Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Asus Planning Netbook With Slot-In Mobile Phone

kdawson posted more than 4 years ago | from the floor-wax-and-dessert-topping dept.

Cellphones 75

An anonymous reader writes "Taiwanese manufacturer Asus is planning a netbook with a slot-in mobile phone that will double as a 3G communications module, according to a distributor. The arrangement is apparently meant to be an easy way to use the same SIM card and data account for both a phone and a portable computer. The phone module, from an Israeli company called Modu, is already on sale, together with an array of feature-phone shells and other devices that it's designed to slot into. There is some comparison being made with the iPhone and iPad — except that with the Modu approach, you can slot the phone into the netbook."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

a.k.a. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32229084)

"The Federation Shuttle," to old Star Trek fans.

I always thought it would be great for the MacBook (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32229132)

They could replace the trackpad area with a slot for the iPhone/iPod. It could server as a dockable computer you could take around to whatever machine you need.

Re:I always thought it would be great for the MacB (1)

Redlazer (786403) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229270)

This is really cool idea, and it's a shame we may never see it.

Haptic feedback from your touchpad, plus DS-like features. Very sexy, and the only company who could get away with it would be Apple.

Re:I always thought it would be great for the MacB (2, Interesting)

a_nonamiss (743253) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231066)

I'm glad to know I'm not the only sysadmin that has trouble typing "serve" without automatically adding an 'r' at the end.

Re:I always thought it would be great for the MacB (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32231624)

It's always there, it's just sometimes silent.

Re:I always thought it would be great for the MacB (1)

bemymonkey (1244086) | more than 4 years ago | (#32233846)

So what happens when you're on the phone and need to look up something on the MacBook? :P

Re:I always thought it would be great for the MacB (1)

gig (78408) | more than 4 years ago | (#32235364)

All you have to do is either plug your iPhone into your MacBook with USB or pair them over Bluetooth and the MacBook will be using the iPhone's Internet connection and both devices remain fully functional.

I can't see how your idea or the Acer solution is better.

Bluetooth (2, Interesting)

timeOday (582209) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229164)

Surely tethering is the better solution, since you could use any laptop with any phone.

Re:Bluetooth (1)

no-body (127863) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229272)

You can use any PC/Laptop with Blackberry over Bluetooth to get on the Internet with BB's SIM/Account.

Re:Bluetooth (3, Interesting)

Redlazer (786403) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229292)

Bluetooth tethering is expensive energy wise, and slow. It's not a great protocol for that.

My N1 can use wifi, which gives me excellent speeds, but really hurts the battery.

There is also USB tether, but I can appreciate something like this. Very clean and modern.

Re:Bluetooth (1)

capo_dei_capi (1794030) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229308)

There is also USB tether, but I can appreciate something like this. Very clean and modern.

Have you seen the phones? They look like feature phones circa 1999.

Re:Bluetooth (1)

Redlazer (786403) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229344)

Ah, no. I was expecting what it may become, I suppose, if it was to be useful.

I was definitely invisioning slotting my Nexus One into the side of my laptop, on the palmrest.

RTFA Fail : (

Re:Bluetooth (2, Interesting)

jonbryce (703250) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229526)

Or even just a separate HSDPA modem. In the UK anyway, a teathering plan for your cell phone generally costs the same per month as a separate modem plan - about £15 per month

Re:Bluetooth (1)

bhtooefr (649901) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231542)

In the US, it depends on the carrier, but some let you tether for as little as $30. (And on many phones, you can hack them on cheaper data plans to allow tethering.)

On the flip side, for "unlimited" data on an aircard, it's usually $60.

Re:Bluetooth (2, Interesting)

rtb61 (674572) | more than 4 years ago | (#32234312)

Think about more from the sellers point of view. All new singing and dancing smartbook with dockable smartphone, for one low initial payment together with a whole lot of expensive and highly profitable phone contract payments (I wasn't about to lie about that part). From the typical users perspective, they know it will work, no weird compatibility problems and it really is logically useful. The smartbook as a charging, long term data storage, easy data input and upload, large screen expansion device, all working pretty much 'automagically' from the typical user perspective.

Similar lifespan, similar price, similar durability, basically all aligning with the 18/24 month phone contract. Of course you can readily imagine the typical 'ugh' fashion statement commercials, the smartpurse, the trend setter, the matching look and upping the intellectual factor of a gossip device, the phone. Plus it avoids the whole keyboard problem associated with smartphones.

How is this better than tethering? (3, Interesting)

mdwh2 (535323) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229176)

Wow, if only we had some standard universal serial bus that might allow us to connect a phone to a netbook, without relying on a custom "slot" and buying both products from one company. Maybe we could use some wireless short range networking method too. And then if only there was a way for the netbook to make use of the phone's Internet connection, so you can use the same SIM and data account for both.

The modular approach addresses one of the great problems of mobile devices for both buyers and designers: you cannot, with current technology, have a device that is both large enough for comfortable extended use and small enough to carry around all the time.

The issue is exemplified by Apple's Iphone and the larger Ipad. The only way to have the advantages of both Apple devices is to buy both and synchronise data between them.

But how is this netbook and phone bundle any different to buying a phone and netbook? Is the price much better, for example?

And how does this device solve the synchronisation problem - do I magically have access to the same data on both, without synchronisation?

Re:How is this better than tethering? (3, Insightful)

davester666 (731373) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229226)

> But how is this netbook and phone bundle any different to buying a phone and netbook? Is the price much better, for example?

It makes it more difficult to use the phone while surfing the net...

Re:How is this better than tethering? (4, Funny)

wiredlogic (135348) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229230)

If only we had some sort of subscriber identity module that could be easily transferred between telecommunications devices.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

Hognoxious (631665) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230264)

The operative word is "easily".

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

leenks (906881) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230646)

Bluetooth? Surely something could be done to share the SIM data over bluetooth in a way that the two devices could use it?

Re:How is this better than tethering? (2)

Patch86 (1465427) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230998)

You can tether over bluetooth. That is essentially the thing you just said, except with the slight bandwidth-over-wireless thing.

Worked well enough for me and my Motorola V3i anyhow.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

leenks (906881) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231044)

No, I meant just share the sim rather than tethering. Ie the other device would have a 3G transceiver in it too, but use the sim remotely in some way. Ie low power.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

Patch86 (1465427) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231274)

Ah, I getcha now. Yes, that'd be very handy.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

IrquiM (471313) | more than 4 years ago | (#32235144)

Why not just get an extra SIM for the same plan? Dual, and even triple SIMs are available from operators that care about their customers.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (2, Informative)

fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231034)

No problem [] .

(Unless your phone declines to support it, or your carrier somehow locks it, or your device doesn't understand it. In any case, though, it exists.)

Even if it didn't exist, SIM cards aren't exactly expensive devices. Wholesale price lists aren't just leaping to the top of my google searches at present; but, based on the prices quoted for new prepaid SIMs, any carrier could easily afford to provide extra SIMs for $5-$10 a pop, tying them to an existing account.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

0100010001010011 (652467) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229378)

PCMCIA? Modern phones are small enough you could easily fit one into a dual PCMCIA slot.

Re:How is this better than tethering? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32230704)

Who the hell even has PCMCIA slots anymore?

Re:How is this better than tethering? (1)

fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231062)

Almost nobody(given that "PCMCIA" officially became "Cardbus" somewhere in the 1995-97 region, depending on whether you want to count from the release of the spec or the broad adoption, and that both are now pretty well superceded by Expresscard); but ExpressCard/54 is virtually the same size, so the point stands. For that matter, it would probably be even easier with ExpressCard, since those slots natively provide a USB2 connection, which virtually all modern phones use as their data/charge interface anyway, possibly behind a funny non-standard connector.

Carrier Issues? (0)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229184)

Which carriers will sell the Modu? Will the Modu phones be sold/subsidized by the carrier? Who will be willing to sacrifice their phone preference for this netbook feature?

BTW, the Modu website [] catalog is annoying as hell.

Re:Carrier Issues? (3, Informative)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229196)

F@ck! Here's the correct link: Modu website [] .

Re:Carrier Issues? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32229816)

F@ck! Here's the correct link: Modu website [] .

Nice to see they haven't updated the copyright notice on their website since 2008(!)

Re:Carrier Issues? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32230244)

JFW! That is one helluva collection of ugly stuff. I guess the iPad repulsion zone must be at least 20 metres. Hmmm, maybe they are on to something after all.

Re:Carrier Issues? (1)

L4t3r4lu5 (1216702) | more than 4 years ago | (#32234848)

Holy crap that website is appalling! It reminds me of Gorilla Mask... SO MUCH FLASH!

and this is better than (1)

SuperBanana (662181) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229198)

How is this an improvement over tethering? Seems like a waste of valuable real estate in the netbook.

Re:and this is better than (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32229324)

Tethering really drains your phone's battery.

Re:and this is better than (1)

dattaway (3088) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230694)

True, tethering sucks batteries quickly, but USB charging is right there from the laptop.

Re:and this is better than (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32231330)

Possibly to get a faster interface between the netbook and the harddrive in the phone?

I see the phone becoming more and more a portable CPU/RAM/SSD combo that can dock - like the Modu into a variety of form factors so that you are aren't syncing data between multiple devices - you dock it.

With some netbooks already looking to Atom + ARM designs for ultra long run times with the ability to switch for more processing power, it then becomes a smaller jump to make the ARM CPU dockable. Small, that is, in concept, I'm sure it would be a design nightmare.

The netbook shell then brings additional battery, larger screen and more powerful GPU, keyboard, extra HDD space, maybe a DVD drive.

Why stop at netbooks though? Go to work, dock your phone into your workstation, work off it's SSD. Undock, go home, dock in your home PC - work apps (email etc) all available again. No duplication of licenses, problems with different configs, syncing of data.

Pointless gimmick (2, Insightful)

mikael_j (106439) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229204)

This is yet another proprietary pointless gimmick that won't take off unless it is really really really well designed and constructed, and these things rarely are...

Re:Pointless gimmick (1)

Nerdfest (867930) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229354)

So basically, as someone above mentioned, Apple might be able to pull this off using the iPhone as a trackpad. The users are used to a limited number of devices and vendor lock-in, so it really wouldn't change much for them. Done well, it might be pretty interesting if you're already an Apple laptop and phone user.

Prediction (1)

malkir (1031750) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229300)

User: Oh hey, I'm going to cruise to Starbucks and get some work done. *meanders on to Starbucks with netbook/phone bundle, sits down, opens SSH connection* *receives phone call* User: Oh fuck... Sure hope you nohup'd that last command before you pull out your internet connection to take a call, buddy.

Re:Prediction (1)

Isaac-Lew (623) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231918)

You could forward your phone calls through a VoIP application, or use the wifi at Starbucks & leave your phone line open. As for the SSH connection - there's GNU screen [] .

Re:Prediction (1)

mjwx (966435) | more than 4 years ago | (#32234102)

User: Oh hey, I'm going to cruise to Starbucks and get some work done. *meanders on to Starbucks with netbook/phone bundle, sits down, opens SSH connection* *receives phone call* User: Oh fuck... Sure hope you nohup'd that last command before you pull out your internet connection to take a call, buddy.

Reaches over and presses the "accept call" button on the desktop only to hear your wife start to complain at you through the laptop speakers and wonders what the hell am I doing in a starbucks, I like real coffee.

Complete article: (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32229304)

With the summary plus the following two paragraphs, you get all info in the full article. No need to rtfa.

Andrew Tse, head of UK distributor Purely Gadgets, said the idea is that you can change the phone shell to match your clothes or to get new features such as a camera. One shell takes the form of a photoframe that screens pictures held in the phone.

Tse, who describes himself as 'chief inspector' of Purely Gadgets - a reference to the Inspector Gadget cartoon series - said the Modu-equipped netbook is an extension of the same idea. "If you don't want to take the netbook out for the evening you just pull out the phone and take that."

Don't see this being useful (1)

Kitkoan (1719118) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229316)

As others have mentioned, why not just tether your phone so it's not vendor locked (not to mention smartphone upgrade friendly) or maybe just buy a smartbook [] and just use something like Skype for phone calls?

Re:Don't see this being useful (1)

fikx (704101) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229616)

The concept or driver behind something like Modu is that the basic parts of the phone have become ubiquitous and a standard dock for something like this allows anything to get the common parts of a cell phone added to them: cars can have a standard slot to make then car phones and allow data services (like map downloads for GPS for example), laptops (like the the one here) can get a data cell connection, TV's can work anywhere , etc. This is basically an oversize SIM since you still need an account hardware token to use cell networks. The difference from a SIM is it also takes some of your data with it and can function outside the dock if need be. I'd like them to add PDA functions to it myself since there's a small set of data I'd like to have with me at all times like calendar and notes and such that is useful in conjunction with other devices.

Waste of time (5, Informative)

neokushan (932374) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229346)

I don't see why they're bothering at all, especially when Android 2.2 is going to have Wireless tethering as standard. Essentially all they've done is opt for a proprietary, limited connection interface when there's at least 3 universal ones out there that could be used (USB, Wifi and Bluetoth).

Re:Waste of time (1)

Luckyo (1726890) | more than 4 years ago | (#32235358)

And nokia s60 phones already had this for over a year. Pretty much any Nokia S60 smartphone + SIM card with 3G internet contract + nokia PC software = free tethering to any USB equipped laptop.

Or, if you want to be truly innovative, get application called joikuspot and have your phone act as a Wi-Fi 3G modem.

Modu back in the news (1)

fikx (704101) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229420)

for those that don't remember, Slashdot saw the Modu phone a while back here [] back in 2008. I thought the idea was intersting then, good to see it in the news again with new ideas. If I remember right, the Modu concept was thought by the same person who thought up USB thumb drives...

Replace "netbook" with "docking station" (2, Insightful)

crow (16139) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229472)

Cell phones are nearing the point where they are powerful enough to be a primary computer. All they need is a better display and keyboard, so why not put everything into the cell phone, and then sell docking stations in laptop and desktop form factors?

The connector would need a few more pins than just USB to support video (perhaps a few lanes of PCI Express), but really, we have the technology now.

Everything can live in your phone.

Modular computer (not just phone) (1)

Troll-Under-D'Bridge (1782952) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231068)

Agreed. I think Modu should have taken the next leap and designed modular computers. Imagine a computer smaller than half the size of a cellphone or a handheld PC of the late nineties (Psion, anyone?). You can then create "jackets" that will turn the module into the core of a variety of gadgets such as:

(a) a cellphone
(b) a tablet
(c) a netbook
(d) a PDA (do they still make these?)
(e) the onboard computer of a car (doubling as the ignition key)
(f) a toaster
(g) a Chumby

I can even imagine Intel or AMD selling not bare-bones processors but computing cores for entry-level desktop systems. Instead of slotting it into a motherboard (a beastly operation for any non-geek), just slot it into the docking station so you can use a full-size keyboard, monitor, etc.

Docking stations for cars, too! (1)

swb (14022) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231608)

Many cars now come with touchscreens for navigation and other system control.

How about a docking station for your iPhone in your car? A bigger screen, better oriented for driving, access to music, apps..

Re:Replace "netbook" with "docking station" (1)

vlad30 (44644) | more than 4 years ago | (#32233530)

Like This []

Re:Replace "netbook" with "docking station" (1)

crow (16139) | more than 4 years ago | (#32238514)

No, that's just a stand to use an iPad as a picture frame. It doesn't provide a larger display, or in any way let you use your iPad as a laptop or desktop computer.

Great idea; forget it (5, Insightful)

Bearhouse (1034238) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229480)

There's a number of issues here:

1. Tethering your 'phone, via USB or bluetooth, is a lot easier these days. Easily within the reach of those technically sophisticated enough to use/need it.
(Plus it's nice to be able to charge your phone via USB - saves a wall-wart when travelling)
2. What happens when your 'phone rings but it's plugged into your 'puter? So now you need to keep your bluetooth earpiece in?
3. Linked to the above point, can foresee some funky situations if you're using bluetooth audio...I use my PC as a handsfree / music player for my phone sometimes
4. Looks like a great way to lose/get stolen your phone along with your laptop.

I went through this whole 'integration' thing with in-car PCs;
A PC which does bluetooth phone, mp3, DVD and also sat-nav? Too complex
Tomtom that does bluetooth handsfree? Have to cut the radio when it 'rings'; crappy sound.
In the end me and my wife found the best compromise to be a car audio set that does bluetooth handfree, (cuts the music automatically when you answer a call; great sound over the car stereo speakers), but a stand-alone sat-nat device.

Sometimes too much integration is a bad thing...

Re:Great idea; forget it (1)

mrmeval (662166) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230672)

Well modu's website shows they have no grasp of internet technology. It's flash laden crap.

Re:Great idea; forget it (1)

PitaBred (632671) | more than 4 years ago | (#32232570)

I've got a Nexus One with my bluetooth car stereo... it does navigation, bluetooth music to the car stereo, calls and everything all together, interruption of the music to speak navigation directions or to take a call. Integration is a good thing, if it's done intelligently.

USB "slot" (1)

lazyBob (324923) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229500)

My notebook has USB "slot" which can plug in my iphone 3G communications module..

Re:USB "slot" (1)

Patch86 (1465427) | more than 4 years ago | (#32231038)

Indeed, if all this is is a standard USB port but built into a special phone-shaped clip so you don't have to have the trailing USB cables, I can sort of see how it was a good idea- although I can't say I'd go for it myself.

If it's proprietary connection crap then it is just plain stupid, and I can't really see what they hope to achieve.

The real problem... (5, Insightful)

fuzzyfuzzyfungus (1223518) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229524)

Is that integration between phones, smart or otherwise, and computers is not really a technical problem at all; but a business one. Yes, there are some technical details(fiddly bluetooth profile stuff, details of USB networking, etc.); but nothing that competent engineers can't work through, and largely have.

The big issue is that carriers, for the most part, absolutely don't want phone/computer local connections to be useful. And, to the degree that they are willing to let them be, they still want to be paid for it. The real control freaks don't even want stuff like bluetooth OBEX to work, so that you have to get pictures off the phone by MMS ($.50 a pop, ka-ching!) and ringtones and things on to the phone from some walled garden store($2.99/ea, ka-ching!). Even among the more moderate, most of them want you to pay more if you are using the phone as an internet connection for a full PC, even if the phone is a smartphone with an existing data plan.

You can, already, get all kinds of useful integration between PCs and phones, with no stupid proprietary hardware bundling nonsense; but you often have to buy unsubsidized handsets(and then pair them with voice/data plans that are priced to include paying off a handset subsidy) and either pay extra or risk TOS disconnection if you do any serious data tethering.

This is reminds me of seeing stories about this device [] a while back. A "portable DVR" that would dock to record shows, and then be removable to watch them out and about. Incredibly stupid idea(Why would you want your DVR's capacity to be constrained by a portable form factor, when gigantic 3.5 inch drives cost nearly nothing? Why would you want a DVR that can't record shows when you are out of the house? Why tie the lifetime of a DVR, that should be able to pretty much sit there and Just Work for years, possibly with the occasional HDD upgrade/replacement to the lifespan of a delicate mobile device?). However, the simple, obvious technical solution(make the DVR networked, transfer recordings to whatever mobile device you want) is largely deemed unacceptable by DRM and control-hungry cable companies, so you get this really ugly hack. Similarly, connecting a phone to a computer using existing ubiquitous technologies should be fucking child's play. There is absolutely no need for any proprietary bundle solution, except because of carrier control freakery.

This is a hardware solution to a paper problem. (1)

fredmosby (545378) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229542)

The only reason people want this is so they can use two devices on the same 3G connection. It's not as convenient as having a 3G card in each device. I would rather have a reasonably priced 'pay as you go' plan that allows me to connect as many devices as I want. Or at least a special 'unlimited' plan that allows me to connect two devices.

Strangely complicated solution (1)

dave420 (699308) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229856)

Why not just get a second SIM from your mobile phone provider, then put that in your notebook/netbook/whatever. The only difference is you don't get instant access to the data on your phone from your computer, but then you can still copy it across using USB, Bluetooth, or WiFi, and take calls while using your data connection.

Re:Strangely complicated solution (1)

farble1670 (803356) | more than 4 years ago | (#32238222)

in the US, two of the 4 major carriers don't use SIM. the other two that do use SIM have incompatible 3G networks. if you built the modem hardware into the computer, it'd be for one carrier (or lots of $$$ to and space to support the networks of all the carriers).

Already patented (1)

RichiH (749257) | more than 4 years ago | (#32229874)

Palm^WHP has a patent on it which is about 10-15 years old.

Re:Already patented (1)

Hamsterdan (815291) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230542)

There were some thinkpads that came with a built-in bay for a Workpad (IBM branded Palm Pilot).

Two SIM cards (1)

freedumb2000 (966222) | more than 4 years ago | (#32230332)

Is there really a market for this? This seems like overengineering. I like to still be able to use the phone when I surf the web. In fact I can do so right now. The solution? Two SIM cards tied to the same account. As an added bonus I get to surf with my phone as well. This is a much cheaper and flexible solution, not even tethering is needed. Is this not commonly possible with other carriers?

Re:Two SIM cards (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32233886)

Sure, any carrier will do this. They'll also make sure to charge you twice as much.

Re:Two SIM cards (1)

freedumb2000 (966222) | more than 4 years ago | (#32234522)

That is unfortunate. My carrier charges me an activation fee for the second card and nothing beyond that.

Touchpad (1)

BodeNGE (1664379) | more than 4 years ago | (#32232272)

I could see how this would work if the PDA's screen was used as a touchpad when docked to the laptop (although the laptop would be a bit useless on its own without the phone. Perhaps as a secondary display it would be OK?

Déjà vu (1)

nelvinboy (956457) | more than 4 years ago | (#32233418)

And they're traveling back in time to 2007 to announce it. They'll call it .... Foleo.

jodiefoster39 (1)

jodiefoster39 (1813238) | more than 4 years ago | (#32234846)

You can tether over bluetooth. That is essentially the thing you just said, except with the slight bandwidth-over-wireless thing. Cheap Auto Parts []

cvbcvb (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32235098)

Hi,here is the best shop on line,and you must fall in love with the punk feeling like the style unique [url=]ED Hardy[/url] and novel [url=]Abercrombie Fitch[/url],and also the cute [url=]replica watches[/url] and cool [url=]Designer Sunglasses[/url] which are so necessary and worth to be owned,besides,you may have the friends who infatuated at sports,and he or she must be fond of the comfy [url=]nike shoes[/url],just also classic [url=]MBT shoes[/url],and the coats just should be the [url=]NFL Jerseys[/url],and you may also have the lady friends just like the girls in theGossip Girlwho own all kinds of [url=]louis vuitton handbags[/url] and elegant [url=]christian louboutin[/url] which are with signature red leather sole,and the fashion [url=]Christian Louboutin Discount[/url] with every years fashion elemants,you may not help to be strucked,and now you should match the charming [url=]christian louboutin shoes[/url] with the [url=]designer handbags[/url],and all the famous brands with you make you so charmfuo and nobleness,you can not forget the exquisite [url=]Tiffany Jewelry[/url],ok,now you can show yourself with all your fashion items.
[url=]Nike SB[/url]Nike SB [url=]Nike Dunks[/url]Nike Dunks [url=]Nike Jordan[/url]Nike Jordan [url=]Nike Air Max[/url]Nike Air Max [url=]Nike Woven[/url]Nike Woven [url=]Nike Zoom[/url]Nike Zoom [url=]Nikes Edge[/url]Nikes Edge [url=]Nike Apple[/url]Nike Apple [url=]Nike Blazer[/url]Nike Blazer [url=]Nike Dunk SB[/url]Nike Dunk SB [url=]Nike SB Dunk[/url]Nike SB Dunk [url=]Nike Free[/url]Nike Free [url=]Nike James[/url]Nike James [url=]Nike Cortez[/url]Nike Cortez [url=]Nike Air Force One[/url]Nike Air Force One [url=]Nike New Balance[/url]Nike New Balance [url=]Nike Air Royal[/url]Nike Air Royal [url=]Nike Waffle[/url]Nike Waffle [url=]Nike Air Jordan 1 Phat Low[/url]Nike Air Jordan 1 Phat Low [url=]Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro Hi Premier[/url]Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro Hi Premier [url=]Nike Air Jordan 1 High Strap in Black and Red[/url]Nike Air Jordan 1 High Strap in Black and Red [url=]Nike Air Max 90 Black[/url]Nike Air Max 90 Black [url=]NIKE ACG[/url]NIKE ACG [url=]nike air max 1[/url]nike air max 1 [url=]Nike Air Max 360[/url]Nike Air Max 360 [url=]Nike Air Max 2003[/url]Nike Air Max 2003 [url=]Nike Air Max 2009[/url]Nike Air Max 2009 [url=]nike air max 2010[/url]nike air max 2010 [url=]nike Air max Tailwind[/url]nike Air max Tailwind [url=]nike air max 90[/url]nike air max 90 [url=]Nike Air Max 87 black/white/peach[/url]Nike Air Max 87 black/white/peach [url=]Nike Magma[/url]Nike Magma [url=]Nike Lunar Elite[/url]Nike Lunar Elite [url=]Nike ACE 83[/url]Nike ACE 83 [url=]Nike Air Max Turbulence[/url]Nike Air Max Turbulence [url=]Nike Daybreak[/url]Nike Daybreak [url=]Nike Air Zoom[/url]Nike Air Zoom [url=]Nike Men's Zoom[/url]Nike Men's Zoom [url=]Air Edge[/url]Air Edge [url=]Nike Series[/url]Nike Series [url=]Nike Nlazer SB[/url]Nike Nlazer SB [url=]Nike SB Dunks Low[/url]Nike SB Dunks Low [url=]Nike Free 5.0[/url]Nike Free 5.0 [url=]Nike Free Trainer[/url]Nike Free Trainer [url=]Nike Lebron James[/url]Nike Lebron James [url=]Nike Soccer Boot sneaker brown[/url]Nike Soccer Boot sneaker brown [url=]Nike Blazer Milk Men Shoes white[/url]Nike Blazer Milk Men Shoes white [url=]Nike Cortez Nylon[/url]Nike Cortez Nylon [url=]Cortez Nike[/url]Cortez Nike [url=]Nike Air Force[/url]Nike Air Force [url=]Nike Air Force 1 Low[/url]Nike Air Force 1 Low [url=]New Balance Running[/url]New Balance Running [url=]New Balance Mens[/url]New Balance Mens [url=]Royal Air Maroc[/url]Royal Air Maroc [url=]Royal Canadian Air[/url]Royal Canadian Air [url=]Christian Louboutin Pumps[/url]Christian Louboutin Pumps [url=]Christian Louboutin Sandals[/url]Christian Louboutin Sandals [url=]Christian Louboutin Boots[/url]Christian Louboutin Boots [url=]Christian Louboutin Slingbacks[/url]Christian Louboutin Slingbacks [url=]Louis Vuitton Shoes[/url]Louis Vuitton Shoes [url=]ED Hardy clothing[/url]ED Hardy clothing [url=]Jimmy Choo Shoes[/url]Jimmy Choo Shoes [url=]Jimmy Choo[/url]Jimmy Choo [url=]Marc Jacobs Shoes[/url]Marc Jacobs Shoes [url=]Salvatore Ferragamo Shoes[/url]Salvatore Ferragamo Shoes [url=]Salvatore Ferragamo[/url]Salvatore Ferragamo [url=]Miu Miu Shoes[/url]Miu Miu Shoes [url=]YSL Shoes[/url]YSL Shoes [url=]Manolo Blahnik[/url]Manolo Blahnik [url=]Manolo Blahnik Sale[/url]Manolo Blahnik sale [url=]Tory Burch Shoes[/url]Tory Burch Shoes [url=]Tory Burch Sale[/url]Tory Burch sale [url=]Tory Burch Discount[/url]Tory Burch discount [url=]Vivienne Westwood Shoes[/url]Vivienne Westwood Shoes [url=]Abercrombie Fitch Mens[/url]Abercrombie Fitch Mens [url=]Abercrombie Fitch Womens[/url]Abercrombie Fitch Womens [url=]Abercrombie Fitch Couples[/url]Abercrombie Fitch Couples [url=]Abercrombie Bags[/url]Abercrombie Bags [url=]Abercrombie Fitch Classic Scarves[/url]Abercrombie Fitch Classic Scarves [url=]Abercrombie Fitch Classic Caps[/url]Abercrombie Fitch Classic Caps [url=]Ruehl No.925[/url]Ruehl No.925 [url=]Abercrombie Clothing[/url]

I own a modu phone and a netbook, and I love them. (1)

ggruschow (78300) | more than 4 years ago | (#32235830)

The modu is especially nifty. It's roughly the size of an iPod nano (and it has 2gb for music). That said, I can't recommend them except as easy things to carry in case you get into a pinch. I only carry them when I don't intend to need them. Asus is right, there's lots of room for improvement. Shoving the modu into the netbook shouldn't be the priority though. The current modu doesn't even do 3G. The top 3 priorities should be:

  • Controls - the base modu phone has 7 keys vs the 12 on a basic push button phone. They didn't even do a good job with the 7. They should've compromised their design a bit and at least put 12 on or switched to something like a trackball or touchscreen/strip/pad.
  • Consistency - Unify their interfaces, and provide consistent metaphors and controls
  • Convenience - Most of the people I can think of that would buy this combo just expect basic features. It should be easier to make a call or read a web page with this system than others. People get *small and simple.*

The 7 keys suck even worse than I'd thought because I hadn't considered all the touch-tone menu systems. Their response is surely that I should put a jacket on it that has more buttons, but that's stupid because:

  • Even though its transformable, everything it transforms into sucks more than a basic Nokia candybar.
  • They have a real feature that people want: it's small and light. Adding jackets breaks that.
  • Putting the 7 buttons there tells me you wanted it to be usable on its own. The device is technically usable, but practically almost unusable.

The netbook's controls are busted too, but not as bad.. and I don't need a manufacturers help to fix that.

Modu: I'd happily volunteer my time, coding skills, and even rudimentary amateur electronics to help. I want less phone. You can't compete with the big boys on the low-end, so fill a niche they miss: small, light, simple. Think of a woman with a tiny little clutch. Make the phone work for her, and you'll discover the other thing in that clutch: an inordinate amount of disposable money.

P.S. Make the headset jack match the standard: 3.5mm & compatible with ones with mics and controls for an iphone. Micro-usb headsets will only cost you sales.

Other way around! (1)

GameboyRMH (1153867) | more than 4 years ago | (#32237116)

What might be useful to me is a netbook body to plug my N900 into, to get a bigger screen, full-size keyboard, more battery power, etc. It only has a 600Mhz CPU but it does everything except playing some higher-res videos.

Actually this is something that could probably be hacked together from off-the-shelf parts. Get a small BT keyboard, an LCD and speakers with RCA inputs, a battery pack for it all that also provides power to the PDA, and have the N900 plug in so that the screen acts as a touchpad when docked, and that's all there is to it. There would probably be enough space left over for maybe an extra-large battery pack, cooling system (yeah it can get hot) or a dock for a WiFi-to-WiMAX router.

In the future I'd expect most computers to be like this - a person's computer is their PDA, and when they get home they plug it into a docking station of some sort and it becomes a laptop or desktop. Since PDAs are hard to repair and easy to lose, making backups would be essential, but it isn't rocket science for docking stations to have some storage for encrypted backups, or maybe use online encrypted backups.

Problem not with technology. (1)

smart_ass (322852) | more than 4 years ago | (#32249714)

All seems MOOT if our damn providers would allow us to have more than one SIM with the same essential ID.
When my home phone rings, several phones ring, but I only answer one.
When I need to make a call, I pick up one phone and make a call ...

Why not the same with mobile phones?
Why can't my laptop have a SIM and my phone use one with the same identity and on the same plan?

The problem is not with the technology, but as usual with companies that have outdated views of how SH*T should work.

Whats wrong with bluetooth (1)

sahmed (254826) | more than 4 years ago | (#32269738)

This is rather silly. You can tether your cell phone with bluetooth anyway. i.e. if you have an unlocked phone.

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?