do want to receive?

The correct word is "whose", not "who's", you uneducated turd.

Sieg hei!

Re:Both ways? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448383)

Sieg hei!

On your knees when you say that, motherfucker.

Re:Both ways? (0)

BlindRobin (768267) | about 10 months ago | (#45448265)

OH KAAAYY This post should have a Score:5 Funny but hell some people just have no sense of humour.

So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassing.. (5, Insightful)

Type44Q (1233630) | about 10 months ago | (#45447907)

...to weed out the burner phones from the high-quality ones.

What do you want to bet those "high quality" numbers quickly become a target for telemarketers to plunder? :p

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (4, Interesting)

dotancohen (1015143) | about 10 months ago | (#45447951)

...to weed out the burner phones from the high-quality ones.

What do you want to bet those "high quality" numbers quickly become a target for telemarketers to plunder? :p

I came to say this. How is this not obvious? Or is that the actual reasoning behind the list?

I think that this should be done in a fashion similar to how Google Chrome checks if addresses are malware. When your phone rings, md5 the phone number and send it off to be checked against a blacklist of known telemarketers. If it's not on the list and the call is marketing, then add it. Maybe I'll make an app for that.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (4, Interesting)

sumdumass (711423) | about 10 months ago | (#45448217)

There is a code you used to be able to play as the call was being answered. This code either signified the call was incorrect or something along the lines of an automated computer answering instead of a human. I forget the name of the device but my brother installed one and all the telemarketing calls think it's a bust call and disconnect the call. I asked him why he kept getting crank calls and he explained how it worked and why when I answered his phone, no one was on the other end but this was years ago (2000 or so).

I forget the name of the device he had but it would likely be quicker to just code something that did that and have it ask the person for a name or to push a number to have the call completed. If it got replied to, it wouldn't be most telemarketers. On the other hand, I never sign up for crap and don't have too many telemarketing calls. When I do, I demand they "take me off their list and any lists they have me associated with". They have to do so else face a fine each time they contact you after the request (document when this happens and with who they claim to be representing along with a number to report it). Most areas will give you a portion of the fines if it goes that far too (you may have to sue the company itself but its easily done). Even if your area doesn't allow the fines, telling them to take you off the list does two things, it first severs any existing permission like previous business and so on that could be used to get around do not call lists, and second, it establishes that you certainly will not purchase anything or donate anything to them and by removing you from the list or placing your number in their internal do not call list, it will be doing them a favor in conserving resources for more productive calls. So at minimum, that should get you out of some of the calls. On average, I get less then 2 telemarketing calls every month. Sometimes I go several months without any. And when the pissed off telemarketing drone start cussing you out, make a record of that and report it to the FCC or whatever regulating authority your area has.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (5, Informative)

BitZtream (692029) | about 10 months ago | (#45448247)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_information_tones [wikipedia.org]

Still works, I use the 'service disconnected' SIT code as the opening to my voicemail message. Pretty much stops spam after the first call. The SIT codes are very timing and tone sensitive, so you need a good recording and to be able to upload a file for your voicemail message rather than trying to record it with the phone mic.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448601)

So you have your voicemail answer after 3 or less rings? Because the telemarketer systems all hang up on the 4th ring so they don't get your voice message unless you set the ring count for answering under 4. You'll generally find that any calls that go on past 4 rings are not your normal telemarketing. They might be calls you don't want, but they usually are not an autodialer type telemarketing scheme.

Of course the "do not call" list was supposed to protect those in the US from this crap already. It worked for awhile, but the scum telemarketers just moved their calls offshore, spoof their numbers, and vanish when too many people complain to the FCC. I do still get a lot of calls for carpet cleaning, some silly thing about electric power prices, etc. All offshore spoofed crap.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (1)

TubeSteak (669689) | about 10 months ago | (#45448653)

This code either signified the call was incorrect or something along the lines of an automated computer answering instead of a human. I forget the name of the device but my brother installed one and all the telemarketing calls think it's a bust call and disconnect the call.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeleZapper [wikipedia.org]
I got one for my parents back in the late 90s and it massively cut down on junk calls after a few weeks.
Eventually it "died" (there's a secret battery inside? thanks wikipedia) but it had served its purpose.
Nowadays the Do Not Call list keeps crap calls to a minimum.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (2)

Greyfox (87712) | about 10 months ago | (#45448517)

There are already several apps for things like that. The one I use doesn't allow calls to reach my phone unless they're in my contacts list. It drops others into my voicemail. If they leave a voicemail, I'll check to see if they're someone I want to talk to. If they are, I'll add them to my contacts and call them back.

If you have a land-line, you can buy a SIP gateway, run asterisk and set up a similar system with asterisk. I've done that, too.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (1)

dotancohen (1015143) | about 10 months ago | (#45448617)

Can you make some suggestions? What are the names of the apps that you use?

Thanks.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (4, Informative)

Greyfox (87712) | about 10 months ago | (#45448913)

The one I use on my Android phone is Advanced Call Blocker. I found several similar apps, but this one does everything I'm looking for with a minimum of fuss. It's a paid app, but was only a couple of bucks and worth every penny. I think I'd have a hard time having a phone without this functionality now. I will disable it occasionally if I'm actually expecting a call from someone whose number I don't know, but I almost never do that.

On the landline side, I don't recall which SIP gateway I bought last. They're nifty little devices you plug into your landline and into your ethernet switch, and when a call comes in they convert the call to a VOIP call and initiate a session with a SIP server. The gateway I bought had a web-based config page and was pretty easy to set up. You could probably set up asterisk on a Raspberry PI or something that doesn't suck too much power. You just need a little space you can write to for a voice mail box. You can do some nifty tricks with a setup like that -- you could install sipdroid or some other sip client app on your cell phone and have the asterisk server try to ring that. If you're not within range of your wlan, you could have it fail over to your voicemail box immediately. I played around with having it dial back out via a VOIP account if the call was from someone on a whitelist, effectively transferring the call to my cell phone. I had some issues with call quality doing that, though -- I'm pretty sure I didn't have echo cancellation set up correctly somewhere in the loop.

You can also have asterisk do least-cost routing. I'd have it dial 800 and local numbers over the landline, try to find data address via enum with e164.org for other numbers and as a last resort dial long distance numbers using a voip account. Technically you don't need a landline in that mix, but at the time my bandwidth was severely limited and the landline was usually a cleaner connection.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (3, Informative)

TheGratefulNet (143330) | about 10 months ago | (#45448525)

on android, its called 'mr. number'.

works great.

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (1)

hebertrich (472331) | about 10 months ago | (#45448693)

all the more important that the do not call lists be enforced

Re:So the telemarketers know who's worth harrassin (1)

znanue (2782675) | about 10 months ago | (#45448905)

Maybe those lonely grannies whose kids and grandkids are neglecting them can develop an algorithm for the minimum amount of money they'll have to spend to keep getting the calls at a satisfactory rate. We could develop a service, or charity, to help them with the algorithm.

Oh my. (4, Interesting)

nospam007 (722110) | about 10 months ago | (#45447935)

So additionally to mailinator.com we will need a phoninator.com if this catches on.

A couple of hundred numbers where you'd add your own random Number, then read the SMS and delete it immediately.

Re:Oh my. (1)

jarkus4 (1627895) | about 10 months ago | (#45447977)

Unlikely, since you cant get phone numbers for free. In regards to availability phone numbers are closer to IP addresses then emails (limited amount, regulation etc).
Also those numbers would quickly become 1000 ranked because of huge activity.

Re:Oh my. (1)

MRe_nl (306212) | about 10 months ago | (#45448043)

You can't get a telephone-number for free? Buy a phone for $40,- and get a unique number. Not exactly free but close enough.

Re:Oh my. (1)

flyingfsck (986395) | about 10 months ago | (#45448139)

Forget the phone, just buy a sim card to get a number.

Re:Oh my. (2)

tepples (727027) | about 10 months ago | (#45448243)

Provided you live in a country where SIM-only service is common, that is, somewhere other than Slashdot's home country.

Re:Oh my. (1)

mlts (1038732) | about 10 months ago | (#45449433)

I can spend $10 and get a T-Mobile SIM plus some prepaid minutes.

In fact, if I'm doing Craigslist transactions, I use a burner phone, and when done, destroy the SIM card [1] and get a new one. That way, after I buy/sell something, I'm not dealing with all the fraudsters who have sons on oil rigs or are willing to send me $50,000 cashiers checks.

I avoid CDMA providers, because if one wants a new number, the whole phone has to be destroyed or recycled. However, once done with the phone, handing it to the nearest street corner hobo pretty much does the same thing (and here in Austin, we envy Santa Cruz for their lack of aggressive homeless population, which says something.)

[1]: Takes only a few times to lock out the PIN, around 20 to fry the PUK, then the card hits a fine-grained shredder.

Re:Oh my. (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448169)

You can't get a telephone-number for free? Buy a phone for $40,- and get a unique number. Not exactly free but close enough.

I think you need to learn how money works. "$40" and "free" are, in fact, not the same thing. If you understood this then you would realise your reply is pointless.

You probably need this: "Free" [reference.com] .

Re:Oh my. (1)

Joining Yet Again (2992179) | about 10 months ago | (#45448235)

You can get thousands of e-mail addresses for free, and one 'phone number for $40 which is almost free. Therefore you can get thousands of 'phone numbers for nearly free.

FTFY. And you made me almost crack a smile - bravo.

Doesn't everyone use Asterisk to troll the telemarketers?

Re:Oh my. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448343)

Americans have the weirdest misconceptions. Of course you can get phone numbers for free. I have several. The NANP with its fixed length phone numbers may make this more difficult, but open plan numbers are so plentiful that supply is virtually unlimited.

Re:Oh my. (1)

wvmarle (1070040) | about 10 months ago | (#45448089)

Not free but cheap. I just pre-paid my phone subscription for a year - just out of convenience - just over US$30, including more minutes than I ever use (700 minutes a month or so). Use pre-paid and it's even cheaper (effectively about USD 6.5 for half year - when the number expires - good enough for just receiving SMS)

This makes me consider to indeed get a number especially for that purpose. And use another number for my regular calls.

Re:Oh my. (1)

zippthorne (748122) | about 10 months ago | (#45448697)

Google voice will give you a phone number for "free." It has many interesting options for routing your calls...

Re:Oh my. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448825)

The next best thing from anonymous disposable phone number is a 'spam bucket' number which you use exclusively for verification messages and other unavoidable situations where there is no legitimate reason for them to get it, but you have to give it to them anyway. You minimise the number of ways this links you to your real identity, periodically renew the number (say once a year with a cheap sim-only deal) and provide as much fake info as you can get away with when signing up.

Re:Oh my. (1)

rea1l1 (903073) | about 10 months ago | (#45449559)

You can if you make use of Google voice. You're able to select your number from a list and change it at any time.

not really unique (1)

jarkus4 (1627895) | about 10 months ago | (#45447939)

while phone number is unique at any given moment, it doesnt necessarily mean it stays with same person. Most providers sell the used numbers some time after they got inactive.
Good luck to the new buyer of 1000 ranked number :)

Re:not really unique (1)

Joce640k (829181) | about 10 months ago | (#45447993)

If only there was a way to inform the phone companies when a number changes owner...

Maybe you could set up a service to help them know about it. It would be worth a fortune!

Re:not really unique (1)

jarkus4 (1627895) | about 10 months ago | (#45448011)

phone companies generally know this. Im not quite sure about this weird rating one - it doesnt seem to be connected with actual phone service providers.

Re:not really unique (4, Interesting)

bz386 (1424109) | about 10 months ago | (#45447997)

while phone number is unique at any given moment, it doesnt necessarily mean it stays with same person. Most providers sell the used numbers some time after they got inactive. Good luck to the new buyer of 1000 ranked number :)

When I moved to the US, I bought a T-Mobile SIM. A month later, I started receiving robo calls from a debt collector. After about 10 of those calls I finally gave in and called them back on their 800 number and they gave me the name of some guy they were looking for. Probably the previous owner of the number...

Re:not really unique (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448471)

And they called you a liar and continued to call right? If they stopped immediately, I'd be very surprised.

Interisting... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45447975)

I wonder how they are going to handle the data privacy issues related to aggregating personal data between the several countries in the world.

Re:Interisting... (1)

siddesu (698447) | about 10 months ago | (#45448057)

that's the easiest part -- they'll incorporate in a place that has "liberal" or no privacy laws whatsoever and do all the aggregation there.

So... (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45447995)

... when do my reputation scores start getting reputation scores?

Re:So... (1)

The FNP (1177715) | about 10 months ago | (#45448207)

On Slashdot, it's called Karma.

--The FNP

Re:So... (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448395)

Thank you for your insight into this matter.

--Anonymous Coward

Re:So... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448679)

did someone say something? oh well must have not been that important

Also this is a great idea until a company decides to turn off its services and shuts off peoples phones ( sprint nextel )

Re:So... (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45449277)

I dunno...how useful is "Karma" without "dogma"? If these phone folks want to get anywhere with a reputation system, they really need to instill some sort of dogma to judge Karma against - it's not just about good/bad behavior. Here are some modest proposals:

- Phone numbers used by Richard Stallman are good, phone numbers used by Bill Gates are evil.
- Phone numbers whose phones run an operating system based on Linux are good, phone numbers whose phones running an operating system based on Windows are evil, not to mention riddled with bugs.
- All phone numbers whose phones are covered by software patents are inherently evil.

In contrast, Slashdot's much more mature system of Karma/dogma works so well that I'm posting this as an Anonymous Coward. Heck, I bet the phone-number-reputation folks don't even know what an Anonymous Coward is...

Re:So... (1)

PPH (736903) | about 10 months ago | (#45448501)

Yo, dawg! .....

oh, well... whitelist time (4, Interesting)

cellocgw (617879) | about 10 months ago | (#45448013)

I have avoided making a whitelist so far, on the theory that every now and then someone (maybe even a friend! :-) ) might call me from a different number, and I'd hate to block legit calls, but if the mere fact that I've had the same number for 20 years and occasionally call retailers from said number means I'm highly rated & thus a robocall target, it'll be time to block 'em all.
(wow, that was a Faulknerian sentence :-) )

Re:oh, well... whitelist time (1)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448077)

I use a blacklist for callers who call more than twice and don't leave a message. Usually toll free, sometimes local, and of course my favorite 000-000-0000 callers.

Another method if you want to see who called but don't want to be bothered immediately, is use a contact with a silent ringtone.

Re:oh, well... whitelist time (1)

wbr1 (2538558) | about 10 months ago | (#45448107)

When you are robocalled umpteen times a day, it may feel little better than as I lay dying.

Re:oh, well... whitelist time (1)

glavenoid (636808) | about 10 months ago | (#45448183)

What I would like is a system where I can whitelist the numbers I expect to need to allow to call me which would then go through like normal, but in the cases where I can't whitelist the number in advance, have a voice-menu type screening system where a human caller needs to listen for and repeat a randomly generated PIN (or other code) in order for the call to go through.

Is this a technical infeasibility? I looked into using a custom asterisk BPX-based solution like this several years ago but put it on the permanent backburner for whatever reason.

I suspect if I had such a system the increasingly frequent spoofed caller-id robo-vertisements would drop to nil.

Re:oh, well... whitelist time (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448375)

Asterisk indeed is your answer. I would look into distribution with advanced GUI like FreePBX http://www.freepbx.org/
  which can also be run on Raspberry PI http://nerdvittles.com/?p=3026
Whitelist for incoming calls can be easily created. Calls can be send to custom recordings, hang up, voicemail or voice prompt menus.
My favorite is recording for telemarketers (my own copy) is "This number is no longer in service". 800 callers think that my DID number is invalid, I'm not charged by VoIP provider because call was not answered and still get call record (CDR) into local database.

With plain Asterisk you can use Visual Dialplan http://www.apstel.com/ to get an idea how to move the call through the system.

Simplified Asterisk version but still powerful can also be used on embedded devices like routers supported by OpenWRT or dd-wrt.

Re:oh, well... whitelist time (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448223)

Same here, my phone is for my convenience, not anybody else's. I also only answer numbers that I recognize. If it is not a number I recognize and it is not important enough for you to leave a voicemail, I label it as not important. I find this works quite well. I have yet to have a telemarketer leave a message.

Everything online does (5, Informative)

onyxruby (118189) | about 10 months ago | (#45448031)

Everything you do has an online score that has a given value to someone. Your slashdot account (and similar accounts) has an online score from any number of companies that monitor such websites for third parties. They look for for your influential posters, political views, shills accounts, who you look for and so on. You would then be valued according to your usefulness to the organization. These companies range from managing online reputations for companies to countries (ever notice certain stories get a lot of hits from Venezuela etc). Certainly facebook, twitter and similar accounts have companies that watch your reputation and score it as well.

If it's Amazon and you are a reviewer of products and nobody finds your reviews useful than your value is low. If your reviews are well thought of and highly considered you will start to get packages from companies hoping to a review. After a while you could become a professional reviewer without ever paying for packages.

Even things like credit scores [myfico.com] aren't standardized anymore and haven't been for years. You could be a perfectly acceptable risk to buy a house, and get turned down for a credit card. You will have a different credit score from each agency based on what type of vendor is requesting your score and for what purpose. You will have one number for employment, another for renting, another for getting a car loan and so on.

The last I checked there are about 1500 different types of credit scores alone (do you know your behavior score?) and they change all the time. Your scores change all the time based on what you buy, where you buy it and when you buy it. Welcome to the world of big data. Don't fear big government, it's big business that you need to worry about.

'Things' haven't changed all that much (1)

Laconique (3426803) | about 10 months ago | (#45448047)

It's true that some carriers, in some countries allow you to port your number (though that's hardly everywhere, making the 'worldwide claim of this database the same be just an empty claim). So some 'things' have changed, just a little. But, most importantly, 'Things' such as phone numbers, are still, to my knowledge, incapable of autonomous intentionality and even of having enough singular qualities for this company's mission to make any sense. A phone number neither intends to do good or evil, nor does it have material components or specs to fail to carry out the user's intention and deserve a bad reputation. Without these, the concept of reputation is simply inapplicable. Until some number phone numbers started willingly or typically call the wrong place or person by intentional design or by poor design, this company shouldn't bother calling me. I suspect they should put their own number first on their own list of numbers being associated with *people* misusing numbers

Re:'Things' haven't changed all that much (1)

johanw (1001493) | about 10 months ago | (#45448251)

But even in countries where you can easily keep your number, the earlier example of somone called by debt collectors would probably deliberately change his/her number.

In other news. (1)

musixman (1713146) | about 10 months ago | (#45448085)

The NSA just found an easy way to find out WHO to tap via "PhoneID".

Re:In other news. (1)

Teun (17872) | about 10 months ago | (#45449347)

Indeed, they already do this, just tap everyone. :(

Mine already has (5, Funny)

antifoidulus (807088) | about 10 months ago | (#45448127)

My phone # is 867-5309, it already has a reputation you insensitive clod!

Re:Mine already has (0)

koan (80826) | about 10 months ago | (#45448145)

I got it, (I got it), I got it
I got your number on the wall

Re:Mine already has (0)

BitZtream (692029) | about 10 months ago | (#45448255)

Jenny! I got your number!

Re:Mine already has (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448707)

Dating yourself so badly.

Laugh (1)

koan (80826) | about 10 months ago | (#45448137)

Seems like a service you offer to people that don't know better, but maybe I'm missing the full implications.
Side Note: I don't want offers or scores or anything on a burner, that alone seems self explanatory.

LEAVE ME ALONE! (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448173)

Thousands of virtual beggars everyday isn't any different than thousands of real beggars everyday.

I have a land line, you insensitive clod (1)

tepples (727027) | about 10 months ago | (#45448259)

This trend toward requiring a mobile phone as the second factor for two-factor authentication is going to hurt people who use a land line instead of carrying a cell phone or for people like me who use a low-cost prepaid plan the way one used to use a payphone. Free web applications such as Facebook and Yahoo! aren't so free if you have to buy a cell phone and keep service active.

Re:I have a land line, you insensitive clod (1)

w_dragon (1802458) | about 10 months ago | (#45448523)

My landline does text-to-speech on any SMS sent to it, which works fine for the 2-factor schemes I've run across that use purely numeric codes. Have you tried sending an SMS to your land line to see what happens?

I'll try that (1)

tepples (727027) | about 10 months ago | (#45448967)

Some schemes that I've seen in use on the Internet require the user to not only receive SMS but also reply through SMS to a shortcode. But once I get home sometime in the next 12 hours, I plan to try texting my home number (a land line on Frontier), and I'll let you all know whether I receive it.

Re:I have a land line, you insensitive clod (1)

Pokey.Clyde (1322667) | about 10 months ago | (#45448597)

This trend toward requiring a mobile phone as the second factor for two-factor authentication is going to hurt people who use a land line instead of carrying a cell phone or for people like me who use a low-cost prepaid plan the way one used to use a payphone. Free web applications such as Facebook and Yahoo! aren't so free if you have to buy a cell phone and keep service active.

Get a Google Voice number. You can send and receive SMS messages from the GV website.

Google Voice is U.S.-only (1)

tepples (727027) | about 10 months ago | (#45448925)

I've read anecdotal reports on forums that providers have begun to block Google Voice numbers from being used to verify accounts. As the reputation score scheme described in the featured article becomes more popular among providers, Google Voice as a carrier is likely to get blocked more often. Besides, immigrating to the United States to subscribe to Google Voice is more expensive than just subscribing to cell phone service.

so sick of social networks, social media (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448279)

seriously, fuck them.

Another end run aorund DNC? (5, Insightful)

tompaulco (629533) | about 10 months ago | (#45448283)

Is this another way for them to pay absolutely no attention to the Do Not Call List? My number is on the DNC list, and yet I get about 6 calls a day from telemarketers. I get maybe three calls a week from people who have any legitimate reason to be calling me.
The fines are not stiff enough for violaters of DNC. Further, the telemarketers use caller ID spoofing to not present a legitimate callback number so that you can determine who they are in order to prosecute. The only way to actually catch them is to buy one of their products and find out where the money goes, and who wants to do that? Even when that happens they are probably being paid by another company to sell their wares, so you still wouldn't find the telemarketing company, although you should be able to find out from the company that apparently hired them.

Re:Another end run aorund DNC? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45449245)

I didn't bother with the do not call list because I bet those assholes just take that list and add it into who they call. Like how MPAA will ask for a bunch of sites to get blocked, then that list gets posted here and people learn a bunch of new sites to get files.

Re:Another end run aorund DNC? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45449543)

The problem is that a lot of the robodialers are offshore, so the DNC list does not affect them, and they spoof other numbers.

In fact bill collectors do the same thing. One was calling me because a neighbor was late with a payment and was wanting the people on the street to know how much the person was in arrears. Because they are operating from overseas, they are free to do things like that without fearing any penalties whatsoever.

To boot, the robodialers that do work in the US are quite good at assets around. If they violate a law and trigger fines, the corporation doing the work shuts down... but that company has no assets. The assets including HR are in the name of a secondary holding corporation. So, ABC robodialer goes under, XYZ forms the next day with the same records, business goes as usual.

Can you say Meta-data? (4, Interesting)

Overzeetop (214511) | about 10 months ago | (#45448287)

Where is the absolute outrage about the harvesting of meta-data which was aimed at the NSA?

Here's a company doing it for profit, willing to sell access to the highest bidder (or just for a flat rate), whereas when the NSA does it for national security reasons, it's like they kill a puppy every time they save to disc. If you're really worried about undue influence of political structures, this is far more damning and easier to access/leverage than a top secret database.

You all should be lighting the torches and sharpening the pitchforks, not bitching about telemarketer strategies.

Re:Can you say Meta-data? (1)

BringsApples (3418089) | about 10 months ago | (#45448425)

Torches and pitchforks? Mere non-participation (on a wide scale, of course) in today's zeitgeist is enough to out the powers that be.

Re:Can you say Meta-data? (2)

martas (1439879) | about 10 months ago | (#45448485)

Because sometimes government is scarier than profit-driven private entities. Typically the worst thing that can happen to me from businesses having my private info is advertising inundation; inability to qualify for loans; getting ripped off because the entity selling me a product or service knows I can afford it; etc. The worst thing that the government can do, however, includes diminished ability to travel (no-fly lists and such), forced cooperation (warrants, secret or otherwise; forced questioning regarding one's associations -- yes I've seen it happen), incarceration, and other wonderful things. Corporations want your money and labor, government can want everything else.

Re:Can you say Meta-data? (1)

ItsJustAPseudonym (1259172) | about 10 months ago | (#45448745)

Yes, this.

TLDR: "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!"

Re:Can you say Meta-data? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448797)

Corporations want your money and labor, government can want the above plus everything else.

FTFY

Re:Can you say Meta-data? (1)

bussdriver (620565) | about 10 months ago | (#45449687)

We've not even begun to see what private uses of these things will cause.

PEOPLE who still run the corporations still want POWER; you missed one. Some power plays are not solely for greater profit (since money is a big source of power the two are intertwined.) Power attracts evil bastards anywhere it is available to attain, government or corporate.

Governments historically can do a lot of things but one does have to remember that Fascism is a government and private partnership... They are merely institutions which wield more power than individuals. Government is not really the problem or even it's design structure, it's the people running it. As Ben Franklin said, any government well managed is good government and cannot remain that way forever (because good management can't stay around for long.) Democratic systems always fall into despotism. History proves it.

Me, I think more structural changes could help... however, I realize as a programmer I have a bias in thinking good design can save the day. It can not compensate for a gradual increase in incompetence and/or malice of the users.

Whom ever controls the might (police, military) is the real government. A puppet leader or organization is just a middle man; and a legal system is just bureaucracy and propaganda which supplements (and reduces the need for physical) might.

countermeasure: seek the low score (2)

nimbius (983462) | about 10 months ago | (#45448335)

Telesign pulls where the phones were registered and who provides the service. The older an account is, the better. And if the number shows up as attached to legitimate accounts with companies, apps, and websites to which Telesign provides services, thatâ(TM)s a good thing. Having a newly-opened account results in a lower score, or using a less-well known carrier, or having a number thatâ(TM)s not registered with some of the customers for which this company does two-factor authentication.

this is all vital information I'll take into consideration. I'm clearly going to switch to cricket mobile, and refuse to use call-to-verify services. because if youre going to maintain a clandestine or "closed" as you call it network of telephone activity used by corporations to target and analyze me as a consumer, I'd like to ensure I rank right around anders brevik and james holmes. I want this ranking, because the companies that need to stalk my every waking moment in search of a need, want, or urge to exploit are the kinds of companies that should be razed to the ground. they dont offer a product or service anyone needs, much like you. rather, they are a font of predatory behavior that in any other walk of life, government or private, would absolutely not be tolerated.

Burner phone = fuck these swine. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448373)

Any business plan which relies on parasitic and inappropriate
use of data which involves intrusion into people's PRIVATE LIVES
deserves to be subverted.

If you doubt this is true, ask yourself this :

Who wants to have their life tracked by people they don't know, so
those mystery people can "earn" money ? The logical answer would be :
no one. ...

Joke is on them. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448535)

I can't get SMS messages! Hah!

Great, more spam phone calls (1)

Cantankerous Cur (3435207) | about 10 months ago | (#45448667)

Maybe it's just my cynicism, but it just feels like that score is going to reflect more than what they're saying. You know, like how likely the sucker is to answer the phone if the caller-id is blocked or susceptibility to cold-call salesmen. When it comes to potential profit, should a person ever underestimate how shady things can get?

I don't have a phone (0)

Anonymous Coward | about 10 months ago | (#45448749)

You insensitive clod!
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>