Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Final Fantasy: The Movie

Hemos posted more than 13 years ago | from the looks-pretty dept.

Movies 206

Epiphani writes: "It's been known for quite some time that Squaresoft was in the process of making a full length CG movie, however I never imagined it would be like this. 'Next to the beautiful Pacific Ocean, Square has selected Harbor Court in downtown Honolulu as the home to more than 150 computer graphic artist from all over the world, including Hollywood, Tokyo and Europe. There, surrounded by state-of-the-art computers and software programs, artists are able to transform their vision into reality set on a computer screen.' Square has really outdone themselves this time, with an amazing voice cast and unbelievably realistic CG -- this one is sure to be a hit considering Square's emphasis on plot. Be sure to check out the featured trailer (req. quicktime)."

cancel ×

206 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

pretty movie (1)

Klowner (145731) | more than 13 years ago | (#725841)

I have a feeling this will look a little better than toystory. 01S woo

Final Fantasy (1)

AntiPasto (168263) | more than 13 years ago | (#725842)

I never cared for any of this stuff. I'm glad tho to see better and better projects available for the rendering world. Perhaps in the future, they'll be the ones striking for higher wages, and hollywood will have to actually finish their beef with the Screen Actors Guild to atleast get *something* into their commercials.

Rendering, I believe, is the next be dristibuted app. Of course, then we might have people sneaking in shout-outs into a frame or two... heheh

----

My hopes (1)

Carbonite (183181) | more than 13 years ago | (#725843)

If we're lucky this will be just like Titan AE, except with a different plot and good.

it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

Moghedien (237619) | more than 13 years ago | (#725844)

as a long-time final fantasy- and Square-fan (anyone remember ff2 on the SNES?), I can't wait to see the result. it's gonna be like heaven again..

IF it ever comes out... (4)

Godai (104143) | more than 13 years ago | (#725845)

Last thing I heard about this movie was that it was 2 years late and a few million over budget. Sure, the scenes look nice, but it seems it's taking them 6 months to do that single, break-taking scene. Uh, that is not good. Another thing: I like - rather, used to like - the Final Fantasy series quite a bit, but as much I think Square's got some killer CG artists, I can't see this flick doing all that well in North America. There are really only two audiences for this movie: fans of CG (geeks) and FF fans. Are there enough fans betwen the two groups to make Square back its investment? I'm not sure...
Wood Shavings!

Will it live up to the games? (1)

dmatos (232892) | more than 13 years ago | (#725846)

I hope they concentrate as much on the plot as they do in the RPG's. Sure, I play them for the graphics as well, but the main point to an RPG is to lose yourself in the ever-twisting plots and sub-plots. If this is used just as an excuse to show off their CG talents, it will be a visually stunning movie, with little to no entertainment value.

Can't wait! (2)

MikeFM (12491) | more than 13 years ago | (#725847)

Waiting for this movie is right up there on my list w/ the new Star Wars and Matrix movies. 2001 may be a great year for movies much like 1999 was. 2000 has mostly sucked. :)

This is news, alright. (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725848)

Yep, this has never [slashdot.org] been featured [slashdot.org] on /. before.

Never mind the fact that the 'new trailer' has been up for months.

Really guys, for all the flack we're giving the Patent Office for not checking into 'prior art', I think the /. crew should be checking prior art itself. This isn't meant to be a troll, or flamebait, but I for one am concerned at the frequency of old or repeated news on /. recently. It's crazy.
----

Re:HEMOS (1)

IniBlitz (227511) | more than 13 years ago | (#725849)

HahAaha! Mod this up.

Can't wait, but... (5)

Zone5 (179243) | more than 13 years ago | (#725850)

While I'm eager to see this movie, and I'm sure many other geeks are as well (be they anime geeks or FF geeks), I'm not sure how the general North American movie-going public will accept it. Let's face it, whenever a movie like Forrest Gump wins Best Picture while Fight Club is almost univerally hated, you have to question the average person's taste and capacity to enjoy something different. Square has always done a great job with warped plots, which should make this movie different enough to trouble the average nimrod who laid out $10 to see a pretty animated film expecting another Toy Story.

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

Losifer (49469) | more than 13 years ago | (#725851)

FF1, 2, and 3 were available on the 8-bit NES, not on the SNES. 2 and 3 were only released in Japan. I'm *pretty sure I'm correct here.

Finally, a CG movie that appeals to people 12... (1)

Swift Kick (240510) | more than 13 years ago | (#725852)

Sorry, folks... but regardless of the technical merits of the Toy Story series, they were just a bit corny. Same with Ants.
I've been a fan of the Final Fantasy series for some time, and the last few releases for the PSX (VII, VIII, FF Tactics) had some amazing CG scenes... Finally, here's a movie that seems pretty appealing to adults and kids alike, yet light-years ahead of movies like Titan AE and Dinosaurs... sweet. I can barely wait for it to come out.

Sorry, subject should read "older than 12..." (1)

Swift Kick (240510) | more than 13 years ago | (#725853)

damn the boss walking on me during preview post...*sigh*

Re:Can't wait! (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725854)

The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie is currently set ofr either 2001 or 2002, isn't it?
----

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

Moghedien (237619) | more than 13 years ago | (#725855)

ah, but I was talking about the European FF2.. which is the Japanese FF4. very confusing, I know..

Anyone else doing something on this level? (1)

GMOL (122258) | more than 13 years ago | (#725856)

I have been waiting a long time for this
(but as a news story, this a little outdated no?)

I thought now that Square has shown a project like this is possible, there would be many that would jump on the bandwagon, but it doesn't seem to be the case...

Are companies taking a 'wait-and-see' approach, or are other making total CG non-cartooinsh 3d movies?

Final.ee (2)

kwashiorkor (105138) | more than 13 years ago | (#725857)

It's about time that they decide to just make a movie. It's practically what their "games" are anyways, except their games have endless waves of non-sensical button mashing "fight" sequences. Fun for the whole family!

Their tech for the movie looks really nice.

Except in the typical wacky fashion of Square's marketing campaigns, they talk about how well they render the clothing on the models in the "character" section, and don't mention a thing about the characters. I mean, who cares what the movie is about when there's redering deformations to talk about.

-- kwashiorkor --
Leaps in Logic
should not be confused with

I'd like to know more about their Iron (5)

Sawbones (176430) | more than 13 years ago | (#725858)

In reading the bits and scraps I've found about the movie for the past year or so I've only ever managed to find two interesting tidbits.

1) The rendering horsepower was/is supplied by something like 2 full floors of sgi onyx boxes. That even with that it was limited to something like a second of film rendering per day and that they anticipated technological advances to be able to render the entire film in time.

2) Square developed a few new algorithms to help with animation. Namely one for hair blowing in the wind (sort of interesting) and the way cloth folds and bends as a "actor" moves (very interesting).

Anyone else with unsubstantiated rumor/facts? :) Or better yet, a more indepth site for details? :)

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

aenomie (55534) | more than 13 years ago | (#725859)

Final Fantasy IV (in Japan) was released in the US on the SNES as Final Fantasy II. Final Fantasy VI (in Japan) was released as Final Fantasy III on the SNES in the US. To further the confusion, they recently rereleased FFV (which was never released in the US on SNES) and FF6 for Playstation, preserving their original numbering. It wasn't until FF7 for the PSX that they resynchronized the numbering.

BTW, FF1 was released for the NES but FF2 and FF3 (japanese numbering) were never released in the US at all (although this may soon change with Bandai's Wonderswan)

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

?erosion (62476) | more than 13 years ago | (#725860)

Someone's gonna post it, might as well be me.

FF1 was released for the 8 bit NES in both Japan and the US. There were a few differences, but they were clearly the same game. FF2,3, 4 etc continued to come out in Japan for the NES, but were never released here. However, Square then ported one of the SNES games over here and called it FF2 (us). There's a lot more to it than that, but you get the idea.

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725861)

It's a bit complicated, but here's a little chart: Japan: Final Fantasy USA: Final Fantasy. Japan: Final Fantasy II USA: Never released. Japan: Final Fantasy III USA: Never released. Japan: Final Fantasy IV USA: Never released. Japan: Final Fantasy IV Easytype USA: Final Fantasy II Japan: Final Fantasy V USA: Final Fantasy V (HORRIBLY TRANSLATED) in FF Anthology Japan: Final Fantasy VI USA: Final Fantasy III, and VI in FF Anthology Japan: Final Fantasy VII USA: Final Fantasy VII and the rest are the same. Also, here are some other "FF" titles that are interesting. USA: FInal Fantasy Mystic Quest Japan: Final Fantasy USA. (This is much like Mario Bros 2) USA: Final Fantasy Adventure Japan: Seiken Densetsu USA: Secret of Mana Japan: Seiken Densetsu 2 (yes, SoM is a sequel to FFA) Japan: Seiken Densetsu 3, USA: Not released, buty ou can get a translated version off the net. USA: Legend of Mana Japan: Seiken Densetsu: Legend of Mana. Seiken Densetsu means, essentially "Legend of the Holy Sword" by the way, as a reference to the Mana Sword. Final Fantasy Legend 1, 2, and 3, in the USA were originally "SaGa", which made it's way to the PSX in SaGa Frontier. FF Tactics is called FF Tactics in both Japan and North America. As for FF Movie, it's not really an FF movie - it's not really Final Fantasy in any sense, they're just using the name a bit more freely. But it will probably still really really kick ass, anyway. It's worth 7 bucks just to see the effects of 3D realism on a crowd.
----

Forget the movie... (1)

Hurricane_Bill (96738) | more than 13 years ago | (#725862)

This website should win an award!! I'd love to see internet applications that have such creative design!!

actors on strike? who needs actors? (2)

MenTaLguY (5483) | more than 13 years ago | (#725863)

...hollywood will have to actually finish their beef with the Screen Actors Guild to atleast get *something* into their commercials.

Either that, or we're going to start seeing a lot of CG spokespersons in commercials from here on in...

Re:Urgh (2)

Tower (37395) | more than 13 years ago | (#725864)

Huh? It looks like it is all from the submission. The quotes line up. Hemos actually *didn't comment* (a first, I know). That's all...

--

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

moonsammy (65351) | more than 13 years ago | (#725865)

Actually, the Quicktime server software *is* free. Also, in going with Quicktime, you can get in on the Akamai action... anyone with a good connection probably notices how insanely fast a quicktime movie transfers even after its been slashdotted. Granted, it really would be nice if a truly open, cross-platform format became *the* standard for online video, but it just isn't the case yet. MPEG-2 is nice, but I believe it tends to be a larger file size in general (please correct me if I'm mistaken on this).

Re:Final.ee (1)

rabababoa (86240) | more than 13 years ago | (#725866)

Ittl be good.. Honestly Have you ever been dissapointed with the plot in any FF game? I havent, and ive played them all (even the imports yay!)

The best thing about CGI. (5)

Julius X (14690) | more than 13 years ago | (#725867)

I've seen the trailer for this, and I have to admit it looks beautiful. Even though, part of me is itching to say that it still doesn't look completely real.

The fact is that CGI movies shouldn't look real. There is a certain magic that CGI can create in a film that makes it look...perhaps more than real... CGI can allow things to look real enough, but then allow us to go beyond what is actually possible, and then take us there.

That is what I'm looking forward to about Final Fantasy. A movie that doesnt even pretend to be a cartoon, and a film that will take us past where reality has ever gone.

-Julius X

Re:This is news, alright. (1)

myc (105406) | more than 13 years ago | (#725868)

oh c'mon it's not so bad. Not everyone reads /. every day. I don't mind the repetition that much if only because I may have missed something interesting in the past.

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (3)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725869)

Okay, let's try this again. Hopefully it'll actually work this time.

It's a bit complicated, but here's a little chart:
Japan: Final Fantasy USA: Final Fantasy.
Japan: Final Fantasy II USA: Never released.
Japan: Final Fantasy III USA: Never released.
Japan: Final Fantasy IV USA: Never released.
Japan: Final Fantasy IV Easytype USA: Final Fantasy II
Japan: Final Fantasy V USA: Final Fantasy V (HORRIBLY TRANSLATED) in FF Anthology
Japan: Final Fantasy VI USA: Final Fantasy III, and VI in FF Anthology
Japan: Final Fantasy VII USA: Final Fantasy VII
and the rest are the same.

Also, here are some other "FF" titles that are interesting.
USA: FInal Fantasy Mystic Quest Japan: Final Fantasy USA. (This is much like Mario Bros 2)
USA: Final Fantasy Adventure Japan: Seiken Densetsu
USA: Secret of Mana Japan: Seiken Densetsu 2 (yes, SoM is a sequel to FFA)
Japan: Seiken Densetsu 3, USA: Not released, buty ou can get a translated version off the net.
USA: Legend of Mana Japan: Seiken Densetsu: Legend of Mana.

Seiken Densetsu means, essentially "Legend of the Holy Sword" by the way, as a reference to the Mana Sword.

Final Fantasy Legend 1, 2, and 3, in the USA were originally "SaGa", which made it's way to the PSX in SaGa Frontier.

FF Tactics is called FF Tactics in both Japan and North America.

As for FF Movie, it's not really an FF movie - it's not really Final Fantasy in any sense, they're just using the name a bit more freely. But it will probably still really really kick ass, anyway. It's worth 7 bucks just to see the effects of 3D realism on a crowd.

----

Re:Urgh (1)

barcode123 (176992) | more than 13 years ago | (#725870)

The information is there, and do the italics really obscure the content that much for you? Sheesh!

Re:HEMOS (2)

Tower (37395) | more than 13 years ago | (#725871)

Yup, and a couple of them don't even make any sense... like this one, where there doesn't seem to be anything wrong, or the other U PUNCTUATIN' U CAPITILIZIN' crap...

He (the <=12 yr old doing this) could at least be relevant. OOG_THE_CAVEMAN was actually funny... this is crap.
[please do not feed the trolls] (shoot! too late!)
--

will Cinepak AVI work for you? (1)

Sawbones (176430) | more than 13 years ago | (#725872)

If so you can grab it from my University site:
Here [washington.edu] It's a ziped AVI file using the Cinepak codec. Yes I know DivX ;-) would have been much better, but I don't have the option available right yet :)

As for hating the embedded quicktime movies (I know the pain) - for $29 you can buy quicktime pro and make use of the little dropdown button that says "Save source as...". Greatest feature of it :)

Re:waiting (1)

Tower (37395) | more than 13 years ago | (#725873)

You could never properly capture Sean Connery in CG.... Pierce Brosnan or Timothy Dalton, yeah - I'll give you that, but not Sean.

--

Kick Ass!!! (2)

imadoofus (233751) | more than 13 years ago | (#725874)

It looks to me like this movie could live up to the hype that something like episode 1 generated. I will definitly be in line for this one!

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725875)

I was going to mention the Wonderswan but I haven't heard anything concrete one way or another about an american release. And these are more remixes then re-releases- they'll have SNES-calibre graphics on NES games, much like Super Mario All Stars.
----

Re:I'd like to know more about their Iron (1)

illumin8 (148082) | more than 13 years ago | (#725876)

In the credits for "A Bugs Life" I noticed that Pixar uses Sun Microsystems for rendering the final theatre quality version, however they use SGI workstations. I would imagine that Squaresoft has a similar setup. Pixar probably has several fully loaded Sun Enterprise 10000 machines that do their rendering. Imagine how quickly they could render using the new UltraSparc III processors...

Re:Oh ... my ... god... (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725877)

Final Fantasy: The Movie never confessed to trying to be a game, you know. And it's not japanimation, it's being developped in CG in Hawaii, which is in the United States.
----

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

johnathan (44958) | more than 13 years ago | (#725878)

All right. QuickTime is not the movie player application, it is a set of libraries and an API. The player is just another application that calls them (and happens to be distributed with them). With the API, any programmer could create a Windows movie player app with standard widgets. Several such 3rd-party players exist on the Macintosh. So why don't you write one, or commission one. Or you could cry about it.

--

Re:Final.ee (1)

kwashiorkor (105138) | more than 13 years ago | (#725879)

No, I've never been disappointed with the plots in the FF "games". I simply can't call them games anymore because they "game" portion has all but been eliminated.

I'm sure that the movie will be good, and I'm really happy that they are simply making a movie and letting me get to the good parts without having to sit on my butt for 60 hours in front of the tube performing advanced calculations on ever increasing hordes of hitpoints.

-- kwashiorkor --
Leaps in Logic
should not be confused with

Re:HEMOS (1)

ChopChopMasterOnion (240689) | more than 13 years ago | (#725880)

maybe you didn't see that hemos italicized the whole frickin page.

Re:Can't wait, but... (2)

Masem (1171) | more than 13 years ago | (#725881)

Americans think animation is for kids. And because the FF film will be animated, it will be regelated to a kids movie, but probably, knowing the FF series, a PG rating, which means NO ONE besides diehard nerds will probably see it. Only a few times has an animated movie (traditional or CG) ever made everyone sit up and take notice; Chicken Run, Toy Story and sequel, and some early 90s Disney are some examples. The fact that Oscars will finally give animated movies their own catagory next year is doublefaced; there must be at least 8 animated works to have this award given; typical year only sees 5 or so.

Re:This is news, alright. (1)

Steveftoth (78419) | more than 13 years ago | (#725882)

Hear hear!

More FFM Pictures (5)

dew (3680) | more than 13 years ago | (#725883)

There's one at Ming-Na's website (she's one of the lead vocalists) not on the main site (picture [ming-na.com] ), another from Animation Artist here [animationartist.com] page [animationartist.com] for the movie).

The dmoz [dmoz.org] category for the movie is here with a fair number of links to sites about the movie (like [dmoz.org] the GIA [thegia.com] ).

David E. Weekly [weekly.org]

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

_Ludwig (86077) | more than 13 years ago | (#725884)

You're not really stuck with the horrid QuickTime Player that comes with QT4. You can use the Movieplayer application from QT3 and get an interface so clean it makes Media Player 6 look like RealPlayer. As a matter of fact, any application can utilize QuickTime and make it look any way it wants.

Re:HEMOS (1)

Tower (37395) | more than 13 years ago | (#725885)

Nope, never saw that... maybe he fixed it...
--

Do you like anime? (1)

Mantle (104724) | more than 13 years ago | (#725886)

Even if you don't, a lot of the people that read /. do. (Enough to warrant an anime news topic) Why not view this as an anime film based in the Final Fantasy universe rather than "the next entertainment transition" from the game? That's what I'm expecting of it. A good story with gorgeous visuals.

Other places to get the trailers (3)

Hadean (32319) | more than 13 years ago | (#725887)

In case you haven't seen any yet (and you can't get on the site), you can get them here [rottentomatoes.com] and here [videoquarterly.com] .

(hmm.. the trailer is months old... how's that new?)

Re:QuickTime Rant (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725888)

I've always wondered what the quicktime facination was. Maybe it's the Macintosh angle (this is the movie industry, after all), or the 'user friendlyness' of it. Maybe filesize? But really, quicktime is a lot slower than others. Plus, it doesn't /ask/ to change file associations and things- I have a SB Live, I don't want Quicktime software midi synthesis. And I have the 'free version' - I don't need to be reminded of "Pro" since I don't do anything that pro would want. I ended up pirating Pro just to get rid of the annoying nag screen that this supposed 'free' software has.

----

Re:I'd like to know more about their Iron (1)

neuneu (232546) | more than 13 years ago | (#725889)

Offtopic, but id Software is selling on eBay the powerful SGI Origin 2000 system that they used to process all of the map data for Quake II and Quake III Arena.

Re:waiting (1)

fenix down (206580) | more than 13 years ago | (#725890)

Indeed. No computer can say "Mosht things in here don't react too well with bulletsh." like he can.
Bell Labs [bell-labs.com] doesn't even have a Russian accent option.

Common Lisp used in Final Fantasy (4)

lispbliss (146952) | more than 13 years ago | (#725891)

just had to point out that Square used Allegro Common Lisp for the movie. The link below has a nice discussion about why they chose Common Lisp and has a picture of the cool photo realistic computer graphics they have in the movie. http://www.fra nz. com/success/customer_apps/animation/squareusa.php3 [franz.com]

Re:The best thing about CGI. (2)

cvd6262 (180823) | more than 13 years ago | (#725892)

People say the same thing about digital movies. They look too real.

We are used to seeing light projected through cells onto screens. Some say that film simulates the way the eye dissects images, so it looks better than digital.... Bunk.

Re:Final.ee (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725893)

Fortunately, Squaresoft isn't entirely in the 'movie business' for games. Other titles like FF Tactics, Vagrant Story, and Chrono Cross are much more interactive. In fact, Chrono Cross takes 'old school' a step further and even has a SNES/NES style 'gather elemental quest items' section.

Sure, FF8 is as interactive as a petrified tree, but FF9 at least looks to reverse that a bit, and Square does have a lot of other games.

Remember, it's SquareSoft, not FinalFantasySoft. "RedHat is not Linux" "Final Fantasy is not Squaresoft"

----

Re:HEMOS (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725894)

At least it's a video game referene. You don't see that too often.
----

2002 (1)

dmatos (232892) | more than 13 years ago | (#725895)

According to www.upcomingmovies.com [upcomingmovies.com]
I hope they can get a voice as good as the radio broadcast one for Marvin the Paranoid Android!

Please Please Please (1)

Milinar (176767) | more than 13 years ago | (#725896)

Don't kill this movie by dubbing the voices horribly.

I wouldn't want to spoil the visuals with ugly subtitles, but the voices in the beginning (james woods and ???) really don't do it justice.

But knowing square, the soundtrack will kick some serious ass.

Re:duuuh (1)

Hadean (32319) | more than 13 years ago | (#725897)

Uh, check the code...

(req. quicktime)."

It's closed. Normal Slashdot as usual, except for the fact that CmdrTaco didn't write a comment. (which, then, wouldn't be italized).

Real time on a PS2 (5)

SIGFPE (97527) | more than 13 years ago | (#725898)

If you were at SIGGRAPH 2000 you may have seen a shot from this movie running *real time* at HD resolution on a Sony box consisting of 16 PS2's running parallel in one box. It was pretty awesome! The camera was movable by the viewer and the image quality was pretty much the same with wonderful lighting, texturing and hair dynamics.
--

so what if it doesn't do well (1)

Johnny00 (213878) | more than 13 years ago | (#725899)

I see the point about it not doing well, but most of us /.ers go and see movies that not everyone will see (or understand for that matter).

I think it'd be interesting to see what square does with the technology born out of this production. Would they draft up a dozen white papers and license out the technology (could help recoop for a poor box office turn out) or would they just open-source the whole shbang? I mean, yea, it's highly unlikely that they would, but it be pretty cool to see what a couple geeks with a nice size beowulf cluster could churn out.

They give us a little taste of the tech talk with the character page about how the clothing is done, but I want to see more!

FF Movie = Starcraft? (2)

DesignMerc (210372) | more than 13 years ago | (#725900)

Looking at the trailer, doesn't it look more appropriate for a Starcraft movie than Final Fantasy? I know the most recent FF iterations (not counting Tactics) have really gotten away from the medieval feel but now it's gone completely sci-fi.

Dammit, I want swords, magic, demons and CG chocobos!

Re:Oh ... my ... god... (1)

The Anti-Christ (238963) | more than 13 years ago | (#725901)

How many times do they expect us to buy the same product, redone in as many ways as can be imagined?

Perhaps you'd like to tell the guys at Eidos/Core that when they release the next _Tomb Raider_ game

Haven't they realized that to sell stuff it has to be ORIGINAL?

I have. I hate the fact that the _Star Wars_ series is just a retelling of various 'classical' tales of the great warrior turning to 'the dark side', of the young warrior saving the princess/galaxy/universe/yada yada yada.

Is anyone but me getting tired of playing the same game over and over?

Yeah, screw Quake 1/2/3/..., we already have DOOM. Programmers need to be more ORIGINAL!!!

Wait, now here's the Ultimate Final Fantasy: They have removed ALL interactivity to provide the Ultimate Corny Japanimation Experience. Now you don't have to push any buttons at all, just sit back with your popcorn and watch as completely unrealistic characters do the most irrational things right before your eyes! And somehow it all turns out good in the end! I saw this coming, though. Each game takes more control away from the player. Each game concentrates less on strategy and real RP'ing and more on the ridiculously brain-dead dialog. And here's the climax.

Oh, yes, I do agree that RPGs are becoming more linear in their plotlines, however, considering that it takes massive amounts of processing power and programming to allow players do everything in such games, it'll take a while for CRPGs to match the flexibility of Pen&Paper RPGs, unless you want a horribly drab, seemingly plotless 'RPG' that gives you shitloads of 'nonlinearity' in gameplay (ie The Elder Scrolls: Arena and Daggerfall).

Re:I'd like to know more about their Iron (4)

hkon (46756) | more than 13 years ago | (#725902)

In the credits for "A Bugs Life" I noticed that Pixar uses Sun Microsystems for rendering the final theatre quality version, however they use SGI workstations. I would imagine that Squaresoft has a similar setup. Pixar probably has several fully loaded Sun Enterprise 10000 machines that do their rendering.

You would think so, but I guess they got a better deal on E4000 servers, as they used 100 of them for A Bug's Life. See http://www.sun .co m/smi/Press/sunflash/9812/sunflash.981215.2.html [sun.com] for more info.
Since then, they've got a new one, tho. 120 Enterprise 4500s, which are $223,000 EACH.... http://www. sun .com/smi/Press/sunflash/1999-08/sunflash.990810.2. html [sun.com]

Someone mentioned that he thought the Final Fantasy people used Onyxes, but that'd really surprise me, since the Onyxes usually are used for realtime graphics things, and not rendering. It would seem kinda pointless to put a really high-end graphics system in a box that's gonna do cpu-intensive things only. Unless, of course these boxes can use some of their graphics hardware for rendering nonrealtime stuff as well. You'd probably want to have one Onyx to see quick previews without having to push it through your rendering farm, but that won't be production-level quality.
--

Re:Can't wait, but... (1)

Borg#9 (25179) | more than 13 years ago | (#725903)

What kind of crack are you smoking?! Fight club was the lamest movie I have seen since Eyes Wide Shut and Bring Out the Dead. I was so upset that I wasted my time watching them (and I didn't watch them in their entirety, either)!

Re:Bad News (1)

talesout (179672) | more than 13 years ago | (#725904)

Some moron actually moderated UP a Bob Jones anonymous post as FUNNY?

Jesus Christ! It's the weekend and all, but I think you must have taken the entire day off to get that stoned by Friday night.

More information on Final Fantasy (1)

Devolver42 (177242) | more than 13 years ago | (#725905)

For those of you unfamiliar with Final Fantasy, here are a few resources to get you up to speed.

A great Final Fantasy summary article [videogames.com] is available at videogames.com [videogames.com]
ffonline.com [ffonline.com] : the best place to find out details about the console game series
On usenet, the newsgroup alt.games.final-fantasy [newsalt.ga...al-fantasy] is useful for getting your FF-related queries answered.

Re:Urgh (1)

Hadean (32319) | more than 13 years ago | (#725906)

Uh, check the code...

(req. quicktime)."

It's closed. Normal Slashdot as usual, except for the fact that CmdrTaco didn't write a comment. (which, then, wouldn't be italized).

Re:actors on strike? who needs actors? (2)

skoda (211470) | more than 13 years ago | (#725907)

CGI News Anchors are a reality. Well one is, anyway: Ananova [ananova.com]

Neat, but weird.
-----
D. Fischer

Re:Urgh (1)

Hadean (32319) | more than 13 years ago | (#725908)

Er, duh.. The /I was removed when I posted.. *sigh* Anyway, it's there.

(and yeah, it's Hemos, and not Taco.. *sigh* Long day at work)

Re:QuickTime Rant (3)

Chemical (49694) | more than 13 years ago | (#725909)

I completely agree. I cannot understand how Quicktime became the standard for Internet video. The software is terribly bloated. The codec is overly proprietary. And you must use Apple's software to view movies, which is only available for Mac and Windows, with apparently no plans for supporting more platforms. The absolute worst part about it is that Nagware viewer. Every time I want to view a QT movie, I gotta see that goddamn nag banner, unless I want to pay to "Upgrade" to QT Pro. The Pro version, by the way, is a total ripoff as it simply adds a few features that Microsoft includes for free in WMP, and it still sucks.

I cannot understand how something as open as the internet has adopted, with wide open arms, something as closed as QT. Maybe one of you could enlighten me because I can't figure it out. Does QT offer better picture quality? Not as far as I can tell. It looks no better than MPEG1. In fact Mpeg movies run significantly smoother on my system. Is the sound quality better? Maybe, but I can't tell. Better compression ratio? Not by a long shot. Divx;) offers nearly DVD quality video, much better video quality than QT, in a much smaller file. RealVideo offers very high compression ratio, and the picture quality is still fairly good. I know RealVideo very proprietary too, but at least their player doesn't constantly nag you to upgrade, supports more than Mac and Windows, and is actually good.

If anyone cares to explain to me how Apple keeps their stronghold over internet video, please feel free. I would really like to know. I pray for the day when webmasters see the errors of their ways and start using Mpeg.

Re:Can't wait! (1)

Kriticism (225999) | more than 13 years ago | (#725910)

Don't forget about Lord of the Rings.

-Kriticism

Re:This is news, alright. (1)

2can (169947) | more than 13 years ago | (#725911)

Hey, its news to me!

Re:SHUT THE FUCK UP (MOD THIS FUCKER DOWN NOT UP) (1)

atrowe (209484) | more than 13 years ago | (#725912)

First of all, the URL is http://goatse.cx/ not http://www.goatse.cx.

Second, that link has been dead for over a week. You troll wannabes are always bitching about the moderators never checking THEIR links, so why don't you check your own once in a while.

Re:pretty movie (1)

enrico_suave (179651) | more than 13 years ago | (#725913)

Well the advances in graphics/tech/PC's/rendering/etc... pretty much makes that an absolute (artists not withstanding, the potential for prettier graphics increases as tech and time go forward)

They actually had problems with Toy Story 2, where the new Woody looked too good and was overshadowing (no pun intended) the look of the old Toy Story Woody.

*shrug*

E,

The trailers have been updated (1)

PenguiN42 (86863) | more than 13 years ago | (#725914)

Never mind the fact that the 'new trailer' has been up for months.

Look down at the bottom of the page:

"ver. 10.2.2000
Trailer A and B updated"

So though it isn't quite a "new" trailer, it is updated.

-------------
The following sentence is true.

Re:G*%Am$N Quicktime ! (2)

isaac_akira (88220) | more than 13 years ago | (#725915)

Apple would appreciate that if there are more systems available to view content generated by their systems

Cept of course linux is a teeny tiny market. Obviously not having support for linux isn't hurting the use of quicktime, since just about all the videos on major web sites are in quicktime format (as you say you "keep running into stuff [you] can not look at"). These sites would not use it if they were concerned about a significant portion of their users not being able to see it.

Re:Forget the movie... (1)

russcoon (34224) | more than 13 years ago | (#725916)

creative or slick?

I'm not sure I see what part is creative...and I do this kind of stuff for a living...

Don't get me wrong, I love the site. The props section is espically slick, and the sounds are top notch for a flash animation.

But what part represents new thought in interface design? And what part would be particularly usefull in the design of internet apps?

I don't mean to flame, I'm just curious. I probably just missed something...

-----------------------
Widgets for the web
(or something like that)

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

fsck (120820) | more than 13 years ago | (#725917)

Apple has already said, there will NEVER be a linux port of the current sorensen quicktime. Ever. I don't see why people use this format anyway, its much more resource hungry and buggy than anything else out there. Why not plain old mpg, or even that new hacked divx

Re:fuck quicktime (the app, not the codecs) (1)

pmsyyz (23514) | more than 13 years ago | (#725918)

Shouldn't posting as Plain Old Text convert greater than, less than, and ampersands to their entities?

Re:waiting (1)

TheCarp (96830) | more than 13 years ago | (#725919)

While true.... Sean Connery doesn't have one either.

I mean, I like the mans work alot. He has been in some great movies, and he is one of the better actors., but be realistic - he does the same accent in every movie - and it sure as hell ain't russian.

-Steve

please mom, (1)

myspys (204685) | more than 13 years ago | (#725920)

give me the skills to do this kinda' graphics, please?

Re:Can't wait, but... (2)

skoda (211470) | more than 13 years ago | (#725921)

I agree that most adults consider animated films 'kids' movies, but with that, the movies you mention are about the only ones capable of making people 'sit up and take notice'.

Don't get me wrong, I love animated films, and have seen most of the US released animated films. But until the recent films from Dreamworks, most of the non-Disney animation has been mediocre at best.

But now, with Chicken Run, Prince of Egypt, TS1, TS2, and the wonderful Veggie Tales [bigidea.com] , "adults" are seeing more high quality 'cartoons' causing them to pay more attention to this genre of film.
-----
D. Fischer

Re:I'd like to know more about their Iron (2)

Sawbones (176430) | more than 13 years ago | (#725922)

You're right, my bad. They didn't use Onyxes, they used Octanes. I can't find the original site I got that info off of, but here is a paragraph from www.thegia.com [thegia.com] :

In development at Square Honolulu, dozens of the world's top graphic artists are slaving away on SGI's hottest machines, rendering what may very well be the future of entertainment. Square, in fact, is the world's largest consumer of SGI machines, outclassing even effects shop Industrial Light and Magic. Over a year was spent in research and development before work on the film itself began. Entire floors are filled with artists -- each with the greatest rendering weapon known to man, a Silicon Graphics Octane. Even so, rendering is proceeding at the horrendously slow rate of only a few seconds a day. The end result, however, should be well worth it.

The second-a-day part was right though :)

Re:fuck quicktime (the app, not the codecs) (1)

Abnornymous Howard (227643) | more than 13 years ago | (#725923)

under windoze:

[START] --> Run... --> regedit --> [CTRL] + [F] --> .png --> [Delete] --> Exit

After that:

find a .png file --> doubleclick it --> Choose app

That's it.. :)

Re:Can't wait! (1)

skoda (211470) | more than 13 years ago | (#725924)

This is also now up on my must-see list; I stopped the trailer 5 seconds into it when I realized I didn't want any part of the movie spoiled.

Sadly, I doubt I will bother with the next Star Wars (sigh). Having spent my formative years playing star wars, I'm disappointed with the TPM, and I am not expecting any improvement with the next. Hopefully I am wrong, and we'll get another Empire Strikes Back.

What I want to see is the next X-Men movie (I've been ready since the credits began rolling on the first one :)
-----
D. Fischer

Re:will Cinepak AVI work for you? (1)

karnal (22275) | more than 13 years ago | (#725925)

there's also an option in qt4 "shareware" that lets you kind of save files:

open up quicktime, click "Later" to the nag, click on "Edit - Preferences - General..."

At the top, you should see a drop-box -- choose "browser plug-in", and here you can check to "save movies in disk cache".

yes, it is a work-around, but all you have to do from here is just search for that file (or file size) in your browser's cache file locales...

hope this helps...

Re:The best thing about CGI. (2)

talesout (179672) | more than 13 years ago | (#725926)

That sounds like the same thing I hear among audiophiles. "Digital recording doesn't give you good 'compression dynamics'".

What they are really saying is that Digital recording doesn't change your sound as it's laid down. Non-digital will 'compress' sound as you hit the high end of the audio spectrum and make it sound 'flatter'. Personally, I've always felt you should go for the sound you want and hope the recording device can pick up exactly that sound. Don't rely on the recording device to compensate for something.

Same principle to digital video. Use it and make your statements through the acting, expressions, and other elements of the film. Don't worry about looking or sounding 'too real'.

Technophobes piss me off!

Re:And (2)

talesout (179672) | more than 13 years ago | (#725927)

Wow, one more reason not to vote for the nutbar.

Wasnt there a SGI behind it too? (1)

MfA (107204) | more than 13 years ago | (#725928)

Didnt they have a SGI Origin 3400 behind it feeding it the data?

Re:The trailers have been updated (2)

webrunner (108849) | more than 13 years ago | (#725929)

the A and B trailers (mere half second glimses) are updated regularly. However the 'featured trailer' - the REAL theatric-type trailer - has been up for a while.
----

Re:it's gonna be wonderful! (1)

Moghedien (237619) | more than 13 years ago | (#725930)

>But Final Fantasy I-VI were never released in Europe.

well.. hm. you're right. but at least there were import versions available...

Re:Can't wait, but... (2)

Sloppy (14984) | more than 13 years ago | (#725931)

Americans think animation is for kids

I dunno... who do you think watches The Simpsons, Futurama, King of the Hill, and Family Guy?


---

Re:QuickTime Rant isn't flamebait! (1)

t0qer (230538) | more than 13 years ago | (#725932)

what the hell are the moderators on crack? this is a perfectly good point. Of course im a windows believer but still why should only windows/mac users be able to see this flick? --t0qer

That's what they have assholes like you for. (1)

Vermifax (3687) | more than 13 years ago | (#725933)

That's what they have assholes like you for.

Vermifax

What about Capcom's... (1)

Jon Shaft (208648) | more than 13 years ago | (#725934)

What about capcom's Resident Evil seris? The games are almost movielike... It would be interesting to see them in the big screen... altho it'd probably be a disappointment. :-)

Oh welps, I tihnk it's great that a video games has become so big that big moveis are coming out of it... (And no, the mario brothers movie was a piece of ....)

Hopefully Final Fantasy will be good... and not a Mario movie! :)

Re:Final Fantasy (2)

tolldog (1571) | more than 13 years ago | (#725935)

Rendering will never be the next distributed app.

One reason is the fact that companies do not want data files outside of the company. Imagine if you had the Toy Story scene files and all the fun you could have making your own scenes with Woody and company and posting them on the web.

The second main reason is that it takes horsepower, memory and storage to render files. The frame sizes, depending on quality and resolution can result in several MBs. The memory required to make those frames can be on the order of 500 - 1000 MBs. Also, industry standard is an hour a frame for rendering film quality for CG.

Third and the greatest reason is that the renderer is not free. They are either in-house solutions and will never leave the company or they are licensed from whomever makes it to that company.

I have thought about this. I would love for fans to be able to render, heck, it would save us money on machines. Sadly though, I don't ever see it as a posibility.

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

whatnotever (116284) | more than 13 years ago | (#725936)

Amen to the pirating...

"No, goddamit! I'm not going to upgrade! #@*&!"
... after a few thousand repeats of that situation, I finally gave in and "upgraded" in my own special way...

Re:QuickTime Rant (1)

Jonathan_S (25407) | more than 13 years ago | (#725937)

Actually with quicktime 4 the annoying nag screen it shows, asking you to upgrade to pro, is itself a quicktime movie. It you delete its .mov file then the free version doesn't nag you anymore and works normally.

Re:My hopes (2)

The Cunctator (15267) | more than 13 years ago | (#725938)

Wow, that's some bad moderation. Who was Carbonite trolling? The large contingent of people who thought Titan AE had a good plot? The movie was pretty, even beautiful, but certainly not well-plotted.

Pointless but... (1)

tfxx (199314) | more than 13 years ago | (#725939)

...offtopic??

Re:I'd like to know more about their Iron (2)

tolldog (1571) | more than 13 years ago | (#725940)


"each with the greatest rendering weapon known to man, a Silicon Graphics Octane."

HAHAHA. Hardly. The Octane is good for hardware renders and animating on, but not for render boxes. I use both Octanes and VALinux boxes. Give me the Linux boxes any day. The price/performance runs circles arround the Octanes.

Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>