Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Solar-Powered Flight Grounded By Equipment Bug

timothy posted more than 4 years ago | from the for-want-of-a-nail dept.

Communications 28

crimeandpunishment writes "If your plane is powered by the sun, it's tough to fly if your crew is in the dark. A 24-hour test flight for the world's first solar-powered round-the-world flight had to be postponed Thursday due to an equipment problem that would have left mission control out of touch with the technology on the experimental aircraft. When they're able to make this test flight, they hope by flying all day they'll be able to fully charge the batteries, then use the stored energy to power the plane all night."

cancel ×

28 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Solar plane... (2, Funny)

girlintraining (1395911) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764476)

People think solar power is renewable. What are they going to do when the Sun burns out, huh? HUH?

Re:Solar plane... (3, Funny)

polar red (215081) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764506)

that depends on whether fusion power is still 50 years away by then.

Re:Solar plane... (1)

PatPending (953482) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764806)

I'm not worried; I've already got a Mr. Fusion (TM) Home Energy Reactor (TM)

Re:Solar plane... (3, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32764550)

There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer.

Re:Solar plane... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32764588)

Spin in their graves. If you think humanity will make it that long, you're delusional.

Re:Solar plane... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32764622)

Die.

Re:Solar plane... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32765014)

Become vampires and thrive on the Twili..... AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Re:Solar plane... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32766416)

I don't know about you but I will cease to need to have an AC anymore instead I will invest on a heater.

Re:Solar plane... (1)

ender06 (913978) | more than 4 years ago | (#32768560)

What do you think we're stockpiling all our nuclear waste for? Refueling the Sun, of course!

Re:Solar plane... (1)

mldi (1598123) | more than 4 years ago | (#32774482)

What do you think we're stockpiling all our nuclear waste for? Refueling the Sun, of course!

"The Core 2: Solar Jumpstart"

Bunch of wimps (1)

WarJolt (990309) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764544)

As long as their transponder is working ATC should be able to steer aircrafts away from them. As long as the weather is clear it shouldn't be a problem to fly around in giant circles.

Re:Bunch of wimps (1, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32766064)

<sigh />
It's telemetry gear that's at issue. The problem is less telling the pilot not to run into the path of that jet (this still works, since their radio is fine), and more telling him that the lithium-ion battery in the left wing is now shorted and about to ignite (which they won't know until it ignites). Not that it matters much, but I guess he'd rather know how he's about to die than not....

Note to self (2, Funny)

SnarfQuest (469614) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764566)

Developers logbook...

Note: Solar cells do not work at night. Maybe add lunar cells?

Re:Note to self (1)

Cwix (1671282) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764742)

they hope by flying all day they'll be able to fully charge the batteries, then use the stored energy to power the plane all night.

From the summary of all places.

Re:Note to self (1)

PatPending (953482) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764900)

Star Light Star bright,

The first star I see tonight,

I wish I may, I wish I might,

Oh, shit, no flight at night!

Re:Note to self (1)

fred fleenblat (463628) | more than 4 years ago | (#32775840)

it wasn't in the linked article, but in addition to the batteries storing energy for night flight, the craft will use elevation to store energy. it will operate partially as a glider at night and climb back up during the day. the reduces the number and/or size of batteries that would be required relative to what would be required to maintain level flight at night.

Critical piece? Think about redundancy (1)

gsgriffin (1195771) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764786)

It would make sense for something as small as a cell phone but as critical to the mission as this is to have it be redundant in the plane or a spare in the hanger. Come on guys! You've obviously spent enough money on this to know what steps to take to mitigate this.

Why charge? (1)

LBArrettAnderson (655246) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764936)

"they hope by flying all day they'll be able to fully charge the batteries, then use the stored energy to power the plane all night."
 
I must be misunderstanding something... it says it's an around-the-world flight that would last 24 hours... if that's the case, why couldn't they follow the daylight? (of course I highly doubt this plane actually goes fast enough to do what I'm understanding from the article, but they do in fact say it... are they flying around the world closer to one of the poles?)

Re:Why charge? (1)

LBArrettAnderson (655246) | more than 4 years ago | (#32764966)

Ok, nevermind me... this was a test/preparation flight before the actual around the world flight, which would certainly take much longer than 24 hours.

Re:Why charge? (2, Funny)

demonbug (309515) | more than 4 years ago | (#32765078)

Ok, nevermind me... this was a test/preparation flight before the actual around the world flight, which would certainly take much longer than 24 hours.

Yeah, I'm guessing there aren't too many solar-powered aircraft around that can manage 1,000 miles per hour (well, maybe in a vacuum... straight down).

Re:Why charge? (1)

PatPending (953482) | more than 4 years ago | (#32765040)

I must be misunderstanding something... it says it's an around-the-world flight that would last 24 hours...

You are misunderstanding something--big time.

Consider: the circumference of the earth at the equator is about 24,900 miles; divide that by 24 hours and you get about 1,037 MPH. Not bad for a solar powered plane, eh?

Re:Why charge? (1)

Threni (635302) | more than 4 years ago | (#32765452)

But they're using perpetual motion, minus the water. They'll be there on time to collect their nobel prize, and they'll get there before they left. Or something.

Re:Why charge? (1)

LBArrettAnderson (655246) | more than 4 years ago | (#32769054)

If you look more carefully, I did in fact mention how outrageous it sounded. I also mentioned a possible scenario where it would be possible. But you're right about me misunderstanding *something*, I didn't initially see that this was just a test flight.

Re:Why charge? (1)

SleazyRidr (1563649) | more than 4 years ago | (#32773588)

Careful analysis seems to indicate that they are in fact, in Switzerland, which is somewhat closer to the north pole, than the equator.

Re:Why charge? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32769432)

Why not just fly around the arctic circle? It's shorter (16000Km instead of 40000Km) and this time of year you have midnight sun.

WTF? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32765694)

The internet must be down. First time I ever saw a story on ./ with only 17 comments. Usually there's hundreds of drivel postings...

USS Enterprise (2, Funny)

by (1706743) (1706744) | more than 4 years ago | (#32766246)

From TFA:

"If it doesn't work, the mission control is blind," said Piccard.

If captain of the Enterprise advises against it, it's a good call to postpone the flight. (Also, people, learn to spell "Picard.")

Re:USS Enterprise (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#32769490)

Who is this Pi-card you are speaking of?

Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?