Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Sex Boosts Brain Growth

CmdrTaco posted more than 4 years ago | from the do-it-for-my-brain-baby dept.

Science 251

climenole writes "Sex apparently can help the brain grow, according to new findings in rats. Sexually active rodents also seemed less anxious than virgins, Princeton scientists discovered. Past findings had shown that stressful, unpleasant events could stifle brain cell growth in adults. To see if pleasant albeit stressful experiences could have the opposite effect, researchers studied the effects of sex in rats."

cancel ×

251 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Bullshit (5, Funny)

elrous0 (869638) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111626)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards and the NBA would be full of geniuses.

I'll believe it when Jon Bon Jovi announces that he's found the Higgs Boson.

Re:Bullshit (1)

i_ate_god (899684) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111660)

it's not bullshit.

Look at how much arguing there is on slashdot, we are all quite stressed...

Re:Bullshit (3, Funny)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111694)

it's not bullshit.

Look at how much arguing there is on slashdot, we are all quite stressed...

Says you !

Re:Bullshit (1)

jd (1658) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112562)

Says you !

*hits WrongSizeGlass over the head with a virtual beer bottle*

Re:Bullshit (1)

WrongSizeGlass (838941) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112778)

Mmmm, beer.

Re:Bullshit (2, Insightful)

V!NCENT (1105021) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111864)

Stressed and axious people are not the typical types that lead. Leaders are more atractive because they are garanteed to protect others from dying in certain dangerous situations.

Evolution theory, bitches.

That doesn't mean that your typical athlete would ever outgrow the brains of who is too stressed to let his/her brain grow that fast.

BTW orgasms where good for about ten thousand brain cells, right? How much brain cells do you think you loose when you bang a soccerball with your head? About the same.

It all means nothing, but it is somewhat a little interesting I guess...

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112660)

you said a whole lot of nothing, and everything.

Re:Bullshit (4, Funny)

tverbeek (457094) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112002)

"If that were the case /. would be full of retards...."

Have you been reading the comments here?

Re:Bullshit (1)

thetoadwarrior (1268702) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112318)

Look at a English council estate, they're chock full of stupid people with tons of kids and people sleeping around with each other's partner. There is just too much proof it's not true at least in humans.

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112376)

It says size and not really much if anything about useful performance.

Re:Bullshit (1)

gstoddart (321705) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111670)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards

Umm, have you been reading it lately? ;-P

Re:Bullshit (5, Insightful)

cayenne8 (626475) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111840)

Hmm...does the sex have to be with someone else in order to be effective?

If not, that might explain the /. crowd....

Re:Bullshit (1)

winkydink (650484) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112010)

So having sex with rats will make you smarter? After you, Mousedick.

Re:Bullshit (4, Insightful)

bsDaemon (87307) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111718)

Just because they chose to focus on physical mastery over themselves, then managed to get a sweet gig making millions of dollars doing something fun doesn't make them "morons." Hell, if I could make a mint playing games all day, why would I bother looking for the Higgs Boson?

Besides, consider the following: The major goal in any living being's life is to ensure the survival of his genes. Those who get the most action have the best chance of doing so, which means on a sub-conscious, primal level they're going to have less to worry about. That means they won't be distracted from focusing on what's important to them.

If more nerds got some, maybe we'd have the Higgs Boson on lock already.

Re:Bullshit (1)

Pharmboy (216950) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111810)

I think you have to consider the whole picture here: How many people in high school go to college vs. how many make a good living 10 years later? A pretty good percentage. Now, how many people in high school decide they want to be a basketball playing millionaire, and what percentage make it? Inversely, what percentage of each of those groups are now living below the poverty level?

I would venture a guess that there are more millionaires that went to business school than who played professional sports of any kind, so while your comparison is interesting, it isn't really a good analog.

Re:Bullshit (2, Interesting)

bsDaemon (87307) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112008)

Yes, but let's look at business school types. Your typical MBA probably at least was on a crew team in high school or college. Lacrosse is a good substitute, too. Their undergrad major was probably in a subject where there were lots of girls, so they had more opportunity to get to know women and how to interact with them, thus more chances for breeding.

They then went on to get an MBA, bought a new BMW 'cause the one their dad gave them for their 16th birthday was showing its age, and probably kept on playing squash or basketball at the Harvard Club with their alumni friends. So, now they're in shape and have shiny things to use as bait to attract a mate (the BMW).

The professional athletes skip the MBA step and go straight to the fancy cars and lots of money.

-----

But, back to the text of the article itself, it indicates:
1) that males who merely interacted with females on a more regular basis were less nervous in general than the ones who only got to see a female every 2 weeks.
2) the ones who were sexually active were less risk-adverse, such as more willing to eat food in strange places.

compare this to humans:
1) your typical nerd male who spends all his time in a lab or on a computer and doesn't get out much, doesn't really know what is and is not ok to say to girls in the rare instances where its required to interact with one outside of the context of a checkout clerk at the convenience store.
2) your typical nerd male is going to be harder to talk into doing risky behavior such as hang gliding or whatever, because he'll be too busy worrying about the elevated risk of death, subconsciously due to the fact that he more than likely hasn't reproduced yet, and therefor would lose evolution.

So, the immediate lesson from the study basically boils down to if you have more experience around the opposite sex you're not going to freak out and be awkward, and if you've already passed on your genes then it really doesn't matter what happens to you, from an evolutionary standpoint. The MBA works just as well as the pro athlete.

Besides, if I just wanted to be a dick about it, I could always just pull out Brian May, the guitarist for Queen, who recently finished a PhD in astrophysics from Imperial College in London. That's a good counter-argument to the original poster's Bon Jovi jab.

Re:Bullshit (1)

diskofish (1037768) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112494)

2) your typical nerd male is going to be harder to talk into doing risky behavior such as hang gliding or whatever, because he'll be too busy worrying about the elevated risk of death

I have to disagree with you on a couple of levels. First, I am a glider pilot (hang gliders), and a high majority of the 100+ members in my club are engineers or technologists of some sort. The skill and depth of knowledge required are very appealing to this type of person.

Having participated in team sports and more "extreme" sports myself, you run into a lot more of the nerdy/dorky type in these areas.

Re:Bullshit (1)

bsDaemon (87307) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112606)

I just picked hang gliding as an example at random. Having been a small plane pilot myself, there is definitely a draw to various forms of powered and un-powered aviation to more technically inclined people. Perhaps I should have used bungee jumping or something instead. However, I still think there is a much higher degree of risk aversion among nerds (not necessarily technical people -- after all, most of the original astronauts had engineering degrees and were military test pilots -- but, you know... the mountain dew moustache and cheetos-fingered d&d tshirt wearing nerd)

Re:Bullshit (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112538)

/me checks the 'Post anonymously' checkbox is really clicked.

"1) that males who merely interacted with females on a more regular basis were less nervous in general than the ones who only got to see a female every 2 weeks."

I have noticed that since I switched watching random TV for an hour a day, for watching certain sorts of camgirls, my anxiety has gone way down.

Namely - not solely the ones that are simply girls wiggling for tips, but ones where the atmosphere is more like a moderately active IRC channel, just with a (sometimes) naked girl as one participant, interacting with the others on a wide range of topics.

Sure - interaction in person would be better, and probably more healthy.
But for a number of reasons - disability - poor transport - ... getting out of the house is not easy for me. /me checks post anonymously is still ticked.

Re:Bullshit (0, Troll)

diskofish (1037768) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112668)

Sorry AC, but it sounds like you're just too much of a wimp to go out and actually talk to women. Anxious and afraid of being rejected. Heck, you even posted as AC.

Re:Bullshit (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111846)

The major goal in any gene's life is to ensure the survival of his genes.

FTFY

Re:Bullshit (1)

thetoadwarrior (1268702) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112366)

Having money doesn't make you smart either. You can earn a billion form playing games no one is going to consider you a genius.

Re:Bullshit (1)

bsDaemon (87307) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112652)

Would you rather be a genius with poor working conditions and little chance of reproduction for the chance to get your name somewhere in a list of "et al"s on a scientific paper, or someone of normal intelligence who made a boat load of money doing something the majority of the population thinks is cool? Man, that's a really tough one, isn't it?

Re:Bullshit (1)

tomcode (261182) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112508)

"If more nerds got some, maybe we'd have the Higgs Boson on lock already."

Hear that ladies? The future of mankind is in your hands! Please?????

Re:Bullshit (2, Insightful)

ZorinLynx (31751) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112628)

That's funny. I couldn't give a rat's ass if my genes get passed on. However, I do enjoy having a partner for the companionship and love it brings. There's more than one reason to pair up with someone you love; passing on your genes is only one of them.

I get a lot more out of a few hours snuggling in the dark talking with someone I care about than a quick session of mindless sex with someone I just met. Does this make me strange, or does it prove that "passing your genes on" isn't the only factor here? I'd say the latter.

Although I AM pretty strange sometimes. But that has less to do with sex and more to do with normal being boring. ;)

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112630)

Why don't you stop wasting your time here then ?

Re:Bullshit (1)

CrashandDie (1114135) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112638)

Besides, consider the following: The major goal in any living being's life is to ensure the survival of his genes. Those who get the most action have the best chance of doing so, which means on a sub-conscious, primal level they're going to have less to worry about. That means they won't be distracted from focusing on what's important to them.

If we want to get all pseudo-psychological (not saying you are, just disclaiming that I have no idea what I'm talking about), then I would wager that the animals who are getting tail in truckloads aren't striving for survival, they're trying to prove that their masculinity is intact and working well.

As opposed to another animal who only mates a couple of times and hits a home run ("She's pregnant! GO HOME, RUN!"), they can go to bed knowing that their lineage's survival is safe.

I'm not saying that the average /. stereotype doesn't get tail because he chooses not to; my train of thoughts goes more into a direction that as cultures get more civilised, their tendency to have 5 or more children slopes down very quickly.

So, as the GP said, a person with a decent education will have less of a need to get tail, as they will be able to focus on different things -- one might even say "more important" or "higher level" things. A monogamous relationship, almost symbiotic, making conscious decisions about when to have children, how many, and how it will fit into the household and careers of the involved parties; as opposed to the bulging sack of muscle emptying his backup singers on every cute face that opens her mouth and having sub-conscious, primal level instinct "hope" for offspring.

Re:Bullshit (5, Insightful)

MessedRocker (1273148) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111802)

Why limit sex strictly to intercourse? Surely there are Slashdotters out there who masturbate frequently.

Re:Bullshit (1)

slick7 (1703596) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111874)

Why limit sex strictly to intercourse? Surely there are Slashdotters out there who masturbate frequently.

You mean the fap factor?

Re:Bullshit (3, Funny)

couchslug (175151) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112446)

Like a spider monkey on meth, but if that works then I should have passed genius level around 1974.

Re:Bullshit (1)

CatsupBoy (825578) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111854)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards and the NBA would be full of geniuses.

I dont get what these two fictionally opposed statements have in common.

Re:Bullshit (2, Insightful)

macbeth66 (204889) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111860)

hmmm...

Make millions playing a kid's game and screw a different blonde, or redhead, every night or live in poverty while chasing the Higgs Boson.

oh, which to choose? Which to choose?

So, who is really smarter? The guy that lived with a basketball growing up, or the guy who lived with that physics text book?

Re:Bullshit (1)

Belial6 (794905) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112512)

That kind of logic leads to spending 100% of your paycheck on lottery tickets every week.

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111880)

Jon Bon Jovi is known for marrying his high school sweetheart and having a stable family. Pick a different rock star.

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112510)

Jon Bon Jovi is known for marrying his high school sweetheart and having a stable family.

Therefore he doesn't get much sex?

Sex... or orgasms? (1)

mrflash818 (226638) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111908)

If geeks are doing a lot of one-handed-typing and the study is really proving high orgasm frequency, then _that_ would prove why /. has such an intellectual discussion range.

P0RN site ==> /. ==> /. posts ;)

Re:Sex... or orgasms? (1)

betterunixthanunix (980855) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111934)

intellectual discussion

Which /. have you been reading?

Re:Bullshit (4, Funny)

Kenja (541830) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111942)

He found it, he just didn't give a rats ass.

Re:Bullshit (2, Insightful)

shadowrat (1069614) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111998)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards and the NBA would be full of geniuses.

How do you know it's not that way? Just because the NBA players don't have incentive to study doesn't mean they couldn't be genius level scholars. They could all have powerful brains that would put us all to shame. However brain growth != knowledge. New brain cells typically are useless unless you fill them with something. TFA didn't claim that the rats also studied productive material and began working for the good of science.

Re:Bullshit (1)

the_last_rites (837649) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112068)

You're forgetting 'masturbation'.

Re:Bullshit (1)

Valdukas (247053) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112096)

I believe he did find how to Hug Bossom.

Re:Bullshit (1)

graffix01 (973350) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112138)

Not sure about the link to intelligence but I think you could replace 'rodents' with just about anything in this quote, "Sexually active rodents also seemed less anxious than virgins, Princeton scientists discovered." And I don't think it takes a Princeton educated scientist to figure that one out!

Re:Bullshit (1)

celesteh (1864708) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112448)

Rats don't wank. But slashdotters do. Probably copiously.

Re:Bullshit (1)

Wyatt Earp (1029) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112468)

Hey, just find a geek-girl/boy with a healthy sex drive like I did.

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112476)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards and the NBA would be full of geniuses.
well, at least half is true

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112482)

You were smart enough to negotiate a multi-million dollar yearly contract when?

Re:Bullshit (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112496)

Brain growth doesn't necessarily equal greater book-smarts. /. probably is full of social retards, i.e. anxious, geeky, less-confident "nerdy" types. And trauma or prolonged "unpleasant stress" situations can certainly affect a person's thinking. Just cause it's all in your head doesn't mean it isn't really happening on some physical level. The brain adapts as it grows to the different ways it's forced to function, like any other living thing.

Re:Bullshit (1)

MobileTatsu-NJG (946591) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112576)

If that were the case /. would be full of retards...

You should visit a cell phone thread.

Further evidence to the contrary... (1)

HotBBQ (714130) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112696)

in the form of a classic Seinfeld episode, The Abstinence [seinfeldscripts.com] .

Now I understand... (5, Funny)

Toksyuryel (1641337) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111634)

...why most mainstream religions demonize sex. It all makes sense now.

Re:Now I understand... (5, Insightful)

Tom (822) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112430)

Aside from the funny part, that is closer to the truth than you like.

Most of our current mainstream religions, i.e. the monotheistic, abrahamic ones, basically need you to feel horrible because their story says the world is bad and the afterlife can be good if (and only if) you follow their teachings.

It's hard to feel like shit after a good night with a lover. Your desire for spiritual salvation is quite a bit low after a hot threesome. Your belief that this world is all bad and evil and only the afterlife counts is kind of weak in the middle of getting your brains fucked out.

Look at the pope and try to take him seriously.
Now fuck for an hour and then look at the pope and try to take him seriously.
You'll notice a considerable difference.

Re:Now I understand... (2, Interesting)

Wyatt Earp (1029) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112526)

Judaism doesn't want you to feel horrible or tell you that the world is bad.

Christianity went sideways with that aspect, Islam can do that, but generally isn't about guilt.

Re:Now I understand... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112776)

No, they just demonize sex outside of marriage. Most of them encourage people to have lots of kids, which requires sex.

Slashdot control group ... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111642)

Hey, we can use all of those lonely, anxious virgins on Slashdot as a control group for a human study.

Yea but (4, Insightful)

liquidpele (663430) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111664)

Rats can't service themselves...

Re:Yea but (4, Insightful)

Zocalo (252965) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111760)

"Self service" obviously doesn't count. If it did then dogs, and not man, would be running the world...

Re:Yea but (1)

jd (1658) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112654)

I take it you've not seen footage from the House of Commons.

Re:Yea but (4, Insightful)

cstacy (534252) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112760)

"Self service" obviously doesn't count. If it did then dogs, and not man, would be running the world...

You mean the dogs who we take into our warm houses, give them a nice place to sleep, feed them, wash them, walk around after them and pick up their poop for them, and tell them "Go lay down now! Good dog!" I for one welcome our pampered canine overlords...

Hmm... (1, Redundant)

the_one(2) (1117139) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111674)

Does masturbation count? (no, I didn't RTFA)

Re:Hmm... (5, Funny)

daremonai (859175) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111748)

Yeah, we know. You were "busy."

All I can say is: (1)

IMightB (533307) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111686)

duh! I need to get funded for a study on finding out if alcohol will make you drunk or if smoking pot will get you high.

Sign me up (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111690)

Sign me up for human studies! And I don't want to be in no fucking control group!

Re:Sign me up (4, Funny)

flogger (524072) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111708)

Do not worry. The control group will not be fucking.

Wow, organisms rewarded for proceating! (2, Insightful)

Orga (1720130) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111698)

Holy %&^%! These findings suggest that while stress hormones can be detrimental to the brain, these effects can be overridden if whatever experiences triggered them were pleasant. Animals that haven't spread their genes are stressed and animals that have aren't as stressed. That's gods work for sure.

Re:Wow, organisms rewarded for proceating! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112710)

That's gods work for sure.

Yep, god's masterplan is to overrun the planet with super-intelligent, hyper-horny rats.

Big Brains (1)

pspahn (1175617) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111724)

You know they say about guys with big brains...

If masturbation counts... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111732)

This could explain all sorts of things...

Sex with hot female rats... (4, Funny)

GPLDAN (732269) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111734)

Studies showed that male rats with Italian sports cars and gold chains, were 40% more likely to score with the most desirable female rats. This effect, deemed the "Mook Effect", was present in all test cases.

Those rats that had contributed to the Linux kernel fared the worst.

Forwarding this important study (4, Funny)

Tweezer (83980) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111754)

To my wife immediately. She complains that her memory could be better.

Re:Forwarding this important study (4, Funny)

macbeth66 (204889) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111882)

I tried that already.

Her memory is still good enough to remember that gorgeous blonde I checked out yesterday...

Re:Forwarding this important study (2)

sharkey (16670) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112570)

Tweezer's wife follows you around to keep track of your doings?

Re:Forwarding this important study (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112282)

I tried that.
She replied that I could enlarge my penis by 3 inches in only three weeks for $20. Satisfaction guaranteed.

Researchers (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111762)

researchers studied the effects of sex in rats

I'd like to see the study of the effects of the resercher's research on themselves. And oblig.: NO PICS -- It didn't happen.

Who cares... (1)

Kildjean (871084) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111816)

Everybody, let's go get laid...

cause and effect? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111870)

Maybe the smarter rats got more/better sex, not the other way around.

Brains (3, Funny)

weicco (645927) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111878)

Poor small-brained me :(

S***! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33111898)

Umm, okay, if you're wanking, does it count as sex?

Cue up the religious right (1, Funny)

betterunixthanunix (980855) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111916)

First those scientists tell our kids that they are just monkeys, and now they are telling them that they should be having sex! Just look at how they are trying to destroy our society!

I can see this (1)

ravenspear (756059) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111946)

If I haven't had sex for a while I sometimes feel frusterated, while right after some amazing sex I feel relaxed and refreshed.

Re:I can see this (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112610)

Or so I've heard.

Dont believe that much (0, Redundant)

anhmhc (1869352) | more than 4 years ago | (#33111964)

Not sure this is right but if that is the case than footballer must be more intelligent than Einstein. anhmhc www.noithatminhha.com

U huh. Right up there with "withdrawal" as BC ... (1)

psbrogna (611644) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112000)

Are we sure this isn't a line some libidinous individual used on some naive prey, which inadvertently made it into scientific research or the press?

Clearly, these rats don't pay child support. (1)

Rene S. Hollan (1943) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112004)

I know men who had good jobs, paid their share of child support, became unemployed and even when they managed to get reemployed, would up living almost under a bridge: child support is assessed on what you "can" earn, not on what you do, and, unlike the stock market, past performance IS indicative of future obligations.

Contraception is never perfect (even sterilization), having MORE kids can land one in jail (for neglecting the kids one has by taking on additional obligations, thus depriving them), and in the industrialized world, children are a HUGE financial liability and risk. Further, we already have WAY too many people for this planet to support.

Further, there is evidence that early sexual activity is inversely related to intelligence, though the initial study that alleges this is racially prejudiced, and statistically flawed: it placed asians at the top of the hierarchy, followed by whites, followed by blacks and everyone else. IIRC, the standard deviation of the error wiped out any statistical significance. Still, we all remember the "smart asian kid" in school who got straight A's and never any "action"/
 

Re:Clearly, these rats don't pay child support. (2, Insightful)

MaWeiTao (908546) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112252)

I think academic performance comes down to upbringing, not race. Although races might place different levels of importance on some things. The asian kid got straight As and never saw action because his parents demanded he excel in school and didn't allow him to socialize. Once you socialize too much grades inevitably suffer. Asians are no smarter than anyone else. Live in Asia for a while and you'll be cured of that misconception. It's like foreign kids who excel in college. They do well because they specifically came to the US to study and are appreciative of the opportunity.

Americans, on the other hand, don't appreciate what they have and are in school to study. And worse, in certain communities positive role models and discipline are seriously lacking. And there's too much of an anti-establishment attitude. The ability is there, it's just totally wasted. I'd say sexual activity is more of symptom than a cause.

Sex Boosts Brain Growth... in rats. (1)

Valtor (34080) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112040)

Sex Boosts Brain Growth... in rats.

Lets not forget the last part of the sentence.

Re:Sex Boosts Brain Growth... in rats. (3, Funny)

jd (1658) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112684)

So we should prevent lawyers breeding at all costs?

reminds of that classic seinfeld episode (5, Funny)

circletimessquare (444983) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112048)

elaine stops having sex with her boyfriend to motivate him to pass an exam (another commentary on sex and smarts) and george stops having sex because his girlfriend has mononucleosis. george gets progressively smarter (until he spontaneously learns portuguese and therefore seduces a portuguese woman, thus becoming a stupid again), and elaine gets progressively dumber. some humor from jerry's summary of what's going on in their heads:

to george:

George: What is Tungsten or Wolfram?

Alex Trebek: We were looking for 'What is Tungsten, or Wolfram'.

Jerry: Is this a repeat?

George: No, no, no. Just lately, I've been thinking a lot clearer. Like this afternoon, (To television) what is chicken Kiev, (Back to Jerry) I really enjoyed watching a documentary with Louise.

Jerry: Louise! That's what's doin' it. You're no longer pre-occupied with sex, so your mind is able to focus.

George: You think?

Jerry: Yeah. I mean, let's say this is your brain. (Holds lettuce head) Okay, from what I know about you, your brain consists of two parts: the intellect, represented here (Pulls off tiny piece of lettuce), and the part obsessed with sex. (Shows large piece) Now granted, you have extracted an astonishing amount from this little scrap. But with no-sex-Louise, this previously useless lump, is now functioning for the first time in its existence. (Eats tiny piece of lettuce)

George: Oh my God. I just remembered where I left my retainer in second grade. I'll see ya. (He throws finished Rubik's cube to Jerry and he exits. Kramer enters)

to elaine:

Elaine: How come he's gettin' so smart? I stopped having sex with Ben three days ago and I don't know no Portuguese?

Jerry: Are you all right?

Elaine: I don't know. It's just the last coupla days my mind has been, not good.

Jerry: Wait a second, I know what's happening. The no sex thing is having a reverse effect on you.

Elaine: What? What are you talking about?

Jerry: To a woman, sex is like the garbage man. You just take for granted the fact that any time you put some trash out on the street, a guy in a jumpsuit's gonna come along and pick it up. But now, it's like a garbage strike. The bags are piling up in your head. The sidewalk is blocked. Nothing's getting through. You're stupid.

Elaine: I don't understand.

Jerry: Exactly.

http://www.operaforthemasses.com/2010/06/seinfeld-review-7-abstinence.html [operaforthemasses.com]

Pleasant albeit stressful? (1)

DaTroof (678806) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112102)

To see if pleasant albeit stressful experiences could have the opposite effect, researchers studied the effects of sex in rats.

Are these rats into extreme bondage or something? "Pleasant albeit stressful" is how I might describe a satisfying occupation, not a satisfying sex life.

Suddenly I'm a lot more impressed with Marvin (4, Funny)

Locke2005 (849178) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112104)

"Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they ask me to take you to the bridge. Call that job satisfaction, 'cause I don't."

Celibacy and creativity (1)

topcoder (1662257) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112132)

There is a well known rumor that keeping celibacy is a great source of creativity.

From Nikola Tesla's webpage:

"Tesla never married. He was celibate and claimed that his chastity was very helpful to his scientific abilities.[22] Nonetheless there have been numerous accounts of women vying for Tesla's affection, even some madly in love with him. Tesla, though polite, behaved rather ambivalently to these women in the romantic sense."

I am sure i could find some other intellectuals who were celibates, or at least didn't give so much importance to sex. Maybe the greats insights of these genius provided them with greater pleasure (and less ephemeral) as substitute for physical orgasms. Or it may be simply that they didn't have much time or didn't give the importance to it.

They got it backwards... (1)

jjh37997 (456473) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112148)

It's not that sex helps the brain grow, it's that sex helps prevent stress, which has been found to cause the brain to shrink.

And a new pick-up line has been born... (1)

tool462 (677306) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112200)

No longer will a guy have to resort to tactics like:
"Hey, baby, I'm shipping off to Iraq tomorrow, and I'm not sure if I'll make it back. Can we spend this one night together?"

Instead, it'll be:
"Hey, baby, I'm taking the SAT tomorrow, and I'm not sure my score will be good enough to get into Stanford. Can we spend this one night together?"

Well, it sure works for me ... (1)

fkx (453233) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112338)

'Duh-Oh" ...

Counterexample (1)

wjc_25 (1686272) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112378)

If having sex all the time made people smart, your mom would be brilliant.

As it is, she thinks the Linux kernel is something you pop in a microwave.

Does exercise work? (1)

MaWeiTao (908546) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112432)

I'm not clear on what is meant by pleasant but stressful experiences. Do they mean physically or emotionally stressful. According to the article the rats which have had sex are less stressful. So where does the stress come in? Were they stressful beforehand and sex simply alleviated that?

But then if it's a stressful but pleasant activity that causes brain growth then that would imply any pleasing activity should produce the same result. Playing video games, sports, mountain climbing, etc should all be able to produce the same results. Presumably masturbation would work too.

It sounds to me like they're stating the obvious. You'll feel better if you do something enjoyable.

New headline for spam (5, Funny)

fabioalcor (1663783) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112462)

En-large your bra1n!

If only... (1)

tenzig_112 (213387) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112504)

Now if we could only get a headline like "brains boost sex growth" then we'd be in business. Somehow if that were the case, I think high school would have been a very different experience for most of us.

A wast of money (1)

Reginald2 (1859758) | more than 4 years ago | (#33112556)

This is all part of an elaborate scheme to get the cute new lab assistant to sleep with the head researcher. A little open and honest communication would have saved a lot of funding.

Well... (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 4 years ago | (#33112716)

Sexually active rodents also seemed less anxious than virgins.

...blow me down with a feather!

I smell an IgNobel award brewing....

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?