Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

HP Shows Off Android 'Printer' Tablet

Soulskill posted more than 3 years ago | from the i'm-not-sure-the-market-was-crying-out-for-this dept.

HP 70

angry tapir writes "Hewlett-Packard showed off a tablet computer that serves as a control panel for its new printer. The tablet browses the Web and can be used as an e-reader. It has a 7-inch screen and can be easily connected to HP's PhotoSmart eStation all-in-one printer. The tablet can be used to move and print documents and images from multiple media devices and can also be used to exchange content between the devices. The display is a larger version of the 3.5-inch control panel screens on HP's earlier Web-connected printers. The device is focused on providing access to content that can be printed, such as photos, articles, e-mail, recipes or e-books."

cancel ×

70 comments

More showing off here (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645478)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropenis

Re:More showing off here (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645564)

Thanks for that, really makes me feel good about my penis length. Now if only I could get one of these tablets that would really boost my feelings about my e-peen...

Woot! (-1, Offtopic)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645494)

1st post Woot!

Why do the people I hate (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645498)

make all the cool shit?

And android is... where? (2, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645502)

From TFA:

"The company did not specify the operating system used on the tablet."

Where did the editor take that it runs Android? I got shocked when i read that, since HP bought Palm to use WebOS on pretty much these kind of devices.

Re:And android is... where? (4, Informative)

symbolset (646467) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645526)

It's reported elsewhere. [pcworld.com] HP is a big company. They don't need everything to run the same OS.

Curiouser: No And. Market sans Carrier subsidy (2, Informative)

rsborg (111459) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645676)

HP is a big company. They don't need everything to run the same OS.

What's really interesting about your link is the title of the article: HP's New Printer Tablet Stays Away From Android Market [pcworld.com] Why has Google still not taken on the iPad directly, given the iPad's huge success for Apple? HP is a huge presence, they could market the Android-based tablet + printer without the need for the carriers, but they're still denied the goodness of the Android Market... why?

Re:Curiouser: No And. Market sans Carrier subsidy (1)

symbolset (646467) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645766)

I suspect this is over concerns about liability and tech support rather than strategic issues like preferring Chrome OS. There's also some overblown concern about the apps scaling well on a larger display.

No 3G (3, Informative)

SuperKendall (25149) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645856)

but they're still denied the goodness of the Android Market... why?

Speculation has it that an Android device must have cell network connectivity in order to be approved to use the Android Market.

Also Google has said they are worried some of the 80k apps on the Android Market will not run properly on a tablet, but that doesn't explain how the Samsung tablet gets Market...

I agree it doesn't make any sense. But never mind the iPad, there's also nothing really like the Touch!

For Android pod touch, see Archos and AppsLib. (1)

tepples (727027) | more than 3 years ago | (#33654930)

But never mind the iPad, there's also nothing really like the Touch!

Archos makes a few devices that could substitute for iPod touch. If they take off, watch Android Market app developers start cross-posting to Archos's preferred market, AppsLib [appslib.com] .

Re:Curiouser: No And. Market sans Carrier subsidy (2, Insightful)

worx101 (1799560) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645986)

Because, believe it or not, Google and Apple are "close" to one another. As close as two companies can be while still sorta competing. The two companies share alot of the same board members to my understanding. And Brin, Page, and Jobs are not enemies.

No, Apple and Google are competitors (1)

rsborg (111459) | more than 3 years ago | (#33654742)

Because, believe it or not, Google and Apple are "close" to one another. As close as two companies can be while still sorta competing. The two companies share alot of the same board members to my understanding. And Brin, Page, and Jobs are not enemies.

Have you lived in a cave for the past year?

There were two shared directors as of May 2009 when the DOJ mentioned [dmwmedia.com] they would investigate. Then Eric Schmidt quit Apple's board [apple.com] and Arthur Levinson quit [blorge.com] Google's board...

Then Jobs proclaimed that Google was trying to kill [wired.com] the iPhone... sure, this could all be fluff, and the two companies are really being controlled by "them" or Dr. Evil, but if so, they have quite a few people fooled... especially since Apple is now increasing the fronts on which they compete with Google [appleinsider.com] , and vice versa [allthingsd.com] .

Clearly, this is all orchestrated.

Re:No, Apple and Google are competitors (1)

worx101 (1799560) | more than 3 years ago | (#33658176)

Oh they compete technically, but its far from cut throat, and the markets each one appeals to is different. Alot of what you are talking about is formality to keep lawsuits from other not so friendly competitors down.

other os (1)

DrYak (748999) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646814)

according to your source, HP has other tablets in the pipeline. Including webOs based and Window 7-based for the business world (well, obviously). No comments about the webos tablet, but the current android tablet is really only a printer companion. So that is also probably why it is not on the android market : it's not targeted as a multipurpose tablet, and only gets a few yaho apps. It less like the ipad and is more to printer what the logitech tablets are to media players (= remote controllers on steroids). For app market capable tablets we'll probably have to wait the next crop of hp tablets.

But not from the article quoted (1, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33648226)

It's reported elsewhere. [pcworld.com] HP is a big company. They don't need everything to run the same OS.

That would be fine (it being reported elsewhere), if the /. posting was about that article. However, the article quoted doesn't say it's android. The title should reflect what the article is about not what may be available information from some other source (unless that source is included in the posting).

Maybe they should change the title (1)

Dcnjoe60 (682885) | more than 3 years ago | (#33648424)

As long as slashdot is now including information from sources outside the posted article to determine the title, maybe the title should be changed to "HP adds defunct tablet line to new printer." Because, according to this quote from CNN http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/09/20/hps-first-and-last-android-tablet-printer-does-apples-airprint [cnn.com] : "Focusing on the tablet aspect, the device will likely be one of HP's last that runs Google's (GOOG) Android. " This is HP's last android table and later in the article they emphasize WebOS.

Palm's WebOS Damn It (1)

billhuey (183070) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645510)

Title says it all.

Keep it simple, stupids! (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645518)

This reminds me of those atrocious oscilloscopes that run Windows [windowsfordevices.com] .

Or one of the many software projects that have inexplicable dependencies or balloon way past their original purpose. (Emacs, I'm looking at you!)

Keep it simple. Or as Einstein more precisely put it, as simple as possible but no simpler.

Re:Keep it simple, stupids! (1)

scdeimos (632778) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645832)

Or a Futaba 14-channel transmitter for Radio Control aircraft. [14mz.com] What's the point of putting Windows on that again?

Re:Keep it simple, stupids! (1)

gad_zuki! (70830) | more than 3 years ago | (#33650378)

Well, that's WindowsCE not the full blown desktop OS. Its perfectly appropriate for a device like that. Its a RTOS with a small footprint that can drive touchscreen GUI apps. If you're already familiar with Visual Studio its easy to develop for.

Re:Keep it simple, stupids! (1)

gad_zuki! (70830) | more than 3 years ago | (#33650488)

WindowsCE isn't desktop Windows. Its a small RTOS that can handle touchscreens and GUI apps. While I'm not a big fan, I don't see why it can't be used on devices like these. You're going to have to run some kind of embedded OS on there if you want an advanced featureset (tcpip support, local storage, config menus, etc).

Re:Keep it simple, stupids! (1)

Bill Hayden (649193) | more than 3 years ago | (#33654224)

Don't knock Emacs! It's a great operating system – it just lacks a good editor.

what a surprise (4, Interesting)

alizard (107678) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645534)

I think it's fairly obvious that one of the places where a tablet can shine is specifically for device controller UI applications. It's compact and all one has to do to make it control a device is to stick a mini-webserver on it, after which your UI can be simple static webpages plus hardware control/monitor scripts. That's why I bought one (MID-006) directly from China a couple of months ago, to enable me to experiment in this area. Other places where it makes sense is as an e-reader and casual websurfing.

That said, I prefer a netbook for multimedia on the basis that one doesn't have to hold it to view it in place to view it and it has a lot more CPU and GPU horsepower than one can stuff into a tablet with acceptable battery life and size.

People and companies are still trying to figure out where tablets make the most sense, the idea that it will magically replace every other form of computer in the next few years is a non-starter no matter how many IT pundits tell us that It Must Happen.

Re:what a surprise (3, Interesting)

pspahn (1175617) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645678)

I think it's fairly obvious that one of the places where a tablet can shine is specifically for device controller UI applications. It's compact and all one has to do to make it control a device is to stick a mini-webserver on it, after which your UI can be simple static webpages plus hardware control/monitor scripts. That's why I bought one (MID-006) directly from China a couple of months ago, to enable me to experiment in this area. Other places where it makes sense is as an e-reader and casual websurfing.

The first thing I thought was the fact that it brings a simple UI to printers with web access and all that jazz. Maybe this means in a few years I won't have to listen to people complain about not being able to print something. The way we print stuff is still pretty archaic, well, in the sense that it often requires further reading to do it right.

Re:what a surprise (3, Insightful)

adolf (21054) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645880)

The way we print stuff is still pretty archaic, well, in the sense that it often requires further reading to do it right.

The way we do almost everything is still is still pretty archaic, well, in the sense that they often require further reading for us to do them right.

They have a limited time window, too (1)

Kupfernigk (1190345) | more than 3 years ago | (#33647222)

HP web printing is an awful kludge. HP have to do something quick before Google Print makes printing vendor-agnostic.

Re:what a surprise (1)

jedidiah (1196) | more than 3 years ago | (#33647942)

Actually, the answer is to do things in an even more archaic manner and let us fend for ourselves.

Just document the damn printers and let anyone who's interested write a "driver" for them.

Although if you can't print something then you're probably one of those people that can't use a
computer at all without constant hand holding from someone with the slightest bit of persistence.

Re:what a surprise (1)

tlhIngan (30335) | more than 3 years ago | (#33650582)

Actually, the answer is to do things in an even more archaic manner and let us fend for ourselves.

Just document the damn printers and let anyone who's interested write a "driver" for them.

Although if you can't print something then you're probably one of those people that can't use a
computer at all without constant hand holding from someone with the slightest bit of persistence.

Buy better printers. Get one that supports PostScript (or an unlicensed compatible version - Brother calls it BrotherScript), or one that supports PCL. Practically all OSes support printing to a PostScript printer and many newer ones support PCL as well. You can go brain dead and work without the PPD (PostScript Printer Description - basically lists the capabilities of the device) file and still end up with decent printouts.

Re:what a surprise (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33646054)

People and companies are still trying to figure out where tablets make the most sense, the idea that it will magically replace every other form of computer in the next few years is a non-starter no matter how many IT pundits tell us that It Must Happen.

I've never heard anyone say it must happen. I've only heard the deniers who say it can't.

Re:what a surprise (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33648316)

I think it's fairly obvious that one of the places where a tablet can shine is specifically for device controller UI applications. It's compact and all one has to do to make it control a device is to stick a mini-webserver on it, after which your UI can be simple static webpages plus hardware control/monitor scripts. That's why I bought one (MID-006) directly from China a couple of months ago, to enable me to experiment in this area. Other places where it makes sense is as an e-reader and casual websurfing. .

For a table to work as a device controller, it needs to be able to do so without adding significantly to the cost. Adding $300 to the price of a standard multifunction inject printer doesn't sound like a good deal, unless you don't have a computer in the house. A more useful gadget would have been a printer that lets me print from my smart phone (iphone, evo, pre, etc) wirelessly and effortlessly.

$300? (1)

alizard (107678) | more than 3 years ago | (#33655116)

I paid $105 plus shipping for my own generic tablet... which is underpowered. I think a $150 generic tablet would be about right.

Re:what a surprise (1)

c++0xFF (1758032) | more than 3 years ago | (#33649792)

This makes me think of LabVIEW, and it would be perfect for a tablet. For those that don't know, it's essentially a block-diagram programming language (you connect wires on the screen instead of typing code) that lets you create a UI to control physical devices. Putting that GUI on a tablet would be the next logical step.

Up until recently, there would be no chance of this being approved by Apple (it boils down to a code interpreter) and probably needs to work as a USB host. Looking around, it seems that the workaround is to use "LabVIEW Web Services" which boils down to what you described.

So, while the iPad only allows a remote view of the interface, this looks like a place where the more liberal policies of the Android market can make a leap forward.

Come to think of it, a visual programming language might be the way to go on a touch device. Typing is a chore, but moving widgets around on a screen is much better than with a mouse. This is coming from a guy who hates working with LabVIEW.

Re:what a surprise (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33660046)

Can you supply a link for buying this MID-006 please?

Re:what a surprise (1)

ResidentSourcerer (1011469) | more than 3 years ago | (#33666554)

Oh goody. ANOTHER (*$&)#*&(&*(&* remote control to lose!

Right now I have an iPod and a cheapy cell phone. That's bad enough. ONE device. I'm giving serious thought to upgrading to an iPhone JUST to decrease my gadget count.

I don't want a device to control my HP printer. I want to be able to download an app for ANY smart device to control my printer. E.g. I want any wifi device in my house to control my printer (subject to usual network security.)

So my iPod, my wife's iPhone, an android tablet, a kindle, whatever.

And they should be able to find each other with minimimum hassle. And if there are small devices, there needs to be a way to wake them up lighting up, and ringing.

One device to rule them all.
One device to find them.
One device to ring them all
and in their brightness bind them.

Sauron had the right idea. He had too many )@(#&$_ rings, so he made ONE to do all the work.

all that's needed is (1)

alizard (107678) | more than 3 years ago | (#33668768)

an Android tablet with IR support and a "learning remote" app and you can toss your individual remotes as quickly as you can load the commands from each into the remote.

Just to be clear... (3, Funny)

tooyoung (853621) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645572)

...I should buy an HP tablet so that I can use a printer?

Re:Just to be clear... (5, Funny)

davester666 (731373) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645682)

No, you need to buy the HP printer so you can use the tablet. Obviously, to reduce costs and to help sell consumables, HP doesn't include a screen on the tablet, it just prints out a page with the new contents of the screen whenever the display buffer changes.

And yes, they acknowledge that it is difficult to play games or watch video on the tablet, as the printer may not be able to keep up the frame rate necessary for smooth playback. And the printer also prints image side down.

Re:Just to be clear... (2, Funny)

gmhowell (26755) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646158)

And the printer also prints image side down.

You're holding it wrong.

Nonono (1)

symbolset (646467) | more than 3 years ago | (#33657404)

The tablet is for printing web pages. You navigate to the web page, then put the tablet face down on the scanner.

I don't see this becoming the "next big thing" (2, Insightful)

dmomo (256005) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645584)

But, I do see it driving the direction of general tablet development. Instead of having to buy a specialized tablet for "printing stuff" others will simply have to "do that too". What is special about this tablet that cannot simply exist on others with software? Couldn't the iPad do this with an APP? Why would one need the HP tablet to obtain the functionality?

I suppose that HP is still largely a printer company. Even though people are printing less as the days go by, it's good to see them pushing forward.

HP ? Cost of full pack of Ink .. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33645790)

is likely to be more than the tablet..

Sooooooo (1)

NetNed (955141) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645796)

It's a tablet that wants me to print out things that I would have bought the tablet for to read them on?

Really, what's with HP and it's need to push printers in directions no one wants or sees a need for? Why not make a palm phone that is nothing more then a printer remote? That seems equally useless.

Well, that's their business model (4, Insightful)

Kupfernigk (1190345) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646654)

HP makes money out of ink. That's basically it. So giving you an almost-free tablet that integrates seamlessly with an HP printer encourages you to print stuff when before you would have just made a note, or read it on-screen. A lot of home printing is done by (mostly) women printing out recipes, knitting patterns, things like that (I'm not being sexist, this is the result of a pop survey of my own). Getting them to print them out without thinking on a color printer = $$$.

Canon have a different approach to the same end - they have a print driver for Android that prints photos to their pixma printers. Another way to encourage ink usage.

Re:Well, that's their business model (0)

Critical Facilities (850111) | more than 3 years ago | (#33649740)

A lot of home printing is done by (mostly) women printing out recipes, knitting patterns, things like that (I'm not being sexist, this is the result of a pop survey of my own).

Ah, thank goodness you provided the citation for your 'proof'. You must be a real hit with the ladies.

HP makes money out of ink. That's basically it.

Not even close. As you can see in this article [boston.com] , imaging/printing/ink is less than 25% of their revenue. I'm not saying they're a great company, but the idea that they're making the lion's share of their money from ink is incorrect.

Re:Well, that's their business model (1)

spxero (782496) | more than 3 years ago | (#33651010)

Using the article you cited, I have highlighted the relevant items:
-- Personal systems (personal computers): $35.3 billion (31 percent of total revenue)
-- Services: $34.7 billion (30 percent)
-- Imaging and printing: $24 billion (21 percent)
-- Storage and servers: $15.4 billion (13 percent)
-- Software: $3.6 billion (3 percent)
-- Financial services: $2.7 billion (2 percent)
-- Total: $116 billion

By selling the tablet, we include the Personal sytems stats in addition to the Imaging and printing. Those two together are 52%, and look a little more like a lion's share. It's not the whole business, but it is enough to maintain and pursue new ways to bring money in for these. And for my $.02, my wife is the only one that uses our printer at home. The recipes I use come from my iPhone or media center. Airline tickets for myself are printed by the service agent at the airport. I can't think of an instance in the last two years where I printed out something of my own volition. I can, however, recount the times I drove to the store at 11PM because my wife had to print something for the next day and the printer was out of cyan. For more on that topic, I refer you to the Oatmeal [theoatmeal.com]

Re:Well, that's their business model (1)

Critical Facilities (850111) | more than 3 years ago | (#33651710)

So you're accounting for the tablet in 2 different categories of the earnings? You definitely need to be in finance. ;-)

The OP's point was that he felt that the point of the tablet was to increase Ink sales, and he was erroneously stating that the Ink sales were the only profitable section of HP's revenue stream. I was correcting him.

I can appreciate that you and your family fit into the stereotype that he was referring to regarding "home" printing. I was simply pointing out that it was indeed a stereotype based on no observable facts. A lot of people (of both genders) work from home. Personally, I often have to print various forms/spreadsheets/contracts on my home printer when working remotely. Not trying to make a federal case of anything here, but I just didn't feel that the OP was particularly Insightful.

Re:Well, that's their business model (1)

spxero (782496) | more than 3 years ago | (#33652212)

I'm accounting the tablet in the personal computers and the stuff it prints off in the imaging and printing. I think it's fair to say those items fit into the respective categories.

HP isn't trying to influence business printing, regardless of it being at the office or home office. Businesses are going to print stuff. Just because the printing happens from your home doesn't mean it's "home" printing.

They're trying to get Mom to print off her recipe rather than writing it down on a piece of paper. Or get her to send those photos Jimmy just e-mailed from college to her local printer rather than the local Walgreens. And similarly if I can send my grandma a tablet and printer at the same time, with the possibility of them already being configured to work together out of the box, they have a better chance of getting my business than the Samsung folk.

I agree it's a stereotype, and while it may not be "fact", it certainly is far from fiction. HP wants to continue selling their unicorn-blood-laced-ink to the masses, and convert all those that switched to Epson, Canon, or Brother back to them with a better selling point: the integrated platform. You and I aren't their target market with this.

Misinterpretation (1)

Kupfernigk (1190345) | more than 3 years ago | (#33654110)

When I wrote "HP makes money out of ink. That's basically it." I meant that selling ink is the main profitability engine of the printer division. I did not mean "it is the only way HP make money". I meant "because HP makes money on ink sales rather than making it up front with printer sales, they need to turn printer sales into volume ink sales to make a profit". I didn't spell it out but, you know, most Slashdot readers are quite intelligent and they don't need things spelt out to them.

As for your other comment, your attempt to be snide fails to take into account that I did mention that this is what I found from a non-peer-reviewed, informal study. I can write this stuff in academicese if I have to, but this was an informal post on Slashdot. And, as it happens, my work is very closely involved with the printing industry and predicting trends. I am as sure as I can be that HP have done marketing studies on this and identified the characteristics of the at-home and home-business market very thoroughly, and I strongly suspect that their conclusions are close to mine - though with the numbers included. I don't have to post everything.

Anyway, Mr. Critical Facilities, isn't your nick rather a host to fortune? Because it strikes me that you are so keen to be seen to be smart that your critical facilities sometimes don't get much of a look in.

Re:Misinterpretation (1)

Critical Facilities (850111) | more than 3 years ago | (#33655336)

Oh goodness, someone needs a nap, or maybe come cocoa and a blankie.

Sorry if I'm not intelligent enough to have finessed your true meaning out of your statement. I'm also sorry if my nick bothers you in some fashion. Since you seem pretty keen on tutoring others on the ins and outs of Slashdot, you might want to keep in mind that a lot of people here have senses of humor, and can take a little playful ribbing.

You might also keep in mind that a lot of people here prefer citation of facts when making sweeping statements that sound very much like generalizations. I believe you that you work in an industry "closely involved with the printing industry" and I can respect that you are "sure as I can be that HP have done marketing studies on this", but that doesn't mean that I think the same, nor does it make me a bad guy for posing the question.

*sheesh*

Huh? (1)

thynk (653762) | more than 3 years ago | (#33645860)

So, it's a tablet with printer drivers and some of HPs bloatware installed on it? Like, the same thing I could do with say, a laptop, or a desktop?

Re:Huh? (1)

tehcyder (746570) | more than 3 years ago | (#33648152)

But with a desktop you can't paint it a shiny colour and put a home made i-Pad sticker on it and take it down the coffee shop and fool your friends that you are hip and cool and technology-forward.

Re:Huh? (1)

mounthood (993037) | more than 3 years ago | (#33652508)

So, it's a tablet with printer drivers and some of HPs bloatware installed on it? Like, the same thing I could do with say, a laptop, or a desktop?

No, no. The bloated drivers weren't enough so they added hardware. Now when you buy a printer it comes with a tablet instead of that little LCD. Rumor is, the next generation of HP printers will require you to change your DNS and DHCP servers to an HP OS.

This just shows how profitable (2, Interesting)

Zouden (232738) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646108)

This just shows how enormously profitable printing is (for ink makers). HP is giving away a tablet with their printer to make it easier to customers to find things to print. Nevermind the fact that for everyone else, tablets and e-readers are seen as an alternative to printed material. If there's even a chance that this increases the amount of printing that people do, HP will come out ahead.

Re:This just shows how profitable (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33646514)

Hey, it (would have) worked for Xerox and the stuff they were doing at PARC. Personal computers with GUIs didn't reduce the demand for photocopying (broadly defined); they just drove up the demand for (photocopying + the closely related laser printing).

Boondocks reference (0, Offtopic)

hex0D (1890162) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646160)

Gin Rummy(voiced by Samuel L Jackson): Basically, nigga technology is asomething that doesn't plug into a printer. Does that plug into a printer?

Ed Wuncler(voiced by Charlie Murphy): No

Gin Rummy: Wanna know why?

Ed Wuncler: Why?

Gin Rummy: 'Cause niggas never have nothin' to print.

- The Boondocks

and before you call me racist, an earlier quote from the same exchange "...and dont start trippin callin me a racist and shit because I mean nigga as a general term for ignorant mothafuckas."

So... (4, Insightful)

vegiVamp (518171) | more than 3 years ago | (#33646404)

Basically, this is a tablet that has a printer queue running ? Impressive. *cough*

Your sig is relevant here :) (2, Funny)

jonaskoelker (922170) | more than 3 years ago | (#33647404)

Basically, this is a tablet that has a printer queue running ? Impressive. *cough*

I like your signature in this context:

What a depressingly stupid machine.

;-)

Pretty much like a USB key with printing abilities (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33647072)

I guess HP was at the apple conference when steve jobs announced "printing on iOS devices" and everybody was clapping like crazy (while IMHO the feature should have been here since v1).

About time! (1)

Jeppe Salvesen (101622) | more than 3 years ago | (#33647686)

Multifunction office printers/fax machines/scanners have horrible, horrible UIs with lots and lots of buttons. And they must - because they are multifunction, and the buttons are function-specific. Hopefully, we'll start to see such machines that can be used be mere mortals and not specially trained secretaries.

Come to think of it - WHAT A HORRIBLE IDEA!

Re:About time! (1)

jedidiah (1196) | more than 3 years ago | (#33647984)

Any remotely interesting scanner is going to have more than just a braindead UI on it.

It will demand that the user actually know what's being talked about (like collating).

If you are going to give it anything but a very basic "copy" button, ANY interface you
give it is going to quickly increase in complexity. Throwing a touchscreen at the problem
isn't going to help.

Re:About time! (1)

OG (15008) | more than 3 years ago | (#33649608)

That's not exactly true. While modern printer touchpads have helped out with the situation, push-button systems, generally speaking, aren't as efficient for creating a UI control systems for complex machines. Every time I use one it feels like a kludge, overextending the button interface. On the other hand, a rich widget toolkit (if you have a good UI designer) really can make the overall experience quicker and easier. Not to mention the fact that it would be fairly trivial to set up multiple levels of interfaces exposing on the necessary commands to different classes of users. I consider this more of an evolution of the current printer touch interface than a revolution in printing, but I at least like the concept (can't comment on the implementation since I haven't seen it).

Re:About time! (2, Insightful)

tehcyder (746570) | more than 3 years ago | (#33648224)

If you think you need special training to operate a Multifunction office printers/fax machines/scanner I'm not sure you're on the right website.

Just plain stupid... (1)

kj_kabaje (1241696) | more than 3 years ago | (#33648296)

Yes, yes--that's what I need! A tablet computer so that I can walk over to my printer and print something I'm already holding in my hands.

e-book? (1)

Halifax Samuels (1124719) | more than 3 years ago | (#33648354)

Why would you want to print an ebook? Doesn't that defeat the purpose?

But, But, But!!! (1)

Revotron (1115029) | more than 3 years ago | (#33649132)

If HP allows people to print e-books on REGULAR PAPER, how will they control who gets to read them, and make them expire and self-destruct after some incredibly short amount of time?

Think of the publishers!

Exactly what the market demands. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33649536)

This is perfect! I can't tell how many hours I've spent standing waiting beside my HP printer and wished that I could do some web surfing! (waiting for my print job to start, waiting for the thing to reboot after a paper jam, waiting for the service call...)

PC-LOAD TABLET ?!?!?!?! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33653174)

what the $#@!$ does that mean?!?!!?

Why? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#33658482)

Would it not make sense to make a printer compatible with a slew of SmartPhones, iPods and iPads rather then coming out with their own tablet? Do they really have to invent a tablet computer to drive a printer? Why do I want to print the weather? This seems like a device invented by a company that has completely lost focus. HP doesn't seem to understand that most people these days already have a device to access weather, stocks, news, the internet so why would they buy a printer that offers yet another interface that does this. Not every appliance needs to have its own touch screen wireless tablet.

More HP bloatware...? (1)

PensivePeter (1104071) | more than 3 years ago | (#33665060)

No thanks. If I need to print something, what's wrong with hitting the "print" control within any application? HP's misguided belied that users want to enter some long-term love affair with their utilities is as misguided as Adobe's....do your job (print, show document, etc) and then get the f**k off the device's limited resources....

Mbt Turisha Black (1)

aotian (1915400) | more than 3 years ago | (#33805538)

MBT cossack markets themselves as mbt running shoes [buy2shoes.com] company. As one of the best accepted walking shoes on the market, MBT shoes, additionally accepted as Mbt Offers Men [buy2shoes.com] , accept its sole architecture that promotes alternation and a accustomed rolling movement for the Compare mbt shoes [buy2shoes.com] . The positives wearers accept anatomy arch to toe afford the success ofMBT shoes [buy2shoes.com] . There is an absorbing cossack aesthetics abaft this celebrity that allowances including added bass anatomy a Mbt Fabric [buy2shoes.com] , a abatement in aback pain, a bigger aspect and added in calories austere can be accomplished by barefoot walking. Usually they are not a little pricy, so there comes up a catechism that is they absolutely aces the cost? Again accumulate reading. If you accept accomplished the actual affliction for continued hours continuing at a time, abrasion these Mbt Trading [buy2shoes.com] for a period, maybe you will get the absolute answer. Some jobs requires you to be walking or continuing the absolute continuance of the shift, which will accomplish you actual aching on you legs, ankles, back, neck, and more. The best shoe for this job is the new Mbt Turisha Black [buy2shoes.com] shoes. If you are agitation in over-weight or aloof appetite to get a bigger amount but feel adamantine to stick with exercise or diet, again the MBT shoes can advance your plan or aloof advance your process. However, such a abundant shoes amount not a little a wholesale Christian Louboutin shoes [cl-shoescom.com] andsell discount Christian Louboutin shoes [cl-shoescom.com] , How to buy them on a bargain supply cheap Christian Louboutin shoes [cl-shoescom.com] ?
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...